Ekonomik Küreselleşme ile Büyüme Arasında Bilgi Küreselleşmesinin Düzenleyici Rolü: BRICS Ülkeleri Örneği

Melike Çetin

doi:10.15869/itobiad.1746632

EN TR

Öz

Informational Globalization as a Moderator Between Economic Globalization and Growth in BRICS

Öz

This study investigates the impact of economic globalization on economic growth and examines the moderating role of informational globalization within this relationship, using the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) as a case study. In today's increasingly digitalized world, the international flow of information and the development of digital infrastructure have become critical determinants of economic performance, particularly in emerging economies. The ability to access, process, and effectively utilize information now plays a strategic role in driving competitiveness and sustainable economic growth. The research employs a comprehensive panel dataset covering the period from 1995 to 2022. To address potential endogeneity and unobserved heterogeneity issues, the empirical analysis utilizes the Panel-Corrected Standard Errors (PCSE) method. This approach accounts for contemporaneous correlation and heteroskedasticity across cross-sectional units, ensuring more robust statistical inference. Westerlund ECM cointegration tests confirm the existence of long-term equilibrium relationships among the key variables. The findings reveal that economic globalization has a significant and positive effect on economic growth across BRICS economies. More importantly, informational globalization meaningfully strengthens this positive relationship, acting as a crucial moderator. In other words, as informational globalization increases, the growth-enhancing impact of economic globalization becomes more pronounced and stable. The interaction effect demonstrates that countries with better digital infrastructure and information access can more effectively leverage the benefits of economic integration. Control variables including capital accumulation, labor force participation, human capital, and political stability are found to exert statistically significant and consistent effects on growth. The results underscore the importance of enhancing digital capacity and expanding informational infrastructure as integral components of sustainable growth strategies and highlights that integrating informational globalization into broader development and globalization policies is essential for maximizing long-term economic benefits and achieving inclusive growth in the digital age.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Informational Globalization, Economic Globalization, Growth, Panel-Corrected Standard Errors (PCSE) method, BRICS Countries

Ekonomik Küreselleşme ile Büyüme Arasında Bilgi Küreselleşmesinin Düzenleyici Rolü: BRICS Ülkeleri Örneği

Öz

Bu çalışma, ekonomik küreselleşmenin ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisini araştırmakta ve bu ilişki içerisinde bilgi küreselleşmesinin düzenleyici rolünü BRICS ülkeleri (Brezilya, Rusya, Hindistan, Çin ve Güney Afrika) örneği üzerinden incelemektedir. Günümüzün giderek dijitalleşen dünyasında, bilginin uluslararası dolaşımı ve dijital altyapının gelişimi, özellikle gelişmekte olan ekonomilerde ekonomik performansın kritik belirleyicileri haline gelmiştir. Bilgiye erişim, işleme ve etkin kullanma yeteneği artık rekabet gücü ve sürdürülebilir ekonomik büyümeyi yönlendirmede stratejik bir rol oynamaktadır. Araştırma, 1995-2022 dönemini kapsayan kapsamlı bir panel veri seti kullanmaktadır. Potansiyel içsellik ve gözlemlenemeyen heterojenlik sorunlarını ele almak için, ampirik analiz Panel-Düzeltilmiş Standart Hatalar (PCSE) yöntemini kullanmaktadır. Bu yaklaşım, yatay kesit birimleri arasındaki eşzamanlı korelasyon ve heteroskedastisiteyi hesaba katarak daha güçlü istatistiksel çıkarım sağlamaktadır. Westerlund ECM koentegrasyon testleri, ana değişkenler arasında uzun vadeli denge ilişkilerinin varlığını doğrulamaktadır. Bulgular, ekonomik küreselleşmenin BRICS ekonomilerinde ekonomik büyüme üzerinde anlamlı ve pozitif bir etkiye sahip olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Daha önemlisi, bilgisel küreselleşme bu pozitif ilişkiyi anlamlı bir şekilde güçlendirmekte ve kritik bir düzenleyici olarak işlev görmektedir. Başka bir deyişle, bilgisel küreselleşme arttıkça, ekonomik küreselleşmenin büyümeyi artırıcı etkisi daha belirgin ve istikrarlı hale gelmektedir. Etkileşim etkisi, daha iyi dijital altyapı ve bilgi erişimine sahip ülkelerin ekonomik entegrasyonun faydalarını daha etkin şekilde kullanabileceğini göstermektedir. Sermaye birikimi, işgücüne katılım, beşerî sermaye ve siyasi istikrar dahil olmak üzere kontrol değişkenlerinin büyüme üzerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ve tutarlı etkiler gösterdiği bulunmuştur. Sonuçlar, dijital kapasitenin artırılması ve bilgisel altyapının genişletilmesinin sürdürülebilir büyüme stratejilerinin ayrılmaz bileşenleri olduğunu ve bilgisel küreselleşmenin daha geniş kalkınma ve küreselleşme politikalarına entegre edilmesinin uzun vadeli ekonomik faydaları maksimize etmek ve dijital çağda kapsayıcı büyüme elde etmek için gerekli olduğunu vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bilgi Küreselleşmesi, Ekonomik Küreselleşme, Büyüme, Panel-Düzeltilmiş Standart Hatalar (PCSE) Yöntemi, BRICS Ülkeleri

