Örgüt Kültürünün Girişimciliğe Etkisinde Özyeterliliğin Düzenleyici Rolü

Öz

Örgüt kültürü pek çok örgütsel değişkeni etkilediği gibi çalışanların girişimcilik davranışını da etkilemektedir. Ancak bu etkide çeşitli değişkenlerin farklı etkilerinin olabileceği de düşünülmektedir. Bu araştırma ile çalışanların girişimci davranışlarında örgüt kültürünün rolü ve bu etkide öz yeterliliğin düzenleyici etkileri belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Savunma sektöründe yapılan bir araştırma ile 583 çalışanın tutumları ölçülerek açıklayıcı bulgulara ulaşılmaya çalışılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda, dışa dönük örgüt kültürü türleri olan gelişimsel ve rasyonel kültürün çalışanların girişimci davranışı olumlu yönde etkilediği ve bu etkilerde öz yeterliliğin düzenleyici etkisinin olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, düzenleyici etki analizleri regresyon eğrileri ile sınanmış ve düşük ve yüksek öz yeterliliğin örgüt kültürleri- girişimci davranış ilişkisindeki düzenleyici rolü irdelenmiştir. Bu kapsamda gelişimsel örgüt kültürü-girişimci davranış ilişkisinde düşük seviyede öz yeterliliğin pozitif düzenleyici etkisinin olduğu, rasyonel kültür -girişimci davranış ilişkisinde ise düşük seviyede öz yeterliliğin pozitif yönde yüksek seviyede öz yeterliliğinde negatif yönde düzenleyici etkisinin olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Gelişim Kültürü, Rasyonel Kültür, Girişimcilik, Öz Yeterlilik, Düzenleyici Etki

The Role Of Self Efficacy In The Relationship Between Organizational Culture And Enterpreunal Behaviors As A Moderator

Abstract

Organizational culture affects many organizational variables including employees' entrepreneurial behavior. However, it is also believed that there are different impacts of various variables on this effect. The aim of this study is to determine the moderating role of self efficacy in the relationship between organizational culture and entrepreneurial behaviors. The sample of the research is comprised of the employees of small scale defense industry enterprises and the workers of the outsourcing companies working for defense industry. In order to obtain descriptive findings, the research hypotheses are tested using data collected from 583 employees with a questionnaire survey. The results of the research demonstrate that external focused organizational culture types-developmental culture and rational culture-increase the entrepreneurial behavior of the employees. In addition, the results also prove that the self efficacy has a moderator effect on the relationship between both the developmental culture-entrepreneurial behavior and the rational culture-entrepreneurial behavior. Additionally the analyses of moderating effect were examined by drawing regression curves in case of low and high level of self-efficacy. In this context, it is determined that low level of self-efficacy has positive moderating effect in the relationship between development culture and entrepreneurial behaviors, while high level of self-efficacy has negative moderating effect and low level of self-efficacy has positive moderating effect in the relationship between rational culture and entrepreneurial behaviors. Finally, the findings are compared with the literature and some recommendations are suggested for executives and researchers.

Keywords

• Development Culture, Rational Culture, Entrepreneurship, Self Efficacy, Moderator Effect

Kaynakça

1. Ağca, V. ve Kurt, M. (2007), İç Girişimcilik ve Temel Belirleyicileri: Kavramsal Bir Çerçeve, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 29, s. 83–112.
2. Aiken, L. S. ve West, S. G. (1991), Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting In- teractions, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Akkoç, İ., Turunç, Ö. ve Çalışkan, A. (2011), Gelişim Kültürü ve Lider Desteğinin Yenilikçi Davranış ve İş Performansına Etkisi: İş-Aile Çatışmasının Aracılık Rolü İş. Güç Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 13 (4), s. 83-114.
4. Antoncic, B. ve Hisrich, R. D. (2001), Intrap- reneurship: Construct Refinement And Cross-Cultural Validation, Journal Of Business Venturing, 16, s. 495–527.
5. Antoncic, B. ve Hisrich, R.D. (2003), Clarif- ying The Intrapreneurship Concept, Jo- urnal of Small Business And Enterprise Development, 10(1), s. 7–24.
6. Antoncic, B.ve Hisrich, R. D. (2000), Intrap- reneurship Modeling in Transition Eco- nomies: A Comparison of Slovenia And The United States”, Journal of Develop- mental Entrepreneurship, 5(1), s. 21–40.
7. Armeli, S, Gunthert K, Lawrence C. (2001), Stressor Appraisals, Coping And Post- Event Outcomes: The Dimensionality And Antecedents Of Stress-Related Growth. J Soc Clin Psychol; 20, s. 366- 395.
8. Artan, İ. E., M. Yener ve S. E. Aykol (2008), Girişimcilik Değerleri ve Girişimcilik Davranışı Yönelimleri Üzerine Bir Araş- tırma, 16. Yönetim Ve Organizasyon Kongresi, İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi, s. 282-288.

