The Interaction of Religion and Robotics and al-Sāmirī’s Calf (the Golden Calf) as an Early Theomorphic Robot

Öz

The interaction between technology and religion has led to discussions on social robots in religious studies. Various robots have been produced to conduct funerals, give blessings, respond to personal prayer requests, preach, answer religious questions, or instruct religious education. Parallel to these developments, the term theomorphic robot was introduced to describe robots employed for religious purposes, and the characteristics of this type of robot have been described. Attitudes toward technological advances have been influenced by the religious or cultural origins of individuals and society. The present study investigates the “calf”, called “The Story of al-Sāmirī” in Islam and the “Golden calf” in Judaism, in terms of theomorphic robot design and features and discusses whether the “calf” can be considered an early theomorphic robot. It is concluded that the “calf” can be considered an example of an early theomorphic robot in terms of most of its features, and the Story of al-Sāmirī can be employed as a criterion for theomorphic robot analysis. This can explain the interaction between religion and robotics in Muslim culture. Attitudes toward the interaction of religion and robotics vary based on the description and perception of theomorphic robots.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Psychology of religion
• social robot
• theomorphic robot
• human-robot interaction
• religion-robotics interaction

Kaynakça

1. Ahmed, Habib - La, Hung Manh. 2021. “Evaluating the Co-Dependence and Co-Existence between Religion and Robots: Past, Present and Insights on the Future”. International Journal of Social Robotics 13/2, 219-235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00636-x
2. Ajdini, Sherife. 2014. “Public Administration in Ancient Rome and Egypt”. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 3/6, 385-389. https://doi.org/10.5901/ajis.2014.v3n6p385
3. Akdoğu Arca, Ebru - Gökalp, Nuray - Tüner Önen, Nihal. 2011. “Pamphylia Bölgesi’nin Mısır ve Kıbrıs ile Olan İlişkileri”. Olba 19, 287-312.
4. Albayrak, İsmail. 2001. “The Qurʾānic Narratives of the Golden Calf Episode”. Journal of Qurʾānic Studies 3/1, 47-69. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2001.3.1.47
5. Albayrak, Kadir. 2004. “İsrailoğulları’nın ‘Altın Buzağı’sı ve ‘Kızıl İnek’i”. Bilimname 5/2, 91-103.
6. Albirini, Abdulkafi. 2006. “Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Information and Communication Technologies: The Case of Syrian EFL Teachers”. Computers & Education 47/4, 373-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.013
7. Alemi, Minoo - Taheri, Alireza - Shariati, Azadeh - Meghdari, Ali. 2020. “Social Robotics, Education, and Religion in the Islamic World: An Iranian Perspective”. Science and Engineering Ethics 26/5, 2709-2734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00225-1
8. Ambrosetti, Nadia. 2012. “Improbable Mechanics: A Short History of Fake Automata”. In Explorations in the History of Machines and Mechanisms. Edited by Teun Coetsier - Marco Ceccarelli. 309-322. Dordrecht: Springer.

9. Associated Press. 2014, February 25. “Iranian Teacher Builds Robot to Teach Prayer”. phys.org https://phys.org/news/2014-02-iranian-teacher-robot-prayer.html
10. Baffelli, Erica. 2021. “The Android and the Fax: Robots, AI and Buddhism in Japan”. In Itineraries of an Anthropologist: Studies in Honour of Massimo Raveri. Edited by Giovanni Bulian and Silvia Rivadossi. 249-263. Venezia: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari. https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-527-8/012
11. Balle, Simon - Ess, Charles. 2020. “Robots in Religious Contexts”. In Culturally Sustainable Social Robotics: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2020. Edited by Marco Nørskov - Johanna Seibt - Oliver Santiago Quick. 585-591. Amsterdam: IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA200963
12. Baraka, Kim - Alves Oliveira, Patricia - Ribeiro, Tiago. 2020. “An Extended Framework for Characterizing Social Robots”. In Human-Robot Interaction. Edited by Jost C. et al. 21-64. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0_2
13. Bartneck, Christoph - Nomura, Tatsuya - Kanda, Takayuki - Suzuki, Tomohiro - Kato, Kennsuke. 2005. “Cultural Differences in Attitudes Towards Robots”. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Robot Companions: Hard Problems and Open Challenges in Robot-Human Interaction, Hatfield. 1-4. Hatfield: The Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22507.34085
14. Bekiroğlu, Harun - Taşdoğan, Ahmet. 2020. “İsrâiloğulları’nın Taşıdığı Yük Meselesi: Tâhâ Sûresi 20/87. Âyetiyle İlgili Bir İnceleme”. Diyanet İlmi Dergi 56/3, 721-754.