Kaynakça

Acemoglu, D., Carvalho, V., M., Ozdaglar, A. E. & Tahbaz-Salehi, A. (2011). The Network Origins of Aggregate Fluctuations. MIT Department of Economics Working Paper, No. 11-23. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1947096 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1947096
Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60(2), 323-351. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951599
Allison, P. D. (2012). Logistic regression using SAS: Theory and application. SAS Institute.
Alesina, A., Özler, S., Roubini, N., & Swagel, P. (1996). Political instability and economic growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 1(2), 189–211. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40215915.
Al-Roubaie, A. (2018).Building digital capacity for sustainable development. In A. Ahmed, (Ed.): PPPs partnerships for the implementation of the 2030 agenda for SD, 1, 363-379. https://doi.org/10.47556/B.OUTLOOK2018.16.23
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
Asongu, S. A., & Le Roux, S. (2017). Enhancing ICT for inclusive human development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118, 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.01.026
Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86(3), 630-640. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2118216
Baldwin, R., & Weder di Mauro, B. (2020). Economics in the time of COVID-19. CEPR Press, Paris & London. ISBN: 978-1-912179-28-2.
Baltagi, B. H. (2013). Econometric analysis of panel data (5th ed.). Wiley.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
Barro, R. J. (1996). Determinants of economic growth: A cross‑country empirical study National Bureau of Economic Research. (NBER Working Paper No. 5698). https://doi.org/10.3386/w5698
Barro, R. J., & Lee, J. W. (1994). Sources of economic growth. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 40, 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2231(94)90002-7
Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634–647. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082979
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2000). Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 23-48. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.4.23
Bukht, R., & Heeks, R. (2017). Defining, conceptualising and measuring the digital economy. Development Informatics Working Paper, No. 68). University of Manchester. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3431732
Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Blackwell Publishers. ISBN: 1557866171.
Chang, R. & Kaltani, L. & Loayza, N. (2009). Openness Can be Good for Growth: The Role of Policy Complementarities. Journal of Development Economics, 90 (1), 33-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.06.011
Chen, L., & De Lombaerde, P. (2014). Testing the relationships between globalization, regionalization, and the regional hubness of the BRICS. Journal of Policy Modeling, 36S, 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2013.10.011
Coe, D. T., & Helpman, E. (1995). International R&D spillovers. European Economic Review, 39(5), 859-887. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(94)00100-E
Darusalam, Omar, N., Janssen, M., Said, J., & Sohag, K. (2021). The influence of ICT diffusion and globalization on the quality of governance: A study using panel data from ASEAN countries. Information Development, 39(1), 46-59. (Original work published 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669211026363)
De Gregorio, J. & Lee, J.-W. & Borensztein, E. (1998). How Does Foreign Investment Affect Growth?. Journal of International Economics. 45, 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(97)00033-0
Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2003). Institutions, trade, and growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(1), 133-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(02)00206-4
Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2004). Trade, growth, and poverty. The Economic Journal, 114(493), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-0133.2004.00186.x
Dreher, A. (2006). Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Applied Economics, 38(10), 1091–1110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500392078
Dreher, A., & Gaston, N. (2008). Has globalization increased inequality? Review of International Economics, 16(3), 516–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2008.00743.x
Dreher, A., Gaston, N., & Martens, P. (2008). Measuring Globalisation. Springer.
Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251–276. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236
Fan, J., Liao, Y., & Yao, J. (2015). Power enhancement in high‑dimensional cross‑sectional tests. Econometrica, 83(4), 1497–1541. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA12749
Farhat, S., & Mahmood, M. A. (1996). Globalisation, Information Technology, and Economic Development [with Comments]. The Pakistan Development Review, 35(4), 1019–1033. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41260013
Findlay, R. (1978). Relative Backwardness, Direct Foreign Investment, and the Transfer of Technology: A Simple Dynamic Model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 92(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885996
Frankel, J. A., & Romer, D. (1999). Does trade cause growth? American Economic Review, 89(3), 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.3.379
Gans, J. (2023). Artificial intelligence adoption in a competitive market. Economica, 90(358),690-705. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12458
Goldfarb, A., & Trefler, D. (2018). AI and international trade. National Bureau of Economic Research (No. w24254). https://doi.org/10.3386/w24254
Griffith, R., Redding, S., & Van Reenen, J. (2004). Mapping the Two Faces of R&D: Productivity Growth in a Panel of OECD Industries. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(4), 883–895. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40042976
Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1993). Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262570978.
Gurgul, H., & Lach, L. (2014). Globalization and economic growth: Evidence from two decades of transition in CEE. Economic Modelling, 36, 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.09.022
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
Heeks, R. (2022). Digital inequality beyond the digital divide: conceptualizing adverse digital incorporation in the global South. Information Technology for Development, 28, 688 - 704. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2022.2068492
