Kuruma Yeni Gelen Bireylerin Uyguladıkları Proaktif Sosyalizasyon Taktikleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 8, 12 - 24, 28.12.2017

Dilek Güngörmez Orkun Demirbağ Uğur Yozgat

https://doi.org/10.23834/isrjournal.366717

Öz

Bu çalışma, kuruma yeni gelenlerin
uyguladıkları proaktif sosyalizasyon taktiklerin örgüte bağlılığa etkisinin ve
bu etkide sosyal bütünleşmenin aracı rolünün irdelenmesi amacıyla
gerçekleştirilmiştir. Gruman vd. (2006) tarafından yapılan araştırmanın bir
devam çalışması niteliğindeki çalışma kapsamında İstanbul ilinde on beş farklı
sektörde 371 kişi tarafından cevaplanan anketler değerlendirmeye tabi tutulmuş
ve yapılan analiz sonucunda; anketi cevaplayan kuruma yeni gelen çalışanların
uyguladıkları proaktif sosyalizasyon taktiklerinden geri bildirim arayışı, iş
değişim müzakereleri, üst ilişkileri, pozitif bakış açısı, genel sosyalleşme,
sosyal ağ kurma gibi taktikler, yeni gelenlerin örgüte bağlılıkları üzerinde
pozitif ve anlamlı bir etkiye sahipken; yine bu taktiklerden iş değişim
müzakereleri, geribildirim arayışı, sosyal ağ kurma ve pozitif bakış açısının
sosyal bütünleşme üzerinde pozitif ve anlamlı bir etkiye sahip olduğu ortaya
koyulmuştur. Araştırmada aynı zamanda, iş değişim müzakereleri, geribildirim
arayışı ve pozitif bakış gibi proaktif sosyalizasyon taktiklerinin örgüte
bağlılığa etkisinde sosyal bütünleşmenin kısmi aracı etkiye sahip olduğu
görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Proaktif Sosyalizasyon Taktikleri, Sosyal Bütünleşme, Örgüte Bağlılık

A Research on the Socialization Tactics Applied by Newcomers to the Institutions

Öz

The purpose of this study was to examine
the effect of proactive socialization tactics practised by newcomers on their
organizational commitment. Additionally, it was analyzed whether social
integration had a mediating role in this relationship. As a follow up study of
Gruman et.al (2006), we carried out a fieldwork including analysis of data
collected from 371 newcomer questionnaires from 15separete business spacein
Istanbul. The results indicated the proactive socialization tactics which
affected newcomers’ commitment to their organizations positively and
significantly were feedback seeking, job change negotiation, building
relationship with the boss, positive framing and general socializing. Besides,
it was revealed that social integration played a partial mediating role in the
relation between the tactics such a job change negotiation, feedback seeking,
positive framing and organizational commitment.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Proactive Socialization Tactics, Social İntegration, Organizational Commitment.