15. Ben-Ari, Mordechai - Mondada, Francesco. 2018. Elements of Robotics. Cham: Springer Open. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62533-1_1
16. Branwyn, Gareth. 2004. Absolute Beginner’s Guide to Building Robots. Indianapolis: Que Publishing.
17. Brynjolfsson, Erik - McAfee, Andrew. 2019. “Yapay Zekânın Vaat Ettikleri”. Translated by Levent Göktem. Dijital Dönüşüm: Yapay Zekâ. 19-56. İstanbul: Optimist Yayınları.
18. Budge, E. A. Wallis. 1988. Egyptian Magic. New York: Penguin Books.
19. Casciati, Sara - Borja, Ronaldo I. 2004. “Dynamic FE Analysis of South Memnon Colossus Including 3D Soil–Foundation–Structure Interaction”. Computers & Structures 82/20-21, 1719-1736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.02.026
20. Cheong, Pauline Hope. 2020. “Robots, Religion and Communication: Rethinking Piety, Practices and Pedagogy in the Era of Artificial Intelligence”. In Religion in the Age of Digitalization: From New Media to Spiritual Machines. 86-96. Edited by Giulia Isetti - Elisa Innerhofer - Harald Pechlaner - Michael de Rachewiltz. 86-96. London: Routledge.
21. Contrada, Norman. 1995. “Golem and Robot: A Search for Connections”. Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts 7/2-3, 244-254.
22. Day, Joseph W. 2020. “Patricia A. Rosenmeyer, the Language of Ruins: Greek and Latin Inscriptions on the Memnon Colossus, New York: Oxford University Press, 2018, ISBN 9780190626310, $85”. International Journal of the Classical Tradition 27, 135-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12138-018-0497-3
23. Dekel, Edan - Gurley, David Gantt. 2013. “How the Golem Came to Prague”. Jewish Quarterly Review 103/2, 241-258. https://doi.org/10.1353/jqr.2013.0015
24. Dodson, Aidan. 2005. “Bull Cults”. In Divine Creatures: Animal Mummies in Ancient Egypt. Edited by Salima Ikram. 72-105. New York: The American University in Cairo Press. 72-105. https://doi.org/10.5743/cairo/9789774248580.003.0004
25. Döner, Ertuğrul - Menteş, Savaş. 2022. “Gelenek Aktarımı: Atalar Dini (Mısır Kültürü, Hz. Musa ve İsrailoğulları Örneği)”. Çukurova Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi (ÇÜİFD) 30. Yıl Özel Sayısı, 173-200. https://doi.org/10.30627/cuilah.1158936
26. al-Jazarī, Badīʿ al-zamān Abū l-ʿIzz Ismāʿīl ibn al-Razzāz. 2002. El-Câmi‘ beyne’l-İlm ve’l-Amel en-Nafi‘ fî eṣ-Ṣınaʿāti’l-Hiyel (Al-Jāmiʿ bayna l-ʿilm wa-l-ʿamal al-nāfiʿ fī ṣināʿat al-ḥiyal-The Book of Knowledge of lngenious Mechanical Devices). Edited and translated by Sevim Tekeli - Melek Dosay - Yavuz Unat. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları.
27. Ess, Charles Melvin. 2020. “Between Luther and Buddhism: Scandinavian Creation Theology and Robophilosophy”. In Culturally Sustainable Social Robotics: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2020. Edited by Marco Nørskov - Johanna Seibt - Oliver Santiago Quick. 611-616. Amsterdam: IOS Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/FAIA200968
28. Europe Parliament. 2017. Report with Recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0005_EN.html
29. Ezzamel, Mahmoud. 1997. “Accounting, Control and Accountability: Preliminary Evidence from Ancient Egypt”. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 8/6, 563-601. https://doi.org/10.1006/cpac.1997.0123
30. Finch, Jacqueline. 2011. “The Ancient Origins of Prosthetic Medicine”. The Lancet 377/9765, 548-549. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60190-6
31. Fong, Terrence - Nourbakhsh, Illah - Dautenhahn, Kerstin. 2003. “A Survey of Socially Interactive Robots”. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42/3, 143-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00372-X
32. Freeman, Charles. 1996. Egypt, Greece and Rome Civilizations of the Ancient Mediterranean. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Gardin, Nanon - Olorenshaw, Robert. 2019. Larousse Semboller Sözlüğü. Translated by Beyza Akşit. İstanbul: Bilge Kültür-Sanat Yayınları.
