Araştırma Makalesi

Orta ve Doğu Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinde Yolsuzluk, Gelir Dağılımı Eşitsizliği ve Yoksulluk: Panel Nedensellik Analizi

Cilt: 6 Sayı: 6 27 Kasım 2017
PDF İndir
EN TR

Corruption, Income Inequality and Poverty in Central and Eastern European Union Countries: A Panel Causality Analysis

Abstract

The global wealth has increased considerably and decreases in income inequality and poverty have been experienced in the recent years. However, both income inequality and poverty have still stayed at critical dimensions. This study investigated the causal interaction among corruption, income inequality, and poverty in Central and Eastern European Union transition economies during 2005-2016 period by employing panel causality test of Dumistrescu and Hurlin (2012). The results revealed a one-way causality from poverty to corruption and also a one-way causality from income inequality to poverty.


Keywords

Corruption,income inequality,poverty,panel causality test

Kaynakça

  1. Ajisafe, R.A. (2016). Corruption and Poverty in Nigeria: Evidence from Ardl Bound Test and Error Correction Model. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences, 7(3), 156-163.
  2. Begović, B. (2007). Economic Inequality and Corruption. Center for Liberal Democratic Studies, http://danica.popovic.ekof.bg.ac.rs/206.pdf (27.07.2016)
  3. Breusch, T. S., Pagan, A.R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification tests in econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), pp.239–53.
  4. Chong, A., Calderon, C. (2000). Institutional Quality and Income Distribution. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 48, 761-786.
  5. Dimant, E., Schulte, T. (2016). The Nature of Corruption: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. German Law Journal, 17(1), 53-72.
  6. Dincer, O.C., Gunalp, B. (2008). Corruption, Income Inequality, and Poverty in the United States. FEEM Working Paper No. 54.2008 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1158446 (05.08.2017)
  7. Dobson, S., Ramlogan-Dobson, C. (2014). Why is Corruption Less Harmful to Income Inequality in Latin America? World Development, 40(8), 1534–1545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.04.015
  8. Dumitrescu, E., Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450–1460, DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014
  9. Eurostat (2017a). S80/S20 income quintile share ratio by sex and selected age group - EU-SILC survey, http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do (28.09.2017)
  10. Eurostat (2017b). People at risk of poverty or social exclusion, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&plugin=1&language=en&pcode=tipslc10 (29.09.2017)

Kaynak Göster

APA
Bayar, Y., Sasmaz, M. U., & Ozturk, O. F. (2017). Orta ve Doğu Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinde Yolsuzluk, Gelir Dağılımı Eşitsizliği ve Yoksulluk: Panel Nedensellik Analizi. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(6), 340-349. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.358432