Discussions on Ibn Sīnā’s Proof (Ishārah) That Existence Is Not Added to The Necessary: al-Rāzī, al-Ṭūsī, And Ṣadr al-Sharīʿah

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2, 279 - 309, 31.12.2024

Güvenç Şensoy

https://doi.org/10.12730/is.1329405

Öz

Later theologians and Peripatetic philosophers concur that existence is added to contingents. However, while philosophers assert that existence is not added to the Necessary, theologians dispute this judgment. According to the argument presented in the fourth namaṭ of Ibn Sīnā’s (d. 428/1037) al-Ishārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt, accepting essence as the cause of existence leads to certain issues. The most prominent of these is taqaddum, which is the precedence of something over itself. This study explores Ibn Sīnā’s argument, al-Rāzī’s (d. 606/1210) objections in his Sharḥ, al-Ṭūsī’s (d. 672/1274) responses to these objections, and Ṣadr al-Sharīʿah’s (d. 747/1346) analysis of al-Ṭūsī’s responses. By focusing on these figures, we can understand how the acceptance of the concept of wujūd (existence), one of the concepts of al-umūr al-ʿāmmah (general concepts), influenced the course of the debate. Unlike the aforementioned scholars, Ṣadr al-Sharīʿah accepts that existence is shared in terms of expression and thus rejects both the distinction between existence and essence and the notion of accidentality. This study will first underscore the critical role of the distinction between existence and essence in the Peripatetic system. After elucidating the position of this distinction within the Peripatetic framework, I will delve into the proof of al-Ishārāt, the central focus of this study. This analysis will examine the approaches of al-Rāzī, al-Ṭūsī, and Ṣadr al-Sharīʿah in terms of their comparative and interconnected perspectives on the proof. Notably, Ṣadr al-Sharīʿah’s approach, which has gained attention in modern scholarship for its methodological significance but has seen less focus on its theological implications, will be particularly emphasized.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kalām, the existence-essence distinction, Necessary being, Ibn Sīnā, al-Rāzī, al-Ṭūsī, Ṣadr al-Sharīʿah

Kaynakça

• Açıkgenç, Alparslan. “İslam Felsefesinde Varlık Öğretilerinin Öncüleri”. Felsefe Dünyası 13 (1994), 7-16.
• Adamson, Peter. “Before Essence and Existence: al-Kindi’s Conception of Being”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 40/3 (2002), 297-312.
• Adamson, Peter. “From the Neccessary Existent to God”. Interpreting Avicenna. ed. Peter Adamson. 170-189. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
• Akgün, Tuncay. “Meşşâi Filozoflar ve Gazâlî’nin Ontolojisinde Varlık-Mâhiyet Tartışmaları”. ÇÜİFD 16/2 (2016), 235-258.
• Alper, Ömer Mahir. “İbn Sînâ ve İbn Sînâ Okulu”. İslam Felsefesi: Tarih ve Problemler. ed. M. Cüneyt Kaya. 251-287. Ankara: TDV İSAM Yayınları, 2013.
• Alper, Ömer Mahir. “İbn Sînâ’da Tanrı’nın Kanıtlanması Sorunu: O Gerçekten Kelâmcılardan Etkilendi mi?” İstanbul Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 7 (2003), 61-77.
• Altaş, Eşref. Fahreddin er-Râzî’nin İbn Sînâ Yorumu ve Eleştirisi. İstanbul: Marmara University, Institute of Social Science, PhD Dissertation, 2009.
• Ay, Mahmut. Sadruşşerîa’da Varlık Ta’dîlu’l-’ulûm Temelinde Kelam-Felsefe Karşılaşması. Ankara: İlâhiyât, 2006.
• Ayğan, Fadıl. “Zorunlu Varlığı İspat Bağlamında İbn Sînâ'da Varlık-Mahiyet İlişkisi: Ontolojiden Teolojiye”. İslâmî İlimler Dergisi 10/1 (2015), 111-131.
• Belo, Catarina. “Essence and Existence in Avicenna and Averroes”. al-Qantara 30/2 (2009), 403-426.
• Bertolacci, Amos. “‘Necessary’ as Primary Concept in Avicenna’s Metaphysics”. Conoscenza e Contingenza Nella Tradizione Aristotelica Medievale. ed. G. Fioravanti - S. Perfetti. 31-51. Pisa: ETS, 2008.
• Bertolacci, Amos. “The Distinction of Essence and Existence in Avicenna’s Metaphysics: The Text and its Context”. Islamic Philosophy, Science, Culture, and Religion. ed. Felicitas Opwis - David Reisman. 257-288. Leiden: Brill, 2012.
• Davidson, Herbert A. “Avicenna’s Proof of the Existence of God as a Necessarily Existent Being”. Islamic Philosophical Theology. ed. Parviz Morewedge. 165-187. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1979.
• al-Fārābî, Abū Nasr Muhammad. Kitāb al-fusūs. Haydârâbâd: Matbaatu Meclisu Dâiretü’l-Maarifi’l-Osmaniyye, 1926.
• al-Fārābî, Abū Nasr Muhammad. Kitāb al-hurūf. ed. Ömer Türker. İstanbul: Litera Yayıncılık, 2008.
• Ibn Sīnā. İşaretler ve Tembihler: al-Ishārāt wa't-tanbīhāt. ed. Ali Durusoy vd. İstanbul: Litera Yayıncılık, 2005.
• İzutsu, Toshihiko. The Concept and Reality of Existence. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Book Trust, 2007.
• Kaş, Murat. Seyyid Şerîf Cürcânî’de Zihnî Varlık. İstanbul: Marmara University, Institute of Social Science, PhD Dissertation, 2017.
• Kaya, M. Cüneyt. Varlık ve İmkân Aristoteles’ten İbn Sînâ’ya İmkânın Tarihi. İstanbul: Klasik Yayınları, 2011.
• Malik, Fazlurrahman. “Essence and Existence in Avicenna”. Medieval and Renaissance Studies 4 (1958), 1-16.
• Marmura, Michael E. “Avicenna and the Kalam”. Probing in Islamic Philosophy-Studies in the Philosophies of İbn Sînâ, al-Ghazâlî and Other Major Muslim Thinkers. 97-131. New York: Global Academic Publishing, 2005.
• Marmura, Michael E. “Avicenna’s Proof from Contingency for God’s Existence in the Metaphysics of the Shifā’”. Mediaeval Studies 42 (1980), 337-352.
• Morewedge, Parviz. “Philosophical Analysis and Ibn Sīnā’s ‘Essence-Existence’ Distinction”. Journal of the American Oriental Society 92/3 (1972), 425-435.
• al-Rāzī, Fakhr al-Din. Sharḥ al-Ishārāt wa't-tanbīhāt. ed. Ali Rıza Necefzâde. Tahran: Encümen-i Asar ve Mefahir-i Ferhengi, 2005.
• Reçber, Mehmet Sait. “Fârâbi ve Tanrı’nın Basitliği Meselesi”. Uluslararası Fârâbî Sempozyumu Bildirileri. ed. Gürbüz Deniz - Hayrani Altıntaş. 213-227. Ankara: Elis Yayınları, 2005.
• Ṣadr al-Sharīʿah, ʿUbayd Allāh Ibn Masʿūd. Sharḥ al-Taʿdīl al-ʿulūm. Süleymaniye Library, Antalya-Tekelioğlu, 798.
• Şensoy, Güvenç. Sadruşşerîa’nın Kelâmı Ta’dîl Teşebbüsü Varlık ve Ulûhiyyet Merkezli Bir İnceleme. İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Vakfı Yayınları, 2023.
• Taşkın, Bilal. İslâm Düşüncesinde Varlık Tartışmaları: Sadeddin et-Teftâzânî Merkezli Bir İnceleme. İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık, 2020.
• Terkan, Fehrullah. Recurrence of the Perennial Encounter? Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd on God’s Knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago, PhD Dissertation, 2004.
• al-Ṭūsī, Nasīruddīn. Sharḥ al-Ishārāt wa't-tanbīhāt. ed. Süleyman Dünya. Cairo: Dar al-Ma'arif.
• Türker, Ömer. İslam Felsefesine Konusal Giriş. Ankara: Bilimsel Araştırma Yayınları, 2020.
• Türker, Ömer. “Mahiyet Teorisi”. Metafizik. ed. Ömer Türker. 2/672-294. İstanbul: Ketebe Yayınları, 2021.
• Türker, Ömer. “Metafizik: Varlık ve Tanrı”. İslam Felsefesi: Tarih ve Problemler. ed. M. Cüneyt Kaya. 603-654. Ankara: TDV İSAM Yayınları, 2013.
• Üçer, İbrahim Halil. İbn Sînâ Felsefesinde Suret, Cevher ve Varlık. İstanbul: Klasik Yayınları, 2017.
• Wisnovsky, Robert. Avicenna’s Metaphysics in Context. New York: Cornell University Press, 2003.
• Wisnovsky, Robert. “Notes on Avicenna’s Concept of Thingness (Say’iyya)”. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 10 (2000), 181-221.