Foucault’s Method: The Archeology and Genealogy of Discursive Construction of Truth

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 0 - 0, 17.09.2018

Ahmet Kemal Bayram

https://doi.org/10.14782/ipsus.460139

Öz

The purpose of this paper is to examine archeological method and genealogical approach that Foucault

refers to as both a method and a strategy. Portraying power-knowledge relations as the essence of

modern society and discourse, Foucault extensively studied dominant discourses in Western thought

since 16th century through archeological method. By means of archeological method, the researcher

could delve into the roots of dominant discourse functioned within culture. Archeology, in this

framework, is a practice or “archive” science in Foucault’s work. Taking archeology as a field of research,

Foucault not only examines meaning or reality, but also examines the historical a priori or possibilities,

existence and transformations of discourses as they acquire a positive character. Archeology, through

the description of conditions or rules, tries to “make visible invisible that things are not visible in

the surface”. The genealogy, in the sense of history of present, investigates how we have constituted,

recognized and accepted ourselves as subjects.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Foucault, Archeology, Genealogy, Post-structuralism, Power-knowledge

Foucault’nun Yöntemi: Hakikatin Söylemsel İnşasının Arkeolojisi ve Soykütüğü

Öz

Kaynakça

• Akay, A. (1995). Michel Foucault: İktidar ve Direnme Odakları, İstanbul: Bağlam Yayınları. Bayram, A., K. (2005). “Hakikat Rejimleri ve Söylemin Efendileri Arasında Bir Entelektüel: Michel Foucault”. Çağan, K. (Ed.), Entelektüel ve İktidar ss. 233-257. Ankara: Hece Yayınları. Bohman, J. ve McCarthy, T.A. (1987). After Philosophy. Cambridge: MIT Press. Bozkurt, N. (1988). “M. Foucault Felsefesinin Bazı Temel Kavramları”, Defter, Sayı:4, ss, 39-50 Connolly, W. E. (1993). “Beyond Good and Evil, The Ethical Sensibility of Michel Foucault”, Political Theory, Vol.21, No.3, ss. 365-389. London: Sage Publications. Deacon, R., A. (2003). Fabricating Foucault: Rationalising the Management of Individuals. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press. Descombes, V. (1993). Modern Fransız Felsefesi. (A. Yardımlı, Çev.) İstanbul: İdea Yayınları. Noujain, E. G. (1987). “History as Geneology: An Exploration of Foucault’s Approach to History”, Griffits,. A. P. (Ed.), Contemporary Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press. Foucault, M. (1987). “Questions of Method”. Bohman, J. ve McCarthy, T.A. (Ed.), After Philosophy. Cambridge: MIT Press. Miller, J. (2000). The Passion of Michel Foucault, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Foucault, M. (1972). Archeology of Knowledge. New York: Harper and Row Pub. Foucault, M. (1984). “Nietzsche, Genealogy, History”, Rabinow, P. (Ed.), The Foucault Reader. New York: Pantheon. Foucault, M. (1988). “What is Enlightenment?”, Robinson, P. ve W.M. Sulliaum, (Ed.), Interpreting Social Science: A Second Look. London: University of California Press. Foucault, M. (1994). “Geneology and Social Criticism”, Seidman, S. (Ed.), The Postmodern Turn: New Perspective in Social Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press. Foucault, M. (1994). Dostluğa Dair, (C. Ener Çev.) İstanbul: Hil Yayınları. Foucault, M. (2003). Society Must be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976. New York: Picado. Foucault, M., (1977). Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews. Newyork: Cornell University Press. Foucault, M. (2000). “Hakikat ve İktidar”. Keskin, F. (Ed.), Michel Foucault, Entelektüelin Siyasi İşlevi. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları. Gutting, G. (1994). Michel Foucault: A User’s Manual. Gutting, G. (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Foucault. New York: Cambridge University Press. Gutting, G., (2005). Foucault : a Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Gürbilek, N., Savaşır, İ. (1989). “Foucault’nun Hapishanelerine Giriş”, Defter, No:9, ss. 7-10 Harvey, I. (1988). “Foucault ve Dil, Düşünülmeyen Metaforlar”, Defter, (D. Kanıt Çev.), Sayı:4, ss. 16-32 Kelly, M. G. E., (2009). The Political Philosophy of Michel Foucault. New York: Routledge. Keskin, F. (2013). Michel Foucault. Tunçel, A. ve K. Gülenç (Ed), Siyaset Felsefesi Tarihi: Platon’dan Zizek’e. İstanbul: Doğu Batı Yayınları. Larrain, J. (1995). İdeoloji ve Kültürel Kimlik. (N. N. Domaniç, Çev.) İstanbul: Sarmal Yayınları. Lock, G. (2009). Foucault, Michel (1926-1984)., The Social Science Encyclopedia, (3. Baskı). London: Routledge. Mills, S. (2003). Michel Foucault. London: Routledge. Minson, J. (1988). Geneologies of Morals. London: The Macmillan Press. Nehamas, A. (1993). “The Examined Life of Michel Foucault”. New Republic, Vol.208, Issue 7, ss. 27-36 Nietzsche, F. (1967). The Will to Power. (W. Kaufmann ve R. J. Hollingdale, Çev.) New York: Random House. Philip, M. (1991). “Michel Foucault”, Çağdaş Temel Kuramlar. (A. Demirhan, Çev.) Ankara: Vadi Yayınları. Sarup, M. (1995). Postyapısalcılık ve Postmodernizm, (A. Güçlü, Çev.) Ankara: Ark Yayınevi. Skinner, Q. (1991). Çağdaş Temel Kuramlar. (A. Demirhan, Çev.) Ankara: Vadi Yayınları. Slattery, M. (2007). Sosyolojide Temel Fikirler. (Ü. Tatlıcan, Çev.) Bursa: Sentez Yayıncılık. West, D., (2007). “Continental Philosophy”. Goodin, R. E. Ve P. Pettit (Ed.), A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.