AKIL RİSALELERİ GELENEĞİ VE BU GELENEK İÇİNDE EBÜ’L-BEREKÂT EL-BAĞDÂDÎ’NİN AKIL RİSALESİ

Yıl 2010, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 10, 75 - 106, 15.10.2010

Ferruh Özpilavcı

Öz

Discussions of Intellect, originating from Aristotle’s De Anima, caused a se
ries of works to come, which can be collected under the title of ‘treatises of in
tellect’ through ‘the expositor’Alexander Afrodisias who handled this issue in
an independent work named De Intellectu. Especially the theory of separate
active intellect which Alexander set forth in his treatise as a producer cause
of human intellect was discussed intensively by many of the commentators
like Themistius and John Philoponus, and had repercussions in the Islamic
world especially in Kindî and Farabî’s treatises of intellect.
One of the most remarkable examples in this tradition of treatises of in
tellect was presented by Abu’l-Barakât al-Baghdâdî, the philosopher with
Jewish origin but converted to Islam and well-known with his considerable
critiques to peripatetic philosophy, in his treatise in which he tried to recon
cile the religious, theological and philosophical views on the intellect in the
light of the verses of Koran and hadith. In this article, the views advanced
on the intellect, the comprehensive subject matter related to several areas
from epistemology to psychology, cosmology to eschatology, and ethics to
prophecy, have been generally discussed on the basis of treatises of intel
lect. In this context, especially Baghdâdî’s views have been examined focus
ing on his treatise ‘Sahîhu edilleti’n-nakl fî mahiyyeti’l-akl (the true religious
arguments on the essential character of intellect)’. His other works have also
been referred in the scope of this article.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Intellect, Treatises of Intellect, Abu’l-Barakât al-Baghdâdî, Active Intellect, John Philoponus.

Kaynakça

• Alexander Afrodisias, De anima, Scripta minora, c. II.1, (ed. Ivo Bruns), Berlin 1887, s. 1-100.
• __________, De intellectu, Scripta minora, c. II. 1, (ed. Ivo Bruns), Berlin 1887, s. 106-113.
• __________, Makâletü’l-İskender el-Afrûdîsî fi’l-akl alâ re’yi Aristutâlis, Şurûh alâ Aristu mef kûde fi’l-Yûnâniyye içinde, (neş. Abdurrahman Bedevî), Beyrut 1968, s. 31-42.
• Aristoteles, Nikomakhos’a Etik, (çev. Saffet Babür), Kebikeç Yayınları, Ankara 2005.
• __________, İkinci Çözümlemeler, (çev. Ali Houshiary), Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul 2005.
• __________, Metafizik, (çev.: Ahmet Arslan) Sosyal Yayınları, 2. baskı, İstanbul 1996.
• __________, On The Soul, (ed. D. Ross, çev., J. A. Smith), The Works of Aristotle içinde, c. I-XII, Oxford 1931.
• __________, De Anima, Books II-III (Translated with introduction and notes, David W. Hamlyn), Reprinted, Oxford 2002.
• __________, Ruh Üzerine (çev. Zeki Özcan), Alfa Yayınları, 2. baskı, İstanbul 2001.
• __________, fi’n-Nefs, (çev. Huneyn b. Ishak, neş., A. Bedevî), Dâru’l-kalem, 2. baskı, Beyrut 1980.
• Arkan, Atilla, İbn Rüşd Psikolojisi, Fizikten Metafiziğe İbn Rüşd’ün İnsan Tasavvuru, İz Yayıncılık, İstanbul 2006.
• __________, “Klasik Eser [De Anima] Okuyucusu ve Şarihi Olarak İbn Rüşd”, Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 12/2005, s. 1-23.
• Bedevî, Abdurrahman, “Nazariyyetü’l-akli’l-faal ‘ınde’l-Yûnân ve’l-Müslimîn ve’l-Lâtîn”, Aristoteles, fi’n-Nefs içinde, (çev. Huneyn b. Ishak, neş., A. Bedevî), Dâru’l-kalem, 2. baskı, Beyrut 1980, s. 1-14