9. Bandura, A. (1977), Self-Efficacy: Toward A Unifying Theory Of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84(2), s. 191-215.
10. Bandura, A. (1986), Social Foundation Of Thought And Action. Englewood Cliffs, Nj: Prentice Hall.
11. Bandura, A. (1995), Self-Efficacy İn Chan- ging Societies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Bandura, A. (1997), Self-Efficacy: The Exer- cise Of Control. New York: Freeman.
13. Bandura, A. (2002), Growing Primacy of Human Agency in Adaptation and Change in the Electronic Era, European Psychologist, 7(1), s. 2-16.
14. Bandura, A., ve Cervone, D. (1986), Diffe- rential Engagement Of Self-Reactive In- fluences in Cognitive Motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38, s. 92–113.
15. Baron, R. M. ve Kenny, D. A. (1986), The Mo- derator–Mediator Variable Distinction İn Social Psychological Research: Con- ceptual, Strategic, And Statistical Con- siderations. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
16. Baum, J. R. ve Locke, E.A. (2004), The Rela- tionship of Entrepreneurial Traits, Skill, and Motivation to Subsequent Venture Growth. Journal of Applied Psycho- logy, 89(4), s. 587–598.
17. Bridge, S. (L998), Understanding Enterprise, Entrepreneurship And Small Business, London: Macmillan Business.
18. Bridge, S. vd. (l998). Understanding Enterp- rise, Entrepreneurship And Small Busi- ness, London: Macmillan Business.
19. Burns, T. ve Stalker, G. M. (1961), The Ma- nagement of Innovation. London: Ta- vistock Publications.
20. Covin, J.G. ve Slevin, D.P. (1986), The Deve- lopment And Testing Of An Organiza- tional-Level Entrepreneurship-Scale, Ronstadt, R., Hornaday, J., Peterson, R., Vesper, K. (Ed.), Frontiers Of Entrepre- neurship Research, 628-639, Babson College Center For Entrepreneurship Research, Wellesley, Ma.
21. Covin, J.G., Ve Slevin, D.P. (1991), A Con- ceptual Model Of Entrepreneurship As Firm Behavior, Entrepreneurship The- ory And Practice, 16(1), s. 7-25.
22. Çetin, F. (2011), Örgüt İçi Girişimcilikte Öz Yeterlilik Algısı ve Kontrol Odağının Rolü. Business and Economics Research Journal, 2(3), s. 69–85.
23. Deal, T. E. ve Kennedy, A. A. (1982), Corpo- rate Cultures: The Rights And Rituals Of Corporate Life. Reading, MA: Addi- son-Wesley.
24. Denison, D. R. (1984), Bringing Corporate Culture To The Bottom Line. Organiza- tional Dynamics, 13(2), s. 5-22.
25. Denison, D. R. ve Mishra, A. K. (1995), Or- ganizational Culture And Effectiveness, Organization Science, 6(2), s. 204–224.
26. Deshpande, R. ve Webster, Jr. F. E. (1989), Organizational Culture and Marketing: Defining The Research Agenda, Journal of Marketing, 53, s. 3–15.
27. Drucker, P. F. (1985), Innovation And En- trepreneurship, Oxford, Butterworth- Heinemann.
28. Elenkov, D. S. ve Manev I. M. (2009). Senior Expatriate Leadership’s Effects on In- novation and the Role of Cultural Intel- ligence, Journal of World Business, 44, 357-369.
29. Fiş, M. A. ve Wasti, A. S. (2009), Örgüt Kül- türü Ve Girişimcilik Yönelimi İlişkisi, ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, 35 (Özel Sayı), s. 127-164.
30. Flynn, F. J. ve Chatman, J. A. (2001). Strong Cultures and Innovation: Oxymoron or Opportunity? In C. L. Cooper, S. Cartw- right, ve P. C. Earley (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences. New York: Wiley.
31. Fraser, J. (1996), The Impact Of Organizatio- nal Composition on The Emergence of Corporate Culture. Georgia State Uni- versity. Unpublished Dissertation.
32. Gist, M. E. (1987), Self-efficacy: Implications for Organizational Behavior And Human Resource Management, Aca- demy of Management Review, 12, s. 472–485.
