FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENTS AND ECONOMİC GROWTH: HOW WELL DOES THE TECHNOLOGY CHANNEL WORK IN TURKEY?

Öz

The interaction between foreign direct investments (FDI) and economic growth is one of the frequently discussed issues in the literature, both theoretically and empirically. The role of different channels through which FDI promotes economic growth is an aspect that should be focused on. The main purpose of this study is to assess the impact of the technology spillovers as a driving force for economic growth of Turkey in terms of manufacturing industry using the data of 1988-2012 period. For this aim, the dynamic interactions between export of the manufacturing industry (EXP) as a measure of technology spillover, gross domestic product (GDP), gross fixed capital formation (GFCF) and FDI in manufacturing industry were investigated via cointegration and causality tests in addition to the innovation accounting techniques in the vector autoregressive (VAR) framework. While the cointegration test yields no clear evidence of long-run equilibrium relationship among these variables. Granger causality test indicates that there is a univariate causality running from the EXP to the all other variables, and FDI is not Granger cause for the other variables. Nevertheless, the positive impact of FDI on the GDP and EXP variables is observed within the results of the innovation accounting analysis. From this point of view, it is concluded that the FDI leads economic growth more significantly in indirect ways rather than through direct ways. Under the light of these empirical outcomes, proposing policies based on strategies which encourage FDI inflows to the sub-sectors of manufacturing industry with higher technological gaps seem as effective and valuable in terms of promoting economic growth.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Foreign direct investment,economic growth,manufacturing industry

FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENTS AND ECONOMİC GROWTH: HOW WELL DOES THE TECHNOLOGY CHANNEL WORK IN TURKEY?

Öz

The interaction between foreign direct investments (FDI) and economic growth is one of the frequently discussed issues in the literature, both theoretically and empirically. The role of different channels through which FDI promotes economic growth is an aspect that should be focused on. The main purpose of this study is to assess the impact of the technology spillovers as a driving force for economic growth of Turkey in terms of manufacturing industry using the data of 1988-2012 period. For this aim, the dynamic interactions between export of the manufacturing industry (EXP) as a measure of technology spillover, gross domestic product (GDP), gross fixed capital formation (GFCF) and FDI in manufacturing industry were investigated via cointegration and causality tests in addition to the innovation accounting techniques in the vector autoregressive (VAR) framework. While the cointegration test yields no clear evidence of long-run equilibrium relationship among these variables. Granger causality test indicates that there is a univariate causality running from the EXP to the all other variables, and FDI is not Granger cause for the other variables. Nevertheless, the positive impact of FDI on the GDP and EXP variables is observed within the results of the innovation accounting analysis. From this point of view, it is concluded that the FDI leads economic growth more significantly in indirect ways rather than through direct ways. Under the light of these empirical outcomes, proposing policies based on strategies which encourage FDI inflows to the sub-sectors of manufacturing industry with higher technological gaps seem as effective and valuable in terms of promoting economic growth.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Foreign direkt invesment,Economic growth,Manufacturing Industry

Kaynakça

1. Chimobi, Omoke Philip (2010). “The Estimation of Longrun Relationship between Economic Growth, Investment and Export in Nigeria”. International Journal of Business and Management, 5 (4): 215-222.
2. Doytch, Nadia, and Merih Uctum (2011). “Does the Worldwide Shift of FDI from Manufacturing to Services Accelerate Economic Growth? A GMM Estimation Study”. Journal of International Money and Finance, 30 (3): 410-427
3. Duce, Maitena (2003). “Definitions of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): A Methodological Note”. Paper for the CGFS Working Group, Banco de Espana. Madrid.
4. Durlauf, Steven N., and Lawrence E. Blume (2008). The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Second Edition.
5. Enders, Walter (1995). Applied Econometric Time Series. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
6. Hansen, Henrik, and John Rand (2005). “On the Causal Links between FDI and Growth in Developing Countries”, UNU-WIDER. United Nations University (UNU). Research Paper No. 2005/31.
7. IMF (2009). Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual. Sixth Edition (BPM6). Washington. D.C.: IMF.
8. Kar, Muhsin ve Fatma Tatlısöz (2008). “Türkiye’de Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Hareketlerini Belirleyen Faktörlerin Ekonometrik Analizi”, KMU İİBF Dergisi, 10 (14): 436-458.

9. Lipsey, Robert E., and Fredrik Sjöholm (2005). “The Impact of Inward FDI on Host Countries: Why Such Different Answers?” in Theodore H. Moran, Edward M. Graham, and Magnus Blomström (eds.). Does Foreign Direct Investment Promote Development?. Washington: Institute for International Economics Center for Global Development.
10. Saggi, Kamal (2002). “Trade, Foreign Direct Investment, and International Technology Transfer: A Survey”, The World Bank Research Observer, 17 (2): 191-235.
11. Sonmez, Alper and M. Teoman Pamukcu (2011). “Foreign Direct Investment and Technology Spillovers in the Turkish Manufacturing Industry”. STPS Working Papers 11/03. STPS-Science and Technology Policy Studies Center. Middle East Technical University.
12. Turan Koyuncu, Fatma (2010). “Türkiye’de Seçilmiş Makroekonomik Değişkenlerin Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımları Üzerindeki Etkisinin Yapısal VAR Analizi: 1990-2009 Dönemi”, Ekonomi Bilimleri Dergisi, 2 (1): 55-62.
13. Wang, Miao (2009). “Manufacturing FDI and Economic Growth: Evidence from Asian Economies”, Applied Economics, 41 (8): 991-1002.