HANDLING INTERREGIONAL TRANSPORT AND TRANSACTION COSTS TROUGH BRIDGES AND ENHANCING ECONOMIC GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT

Öz

The most important impediment to interregional trade is the transportation and transaction cost among trading parties. In this study, the transportation and transaction cost is characterized in three different forms of gaps between trading partners viz; physical, institutional, and social. In all forms of gaps, movement can be facilitated by a form of bridge. Bridges, as an abstract concept, can be characterized as i) physical bridges connecting two sides of any geographic obstacles, ii) institutional bridges handling transaction limitations (such as absence of compatible telecommunication, banking, legal system), and iii) socio-cultural bridges dealing with difficulties for mutual understanding of trading parties such as cultural mismatches. Physical bridges are the basic capital investments linking physical gaps between sides such as tunnels, bridges, highways, airports. Institutional bridges are the compatible institutional structures among regions, states, countries such as banking, insurance finance, and legal structures. Socio-cultural bridges are the socio-cultural proximities among societies such as historic backgrounds, common languages, familiar religious practices, common cultural identities from food to humor. In this study, first, the benefits of bridges are theoretically presented, and then the advantages of various forms of bridges to the selected country, Turkey, are critically presented. The study has shown that, Turkey has been handling all forms of transportation and transaction costs not only through the physical bridges but also through the legal, institutional as well as the informal and emotional bridges. In this process, Turkey is taking advantage of her geostrategic and geopolitical location as well as her geo-cultural characteristics which have been accumulated throughout history. As a result, all efforts aimed to reduce the cost of transportation and transaction bring about additional consumer and producer surpluses and which consequently bring about positive welfare gain to the Turkish society. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bridges,spatial price equilibrium model,transport cost,transaction cost,consumer surplus,local and international trade,growth and development,hinterland,export based growth.

Kaynakça

1. Arrow, K. (1969). The limits of organization, the Fels lectures on public policy analysis. New York: Norton. Bawden, D. L. (1966). A Spatial Price Equilibrium Model of International Trade. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 48 (4) pp 862–874
2. Bennett, M., & Yuan, Y. (2016). On the Price Spread of Benchmark Crude Oils: A Spatial Price Equilibrium Model. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2894389
3. Cheung, S. N. (1987). Economic organization and transaction costs. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, 2, 55. Retrieved from http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/dictionary.com/article?id=pde1987_X000658
4. Cournot, A.A. (1838). Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth. New York: Macmillan, translated by N. T. Bacon, 1897.
5. Czamanski, S. (1973). Regional and Interregional Social Accounting. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books. Davutoğlu, A. (2009). Stratejik Derinlik: Türkiye’nin Uluslararası Konumu. (29. baskı). İstanbul: Küre Yayınları.
6. Dymond, L.H. (2015). A Recent History of Recognized Economic Thought: Contributions of the Nobel Laureates to Economic Science. Lulu Publishing Services.
7. Flinn, J.C. & Guise, J.W.B. (1970). An Application of Spatial Equilibrium Analysis to Water Resources Allocation. Water Resources Research, 6 (2): 398-407.
8. Fujita, M. (2012). Thünen and the New Economic Geography. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42 (2012) 907–912.

9. Harker, P. T. (1984). A generalized spatial price equilibrium model. Papers in Regional Science, 54(1) pp 25-42.
10. Hartwick, J.M. (1972). The location of firms and general spatial price equilibrium. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 108(3) pp 462-482.
11. Ho, W. F. D. (1990). Government trade intervention, thin markets and international price fluctuations: the case of the world rice market (Doctoral dissertation).
12. Kooten, G. C. (2013). Modeling forest trade in logs and lumber: Qualitative and quantitative analysis (Working Paper No. 2013-04).
13. Krugman, P.R., (1991). Geography and Trade. MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass).
14. Krugman, P. (1999) Was it all in Ohlin?, available at http://web.mit.edu/krugman/www/ohlin.html (last visit May 28, 2017)
15. Mosavi, S. H. (2014). Positive agricultural and food trade model with ad valorem tariffs. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 16: pp 1481-1492.
16. North, D.C. (1993). Institutions and Credible Commitment. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 149(1):11-23.
17. http://129.3.20.41/eps/eh/papers/9412/9412002.pdf (Son ziyaret: Nisan 2010)
18. North, D.C. (2003). The Role of Institutions in Economic Development. UNECE Discussion Papers Series No. 2003.2, October 2003.
19. North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Prize Committee of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, (2008). Trade and Geography – Economies of Scale, Differentiated Products and Transport Costs. https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/2008/advanced-economicsciences2008.pdf (last visit May 30, 2017)
20. Qian, Q.K., Fan, K., & Chan E.H.W. (2016) Regulatory incentives for green buildings: gross floor area concessions. Building Research & Information, 44:675-693.
21. Randal, A. (1987). Resources Economics: An economic Approach to Natural Resources and Environmental Policy. New York: Hohn Wlley & Son.
22. Richardson, H.W. (1979). Regional Economics. (2. Baskı). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
23. Samuelson, P. A. (1952). Spatial Price Equilibrium and Linear Programming. American Economic Review, 42: 283-303.
24. Shukurov. S. (2016). Determinants of FDI in Transition Economies: The Case of CIS Countries. Journal of International and Global Economic Studies, 9(1): 75-94.
25. Takayama, T. (1967). International Trade and Mathematical Programming. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 11(1) pp 36-48.
26. Takayama, T. & Judge, G. G. (1964). Spatial Equilibrium and Quadratic Programming. Journal of Farm Economics, 46(1): 67-93.