33. Gordon, C., Lim, L., Mckinnon, D. ve Nkala, F. (1998), Learning Approach, Control Orientation And Self-Efficacy Of Begin- ning Teacher Education Students. Asia- Pacific Journal of Teacher Education & Development, 1(1), s. 53-63.
34. Grau, R., Salanova, M., & Peiro, J. M. (2001). Moderator effects of self-efficacy on oc- cupational stress. Psychology in Spain, 5(1), s. 63–74.
35. Gutiérrez-Doña, B., Lippke, S., Renner B., Kwon S. ve Schwarzer R. (2009), Self-Ef- ficacy and Planning Predict Dietary Be- haviors in Costa Rican and South Korean Women: Two Moderated Me- diation Analyses Applied Psychology: Health And Well-Being, 1(1), s. 91–104.
36. Hayton, J. C., George, G. ve Zahra, S. A. (2002), National Culture And Entrepre- neurship: A Review Of Behavioral Re- search. Entrepreneurship Theory And Practice, 26(4), s. 33–52.
37. Heracleous, L. (2001). An Ethnographic Study of Culture in The Context of Or- ganizational Change. Journal of App- lied Behavioral Science, 37, 426-446.
38. Hisrich, R. D. ve Peters, M. (1998), Entrepre- neurship. 4th Edition. United States: The Mcgraw – Hill Book Co.
39. Hisrich, R. D. ve Peters, M. (2001), Entrepre- neurship, 5th Ed., Mcgraw-Hill Higher
40. Hofstede, G. (1980), Culture’s Consequen- ces: International Differences İn Work- Related Values. Beverly Hill, CA: Sage Publications.
41. Hofstede, G. (2001), Culture’s Consequen- ces: International Differences İn Work Related Values (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. Hornsby, J. S., Kuratko, D. F. ve Zahra, S. A. (2002), Middle Managers’ Perception of the Internal Environment for Corporate Entrepreneurship: Assessing a Measu- rement Scale, Journal of Business Ven- turing, 17, s. 253-273.
43. Ireland, R. D., Hıtt, M. A., Camp, S. M. ve Sexton, D. L. (2001), Integrating Entrep- reneurship and Strategic Management Actions To Create Firm Wealth, Aca- demy Of Management Executive, 15, s. 49-63.
44. Jaskyte K., (2004). Transformational Lea- dership, Organizational Culture, and Innovativeness in Nonprofit Organiza- tions. Nonprofit Management & Lea- dership, 15(2),153-168.
45. Jaskyte, K. (2003). Organizational Culture and Innovation in Nonprofit Human Service Organizations. Dissertation Abstracts International, 63, 10.
46. Jennings, D. F., ve Lumpkin, J.R. (1989), Functioning Modeling Corporate En- trepreneurship: An Empirical Integra- tive Management,15(3), s. 485-502. Journal of
47. Khandwalla, P. N. (1976), The Design of Or- ganizations. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
48. Kilmann, R.R.; Saxton, M.J. ve Sepra, R., (1985), Five Key Issues İn Understan- ding And Changing Culture, Gaining Control Of The Corporate Culture, Ralph H. Kilman (Ed.), Jossey-Bass., s.1- 16.
49. Knight, G.A. (1997), Cross-Cultural Reliabi- lity And Validity of A Scale To Measure Firm Entrepreneurial Orientation, Jour- nal Of Business Venturing, 12, s. 213- 225.
50. Kotter, J. P., ve Heskett, J. L. (1992), Corpo- rate Culture And Performance. New York: The Free Press.
51. Krueger, N. F. ve Brazeal, D. V. (1994), En- trepreneurial Potential and Potential Entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship The- ory and Practice, Spring, s. 91-104.
52. Lau, C. M. ve Ngo, H.Y. (2004). The Hr System, Organizational Culture, And Product İnnovation. International Busi- ness Review, 13(6), 685–703.
53. Lombardo, T. (2006), Thinking Ahead: The Value Od Future Consciousness. The Futurist, 40(1), s. 45-50.
54. Louis, M.R. (1983), Organizations As Cul- ture-Bearing Milieux. L. Pondy, P. Frost, G. Morgan, Ve T. E. Dandridge (Eds.). Organizational Symbolism, Gre- enwich, CT: JAI Press.