Kaynakça

• Alpkan, L., Ergün, E., Bulut, Ç., Yılmaz, C. (2005) “Şirket Girişimciliğinin Şirket Performansına Etkileri”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi 6 (2), Temmuz, 175-189.
• Allen, N.J. and Meyer, J.P. (1990), Organizational socialization tactics: a longitudinal analysis of links to newcomers’ commitment and role orientation, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 33 No.4, 847-858.
• Argün, M. (2007). Kurumsal Sosyalizasyon Uygulamalarının Birey- Kurum Uyumuna Etkileri, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi SBE.
• Ashford, S. J., & Black, S. J. (1996). Proactivity during organizational entry: The role of desire for control. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 199–214.
• Ashford, S. (1986). Feedback seeking in individual adaptation: a resource perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 465-487.
• Ashforth, B.E., Sluss, D. M., &Saks A.M. (2007). Socialization tactics, proactive behavior, and newcomer learning: Integrating socialization models, 70, 447-462.
• Ardts, J., Jansen, P., Van Der Velde, M.(2001). The breaking in of new employees: effectiveness of socialization tactics and personel instruments, Journal of Management Development, vol.20.2, 159-167
• Baron, R.M., Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 51(6):1173–1182
• Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1998). Testing the combined effects of newcomer information seeking and manager behavior on socialization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 72–83.
• Bauer T.N., Morrison E.W.,& Callister R.R. (1998). Organizational socialization: A review and directions for future research. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Managemet, Vol. 16, 149-214
• Bauer, T. N., Bodner, T., Erdogan, B., Truxillo, D. M., & Tucker, J. S. (2007). Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: A meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 707-721.
• Bauer, T.N. & Erdoğan B. (2011). Organizational Socialization Outcomes: Now and into the future. Oxford Handbook Chapter, Portland State University.
• Blau, G., (1999), Early-Career Job Factors Influencing the Professional Commitment of Medical Technologists, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42, No:6 687-695.
• Burke, S.A. (2009). Proactive Socialization: A longitudinal investigation of newcomer adjustment inside both an institutionalised and individualised workplace, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. University of Wellington.
• Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 875–884.
• Cooper-Thomas, H. and Anderson, N. (2002), Newcomer adjustment: the relationship between organizational socialization tactics, information acquisition and attitudes, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 75, 423-37
• Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435-462.
• Davis, K. & Newstrom; (1989), Human behavior at work: Organizational Behavior, New York: McGraw Hill.
• Feldman D.C. (1976). A contingency theory of socialization, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.21, 433-452.
• Filstad, C.(2011). Organizational commitment through organizational socialization tactics, Journal of Workplace Learning, Vol. 23, 376 – 390.
• Frese, M., Fay, D., Hilburger, T., Leng, K., & Tag, A. 1997. The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70: 139–161.
• Garavan, T. & Moreley, M. (1997).The socialization of high-potential graduates into the organization, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 12(2),118-137.
• Griffin, A. E. C., Colella, A., & Goparaju, S. (2000). Newcomer and organizational socialization tactics: An interactionist perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 453-474
• Gruman, J. A., Saks, A. M., & Zweig, D.I. (2006). Organizational socialization tactics and newcomer proactive behaviours: An İntegrative Study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 90-104.
• Jones, G.R. (1986), Socialization tactics, self-efficacy, and newcomers’ adjustments to organizations, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 29, 262-79.
• Kalaycı, Ş. (2009). Spss uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri, Ankara, Asil Yayın.
• Kim, T., Cable, D. M., & Kim, S. (2005). Socialization tactics, employee proactivity, and person–organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 232–241.
• Louis, M. R. (1980). Surprise and sense making: what newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64, 226–251.
• Major, D. A., & Kozlowski, W. J. (1997). Newcomer information seeking: individual and contextual influences. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 5(1), 16–28.
• Masterson, S. S., & Stamper, C. L. (2003). Perceived organizational membership: An aggregate framework representing the employee–organization relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 473–490.
• Menguç B., Han S.& Auh S. (2007). A test of a model of new salespeople’s socıalızatıon and adjustment ın a collectıvıst culture. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, Vol. XXVII, No. 2,149–167.
• Miller, V. D., & Jablin, F.M. (1991). Information seeking during organizational entry: Influences, tactics, and a model of the process. Academy of Management Review, 16, 92-120
• Morrison, E. W. (1993). Longitudinal study of the effects of information seeking on newcomer socialization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 173-183.
• Mowday, R.; R. Steers ve L. Porter; (1982), Employee-Organisation Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism and Turnover, Academic Press, London.
• Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M. ve Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 223-247.
• Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw Hill.
• Ostroff, C. and Kozlowski, S. (1992), Organizational socialization as a learning process: the role of information acquisition, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 45 No. 4, 849-874.
• Parker, S. K. (2000). From passive to proactive motivation: The importance of flexiblerole orientations and role breadth self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49(3), 447–469.
• Reichers, A. E. (1987). An interactionist perspective on newcomer socialization rates. Academy of Management Review, 12, 278–287.
• Saks, Alan M. ve Ashforth, Blake E. (1997). Organizational socialization: Making sense of the past and present as a prologue for the future. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51(2) , 234-279.
• Saks, Alan M. Gruman, Jamie A., (2011), Getting newcomers engaged: the role of socialization tactics, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 26, 383 – 402
• Saks, A.M., Uggerslev, K.L. and Fassina, N.E. (2007), Socialization tactics and newcomer adjustment: a meta-analytic review and test of a model, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 70, 413-446.
• Simosi, M .(2010). The role of social socialization tactics in the relationship between socialization content and newcomers' affective commitment, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 25, 301-327.
• Stumpf S. A., Hartman K., (1984). Individual exploration to organizational commitment of withdrawal, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 27, No.2, 308-329.
• Taormina, R.J. (1997). Organizational Socialization: A Multidomain, Continuous Process Model. International Journal of Selection and Assesment, 5(1), 29-47.
• Wang, J., Kim, T. (2013). Proactive socialization behavior in China: The mediating role of perceived insider status and the moderating role of supervisors’traditionally. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 34, 389–406.
• Wang, M., Kammeyer- Mueller, J.D., Liu, Y. (2014). Context, socialization and newcomer learning. Sage Publication, USA, 1-23.
• Wanberg, C. R., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2000). Predictors and outcomes of proactivity in the socialization process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 373-385.
• Van Maanen, J. and Schein, E.H. (1979), Toward a theory of organizational socialization, Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 1, 209-64.
• Weatherly, E.W. (1999). Newcomer and insider proactionin organizational socialization,Yayımlanmamış Doktara Tezi. University of Georgia.
• Yılmaz, C. (1999). Salesforce cooperation: The impact of relational, task, organizational and personal factors, Phd thesis, Texas Tech University.