Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Akıllı Telefon Bağımlılığının Sosyal Medya Kullanımı ve Beş Faktör Kişilik Özelliği İle İlişkisi: Üniversite Öğrencileri Üzerinden Bir Araştırma

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 695 - 717, 30.06.2018
https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.361081

Öz

Günümüz toplumunda akıllı telefonlar aracılığıyla kullanılan sosyal medya,
özellikle üniversite öğrencileri arasında, günlük yaşamın vazgeçilmez bir
parçası haline gelmiştir. Bu durum, beraberinde akıllı telefonlara olan
bağımlılık sorunsalını da gündeme getirmekte ve bireyin kişilik özellikleri ile
ilişkilendirilerek açıklanabileceği düşünülmektedir. Dolayısıyla bu
araştırmada; öğrencilerin akıllı telefon bağımlılık düzeyleri ve sosyal medya
kullanmalarının, Beş Faktör Kişilik özelliği ile ilişkisi incelenmiştir.
Araştırma, Bitlis Eren Üniversitesinde öğrenim gören 343 öğrenci üzerinde
gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veri toplamak amacıyla anket formu yöntemi kullanılmış
olup, örneklem seçiminde basit tesadüfi örneklem yöntemi benimsenmiştir.
Araştırma kapsamında, tanımlayıcı istatistiklerin yanı sıra, korelasyon, basit
doğrusal regresyon, çoklu regresyon analizleri yapılmıştır. Yapılan analizler
sonucunda öğrencilerin kişilik özellikleri ile akıllı telefon bağımlılığı ve
sosyal medya kullanımları arasında istatistiki açıdan anlamlı ilişkiler
bulunmuş, aynı zamanda sosyal medya kullanımının akıllı telefon bağımlılığını
artırdığı tespit edilmiştir.      