34. Gardiner, Alan. 1961. “The Egyptian Memnon”. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 47/1, 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/030751336104700110
35. Gee, Henry. 2001. “Golem Schmolem”. Nature 414, 848-849. https://doi.org/10.1038/414848a
36. Geraci, Robert M. 2007. “Robots and the Sacred in Science and Science Fiction: Theological Implications of Artificial Intelligence”. Zygon 42/4, 961-980. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2007.00883.x
37. Geraci, Robert M. 2006. “Spiritual Robots: Religion and Our Scientific View of the Natural World”. Theology and Science 4/3, 229-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700600952993
38. Gezer, İbrahim. 2022. İslam Hukukuna Göre Yapay Zekânın Hukuki Mahiyeti. Konya: Necmettin Erbakan University, Institute of Social Sciences, Master’s Thesis.
39. Giger, Jean-Christophe - Moura, Daniel - Almeida, Nuno - Piçarra, Nuno. 2017. “Attitudes Towards Social Robots: The Role of Gender, Belief in Human Nature Uniqueness, Religiousness and Interest in Science Fiction”. In Proceedings of the II International Congress on Interdisciplinarity in Social and Human Sciences 11th - 12th May 2017. Edited by Saul Neves de Jesus - Patrícia Pinto. 509-514. Faro: Research Centre for Spatial and Organizational DynamicsUniversity of Algarve.
40. Giuliano, Roberto Musa. 2020. “Echoes of Myth and Magic in the Language of Artificial Intelligence”. AI & Society 35, 1009-1024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00966-4.
41. Görgülü, Ülfet - Kesgin, Sena. 2021. “Yapay Zekâ Robotlara Ahlâki ve Hukuki Statü Tanınması Problematiği - İslam Ahlâkı ve Hukuku Açısından Bir Değerlendirme”. Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 20, 37-65. https://doi.org/10.32950/rteuifd.1010399
42. Hart, George. 1995. Egyptian Myths (The Legendary Past). Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.
43. Hernigou, Philippe. 2013. “Ambroise Paré IV: The Early History of Artificial Limbs (From Robotic to Prostheses)”. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 37, 1195-1197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1884-7
44. Işık, Şemsettin. 2014. “Tâhâ Sûresinin 95-97. Ayetlerini Anlama ve Anlamlandırmada İsrailiyyatın Etkisi”. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 3/5, 137-154.
45. Kaplan, Frederic. 2004. “Who is Afraid of The Humanoid? Investigating Cultural Differences in the Acceptance of Robots”. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics 1/3, 465-480. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219843604000289
46. Katz, James E. - Halpern, Daniel - Crocker, Elizabeth Thomas. 2015. “In the Company of Robots: Views of Acceptability of Robots in Social Settings”. In Social Robots from a Human Perspective. Edited by Jane Vincent- Sakari Taipale - Bartolomeo Sapio - Giuseppe Lugano - Leopoldina Fortunati. 25-38. Cham: Springer. 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15672-9_3
47. Keskinoğlu, Osman. 1961. “İslâm’da Tasvîr ve Minyatürler”. Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 9/1-4, 11-24.
48. Kheddar, Abderrahmane - Yoshida, Eiichi - Sam Ge, Shuzhi - Suzuki, Kenji - Cabibihan, John-John - Eyssel, Friederike - He, Hongsheng (eds.). 2017. Social Robotics: 9th International Conference, ICSR 2017, Tsukuba, Japan, November 22-24, 2017, Proceedings. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
49. Kimura, Takeshi. 2017. “Robotics and AI in the Sociology of Religion: A Human in Imago Roboticae”. Social Compass 64/1, 6-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768616683326
50. King, Elizabeth. 2002. “Clockwork Prayer: A Sixteenth-Century Mechanical Monk”. Blackbird: An Online Journal of Literature and the Arts 1/1, 1-29.
