Araştırma Makalesi

The Reform Debate: al-Marzūqī and al-Būṭī on the Renewal of Uṣūl al-fiqh

Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1 11 Aralık 2013
  • Abdessamad Belhaj
PDF İndir
TR EN

The Reform Debate: al-Marzūqī and al-Būṭī on the Renewal of Uṣūl al-fiqh

Öz

The renewal of Islamic legal hermeneutics has been a subject of controversy since the 19th century. Muslim jurists and thinkers disagree on the extent to which the sources and the procedures of istidlāl, legal reasoning, embodied in Islamic legal hermeneutics, uṣūl al-fiqh, should be restructured. This study deals with one of the most recent discussions on this question, which opposed the Tunisian A. al-Marzūqī and the Syrian M. S. Ramaḍān al-Būṭī. The answers of the two debaters are interesting in more than a case. On the one side, al-Marzūqī argued for an open and collective legal hermeneutics that would function as a public reasoning. On the other side, al-Būṭī adopts a conventional line of thought, defending the methodological self-sufficiency of Islamic law. This paper will investigate the premises, the conclusions, and the counter-arguments of each of the debaters. Besides, light will be shed on the new elements that emerged in the dispute with regard to legal reform in Islamic law.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. ʿAbd al-Karīm, ʿAbd al-Salām, al-Tajdīd wa-l-mujaddidūn fī uṣūl al-fiqh (Cairo: al-Maktaba al-Islāmiyya, 2003).
  2. Arkoun, Mohammad, Pour une Critique de la Raison Islamique (Paris: Maisonneuve et Larose, 1984).
  3. ʿAtrabī, Muḥammad Fatḥī Muḥammad, al-Tajdīd fī ʿilm uṣūl al-fiqh al-Sunnī fī l-ʿaṣr al-ḥadīth: bayna l-naẓariyya wa-l-taṭbīq (al-Iskandariyya: Dār al-Maṭbūʿāt al-Jāmiʿiyya, 2012).
  4. Balājī, ʿAbd al-Salām, Taṭawwur ʿilm uṣūl al-fiqh wa-tajadduduhū (al-Manṣūra: Dār al-Wafāʾ, 2007).
  5. Balḥājj, ʿAbd al-Ṣamad, "al-Taṣawwuf wa-l-Ikhwān al-Muslimūn fī Sūriyya: al-Būṭī wa-madrasatuhū," al-Misbār 66 (al-Islām al-nāʾim: al-taṣawwuf fī bilād al-Shām) (2012), 283-304.
  6. al-Būṭī, Muḥammad Saʿīd Ramaḍān, Ḍawābiṭ al-maṣlaḥa fī l-sharīʿa al-Islāmiyya (Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Risāla, 1973).
  7. Christmann, Andreas, "Islamic Scholar and Religious Leader: a Portrait of Shaykh Muḥammad Saʿīd Ramaḍān al-Būṭī," Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations 9/2 (1998), 149-169, https://doi.org/10.1080/09596419808721146
  8. al-Dasūqī, Muḥammad, al-Tajdīd fī l-fiqh al-Islāmī (Beirut: Dār al-Madār al-Islāmī, 2001).

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Din Araştırmaları

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Abdessamad Belhaj Bu kişi benim
Hungary

Yayımlanma Tarihi

11 Aralık 2013

Gönderilme Tarihi

1 Nisan 2013

Kabul Tarihi

29 Haziran 2013

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2013 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Belhaj, A. (2013). The Reform Debate: al-Marzūqī and al-Būṭī on the Renewal of Uṣūl al-fiqh. Ilahiyat Studies, 4(1), 9-24. https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2013.41.68
AMA
1.Belhaj A. The Reform Debate: al-Marzūqī and al-Būṭī on the Renewal of Uṣūl al-fiqh. IS. 2013;4(1):9-24. doi:10.12730/13091719.2013.41.68
Chicago
Belhaj, Abdessamad. 2013. “The Reform Debate: al-Marzūqī and al-Būṭī on the Renewal of Uṣūl al-fiqh”. Ilahiyat Studies 4 (1): 9-24. https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2013.41.68.
EndNote
Belhaj A (01 Aralık 2013) The Reform Debate: al-Marzūqī and al-Būṭī on the Renewal of Uṣūl al-fiqh. Ilahiyat Studies 4 1 9–24.
IEEE
[1]A. Belhaj, “The Reform Debate: al-Marzūqī and al-Būṭī on the Renewal of Uṣūl al-fiqh”, IS, c. 4, sy 1, ss. 9–24, Ara. 2013, doi: 10.12730/13091719.2013.41.68.
ISNAD
Belhaj, Abdessamad. “The Reform Debate: al-Marzūqī and al-Būṭī on the Renewal of Uṣūl al-fiqh”. Ilahiyat Studies 4/1 (01 Aralık 2013): 9-24. https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2013.41.68.
JAMA
1.Belhaj A. The Reform Debate: al-Marzūqī and al-Būṭī on the Renewal of Uṣūl al-fiqh. IS. 2013;4:9–24.
MLA
Belhaj, Abdessamad. “The Reform Debate: al-Marzūqī and al-Būṭī on the Renewal of Uṣūl al-fiqh”. Ilahiyat Studies, c. 4, sy 1, Aralık 2013, ss. 9-24, doi:10.12730/13091719.2013.41.68.
Vancouver
1.Abdessamad Belhaj. The Reform Debate: al-Marzūqī and al-Būṭī on the Renewal of Uṣūl al-fiqh. IS. 01 Aralık 2013;4(1):9-24. doi:10.12730/13091719.2013.41.68

SCImago Journal & Country Rank