55. Lumpkin, G.T. ve Dess, G.G. (1996), Clarif- ying The Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct And Linking İt To Perfor- mance, Academy of Management Re- view, 21(1), s. 135-172.
56. Luszczynska, A., Scholz, U. ve Schwarzer, R. (2005), The General Self-Efficacy Scale: Multicultural Validation Studies. The Jo- urnal of Psychology, 139(5), s. 439-457.
57. Mau, Wei-Cheng. (2000), Cultural Differen- ces İn Career Decision-Making Styles And Self-Efficacy, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57, s. 365–378.
58. Miller, D. (1983), The Correlates of Entrep- reneurship in Three Types of Firms, Management Science, 29, s. 770–791.
59. Miller, D. ve Friesen, P. H. (1982), Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms: Two Models of Strategic Mo- mentum, Strategic Management Jour- nal, 3(1), s. 1-25.
60. Morris, M. H. ve Kuratko, D. F. (2002), Cor- porate Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneu- rial Organizations, Harcourt College Pub- lishers, Orlando, Florida. Within
61. Naffziger, D. (l995),Entrepreneurship: A Per- son Based Theory Approach” Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, And Growth, Volume 2, JAI Pres.
62. Nasurdin, A. M., Ramayah T. ve Beng Y. C. (2009), The Impacts Of Structure, Cli- mate and Selfefficacy On Stress: A Ma- laysian Survey, Asian Academy of Management Journal, 14(1), s. 59–79.
63. Oettigen, G. (1995), Cross-Cultural Perspec- tive Bandura(Ed.), Self-Efficacy İn Changing Societies (Pp. 149-176). New York: Cam- bridge University Press. In A.
64. O'reilly, C. ve Chatman, J. (1996), Culture As Social Control: Corporations, Cults And Commitment. In, B. Staw Ve L. Cum- mings (Eds.), Research in Organizatio- nal Behavior,. 18. (p. 157-200). Jaı Press.
65. Pajares, F. ve Cheong, Y. F. (2003), Achieve- ment Goal Orientations in Writing: A Developmental Perspective. Internatio- nal Journal of Educational Research 39, s. 437–455.
66. Pearce, J. A., Kramer, T. R. ve Robbins, K. D. (1997), Effects Ofmanagers’ Entrepre- neurial Behaviour On Subordinates. Jo- urnal of Business Venturing 12, 147–160.
67. Pfeffer, J. (1981), Management As Symbolic Action: The Creation and Maintenance of Organizational Paradigms." L. L. Cummings Ve B. M . Staw (Ed.), Rese- arch in Organizational Behavior, 3: p. 1- 52. Greenwich. CT: JAI Press.
68. Phillips, J. M. ve Gully, S. M., (1997), Role Of Goal Orientation, Ability, Need For Ac- hievement, And Locus of Control in The Self-Efficacy And Goal-Setting Pro- cess. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82 (5), s. 792–802.
69. Poon, J. M. L., Ainuddin, R. A. ve Junit, S. H. (2006), Effects of Self-concept Traits and Entrepreneurial Orientation on Firm Performance. International Small Busi- ness Journal, 24(1), s. 61-82.
70. Prajogo, D. I. ve Mcdermott, C. M. (2005). The Relationship Between Total Quality Management Practices and Organiza- tional Culture, International Journal of Operations and Production Manage- ment, 25(11), 1101-1122.
71. Quinn, R. E. (1988), Beyond Rational Mana- gement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc Publishers.
72. Quinn, R. E. ve Spreitzer, G. E. (1991), The Psychometrics of The Competing Va- lues Culture Instrument and An Analy- sis of The Impact of Organizational Culture on Quality of Life, Research on Organizational Change and Develop- ment, 5, s. 115–142.
73. Robinson, P. B. vd. (1991), An Attitude App- roach To The Prediction Of Entreprene- urship, Entrepreneurship: Theory And Practice, 15 (4), s. 13-31.
74. Salas, E.ve Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2001), The Science of Training: A Decade of Prog- ress. Annual Review Of Psychology, 52, s. 471-499.
75. Schein, E. H. (1984), Coming to a New Awa- reness of Organizational Culture. Sloan Management Review, 25(2), s. 3–16.
