The Lyric Art of Chaucer: Songs and Letters in Troilus and Criseyde

Öz

Geoffrey Chaucer, regarded to be the greatest author of the medieval times, marked his mastery and gift in not only his narrative composition but also lyric poetry. Songs and letters, as significant mediums of lyric art, have an important role in his work Troilus and Criseyde, which was composed in the 1380s. In this work, Chaucer exhibits his lyric prowess in a superb and functional way by using the songs and letters which signalize themselves in the forms of mainly love, bliss, sorrow or complaint. In examining the lyric units in this work, new historicism is also used as a literary approach that connects the ancient and medieval times. Also some comparison with the works of Boccaccio, Robert Henryson and Shakespeare is made in terms of their using lyric units. The aim of this paper is to analyse Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde in terms of his use of songs and letters, functioning in several senses such as means of self-expression of characters – their bliss or afflictions, fundamental communication tools of characters, mediums that assure secrecy in terms of court literature and instruments representing both human love and eternal love.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Lyric art,songs,letters,new historicism,human nature

Chaucer’ın Lirik Sanatı: Troilus ve Criseyde’de Şarkılar ve Mektuplar

Öz

Ortaçağın en büyük yazarı olarak kabul edilen Geoffrey Chaucer, ustalık ve yeteneğini sadece hikâye türünden yazılarında değil, aynı zamanda lirik şiirinde de göstermiştir. Lirik sanatın önemli araçları olan şarkılar ve mektuplar, 1380’lerde yazılan Troilus ve Criseyde eserinde önemli yere sahiptir. Bu eserde Chaucer, kendilerini temel olarak aşk, sevinç, üzüntü ya da şikâyet şekillerinde gösteren şarkılar ve mektuplar kullanarak, lirik sanatını harikulade ve işlevsel bir şekilde ortaya koyar. Bu çalışmadaki lirik öğeleri incelerken, antik ve orta çağı bağdaştıran bir edebi yaklaşım olan yeni tarihselcilik de kullanılmıştır. Aynı zamanda Boccaccio, Robert Henryson ve Shakespeare’in eserleriyle de lirik kullanımlar bağlamında kıyaslama yapılmıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Chaucer’ın Troilus ve Criseyde eserini, Chaucer’ın karakterlerin kendilerini ifade etme araçları – sevinçleri ve kederleri, karakterlerin temel iletişim araçları, saray edebiyatı bağlamında gizliliği sağlayan araçlar ve hem beşeri hem de sonsuz aşkı yansıtan vasıtalar olarak çeşitli açılardan işlev gören şarkı ve mektup kullanımı açısından tahlil etmektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Lirik sanat,şarkılar,mektuplar,yeni tarihselcilik,insan doğası

Kaynakça

1. Ashley, T. (2009). Edinburgh Festival: Dangerous Liaisons. Access: 01.07.2019: https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2009/aug/22/troilus-cressida-play-interpretations
2. Boccaccio, G. (1999). Filostrato (N.Griffin and A.Myrick, Trans.). Cambridge: In Parantheses Publications.
3. Bressler, C.E. (2007). Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
4. Brewer, D. (1998). A New Introduction to Chaucer. London: Longman.
5. Chaucer, G. (1971). Troilus and Criseyde. Middlesex: Penguin Books.
6. Coghill, N. (1971). Introduction. G. Chaucer (Aut.). Troilus and Criseyde (p.xi-xxvi). Middlesex: Penguin Books.
7. Donaldson, E. T. (1991). Troilus and Criseide. C. D. Benson (Ed.). Critical Essays on Chaucer’s “Troilus and Criseyde” and his major early poems (p.44-56). Buckingham: Open University Press.
8. Frantzen, A.J. (1993). Troilus and Criseyde - the poem and the frame. New York: Twayne Publishers.

9. Gao, J. (2019). A New Historicism Study of Shakespeare’s Historical Plays. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 310, 191-196.
10. Greenblatt, S. (Ed.). (2006). The Norton Anthology of English Literature (8th Edition, Volume II). London, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
11. Henryson, R. (1925). The Testament of Cresseid. Edinburgh: The Porpoise Press.
12. Hickling, M. (2018). New Historicism. Brock Education Journal, 27 (2), 53-57.
13. Hinson, M. (Ed.). (1902). Anthology of Romantic Piano Music. Venice: Alfred Publishing.
14. Hussey, S.S. (1985). Chaucer – An Introduction. London: Methuen.
15. McKinnell, J. (1991). Letters as a Type of the Formal Level in Troilus and Criseyde. M. Salu (Ed.). Essays on Troilus and Criseyde (p. 73-89). Cambridge: D.S.Brewer.
16. Olson, C.C. (1941). Chaucer and the Music of the Fourteenth Century. Speculum, 16(1), p. 64-91.
17. Saunders, C. (Ed.). (2001). Chaucer. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
18. Shakespeare, W. (1901). Troilus and Crisseda. New York: The University Society.
19. Szarmach, P.E., Tavormina, M.T. and Rosenthal, J.T. (Ed.). (1998). Medieval England: An Encyclopedia. New York: Routledge.
20. Turhan, V. (1949). Chaucer – Devri, Hayatı, Eserleri ve Canterbury Masalları’ndan Seçme Tercümeler. İstanbul : Üçler Basımevi.
21. Windeatt, B. (1992). Oxford Guides to Chaucer – Troilus and Criseyde. Oxford: Clarendon Press.