Objections to Sam Harris’ Critic of Religion

Öz

Some thinkers of the modern period have reached the general opinion that the social appearance and social dynamics of religion have increased, and therefore, religion is on the rise. However, the historical and theological tensions between religions that sometimes lead to conflicts and the increase in disagreements between various sects of the same religion have led to an increase in criticism of religion as a whole in certain circles. Sam Harris is one of the important representatives of the new atheism, which is among the schools of thought that make these criticisms. In this study, I will discuss Harris’ criticism of religion in which he argues that religious belief has many harmful and negative aspects. Therefore, he defends the view that it is necessary to fight against religion and to completely remove the phenomenon of religion from people’s lives. This and other of Harris’ basic claims, grounds, evidence, and views on the subject will be discussed, the persuasiveness and philosophical value of his basic approach will be examined through comparisons with rational and philosophical evaluations, and prominent dilemmas, if any, will be identified. The consistency of Harris’ criticism of religious beliefs and the accuracy of these criticisms constitute the problematic of the study. The aim of this study is to examine the author’s views through criticism, consider comparisons of this subject, and create a synthesis based on different approaches to the subject. To present this synthesis, the basic framework of this study is an examination of his The End of Faith: The Separation of Religion and Reason, Morality without God: A Guide for Spirituality without Religion, and The Harms of Religion: Conflicting Truth Claims of Religions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Philosophy of religion
• religion
• God
• new atheism
• Sam Harris

Kaynakça

1. Aczel, Amir D. Why Science Does Not Disprove God. New York: Harper Collins, 2014.
2. Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Terence Irwin. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Second Edition, 1999.
3. Armstrong, Walter Sinnott. Morality Without God. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
4. Aygün, Fatma. “Ateizme Yol Açan Faktörlerden Biri Olarak Fanatizm ve Dışlayıcılık”. İslâm Düşüncesinde Ateizm Eleştirisi. Edited by Cemalettin Erdemci - Fadıl Ayğan - Seyithan Can - Mustafa Sancar. 67-95. Ankara: Elis Yayınları, 2019.
5. Batak, Kemal. Naturalizm Çıkmazı: Dennett’ten Dawkins’e Yeni Ateizm’in Felsefî Temelleri ve Teistik Eleştirisi. İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık, 2011.
6. Bilgili, Alper. Bilim Ne Değildir? Yeni-Ateist Bilim Anlayışının Felsefi ve Sosyolojik Analizi. İstanbul: Doğu Kitabevi, 2018.
7. Charles, Enoch. “Sam Harris’s Science of Morality: A Philosophical, Historiographical, and Theological Critique”. Researchgate. Accessed February 2, 2022. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305400344_Sam_Harris’s_Science_of_Morality_A_Philosophical_Historiographical_and_Theological_Critique. 10.13140/RG.2.1.1675.1601
8. Çankı, Mustafa Namık. Büyük Felsefe Lûgatı. 3 vols. İstanbul: Cumhuriyet Matbaası, 1954.

9. Çınar, Aliye. Tanrı Yanılgısı Üzerine: İnanmak ya da İnanmamak. İstanbul: Profil Yayıncılık, 2009.
10. Çınar, Aynur. “Tarihte Kaybolmuş Bir Medeniyet: Etrüskler ve Etrüsk Dini”. Belleten. 84/299 (Nisan 2020), 51-61.
11. Dawkins, Richard. The God Delusion. London: Bantam Press, 2006.
12. Dbpedia. “About: Sam Harris”. Accessed January 25, 2022. https://dbpedia.org/page/Sam_Harris
13. Dennett, Daniel C. Breaking The Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. New York: Penguin Books, 2006.
14. Evkuran, Mehmet. “Yeni Ateist Akımın Din Eleştirisi Üzerine”. Dini Araştırmalar ve Küresel Bakış. Vol.1. Konya: Türkiye İmam Hatipliler Vakfı Yayınları, 2016.
15. Feser, Edward. The Last Superstition: A Refutation of the New Atheism. Indiana/South Bend: St. Augustine’s Press, 2008.
16. Gündoğan, Saim. “Richard Dawkins’in Tanrı’nın Varlığına Yönelik Eleştirisinin Çıkmazları (The Deadlocks of Richard Dawkins’s Critique of God’s Existence)”. İhya Uluslararası İslam Araştırmaları Dergisi (İhya International Journal of Islamic Studies) 8/2 (Autumn 2022), 815-847.
17. Hagerty, Barbara Bradley. “A Bitter Rift Divides Atheists”. NPR. Accessed October 19, 2009. https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=113889251
18. Harris, Sam. “Bombing Our IIIusions”. HuffPost. Accessed January 26, 2022. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/bombing-our-illusions_b_8615
19. Harris, Sam. “Mired in a Religious War”. The Washington Times (January 26, 2022).
20. Harris, Sam. Islam and the Future of Tolerance-A Dialogue Sam Harris Maajid Nawaz. London: Harvard University Press, 2015.
21. Harris, Sam. Lying. Edited by Annaka Harris. London: Four Elephants Press, 2013.
22. Harris, Sam. The End of Faith: Religion, Terror and the Future of Reason. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2004.
23. Harris, Sam. The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values. New York, Free Press, 2010.
24. Harris, Sam. Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks, 2014.
25. Hitchens, Christopher. God is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything. Toronto: Warner Books, 2007.
26. Hovey, Craig. What Makes Us Moral? Science, Religion and the Shaping of the Moral Landscape: A Christian Response to Sam Harris. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2012.
27. Huntington, Samuel P. “The Clash of Civilizations”. Foreign Affairs. 72/3 (Summer 1993), 3-28.
28. Johnson, Andrew. “An Apology for the New Atheism”. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion. 1/73 (2013), 5-28.
29. Johnson, Nathan W. Conveying Controversial Science: Sam Harris’s The Moral Landscape and Popular Science Communication. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University, Ph.D. Dissertation, 2013.
30. Kılıç, Recep. Ahlakın Dinî Temeli. Ankara: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Yayınları, 2016.
31. McGrath, Alister E. - McGrath, Joanna Collicutt. The Dawkins Delusion? Atheist Fundamentalism and the Denial of the Divine. Illinois: IVP Books, 2007.
32. Nichols, David E. “Psychedelics”. Pharmacologıcal Reviews. 68/2 (February 2016), 264-356.
33. Nixon, Alan G. New Atheism as a Case of Competitive Postsecular Worldviews. Sydney: The University of Western Sydney, School of Social Sciences and Psychology, Ph.D. Dissertation, 2014.
34. Özkan, Mehmet Şükrü. “Yeni Ateizmde Din Eleştirisi”. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 7/89 (March 2019), 130-149.
35. Özkan, Mehmet Şükrü. Rasyonel Teoloji Yeni Ateizm ve Tanrı: Tanrı’nın Varlığı veya Yokluğu Kanıtlanabilir mi?. Ankara: Elis Yayınları, 2019.
36. Stenger, Victor J. The New Atheism: Taking a Stand for Science and Reason. New York: Prometheus Books, 2009.
37. Torres, Phil. “Sam Harris and Donald Trump: They’re Completely Different… Yet Very Much Alike”. Salon. Accessed January 26, 2022. https://www.salon.com/2020/08/16/sam-harris-and-donald-trump-theyre-completely-different--yet-very-much-alike/.
38. Yasa, Metin. Varoluşsal İnanç Sorunları. Ankara: Elis Yayınları, 2018.
39. Zenk, Thomas. New Atheism. Edited by S. Bullivant - M. Ruse. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.