Araştırma Makalesi

A Reply to Morriston’s Objection to Plantinga’s Free Will Defense

Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2 31 Aralık 2023
PDF İndir
EN

A Reply to Morriston’s Objection to Plantinga’s Free Will Defense

Öz

The logical problem of evil holds that the existence of the theistic God, who is considered omniscient, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent, is logically incompatible with the existence of evil. Since there is evil in the world, the existence of the theistic God is then logically impossible. Alvin Plantinga has argued that if God has a good reason to allow evil to exist, the logical problem of evil fails. And the good reason that God has might be the great value of significant freedom – the freedom to choose between moral good and evil. Wesley Morriston objects that Plantinga’s free will defense is incompatible with one of the components of his ontological argument that God is omnibenevolent in every possible world. This paper aims to show that Morriston mistakenly assumes that the free will defense theorist holds the account of significant freedom for both human and divine freedom. If I am right, Plantinga’s defense of free will can meet Morriston’s objection.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Kane, Robert. A Contemporary Introduction to Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
  2. Morriston, Wesley. “Is God “Significantly Free?””. Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers 2/3 (1985), 257-264. https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil19852331
  3. O’Connor, Timothy. “Freedom with a Human Face”. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 29/1 (2005), 207-227. https://doi-org.proxyiub.uits.iu.edu/10.1111/j.1475-4975.2005.00113.x
  4. O’Connor, Timothy – Franklin, Christopher. “Free Will”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2021 Edition). Edited by Edward N. Zalta. Accessed on March 21, 2023. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/freewill/
  5. Plantinga, Alvin. God, Freedom, and Evil. Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1977.
  6. Plantinga, Alvin. “Will There Be Free Will in Heaven?” (Interviewer: Bart Ehrman, Video Recording, Accessed on March 21, 2023). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWsDZzTIWhw
  7. Smith, Quentin. Ethical and Religious Thought in Analytic Philosophy of Language. Michigan: Yale University Press, 1997.
  8. Taskin, Ferhat. The Problem of Divine Creative Freedom. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University, Ph.D. Dissertation, 2023.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Din Araştırmaları

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Aralık 2023

Gönderilme Tarihi

5 Nisan 2023

Kabul Tarihi

12 Mayıs 2023

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2023 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Taşkın, F. (2023). A Reply to Morriston’s Objection to Plantinga’s Free Will Defense. Ilahiyat Studies, 14(2), 419-437. https://doi.org/10.12730/is.1277893
AMA
1.Taşkın F. A Reply to Morriston’s Objection to Plantinga’s Free Will Defense. IS. 2023;14(2):419-437. doi:10.12730/is.1277893
Chicago
Taşkın, Ferhat. 2023. “A Reply to Morriston’s Objection to Plantinga’s Free Will Defense”. Ilahiyat Studies 14 (2): 419-37. https://doi.org/10.12730/is.1277893.
EndNote
Taşkın F (01 Aralık 2023) A Reply to Morriston’s Objection to Plantinga’s Free Will Defense. Ilahiyat Studies 14 2 419–437.
IEEE
[1]F. Taşkın, “A Reply to Morriston’s Objection to Plantinga’s Free Will Defense”, IS, c. 14, sy 2, ss. 419–437, Ara. 2023, doi: 10.12730/is.1277893.
ISNAD
Taşkın, Ferhat. “A Reply to Morriston’s Objection to Plantinga’s Free Will Defense”. Ilahiyat Studies 14/2 (01 Aralık 2023): 419-437. https://doi.org/10.12730/is.1277893.
JAMA
1.Taşkın F. A Reply to Morriston’s Objection to Plantinga’s Free Will Defense. IS. 2023;14:419–437.
MLA
Taşkın, Ferhat. “A Reply to Morriston’s Objection to Plantinga’s Free Will Defense”. Ilahiyat Studies, c. 14, sy 2, Aralık 2023, ss. 419-37, doi:10.12730/is.1277893.
Vancouver
1.Ferhat Taşkın. A Reply to Morriston’s Objection to Plantinga’s Free Will Defense. IS. 01 Aralık 2023;14(2):419-37. doi:10.12730/is.1277893

SCImago Journal & Country Rank