Araştırma Makalesi

HYBRID PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS WITH MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS: EXAMPLE OF STORE MANAGERS

Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2 13 Eylül 2024
PDF İndir
TR EN

HYBRID PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS WITH MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS: EXAMPLE OF STORE MANAGERS

Öz

Effectively evaluating and enhancing managers' performance is crucial for achieving organizational success and maintaining competitive advantage in a dynamic business environment. This paper presents a new approach for store manager performance evaluation using a comprehensive framework that combines two important decision-making techniques: Global Fuzzy Step-by-Step Step Weight Rating Ratio Analysis (SF-SWARA) and Global Fuzzy Combined Consensus Solution (SF-CoCoSo). The presented SF-SWARA-CoCoSo method aims to address the inherent complexities and subjectivities involved in evaluating managers' performance by incorporating multiple perspectives and objective criteria into the evaluation process. The aim of this study is to apply multi-criteria decision-making methods in a hybrid way to evaluate the performance of store managers in a simple and understandable way. Global Fuzzy Step-by-Step Step Weight Rating Ratio Analysis (SF-SWARA) and Global Fuzzy Combined Consensus Solution (SF-CoCoSo) hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method were used in the study. The findings of the study reveal that the “Knowledge and Training Level” criterion is the most important criterion for the store manager and the criterion with the lowest importance is the “Salary” criterion. As a result of the study, it is concluded that the criterion “Knowledge and Education Level”, which is determined to be the most important criterion, has emerged due to the fact that today is the information age.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Store Manager, Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Performance Evaluation, SF-SWARA, SF-CoCoSo

Kaynakça

  1. Afshari, A. & Letić, D. (2016). Linguistic evaluating the employee’s performance. VI International Symposium Engineering Management and Competitiveness 2016 (EMC 2016)17- 18th June 2016, Kotor, Montenegro. Doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.4003.2882.
  2. Ahmed, I., Sultana, I, Paul, S. K., & Azeem, A., (2013). Employee performance evaluation: A fuzzy approach. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 62 Issue: 7, 718-734, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2013-0013
  3. Boran, F. E., Genç, S., Kurt, M., & Akay, D. (2009). A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method. Expert systems with applications, 36(8), 11363-11368.
  4. Daft, R. L. (2008). Organization Theory and Design. United States of America: South-Western/ Cengage Learning.
  5. Edinsel, S. & Işıkçı, E. (2023). “Manager Performance Evaluation with Hybrid Multimoora Method: An Application in Logistics Industry”, International Social Mentality and Researcher Thinkers Journal, (ISSN:2630-631X) 9(75): 4381-4393. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/smryj.72105
  6. Esen, H., Hatipoğlu, T., & Boyacı, A. İ. (2016). A fuzzy approach for performance appraisal: the evaluation of a purchasing specialist. In Computational Intelligence: International Joint Conference, IJCCI 2014 Rome, Italy, October 22-24, 2014 Revised Selected Papers (pp. 235- 250). Springer International Publishing.
  7. Falsafi, N., Zenouz, R.Y. & Mozaffari, M.M. (2011). Employees’ performance appraisal with TOPSIS under fuzzy environment. Int. J. Society Systems Science, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp.272–290. Genç, K. Y. (2020). The Management of Street Economy. Global Street Economy and Micro Entreproneurship (Edt.: S. Grima, Osman Sirkeci, Kamuran Elbeyoğlu). England: EmeraldPublication.
  8. Ghoushchi, S. J., Bonab, S. R., Ghiaci, A. M., Haseli, G., Tomaskova, H., & Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M. (2021). Landfill site selection for medical waste using an integrated SWARA-WASPAS framework based on spherical fuzzy set. Sustainability, 13(24), 13950. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413950
  9. Hermawan, A. & Damiyati, A. (2020). Decision support system for employee performance assessment with SAW and TOPSIS Methods. eCo-Buss. 2. 50-70. 10.32877/eb.v2i3.139. Higgs, M., Plewnia, U., & Ploch, J. (2005). Influence of team composition and task complexity on team performance. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 11(7/8), 227- 250.
  10. Hooshang M. B. & James G. L., (2008),"Fuzzy logic and performance evaluation: discussion and application", International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 57 Iss 3 pp. 237 – 246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410400810857248.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Edinsel, S., Duran, C., & Akdemir, M. A. (2024). HYBRID PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS WITH MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS: EXAMPLE OF STORE MANAGERS. İstanbul Kent Üniversitesi İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(2), 47-70. https://izlik.org/JA84LT38DC
AMA
1.Edinsel S, Duran C, Akdemir MA. HYBRID PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS WITH MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS: EXAMPLE OF STORE MANAGERS. İstanbul Kent Üniversitesi İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi. 2024;4(2):47-70. https://izlik.org/JA84LT38DC
Chicago
Edinsel, Sercan, Cem Duran, ve Mehmet Alper Akdemir. 2024. “HYBRID PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS WITH MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS: EXAMPLE OF STORE MANAGERS”. İstanbul Kent Üniversitesi İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi 4 (2): 47-70. https://izlik.org/JA84LT38DC.
EndNote
Edinsel S, Duran C, Akdemir MA (01 Eylül 2024) HYBRID PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS WITH MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS: EXAMPLE OF STORE MANAGERS. İstanbul Kent Üniversitesi İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi 4 2 47–70.
IEEE
[1]S. Edinsel, C. Duran, ve M. A. Akdemir, “HYBRID PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS WITH MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS: EXAMPLE OF STORE MANAGERS”, İstanbul Kent Üniversitesi İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 4, sy 2, ss. 47–70, Eyl. 2024, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA84LT38DC
ISNAD
Edinsel, Sercan - Duran, Cem - Akdemir, Mehmet Alper. “HYBRID PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS WITH MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS: EXAMPLE OF STORE MANAGERS”. İstanbul Kent Üniversitesi İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi 4/2 (01 Eylül 2024): 47-70. https://izlik.org/JA84LT38DC.
JAMA
1.Edinsel S, Duran C, Akdemir MA. HYBRID PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS WITH MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS: EXAMPLE OF STORE MANAGERS. İstanbul Kent Üniversitesi İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi. 2024;4:47–70.
MLA
Edinsel, Sercan, vd. “HYBRID PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS WITH MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS: EXAMPLE OF STORE MANAGERS”. İstanbul Kent Üniversitesi İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 4, sy 2, Eylül 2024, ss. 47-70, https://izlik.org/JA84LT38DC.
Vancouver
1.Sercan Edinsel, Cem Duran, Mehmet Alper Akdemir. HYBRID PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS WITH MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS: EXAMPLE OF STORE MANAGERS. İstanbul Kent Üniversitesi İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi [Internet]. 01 Eylül 2024;4(2):47-70. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA84LT38DC