Araştırma Makalesi

Comparison of Turkish Science Curricula and British Science Curriculum in Terms of Environmental Education

Cilt: 13 Sayı: 5 31 Aralık 2024
PDF İndir
TR EN

Comparison of Turkish Science Curricula and British Science Curriculum in Terms of Environmental Education

Abstract

A common and important problem that threatens all humanity today is environmental problems. A comprehensive effort is indispensable for the permanent solution of environmental problems. Again, in this process, it is important for all countries and societies to work simultaneously and collaboratively. However, perhaps qualified environmental education is a must in this process. In this context, all curricula around the world, especially science curricula, are rapidly being enriched in terms of environmental education. The purpose of this study is to compare Turkish and British science curricula in terms of environmental education. In this context, the science curricula of the two countries at primary and secondary school levels (3rd-8th grades) were compared in the context of environmental education. Turkey's 2018 and 2024 curricula were used in the study. The study generally falls into the document analysis method. In particular, it falls into the category of content analysis. In this research, British and Turkish science curricula were compared in three categories. First, the frequency of use of environmentally related keywords in the curriculum was examined. Secondly, the numbers and contents of environmentally related acquisitions were compared. Finally, it was examined whether there were independent courses on environmental education. As a result, Turkish science curriculum stands out in terms of the frequency of use of environmental concepts. Again, in terms of the number of environmental acquisitions, the 2018 Turkish science curriculum includes more acquisitions. However, in terms of the distribution and content of the acquisitions, the English science curriculum is more harmonious, meaningful and effective. In addition, the Turkish 2024 curriculum mentions the course "environmental education and climate change". However, there is no information about the content of the course. Within the framework of the research findings, it would be beneficial to enrich the Turkish science curriculum in terms of effective acquisitions for environmental education. Finally, it can be suggested that the Turkish science curriculum be enriched in terms of the protection of natural resources.

Keywords

Environment , Education , Science Education , Curriculum , Turkish , British

Kaynakça

  1. Adebayo, T. S., Pata, U. K., & Akadiri, S. S. (2024). A comparison of CO2 emissions, load capacity factor, and ecological footprint for Thailand’s environmental sustainability. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(1), 2203-2223, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02810-9
  2. Akınoğlu, O., & Sarı, A. (2013). Environmental education in primary school curriculum Marmara University Atatürk Education Faculty Journal of Educational Sciences, 30(30), 5-29.
  3. Aksakal, Ş. (2013). Determination of Science and Technology Teacher Candidates’ Sensitivity About Recycling. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Fırat University, Elazığ, Türkiye.
  4. Alım, M. (2006). Environment and environmental education in primary school in turkey within the process of the membership of European union. Kastamonu Education Journal, 14(2), 599-616
  5. Artvinli, E., & Bayar, V. (2018). Recycling as a value in primary and secondary school curriculum. Osmangazi Journal of Educational Research (OJER), 5(1),18-33.
  6. Balkan Kıyıcı, F., & Atabek-Yiğit, E. (2023). Examining environmental acquisitions in science curriculum: a comparison of brazil and turkey. Trakya Journal of Education, 13(1), 593-605, https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.1067454
  7. Baltacı, A. (2019). The qualitative research process: how to conduct a qualitative research? Ahi Evran University Institute of Social Sciences Journal, 5(2), 368-388, https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.598299.
  8. Başer, Ş. (2019). Perception of high school students about recycling and waste. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye.
  9. Boschhuizen, R., & Brinkman, F. G. (1995). The concept of cycles for environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 1(2), 147-158, https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462950010202
  10. Bozkurt, O. (2017). Çevre eğitimi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Akçay, S. (2024). Comparison of Turkish Science Curricula and British Science Curriculum in Terms of Environmental Education. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(5), 1858-1872. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.1470356