Konformizmin Örgütsel Yabancılaşma Üzerine Etkisi

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1 , 314 - 331 , 31.03.2026

Enes Uğur Tohum

https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.1799383

https://izlik.org/JA48UX78HG

Öz

Çalışma hayatında başkalarıyla özdeş olan, çalışma hayatının doğal akışında çatışmalardan uzak durmak için başkalarına uyan, itiraz etmeyen kişiler için kullanılan konformizm, genel olarak liderden çok takip eden kişi olma özellikleri gösteren bireyleri açıklamaktadır. Sosyal etki kavramı ile açıklanan konformizm, sosyal psikolojide başkaları ile birlikte iken tek başına olduğundan farklı davranan kişiyi, bu kişinin davranış şeklini tasvir etmektedir. Örgütsel yabancılaşma kavramı ise, çalışma hayatında kişilerin kendilerini yöneticilerinin performansına katkı sunma noktasında, istediklerini yerine getiren bir araç olarak görmeleri/hissetmeleri, kişinin örgütten uzaklaşması, yalnız kalmışlık hissine kapılması olarak ifade edilmektedir. Bu bağlamda araştırmanın temel amacı konformizmin örgütsel yabancılaşma üzerindeki etkisini incelemektir. Araştırmada, nicel araştırma tekniklerinden kesitsel araştırma yöntemi ve kolayda örnekleme tekniğinden yararlanılmıştır. Araştırma 155 beyaz yakalı çalışanın katılımıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın analiz aşamasında katılımcılardan elde edilen veriler SPSS istatistiksel programı ile analiz edilerek konformizmin örgütsel yabancılaşmaya etkisini ölçümlemek için regresyon analizi yapılmıştır. Yapılan analiz sonucunda konformizmin örgütsel yabancılaşmayı ve güçsüzlük dışında örgütsel yabancılaşma alt boyutlarını pozitif yönde etkilediği ortaya konulmuştur. Bu çalışma genel olarak örgüt düzeyinde yönetim ya da yönetim ile ilişkili süreçlerde yer alan çalışanların konformist (uymacı) davranış sergileme durumlarının örgütsel yabancılaşma süreçlerini etkilediğini ortaya koyması açısından oldukça önemlidir. Böylelikle, çalışanların iş hayatında konformist davranışlar sergilemesinin zaman içerisinde örgüte karşı yabancılaşma hissi yaşamalarına neden olabileceği araştırma ile ortaya konulmaktadır. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Konformizm , Yabancılaşma , Örgütsel Yabancılaşma , Beyaz Yakalı Çalışanlar , Türkiye

Etik Beyan

Çalışma kapsamında veri toplamak amacıyla Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Fen, Matematik ve Sosyal Bilimler Etik Kurulu'nun 12.02.2025 tarihli ve 50 sayılı toplantısı ile izin alınmış, akabinde ise veriler katılımcıların gönüllü katılımı esas alınarak toplanmıştır.

The Effect of Conformism on Organizational Alienation

https://izlik.org/JA48UX78HG

Öz

Conformism, which describes people who identify with others in their work life, conform to others to avoid conflicts in the natural flow of work life, and do not object, generally describes individuals who exhibit characteristics of followers rather than leaders. Conformism, as explained by the concept of social influence, describes individuals who behave differently in the presence of others than when alone, thereby revealing their behavioral patterns. The concept of organizational alienation, on the other hand, is expressed when individuals in the workplace see or feel themselves as tools to fulfill their managers' performance expectations, leading them to distance themselves from the organization and feel isolated. In this context, the main objective of the study is to examine the effect of conformity on organizational alienation. The study used a cross-sectional research design and a convenience sampling technique from quantitative research methods. The research was conducted with the participation of 155 white-collar workers. During the study's analysis phase, participants' data were analyzed using SPSS, and a regression analysis was conducted to assess the effect of conformity on organizational alienation. The analysis revealed that conformity has a positive effect on organizational alienation and its subdimensions, except for powerlessness. This study is particularly important because it reveals that the conformist (compliant) behavior of employees involved in management or management-related processes at the organizational level affects organizational alienation. Thus, the research shows that employees' conformist behavior in their work life may cause them to experience a sense of alienation towards the organization over time. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Conformism , Alienation , Organizational Alienation , White-Collar Workers , Türkiye

Etik Beyan

To collect the data for the study, permission was obtained from Çankırı Karatekin University's Science, Mathematics, and Social Sciences Ethics Committee. After obtaining the approval of the ethics committee with the decision taken at the Board's meeting dated 12.02.2025 and numbered 50, the research data were collected by taking into account the voluntary participation of the participants.

