Araştırma Makalesi

Effect of Supply Chain Finance Solutions on Production Planning Under Yield and Lead Time Uncertainty

Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1 31 Mart 2026
PDF İndir
EN TR

Effect of Supply Chain Finance Solutions on Production Planning Under Yield and Lead Time Uncertainty

Öz

For capital constrained suppliers, use of supply chain finance requires consideration of interplay between production and finance decisions. We solve the optimal input procurement problem for a capital constrained make to order manufacturer subject to yield and lead time uncertainty and compare use of supply chain finance methods (Advance Payment Discount (APD), Bank Loan (BL), Reverse Factoring with initial bank loan (RF), and Buyer Backed Purchase Order Finance (BPOF)). Our model applies to manufacturing from raw material such as mechanical and electronics and service processes such as cold chain transportation with individual cooling units, e.g. for vaccine distribution. We model our problem via stochastic optimization with binomial production yield and discrete random lead time. We prove the convexity of the objective functions for APD, BL, and RF; and we show that the objective function for BPOF can be expressed as difference of two convex functions and employ Difference of Convex Functions programming to find the optimal production input amount. We see that, as frequently applied in practice, payment terms longer than 90 days may make the supplier give up on the order due to no expectation for any profit. Optimal profit is more sensitive than procurement amounts to the joint effect of interest rates and yield probability as well as fluctuations in lead time. For suppliers with higher yield rates BPOF brings the most advantage when interest rates are the same for all methods, and APD brings the most advantage when flexibility on interest rates it provides is employed for suppliers with lower yield rates. Methodologically, we develop an analytical make-to-order model under yield and lead time uncertainty and solve the resulting optimization problems using expected profit maximization, including DC programming for the BPOF scheme.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Production Planning, Supply Chain Finance, Uncertain Yield, Uncertain Lead Time, Make to Order, Batch Production

Kaynakça

  1. Barad, M., & Braha, D. (1996). Control limits for multistage manufacturing processes with binomial yield (Single and multiple production runs). The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47 (1), 98112.
  2. BenZvi, T. , & GrosfeldNir, A. (2007). Serial production systems with random yield and rigid demand: A heuristic. Operations Research Letters, 35 (2), 235–244.
  3. Camerinelli, E., & Schizas, E. (2014). A study of the business case for supply chain finance. The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, Studie.
  4. Caniato, F., Moretto, A. & Rice, J. B. (August 06, 2020). A Financial Crisis Is Looming for Smaller Suppli ers. Harvard Business Review, 14.
  5. Cao, Y., Zhang, J. H., & Ma, X. Y. (2019). Optimal Financing and Production Decisions for a Supply Chain With BuyerBacked Purchase Order Financing Contract. IEEE Access, 7, 119384119392.
  6. Chakuu, S., Masi, D., & Godsell, J. (2019). Exploring the relationship between mechanisms, actors and instruments in supply chain finance: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Economics, 216, 3553.
  7. Choi, S., Jeon, S., Kim, J., & Park, K. (2019). A newsvendor analysis of a binomial yield production process. European Journal of Operational Research, 273(3), 983991.
  8. Clemens, J., & Inderfurth, K. (2015). Supply chain coordination by contracts under binomial production yield. Business Research, 8(2), 301332.
  9. Cobb, B. R. (2013). Mixture distributions for modelling demand during lead time. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 64(2), 217228.
  10. Cohen, M. A., & Lee, H. L. (1988). Strategic analysis of integrated productiondistribution systems: models and methods. Operations research, 36(2), 216228.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Bayram, O. (2026). Effect of Supply Chain Finance Solutions on Production Planning Under Yield and Lead Time Uncertainty. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15(1), 38-61. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.1732808
AMA
1.Bayram O. Effect of Supply Chain Finance Solutions on Production Planning Under Yield and Lead Time Uncertainty. itobiad. 2026;15(1):38-61. doi:10.15869/itobiad.1732808
Chicago
Bayram, Orkun. 2026. “Effect of Supply Chain Finance Solutions on Production Planning Under Yield and Lead Time Uncertainty”. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi 15 (1): 38-61. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.1732808.
EndNote
Bayram O (01 Mart 2026) Effect of Supply Chain Finance Solutions on Production Planning Under Yield and Lead Time Uncertainty. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi 15 1 38–61.
IEEE
[1]O. Bayram, “Effect of Supply Chain Finance Solutions on Production Planning Under Yield and Lead Time Uncertainty”, itobiad, c. 15, sy 1, ss. 38–61, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.15869/itobiad.1732808.
ISNAD
Bayram, Orkun. “Effect of Supply Chain Finance Solutions on Production Planning Under Yield and Lead Time Uncertainty”. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi 15/1 (01 Mart 2026): 38-61. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.1732808.
JAMA
1.Bayram O. Effect of Supply Chain Finance Solutions on Production Planning Under Yield and Lead Time Uncertainty. itobiad. 2026;15:38–61.
MLA
Bayram, Orkun. “Effect of Supply Chain Finance Solutions on Production Planning Under Yield and Lead Time Uncertainty”. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. 15, sy 1, Mart 2026, ss. 38-61, doi:10.15869/itobiad.1732808.
Vancouver
1.Orkun Bayram. Effect of Supply Chain Finance Solutions on Production Planning Under Yield and Lead Time Uncertainty. itobiad. 01 Mart 2026;15(1):38-61. doi:10.15869/itobiad.1732808