76. Schein, E. H, (1986), Organizational Culture And Leadership, Jossey-Bass, London.
77. Schein, E. H. (1992), Organizational Culture And Leadership. (2nd Ed.). San Fran- cisco: Jossey-Bass.
78. Schwarzer, R.,ve Jerusalem, M. (1995), Ge- neralized Self-Efficacy Scale. In J. Wein- man, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in Health Psychology: A User’s Portfolio. Causal and Control Be- liefs (Pp. 35–37). Windsor, England: Nfer-Nelson.
79. Sekaran, U. (1992), Research Methods for Business, Canada: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
80. Seong, J. Y. (2011) The Effects of High Per- formance Work Systems, Entreprene- urship and Organizational Culture on Organizational Performance, Seoul Jo- urnal of Business, 17(1), 3–36.
81. Shane, S., ve Venkataraman, S. (2000), The Promise of Entrepreneurship As A Field of Research, Academy of Mana- gement Review, 25, s. 217–226.
82. Shariff, M. N. M. ve M. B. Saud (2009), An Attitude Approach To The Prediction Of Entrepreneurship On Students At Institution Of Higher Learning In Ma- laysia, International Journal Of Business And Management, 4 (4), s. 129-135.
83. Sharma, P. ve Chrisman, J. J. (1999), Toward a Reconciliation of the Definitional Is- sues in the Field of Corporate Entrepre- neurship, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), s. 11-17.
84. Sheldon Cohen, William J. Doyle, Ronald Turner, Cuneyt M. Alper, and David P. Skoner, (2003), Sociability And Suscep- tibility To The Common Cold Psycho- logical Science, Vol. 14, No. 5.
85. Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B.,ve Rogers, R. W. (1982), The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction And Validation. Psycho- logical Reports, 51, s. 663–671.
86. Siu, O. L., Spector, P. E., Cooper, C. L.,ve Lu, C. Q. (2005), Work Stress, Self-Efficacy, Chinese Work Values, and Work Well- Being in Hong Kong and Beijing, Inter- national Journal of Stress Management, 12(3), s. 274–288.
87. Škerlavaj, M., Song J. H., Lee Y. (2010), Or- ganizational Learning Culture, Innova- tive Culture And Innovations in South Korean Firms, Expert Systems With Applications, 37, s. 6390–6403.
88. Stevens, C. K. ve Gist, M. E. (1997), Effects Of Self-Efficacy And Goal Orientation Training On Negotiation Skill Mainte- nance: What Are The Mechanisms? Per- sonnel Psychology, 50, s. 955–978.
89. Stopford, J. M. ve Baden-Fuller, C. W. F. (1994), Creating Corporate Entreprene- urship, Strategic Management Journal, 15, s. 521–536.
90. Tseng, Y. F. ve Lee, T. Z. (2009), Comparing Appropriate Decision Support of Human Resource Practices on Organi- zational Performance With Dea/Ahp Model, Expert Systems With Applicati- ons, 36, s. 6548–6558.
91. Waldman, D. A., Ramirez G. G., House F. R. ve Puranam P. (2001), Does Leadership Matter? Ceo Leadership Attributes and Profitability Under Conditions of Per- ceived Environmental Uncertainty, Acadumy of Management Journal 44(1), s. 14–143.
92. Wallach, E. (1983), Individuals and Organi- zation: The Cultural Match. Training and Development Journal, 12, s. 28–36.
93. Wang, D. S. ve Shyu, C. L. (2003), The Impact of Organizational Culture and Know- ledge Sharing Motivation on Know- ledge Management Review, 11(3), s. 409–431. Sun Yat-Sen
94. Zahra, S. A. (1991), Predictors and Financial Outcomes of Corporate Entrepreneurs- hip: An Exploratory Study”, Journal of Business Venturuing, 6 (4), 259–285.
95. Zampetakis, L. A. Beldekos, P. ve Moustakis V. S. (2009), Day-To-Day’’ Entreprene- urship Within Organisations: The Role of Trait Emotional Intelligence and Per- ceived Organisational Support. Euro- pean Management Journal, 27, s. 165– 175.