Ho, C., & Tseng, S. (2006). From digital divide to digital inequality: the global perspective. Int. J. Internet Enterp. Manag., 4, 215-227. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIEM.2006.010915
Ignatov, V. (2020). The digital economy of BRICS: Prospects for multilateral cooperation. International Organisationsresearchjournal,15(1), 31–62. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2020-01-02
Ionascu, A. (2023). Bibliometric analysis between globalization, information technology and economic growth. In: Creşterea economică în condiţiile globalizării, Ed. 17, 12-13, Chisinau, Moldova: Departamentul Editorial-Poligrafic al ASEM, 2023. ISBN (pdf) 978-9975-167-06-2. https://doi.org/10.36004/nier.cecg.III.2023.17.36
Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577-598. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118401
Jing, A. H. Y., & Ab-Rahim, R. (2020). Information and communication technology (ICT) and economic growth in ASEAN-5 countries. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 10(2), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v10i2.16589
Juodis, A., & Reese, S. (2021). The Incidental Parameters Problem in Testing for Remaining Cross-Section Correlation. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 40(3), 1191–1203. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2021.1906687
Keller, W. (1998). Are international R&D spillovers trade-related? Analyzing spillovers among randomly matched trade partners. European Economic Review, 42(8), 1469-1481. https://doi.org/10.3386/w6065
Keller, W. (2002). Geographic localization of international technology diffusion. American Economic Review, 92(1), 120-142. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802760015630
Latif, Z., Yang, M., Pathan, Z., Salam, S., & Zeng, J. (2018). The dynamics of ICT, foreign direct investment, globalization, and economic growth: Panel estimation robust to heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence. Telematics and Informatics, 35(2), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.12.006
Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7
Madsen, J. B. (2007). Technology spillover through trade and TFP convergence: 135 years of evidence for the OECD countries. Journal of International Economics, 72(2), 464-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.12.001
Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407-437. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118477
Mikhno, I., Koval, V., Sedikova, I., & Kotlubai, V. (2022). Digital globalization in the international development of strategic alliances. Economics Ecology Socium, 6, 11-21. https://doi.org/10.31520/2616-7107/2022.6.1-2
Mullainathan, S., & Spiess, J. (2017). Machine learning: An applied econometric approach. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 87-106. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.87
Nipo, D. T., Lily, J., Idris, S., Pinjaman, S., & Bujang, I. (2022). Information and Communication Technology (ICT) on Economic Growth in Asia: A Panel Data Analysis. International Journal of Business and Management, 17(12), 18-23. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v17n12p18
O’Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(S1), 653-670. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1653
Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
Pesaran, M. H. (2014). Testing Weak Cross-Sectional Dependence in Large Panels. Econometric Reviews, 34(6–10), 1089–1117. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2014.956623
Pesaran, M.H. & Xie, Y. (2021). A Bias-Corrected CD Test for Error Cross-Sectional Dependence in Panel Data Models with Latent Factors. [Working Paper]. Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.89403
Rivera-Batiz, L. A., & Romer, P. M. (1991). Economic integration and endogenous growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 531-555. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937946
Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do more open economies have bigger governments? Journal of Political Economy, 106(5), 997–1032. https://doi.org/10.1086/250038
Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002-1037. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1833190
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 71-102. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2937632
Röller, L. H., & Waverman, L. (2001). Telecommunications infrastructure and economic development: A simultaneous approach. American Economic Review, 91(4), 909-923. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.4.909
Sachs, J. D., Warner, A., Åslund, A., & Fischer, S. (1995). Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1995(1), 1–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/2534573
Selim, T. (2005). Economic Growth and Information Technology: A Note. Journal of Business and Economics Research , 3 ( 11). https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/101416/
Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65-94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513
Swan, T. W. (1956). Economic growth and capital accumulation. Economic Record, 32(2), 334-361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1956.tb00434.x
Varian, H. R. (2014). Big data: New tricks for econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2), 3-28. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.2.3
Vu, K. M. (2011). ICT as a source of economic growth in the information age: Empirical evidence from the 1996–2005 period. Telecommunications Policy, 35(4), 357-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2011.02.008
Wang, J. Y. (1990). Growth, technology transfer, and the long-run theory of international capital movements. Journal of International Economics, 29(3-4), 255-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(90)90033-I
Wen, H., Liu, Y., & Zhou, F. (2024). New-type Infrastructure and Urban Economic Resilience: Evidence from China. International Review of Economics ann Finance. 96 (A), 103560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103560
Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(6), 709-748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x
Weymouth, S. (2023). Digital globalization. Politics, Policy, and a Governance Paradox. Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 May 2023. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108974158
Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross-section and panel data (2nd ed.). MIT Press.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Uygulamalı Makro Ekonometri, Makro İktisat (Diğer)