51. Korn, Oliver - Akalin, Neziha - Gouveia, Ruben. 2021. “Understanding Cultural Preferences for Social Robots: A Study in German and Arab Communities”. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI) 10/2, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3439717
52. Kurzweil, Ray. 1999. “Spiritual Machines: The Merging of Man and Machine”. Futurist 33, 16-21.
53. LaGrandeur, Kevin. 2010. “Do Medieval and Renaissance Androids Presage the Posthuman?”. Comparative Literature and Culture 12/3. https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.1553
54. Loewen-Colón, J. - Mosurinjohn, Sharday C. 2022. “Fabulation, Machine Agents, and Spiritually Authorizing Encounters”. Religions 13/4, 333. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13040333
55. Löffler, Diana - Hurtienne, Jörn - Nord, Ilona. 2021. “Blessing Robot BlessU2: A Discursive Design Study to Understand the Implications of Social Robots in Religious Contexts”. International Journal of Social Robotics 13/4, 569-586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00558-3
56. Łukaszewicz, Adam. 1995. “Memnon, King of Egypt”. The Journal of Juristic Papyrology 25, 131-146.
57. Maden, Şükrü - Yiğitoğlu, Mustafa. 2018. “Kur’an-ı Kerim ve Eski Ahit Bağlamında Buzağıya Tapan İsrailoğulları’na Ölüm Cezası Verilmesi Meselesi”. Amasya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 11, 419-446. https://doi.org/10.18498/amauifd.504003
58. Marković, Nenad. 2016. “A Look Through His Window: The Sanctuary of the Divine Apis Bull at Memphis”. The Journal of Ancient Egyptian Architecture 1, 57-70.
59. Mataric, Maja J. 2007. The Robotics Primer. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
60. Mavridis, Nikolaos - Katsaiti, Marina Selini - Naef, Silvia - Falasi, Abdullah - Nuaimi, Abdulrahman - Araifi, Hamdan - Kitbi, Ahmed. 2012. “Opinions and Attitudes Toward Humanoid Robots in the Middle East”. AI & Society 27/4, 517-534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-011-0370-2
61. Mawdūdī, Abū l-Aʿlā. 2005.Tefhîmu’l Kur’ân: Kur’ân’ın Anlamı ve Tefsiri. Translated by Muhammed Han Kayani et al. İstanbul: İnsan Yayınları.
62. Mayor, Adrienne. 2018. Gods and Robots: Myths, Machines and Ancient Dreams of Technology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
63. McBride, James. 2019. “Robotic Bodies and the Kairos of Humanoid Theologies”. Sophia 58/4, 663-676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-017-0628-3
64. McBride, James. 2015. “The Advent of Postmodern Robotic Technoreligiosity”. Journal of Ethics and Emerging Technologies 25/2, 25-38. https://doi.org/10.55613/jeet.v25i2.46
65. McCorduck, Pamela. 2004. Machines Who Think: A Personal Inquiry into the History and Prospects of Artificial Intelligence. Massachusetts: A K Peters, Ltd.
66. McCormack, Ryan. 2016. “The Colossus of Memnon and Phonography”. Sound Studies 2/2, 165-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/20551940.2016.1257350
67. Meral, Yasin. 2021. Samiri’nin Buzağısı. Ankara: Ankara Okulu Yayınları, 2nd edition.
68. Merlet, Jean-Pierre. 2000. “A Historical Perspective of Robotics”. In International Symposium on History of Machines and Mechanisms Proceedings. Edited by M. Ceccarelli. 379-386. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9554-4_43
69. Metzler, Ted - Lundy Lewis. 2008. “Ethical Views, Religious Views, and Acceptance of Robotic Applications: A Pilot Study”. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, 15-22.
70. Midson, Scott. 2022. “Posthuman Priests: Exploring the ‘New Visibility of Religion’in Robotic re(-)presentations of Religious Rituals”. Religions 13/10, 941. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13100941
71. Midson, Scott. 2018. “Robo-Theisms and Robot Theists: How Do Robots Challenge and Reveal Notions of God?”. Implicit Religion 20/3, 299-318. https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.35898
72. Mohamad, Siti Majidah Haji. 2017. “Performance of Religiosity on a ‘Techno-Religious’ Space”. Advanced Science Letters 23/5, 4918-4921. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.8956
73. Mori, Masahiro. 1989. The Buddha in the Robot. Tokyo: Kosei Publishing Company.
74. Natoli, Bartolo A. - Pitts, Angela - Hallett, Judith P. 2022. Ancient Women Writers of Greece and Rome. London: Routledge.