Kaynakça

• Abbas, A. A., Hussein, A. A. A. & Khali, H. H. (2017). The effect of a hostile work environment on organizational alienation: the mediating role of the relationship between leaders and followers. Asian Social Science, 13(2), 140–158.
• Abraham, R. (1998). Emotional dissonance in organizations: Antecedents, consequences, and moderators. Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs, 124(2), 229.
• Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
• Akıncı, S. & Kıymalıoğlu, A. (2014). The Theory of Planned Behavior. In Marketing Theories, Ed: M. İ. Yağcı and S. Çabuk, İstanbul: MediaCat Publications.
• Aranson Elliot, Timothy D. Wılson & Robin M. Ekert (2010). Social Psychology, Pearson Prentice Hall, 7th Edition, Trans: Okhan Gunduz, Social Psychology, Kaknus Publications, Istanbul.
• Aytac, O. (2004). Organizations: A sociological perspective. Fırat University Journal of Social Sciences, 14(1), 189-217.
• Banai, M., Reisel, W. D., & Probst, T. M. (2004). A managerial and personal control model: Predictions of work alienation and organizational commitment in Hungary. Journal of International Management, 10(3), 375–392.
• Bowles, H. R., & Gelfand, M. (2010). Status and the evaluation of workplace deviance. Psychological Science, 21(1), 49–54.
• Breker, T. (2009). The theory of cognitive dissonance and its application. Marketing: An overview of literature and practical experiences.
• Ceylan, A., & Sulu, S. (2010). Work alienation as a mediator of the relationship of procedural injustice to job stress. South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 5(2), 65.
• DeCarlo, L. T. (1997). On the meaning and use of kurtosis. Psychological Methods, 2(3), 292–307.
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.
• Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629–636. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046408
• Ergun Özler, N. D., & Dirican Ozcınar, M. (2014). Research is needed to determine the relationship between alienation and burnout syndrome in organizations. Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences, (39), 291–310.
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
• Guney, S. (2012). Social Psychology. (2. Basım). Ankara: NOBEL Yayınevi.
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2019). Multivariate data analysis.
• Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook, Springer Nature.
• Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed, a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
• Hewlin, P. F. (2003). And the award for best actor goes to…: Facades of conformity in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 28(4), 633–642.
• Hinton, P. R., Brownlow, C., McMurray, I., & Cozens, B. (2004). SPSS explained, Routledge: NY.
• Hirschfeld, R. R., & Feild, H. S. (2000). Work centrality and work alienation: Distinct aspects of a general commitment to work. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 21(7), 789–800.
• Iskin, Y. (2015). The relationship between authentic leadership approach, organizational commitment, and organizational alienation: a comparative research in the furniture industry, (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Kafkas University, Institute of Social Sciences.
• Gokcen Kapusuz, A. (2023). Conformism (conformist behavior): a scale development study. Hitit Journal of Social Sciences, 16(1), 57–73. doi: 10.17218/hititsbd.1215661
• Gökçen Kapusuz, A., & Milandou, G. M. (2024). Konformizm ve işten ayrılma niyeti ilişkisi: işe adanmışlığın aracı rolü. Izmir Democracy University Social Sciences Journal, 7(1), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.61127/idusos.1454829
• Kanungo, R. N. (1992). Alienation and empowerment: Some ethical imperatives in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 413–422.
• Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36(4), 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.36.4.343
• Mehrabian, A. (1997). Analysis of affiliation-related traits in terms of the PAD temperament model. Journal of Psychology, 131, 101–117.
• Mehrabian, A., & Stefl, C. A. (1995). Basic temperament components of loneliness, shyness, and conformity. Social Behavior and Personality, 23(3), 253-264
• Mustafa, U. B., Ahmad, I., Khalid, M. A., Rafiq, S., & Mehmood, T. M. (2025). Impact of Workplace Loneliness on Workplace Deviance and Facades of Conformity with Mediating role of Emotional Exhaustion: A case of the Healthcare Professionals. Journal of Social Horizons, 2(4), 219–238.
• Mottaz, C. J. (1981). Some determinants of work alienation. Sociological Quarterly, 22(4), 515–529.
• Ozler, N.D.E. & Dirican, M., (2014). Research is needed to determine the relationship between alienation and burnout syndrome in organizations. Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences, 39, 291-309.
• Sargut, A. S. (2015). Intercultural differentiation and management. Ankara. İmge Bookstore.
• Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Advances in experimental social psychology, 25, Academic Press, 1-65
• Seeman, M. (1959). On the meaning of alienation. American Sociological Review, 24(6), 783–791. https://doi.org/10.2307/2088565
• Sharma, S., & Singh, G. (2022). Virtual Fitness: investigating team commitment and post-pandemic virtual workout perceptions. Telematics and Informatics, 71, 101840.
• Shepard, J. M. (1973). Technology, division of labor, and alienation. Pacific sociological review, 16(1), 61–88.
• Suárez‐Mendoza, M. J., & Zoghbi‐Manrique‐de‐Lara, P. (2007). The impact of work alienation on organizational citizenship behavior in the Canary Islands. International journal of organizational Analysis, 15(1), 56–76.
• Tanford, S. ve Montgomery, R. (2015). The effects of social influence and cognitive dissonance on travel purchase decisions. Journal of Travel Research, 54(5): 596–610.
• Tang, J., Wu, S., & Sun, J. (2013). Confluence: Conformity influence in large social networks. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, 347–355. Thompson, W. E., Hickey, J. V., & Thompson, M. L. (2016). Society in focus: An introduction to sociology. Rowman & Littlefield.
• Turan, M., & Parsak, G. (2011). The relationship between alienation and job satisfaction: A study on administrative staff of a state university. Journal of Cukurova University Social Sciences Institute, 20(2), 1–20.
• Vuèkoviã, I., Gadziã, A., Sekuliã, Z., & Lepir, D. (2010). Social characteristics and conformity of basketball players. Exercise and Quality of Life, 2(1), 77–84.
• Yeniçeri, O. (2011). Conformism, corruption, and disobedience. Istanbul Journal of Sociological Studies, (44), 69–90.