Research Article

Assessment of Being Trained in the Turkish Education System in Terms of Progressive and Traditional Understandings and Practices (Case of Malatya)

Volume: 14 Number: 3 April 7, 2014
EN TR

Assessment of Being Trained in the Turkish Education System in Terms of Progressive and Traditional Understandings and Practices (Case of Malatya)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to make an assessment of being trained in the Turkish education system in terms of progressive and traditional understandings and practices. The study sample is formed by 43 faculty members working in Inonu University, Department of Education and 51 elementary school teachers and 47 secondary school teachers working in the municipality of Malatya City Center that are selected randomly. In the study a questionnaire consisting of 56 items that are prepared based on expert opinion was used as data collection tool based. The questionnaire forms were applied to sample group by the researchers. In the analysis of the data, about each item, the frequency and percentages of the opinions of teaching staff and the teachers are given in the table. Kay-square (χ2) test was used to determine whether there is a significant difference between the opinions of the teaching staff and teachers according to their education level and seniority. At the result of the study, it is found that the individuals grown through school education should be useful for themselves and the society, but the one within the education system cannot log out of the system as a quality product, theoretical and practical knowledge should be made the students acquired in school education and training activities, however, in these processes, there are problems in reaching high-level learning (analysis, synthesis, and evaluation), although a student-centered teacher training is aimed, the methods and techniques in which the teachers are active in the practices are not usually given up, there is a significant difference between the opinions of lecturers and teachers in the 25 items of the questionnaire due to their level of education and there is no significant difference between the opinions of lecturers and teachers according to their seniority in general but there is a significant difference in the six items of the questionnaire.

Keywords

Turkish Education System, Progressivism, Traditional Education System

References

  1. Alkan, C. (1983). Eğitim Felsefesi. Bursa, Uludağ Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  2. Arslan, A. (2001). Felsefeye Giriş. Ankara, Vadi Yayınları.
  3. Başaran, İ. E. (1998). Eğitime Giriş. Ankara, Umut Yayım.
  4. Bayrak, C. ve Diğ. (2004). Öğretmenlik Mesleğine Giriş. Ankara, PegemA Yayıncılık.
  5. Bilir, Ş. (2006). Cumhuriyet Döneminde Dört Türk Felsefecisinin Eğitime Ve Eğitim Sorunlarına Bakışları. Ankara, Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  6. Binbaşıoğlu, C. (1982). Eğitim Düşüncesi Tarihi. Ankara, Binbaşıoğlu Yayınevi.
  7. Büyükdüvenci, S. (1991). Eğitim Felsefesine Giriş. Ankara, Savaş Yayınları.
  8. Cevizci, A. (2011). Eğitim Felsefesi. Ankara, Say Yayınları.
  9. Çağlayan, S. (2007). Türk Eğitim Sistemi Üzerinde Etkili Olan Felsefi Akımlar. Sivas, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  10. Çilingir, L. (2003). Niçin Felsefe? Ankara, Eliş Yayınları.
APA
Duruhan, K., Gürbüztürk, O., Şan, İ., & Pepeler, E. (2014). Assessment of Being Trained in the Turkish Education System in Terms of Progressive and Traditional Understandings and Practices (Case of Malatya). İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 14(3), 59-78. https://izlik.org/JA48XG22WL
AMA
1.Duruhan K, Gürbüztürk O, Şan İ, Pepeler E. Assessment of Being Trained in the Turkish Education System in Terms of Progressive and Traditional Understandings and Practices (Case of Malatya). INUJFE. 2014;14(3):59-78. https://izlik.org/JA48XG22WL
Chicago
Duruhan, Kemal, Oğuz Gürbüztürk, İsmail Şan, and Ezlam Pepeler. 2014. “Assessment of Being Trained in the Turkish Education System in Terms of Progressive and Traditional Understandings and Practices (Case of Malatya)”. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education 14 (3): 59-78. https://izlik.org/JA48XG22WL.
EndNote
Duruhan K, Gürbüztürk O, Şan İ, Pepeler E (March 1, 2014) Assessment of Being Trained in the Turkish Education System in Terms of Progressive and Traditional Understandings and Practices (Case of Malatya). İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education 14 3 59–78.
IEEE
[1]K. Duruhan, O. Gürbüztürk, İ. Şan, and E. Pepeler, “Assessment of Being Trained in the Turkish Education System in Terms of Progressive and Traditional Understandings and Practices (Case of Malatya)”, INUJFE, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 59–78, Mar. 2014, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA48XG22WL
ISNAD
Duruhan, Kemal - Gürbüztürk, Oğuz - Şan, İsmail - Pepeler, Ezlam. “Assessment of Being Trained in the Turkish Education System in Terms of Progressive and Traditional Understandings and Practices (Case of Malatya)”. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education 14/3 (March 1, 2014): 59-78. https://izlik.org/JA48XG22WL.
JAMA
1.Duruhan K, Gürbüztürk O, Şan İ, Pepeler E. Assessment of Being Trained in the Turkish Education System in Terms of Progressive and Traditional Understandings and Practices (Case of Malatya). INUJFE. 2014;14:59–78.
MLA
Duruhan, Kemal, et al. “Assessment of Being Trained in the Turkish Education System in Terms of Progressive and Traditional Understandings and Practices (Case of Malatya)”. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, vol. 14, no. 3, Mar. 2014, pp. 59-78, https://izlik.org/JA48XG22WL.
Vancouver
1.Kemal Duruhan, Oğuz Gürbüztürk, İsmail Şan, Ezlam Pepeler. Assessment of Being Trained in the Turkish Education System in Terms of Progressive and Traditional Understandings and Practices (Case of Malatya). INUJFE [Internet]. 2014 Mar. 1;14(3):59-78. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA48XG22WL