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Melike Çetin ^*
0000-0001-6744-9337
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Mart 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

20 Temmuz 2025

Kabul Tarihi

25 Şubat 2026

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.1746632

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA85WE45YW

APA

Çetin, M. (2026). Ekonomik Küreselleşme ile Büyüme Arasında Bilgi Küreselleşmesinin Düzenleyici Rolü: BRICS Ülkeleri Örneği. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15(1), 237-261. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.1746632

AMA

1.Çetin M. Ekonomik Küreselleşme ile Büyüme Arasında Bilgi Küreselleşmesinin Düzenleyici Rolü: BRICS Ülkeleri Örneği. itobiad. 2026;15(1):237-261. doi:10.15869/itobiad.1746632

Chicago

Çetin, Melike. 2026. “Ekonomik Küreselleşme ile Büyüme Arasında Bilgi Küreselleşmesinin Düzenleyici Rolü: BRICS Ülkeleri Örneği”. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi 15 (1): 237-61. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.1746632.

EndNote

Çetin M (01 Mart 2026) Ekonomik Küreselleşme ile Büyüme Arasında Bilgi Küreselleşmesinin Düzenleyici Rolü: BRICS Ülkeleri Örneği. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi 15 1 237–261.

IEEE

[1]M. Çetin, “Ekonomik Küreselleşme ile Büyüme Arasında Bilgi Küreselleşmesinin Düzenleyici Rolü: BRICS Ülkeleri Örneği”, itobiad, c. 15, sy 1, ss. 237–261, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.15869/itobiad.1746632.

ISNAD

Çetin, Melike. “Ekonomik Küreselleşme ile Büyüme Arasında Bilgi Küreselleşmesinin Düzenleyici Rolü: BRICS Ülkeleri Örneği”. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi 15/1 (01 Mart 2026): 237-261. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.1746632.

JAMA

1.Çetin M. Ekonomik Küreselleşme ile Büyüme Arasında Bilgi Küreselleşmesinin Düzenleyici Rolü: BRICS Ülkeleri Örneği. itobiad. 2026;15:237–261.

MLA

Çetin, Melike. “Ekonomik Küreselleşme ile Büyüme Arasında Bilgi Küreselleşmesinin Düzenleyici Rolü: BRICS Ülkeleri Örneği”. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. 15, sy 1, Mart 2026, ss. 237-61, doi:10.15869/itobiad.1746632.

Vancouver

1.Melike Çetin. Ekonomik Küreselleşme ile Büyüme Arasında Bilgi Küreselleşmesinin Düzenleyici Rolü: BRICS Ülkeleri Örneği. itobiad. 01 Mart 2026;15(1):237-61. doi:10.15869/itobiad.1746632

İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY NC) ile lisanslanmıştır.

Öz

Öz

Öz

Informational Globalization as a Moderator Between Economic Globalization and Growth in BRICS

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ekonomik Küreselleşme ile Büyüme Arasında Bilgi Küreselleşmesinin Düzenleyici Rolü: BRICS Ülkeleri Örneği

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster