Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Broadcasting A Festivity Without Offending The Other

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2, 13 - 41, 01.11.2012

Öz

This paper deals with how Turkish commercial channels serve wholeheartedly the demands of political and military officials on issues involving national sentiments. Nevruz Bayramı, (a folk festivity) which was initiated before the arrest of PKK leader Abdullah Öcalan in 1999 as a symbol to both reinforce Kurdish identity and challenge Turkish national unity, was originally anathema to Turkish authorities. Now the media have thrown their weight behind the official campaign to transform the concept of Nevruz, providing full coverage to the newly-evolved Nevruz, a pseudo-event staged for public consumption. This paper hopes to shed some light on the media-state partnership in creating the new concept of Nevruz, now a government symbol of nationality, examining the reasons the media so thoroughly cooperated with authorities in constructing a new reality around Nevruz, how they in so doing served their own interests and preserved their economic monopoly

Kaynakça

  • Becker, K.(1995). Media and the ritual process. Media Culture and Society, 17 (4), 629-647.
  • Blumler, J.G.(1993). Meshing money with mission: Purity versus pragmatism in public broadcasting. Journal of Communication, 8(4), 403-425.
  • Bulck, V. den (1993). Television and the social construction of political reality. IAMCR, Dublin (June 25-26).
  • Chomsky, N. (1989). (Medya Gerçeği). Necessary Illusions: Thought Control in Democratic Societies. İstanbul: Karınca Yayın. Southend Press, Boston, Massachusets.
  • Cottle, S. (1995). The production of news formats: Determinants of mediated public contestation. Media Culture and Society. 17(2), 275-293.
  • Galtung, j. (1999). State, capital, and civil society. In Richard C.V., Kaarle N., Michael T. Towards equity in global communication ( pp.1-21). New Jersey: Hampton Press (eds.)
  • Garnham, N. (1995). The media and the narrative of the intellectual. Media Culture and Society. 17(3), 359-385.
  • Grenier, M. (1994). Native Indians in the English Canadian press. The case of the oka crisis. Media Culture and Society. 16(2), 313-337.
  • Halloran, J.D.(1993). The European image: Unity in diversity-myth or reality? Media Development, Journal of the World Association for Christian Communication, 40(4), 23-30
  • Hawkins, R.W. (1992). Perspectives on information technology policy. IAMCR, Brasil (August 16-22).
  • Hellman, H. & Sauri T. (1994). Public service television and the tendency towards convergence: Trends in prime time program structure in Finland, 1970-92. Media Cultureand Society, 16 (1), 47-73.
  • Husband,C. (1993). Europe, media and identities: The European Community and ethnic minorities. Media Development, Journal of the World Association for Christian Communication, 40(4), 14-19.
  • Johnsen, J. & Mathiesen, T. (1992) A war in the name of freedom , The Nordicom Review of Nordic Mass Communication Research, 2, 20-28.
  • Kim, C.W. & Lee, H-S. (1992). Political power and mass manipulation: A case study of (South ) Korea. IAMCR, Brasil(August 16-22).
  • Maggiore, M. (1990). Audiovisual production in the single market. Commission of the EC. Luxemburg.
  • Mistry, Reena (1999). “Can Gramsci’s Theory of Hegemony Help us to Understand the representation of the Ethnic Minority in Western Television and Cinema” http://www.theory.org.uk/crt-rol6.htm
  • Sandman, P. M., Rubin,D.M. & Sachsman, D.B. (1982). Media: An introductory analysis of American mass communication. New Jersey: Prantice Hall, Inc.
  • Schlesinger, P. (1991). (Medya Devlet Ulus). Media State and Nation: Political Violence and Identities. İstanbul: Ayrıntı.Sage Publications.
  • Şahin, H. & Aksoy, A. (1993). Global media and cultural identity in Turkey, Journal of Communication. 43(2), 31-41.
  • Tekinalp, Ş. (1996). Mainstream-centering political views in Turkish elections. In Political communication research (pp.145-163). New jersey: Ablex (eds.)
  • Tveiten, O. (1992). News ideology of development and dependency: US media and the 1990 elections in Nicaragua. IAMCR, Brasil (August 16-22).
  • Wasburn, P. C. (1995). Democracy and media ownership: A comparison of commercial, public and government broadcast news, Media Culture and Society, 17 (4), 647-677.