75. Nerlich, Andreas. G. - Zink, Albert - Szeimies, Ulrike - Hagedorn, Hjalmar G. 2000. “Ancient Egyptian Prosthesis of the Big Toe”. The Lancet 356/9248, 2176-2179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03507-8
76. Nord, Illona - Ess, Charles - Hurtienne, Jörn - Schlag, Thomas. 2023. “Robotics in Christian Religious Practice: Reflections on Initial Experiments in This Field”. OPUS 30314, 1-35. https://doi.org/10.25972/OPUS-30314
77. Olgun, Hakan. 2021. Hz. Musa’nın Muhalefeti: Horus’u Öldürmek. Ankara: MilelNihal Yayınları.
78. Otto, Rudolf. 1936.The Idea of the Holy. Oxford: Oxford Bookshelf.
79. Paloutzian, Raymond. F. - Park Crystal. L. (eds.). 2005. Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. New York - London: The Guilford Press.
80. Pregill, Michael E. 2020. The Golden Calf between Bible and Qurʾān. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
81. Price, Derek J. de Solla. 1964. “Automata and the Origins of Mechanism and Mechanistic Philosophy”. Technology and Culture 5/1, 9-23.
82. Rappaport, Z. H. 2006. “Robotics and Artificial Intelligence: Jewish Ethical Perspectives”. In Medical Technologies in Neurosurgery. Edited by Christopher Nimsky - Rudolf Fahlbusch. 9-12. Wien: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-33303-7_2
83. Reuters. 2017, August 27. “A Robot Buddhist Priest in Japan Can Now Perform Funeral Rites”. The Indian Express. https://indianexpress.com/article/trending/bizarre/a-robot-buddhist-priest-in-japan-can-now-perform-funeral-rites/
84. Rice, Michael. 1998. The Power of the Bull. London: Routledge.
85. Riek, Laurel D. - Mavridis, Nikolaos - Antali, Shammah - Darmaki, Noura - Ahmed, Zeeshan - Al-Neyadi, Maitha - Alketheri, Amina. 2010. “Ibn Sina Steps Out: Exploring Arabic Attitudes toward Humanoid Robots”. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction, AISB, Leicester. Edited by Kerstin Dautenhahn - Joe Saunders. 88-94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
86. Rosenmeyer, Patricia. 2018. The Language of Ruins: Greek and Latin Inscriptions on the Memnon Colossus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
87. Sayı, Ali. 2012. Firavun, Haman ve Karun Karşısında Hz. Musa. İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık.
88. Shaw-Garlock, Glenda. 2009. “Looking Forward to Sociable Robots”. International Journal of Social Robotics 1, 249-260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-009-0021-7
89. Shaw, Ian. 2013. Ancient Egyptian Technology and Innovation. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
90. Sherwood, Harriet. 2017, May 30. “Robot Priest Unveiled in Germany to Mark 500 Years Since Reformation”. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/30/robot-priest-blessu-2-germany-reformation-exhibition
91. Shibata, Takanori. 2004. “An Overview of Human Interactive Robots for Psychological Enrichment”. Proceedings of the IEEE 92/11, 1749-1758. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2004.835383
92. Siciliano, Bruno - Khatib Oussama. 2019. “Humanoid Robots: Historical Perspective: Overview and Scope”. In Humanoid Robotics: A Reference. Edited by A. Goswami and P. Vadakkepat. 3-8. Dordrecht: Springer.
93. Sipahi, Yıldıray. 2018. “İstihsân Açısından Resim ve Heykel”. İslam Hukuku Araştırmaları Dergisi 31, 509-540.
94. Sipahioğlu, Mukadder. 2021. Antik Mısır’da Rahip Sınıfı. Ankara: Ankara Okulu Yayınları.
95. Skvorchevsky, Anatoly K. - Sergeev, Alexander M. - Kovalev, Nikita S. 2020. “From the Golem to the Robot and Beyond to the Smart Prostheses”. In Advances in Artificial Systems for Medicine and Education. Edited by Zhenbing Hu et al. 355-365. Gewerbestrasse: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12082-5_33
96. Straub, Detmar W. - Loch, Karen D. - Hill, Carole E. 2003. “Transfer of Information Technology to the Arab World: A Test of Cultural Influence Modeling”. In Advanced Topics in Global Information Management. Edited by Felix B. Tan. 141-172. Hershey: IGI Publishing.