Kaynakça

  • Akar, E. (2010). Sosyal Medya Pazarlaması, Sosyal Webde Pazarlama Stratejileri. Efil Yayınevi: İstanbul.
  • Allport, G.W. (1961). Pattern and Growth in Personality. Holt, Rinehart and Winston: New York.
  • Anagnostopoulos, A., Kumar, R. ve Mahdian, M. (2008). Influence and Correlation in Social Networks, KDD’08 Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 7-15, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
  • Antonioni, D. (1998). Relationship Between The Big Five Personality Factors and Conflict Management Styles. International Journal of Conflict Management. (9)4, 336-355.
  • Armelini, G. ve Villanueva, J. (2011). Adding Social Media to the Marketing Mix. IESE Insight Magazine. (2)9.
  • Bazana, P.G. ve Stelmack, R.M. (2004). Stability of Personality Across The Life Span: A Meta-Analysis. R. M. Stelmak, (Ed.), On The Psychology of Personality İçinde. Elsevier Ltd.
  • Bono, J.E., Boles, T.L., Judge, T.A. ve Lauver, K.J. (2002). The Role of Personality in Task and Relationship Conflict. Journal of Personality. (70)3, 1311-1344.
  • Borgatta, E.F. (1964). The Structure of Personality Characteristics. Behavioral Science. 9, 8-17.
  • Bouchard, G., Guillemette, A. ve Landry-Leger, N. (2004). Situational and Dispositional Coping: An Examination of Their Relation to Personality. Cognitive Appraisals and Psychological Distress. European Journal of Personality. 18, 221-238.
  • Boyd, D., Ellison, M., ve Nicole, B. (2007). Social Network: Definition, History and Scholarship, Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication. (13)1.
  • Bragazzı, N.L. ve Pente, G.D. (2014). A Proposal for Including Nomophobia in The New DSM-V. Psychology Research and Behavior Management. 7, 155-160.
  • Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2007). Personality and Individual Differences. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
  • Christensen, M.V. ve Kessing, L.V. (2006). Do Personality Traits Predict First Onset in Depressive and Bipolar Disorder? Nordic Journal of Psychiatry. (60)2, 79-88.
  • Costa, P.T. ve McCrae, R.R. (1992). Four Ways the Five Factors Are Basic. Personality and Individual Differences. 13, 653-665.
  • Costa, P.T. ve McCrae, R.R. (1995). Domains and Facets: Hiyerarchical Personality Assessment Using The Revised Neo Personality İnventory. Journal of Personality Assessment. (64)1, 21-50.
  • Dawley, L. (2009). Social Network Knowledge Construction: Emerging Virtual World Pedagogy. On The Horizon. (17)2.
  • Delongis, A. ve Holtzman, S. (2005). Coping in Context: The Role of Stres. Social Support and Personality in Coping. 73, 1633-1656.
  • Erkul, R. Erdem (2009). Sosyal Medya Araçlarının (Web 2.0) Kamu Hizmetleri ve Uygulamalarında Kullanılabilirliği. Türkiye Bilişim Derneği Bilişim Dergisi. (11)6, 96-101.
  • Eysenck, H.J. (1951). The Organization of Personality. Journal of Personality. (20)1, 101-107.
  • George, D., ve Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0 Update (10a ed.) Pearson: Boston.
  • Göker, G. (2015). İletişimin Mcdonaldlaşması: Sosyal Medya Üzerine Bir İnceleme. International Periodical For the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic. Winter (10)2.
  • Goldberg, L.R. (1990). An Alternative Description of Personality: The Big Five Factor Structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 59, 1216-1229.
  • Graziano, W.G., Jensen-Campbell, A.L. ve Hair, C.E. (1996). Perceiving Interpersonal Conflict and Reacting to it: The Case for Agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 70, 820-835.
  • Guenole, N. ve Chernyshenko, O. (2005). The Suitability of Goldberg’s Big Five Personality Markers in New Zealand: A Dimensionality, Bias, and Criterion Validity Evaluation. New Zealand Journal of Psychology. (34)2, 86-96.
  • Güzeller, C.O. ve Coşguner, T. (2012). Development of A Problematic Mobile Phone Use Scale For Turkish Adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 15, 205-211.
  • Hutton, G., Maggie Fosdick, (2011). The Globolization of Social Media, Consumer Relationships with Brands Evolve in The Digital Space. Journal of Avertising Research, December.
  • Idc, Worldwide Smartphone 2014–2018 Forecast Update. Mart-2014. http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=247140.
  • İhh (2015). Teknoloji kullanımı ve bağımlılığı açısından Türkiye gençliğinin fotoğrafı. İnsani Sosyal Araştırmalar Merkezi, http://insanhaklarimerkezi.bilgi.edu.tr/tr/ Erişim Tarihi: 02.10.2017.
  • Jacobsen, W.C. ve Forste, R. (2010). The Wired Generation: Academic and Social Outcomes of Electronic Media Use Among University Students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. (14)5, 275-280. doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0135.
  • Jena, R.K. (2015). Compulsive Use of Smartphone and Its Effect on Engaged Learning and Nomophobia. Smart Journal of Business Management Studies. (11)1, 42-51.
  • John, O.P. ve Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five Trait Taxonomy: History, Measurement, and Theoretical Perspectives. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. 2, 102-138.
  • Jylhä, P. ve Isometsä, E. (2006). The Relationship of Neuroticism and Extraversion to Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression in The General Population. Depression & Anxiety. (23)5, 281-289.
  • Kaplan, M. ve Haenlein, M. (2009). The Fairyland of Second Life: About Virtual Social Worlds and How to Use Them. Business Horizons. (52)6, 59-68.
  • Karaca, M. (2007). Sosyolojik Bir Olgu Olarak İnternet Gençliği: Elazığ Örneği. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Elazığ: FÜ. SBE.
  • King, A.L.S., Valença, A.M., Silva, A.C., Sancassiani, F., Machado, S., ve Nardi, A.E. (2014). Nomophobia: Impact of Cell Phone Use Interfering with Symptoms and Emotions of Individuals with Panic Disorder Compared with a Control Group. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health. 10, 28–35.