-

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2, 13 - 41, 01.11.2012

Öz

-

Kaynakça

  • Becker, K.(1995). Media and the ritual process. Media Culture and Society, 17 (4), 629-647.
  • Blumler, J.G.(1993). Meshing money with mission: Purity versus pragmatism in public broadcasting. Journal of Communication, 8(4), 403-425.
  • Bulck, V. den (1993). Television and the social construction of political reality. IAMCR, Dublin (June 25-26).
  • Chomsky, N. (1989). (Medya Gerçeği). Necessary Illusions: Thought Control in Democratic Societies. İstanbul: Karınca Yayın. Southend Press, Boston, Massachusets.
  • Cottle, S. (1995). The production of news formats: Determinants of mediated public contestation. Media Culture and Society. 17(2), 275-293.
  • Galtung, j. (1999). State, capital, and civil society. In Richard C.V., Kaarle N., Michael T. Towards equity in global communication ( pp.1-21). New Jersey: Hampton Press (eds.)
  • Garnham, N. (1995). The media and the narrative of the intellectual. Media Culture and Society. 17(3), 359-385.
  • Grenier, M. (1994). Native Indians in the English Canadian press. The case of the oka crisis. Media Culture and Society. 16(2), 313-337.
  • Halloran, J.D.(1993). The European image: Unity in diversity-myth or reality? Media Development, Journal of the World Association for Christian Communication, 40(4), 23-30
  • Hawkins, R.W. (1992). Perspectives on information technology policy. IAMCR, Brasil (August 16-22).
  • Hellman, H. & Sauri T. (1994). Public service television and the tendency towards convergence: Trends in prime time program structure in Finland, 1970-92. Media Cultureand Society, 16 (1), 47-73.
  • Husband,C. (1993). Europe, media and identities: The European Community and ethnic minorities. Media Development, Journal of the World Association for Christian Communication, 40(4), 14-19.
  • Johnsen, J. & Mathiesen, T. (1992) A war in the name of freedom , The Nordicom Review of Nordic Mass Communication Research, 2, 20-28.
  • Kim, C.W. & Lee, H-S. (1992). Political power and mass manipulation: A case study of (South ) Korea. IAMCR, Brasil(August 16-22).
  • Maggiore, M. (1990). Audiovisual production in the single market. Commission of the EC. Luxemburg.
  • Mistry, Reena (1999). “Can Gramsci’s Theory of Hegemony Help us to Understand the representation of the Ethnic Minority in Western Television and Cinema” http://www.theory.org.uk/crt-rol6.htm
  • Sandman, P. M., Rubin,D.M. & Sachsman, D.B. (1982). Media: An introductory analysis of American mass communication. New Jersey: Prantice Hall, Inc.
  • Schlesinger, P. (1991). (Medya Devlet Ulus). Media State and Nation: Political Violence and Identities. İstanbul: Ayrıntı.Sage Publications.
  • Şahin, H. & Aksoy, A. (1993). Global media and cultural identity in Turkey, Journal of Communication. 43(2), 31-41.
  • Tekinalp, Ş. (1996). Mainstream-centering political views in Turkish elections. In Political communication research (pp.145-163). New jersey: Ablex (eds.)
  • Tveiten, O. (1992). News ideology of development and dependency: US media and the 1990 elections in Nicaragua. IAMCR, Brasil (August 16-22).
  • Wasburn, P. C. (1995). Democracy and media ownership: A comparison of commercial, public and government broadcast news, Media Culture and Society, 17 (4), 647-677.
Toplam 22 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Şermin Tekinalp Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Kasım 2012
Gönderilme Tarihi 2 Temmuz 2012
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2012 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Tekinalp, Ş. (2012). -. İstanbul Arel Üniversitesi İletişim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 13-41.