97. Şimşek, Muhammed Salih. 2018. Antik Mısır Dininde Kâhinlik, Sihir ve Büyü. Marmara University, Institute of Social Sciences, Master’s Thesis.
98. Thomas, R. Murray. 1987. “Computer Technology: An Example of Decision-Making in Technology Transfer”. In Educational Technology – Its Creation, Development and Cross-Cultural Transfer. Edited by R. M. Thomas and V. N. Kobayashi. 25-34. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
99. Travagnin, Stefania. 2020. “From Online Buddha Halls to Robot-Monks: New Developments in the Long-Term Interaction Between Buddhism, Media and Technology in Contemporary China”. Review of Religion and Chinese Society 7/1, 120-148. https://doi.org/10.1163/22143955-00701006
100. Trovato, Gabriele - Zecca, Massimiliano - Sessa, Salvatore - Jamone, Lorenzo - Ham, Jaap - Hashimoto, Kenji - Takanishi, Atsuo. 2013. “Cross-Cultural Study on Human-Robot Greeting Interaction: Acceptance and Discomfort by Egyptians and Japanese”. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics 4/2, 83-93. https://doi.org/10.2478/pjbr-2013-0006
101. Trovato, Gabriele - Cuellar, Francisco - Nishimura, Masao. 2016. “Introducing Theomorphic Robots”. 2016 IEEE-RAS 16th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids). 1245-1250. https://doi.org/10.1109/HUMANOIDS.2016.7803429
102. Trovato, Gabriele - Lucho, Cesar - Huerta Mercado, Alexander - Cuellar, Francisco. 2018a. “Design Strategies for Representing the Divine in Robots”. Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 29-35. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173386.3173388
103. Trovato, Gabriele - Lucho, Cesar - Ramon, Alvaro - Ramirez, Renzo - Rodriguez, Laureano - Cuellar, Francisco. 2018b. “The Creation of SanTO: A Robot with ‘Divine’ Features”. 437-442. 15th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots (UR). https://doi.org/10.1109/URAI.2018.8442207
104. Trovato, Gabriele - Kishi, Tatsuhiro - Kawai, Mao - Zhong, Tingting - Lin, Jia Yeu - Gu, Zixi - Oshiyama, Chiaki - Takanishi, Atsuo. 2019a. “The Creation of DarumaTO: A Social Companion Robot for Buddhist/Shinto Elderlies”. 2019 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM). 606-611. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIM.2019.8868736
105. Trovato, Gabriele - Pariasca, Franco - Ramirez, Renzo - Cerna, Javier - Reutskiy, Vadim - Rodriguez, Laureano - Cuellar, Francisco. 2019b. “Communicating with SanTO–the First Catholic Robot”. 2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN46459.2019.8956250
106. Trovato, Gabriele - Weng, Yueh-Hsuan - Sgorbissa, Antonio - Wieching, Rainer. 2021a. “Editorial Introduction to Special Issue on Religion in Robotics”. International Journal of Social Robotics 13/4, 537-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00808-3
107. Trovato, Gabriele - Chamas, Loys De Saint - Nishimura, Masao - Paredes, Renato - Lucho, Cesar - Huerta Mercado, Alexander - Cuellar, Francisco. 2021b. “Religion and Robots: Towards the Synthesis of Two Extremes”. International Journal of Social Robotics 13, 539-556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00553-8
108. Valbelle, Dominique. 1998. Eski Mısır’da Yaşam. Translated by Cem Muhtaroğlu. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
109. Vudka, Amir. 2020. “The Golem in the Age of Artificial Intelligence”. Necsus: European Journal of Media Studies 9/1, 101-123. https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/14326
110. Wainwright, Gerald Avery. 1933. “The Bull Standards of Egypt”. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 19/1-2, 42-52. https://doi.org/10.2307/3854855
111. Wecker, Alan - Lavee, Moshe. 2020. “Social Robots and Religion: The Case of Judaism”. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2696, 18-19. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2724/paper6.pdf
112. Weng, Yueh-Hsuan - Hirata, Yasuhisa - Sakura, Osamu - Sugahara, Yusuke. 2019. “The Religious Impacts of Taoism on Ethically Aligned Design in HRI”. International Journal of Social Robotics 11/5, 829-839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00594-z
113. Wiener, Norbert. 1964.God and Golem, Inc. A Comment of Certain Points Where Cybernetics Impinges on Religion. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
114. Wilkinson, Toby. 2010. The Rise and Fall of Ancient Egypt. New York: Random House.