  • Koçer M. (2012). Erciyes Üniversitesi Öğrencilerinin İnternet Ve Sosyal Medya Kullanım Alışkanlıkları. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi. 18, 70-85.
  • Kuss, D.J. ve Griffiths, M.D. (2011). Excessive Online Social Networking: Can Adolescents Become Addicted to Facebook? Education and Health. 29, 63-66.
  • Kwon, M., Kim, D.J., Cho, H. ve Yang, S. (2013). The Smartphone Addiction Scale: Development and Validation of a Short Version for Adolescents. Plos One. (8)12, 1-7.
  • Lepp, A., Barkley, J.E., Sanders, G.J., Rebold., M. ve Gates, P. (2013). The Relationship Between Cell Phone Use, Physical and Sedentary Activity, and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in A Sample of U.S. College Students. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 10, 1-9.
  • Leung, L. (2008). Linking Psychological Attributes to Addiction and Improper Use of The Mobile Phone Among Adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of Children and Media. (2)2, 93-113.
  • McCrae, R.R. ve John, O.P. (1992). An Introduction to The Five Factor and Its Applications. Journal of Personality. (60)2, 175-215.
  • Mount, M.K., Barrick, M.R., Scullen, S.M. ve Rounds, J. (2005). Higher-Order Dimensions of The Big Five Personality Traits and The Big Six Vocational Interest Types. Personal Psychology. 58, 447-478.
  • Noyan, C.O., Darçın, E.A., Nurmedov, S., Yılmaz, O. ve Dilbaz, N. (2015). Akıllı Telefon Bağimliliği Ölçeğinin Kisa Formunun Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Türkçe Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik Çalişmasi. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi. (16)1, 73-81.
  • Ozer, I. (2014). Facebook Addiction, Intensive Social Networking Site Use, Multitasking, and Academic Performance Among University Students in The United States, Europe, and Turkey: A Multigroup Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Kent State University.
  • Przybylski, A.K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C.R. ve Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, Emotional, and Behavioral Correlates of Fear of Missing Out. Computers in Human Behavior. 1841–1848. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014.
  • Sayımer, İ. (2008). Sanal Ortamda Halkla İlişkiler. Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım: İstanbul.
  • Schmitt, D.P., Allik, J., McCrae, R.R. ve Benet-Martinez, V. (2007). The Geographic Distribution of Big Five Personality Traits: Patterns and Profiles of Human Self-Description Across 56 Nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. (38)2, 173-212.
  • Staiano, J., Lepri, B., Aharony, N., Pianesi, F., Sebe, N. ve Pentland, A. (2012). Friends don't Lie: Inferring Personality Traits from Social Network Structure. UbiComp ‟12, Sep 5-Sep 8, 2012, Pittsburgh, USA.
  • Sungur, Z. M. (1997). Fobik Bozukluklar. Psikiyatri Dünyası Dergisi. (1)1, 5-11.
  • Takao, M., Takahashi., S. ve Kitamura, M. (2009). Addictive Personality and Problematic Mobile Phone Use. Cyberpsychology and Behavior. 12, 501-507.
  • Tavolacci, M.P., Meyrignac, G., Richard, L., Dechelotte P., ve Ladner, J. (2015). Problematic Use of Mobile Phone and Nomophobia Among French College Students. The European Journal of Public Health. (25)3, 206.
  • Thoms, P., Moore, K.S. ve Scott, K. (1996). The Relationship Between Self-Efficacy for Participating in Self-Managed Work Groups and the Big Five Personality Dimensions. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 17, 349-362.
  • Toda, M. ve Ezoe, S. (2013). Multifactorial Study of Mobile Phone Dependence in Medical Students: Relationship to Health-Related Lifestyle, Type A Behavior, and Depressive State. Open Journal of Preventive Medicine. (3)1, 99-103.
  • Tüik, Hane Halkı Bilişim Teknolojileri Kullanım Araştırması, 2015, http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=18660,Kasım, 2017.
  • Uzgören, E., Mehmet, Ş. ve Yiğit, Ü. (2013). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Cep Telefonu Talebinde İsrafa Yönelik Davranışlarının Analizi -Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Öğrencilerine Yönelik Bir Uygulama. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. (18)1, 29-44.
  • Vural, Z. ve Bat, M. (2010). Yeni Bir İletişim Ortamı Olarak Sosyal Medya: Ege Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma. Yaşar Üniversitesi Dergisi. http://journal.yasar. edu.tr/wpcontent/ uploads/ 2012/08/3_BVural_ MBat.pdf, erişim tarihi: 10.11.2017.
  • Yen, C., Tang, T., Yen, J., Lin, H., Huang, C., ve Liu, S. (2009). Symptoms of Problematic Cellular Phone Use, Functional Impairment and Its Association with Depression Among Adolescents in Southern Taiwan, Journal of Adolescence. 32, 863-873.
  • Yen, C., Tang, T., Yen, J., Lin, H., Huang, C., ve Liu, S. (2009). Symptoms of Problematic Cellular Phone Use, Functional Impairment and Its Association with Depression Among Adolescents in Southern Taiwan. Journal of Adolescence. 32, 863-873.
  • Young, K. (1996). Internet Addiction; The Emergence of New Clinical Disorder. Cyber Psychology & Behavior. 1, 237-244.
  • http://www.dijitalajanslar.com/internet-ve-sosyal-medya-kullanici-istatistikleri-2017/ erişim: 15.11.2017.

The Relation of Smart Phone Addiction to Social Media Usage and Five Factor Personality Trait: A Research on University Students

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 695 - 717, 30.06.2018
https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.361081

Öz

In today’s society, social media usage through smartphones has become
an indispensable part of everyday life, especially among university students.
This situation brings up the smartphone addiction problem with it and it is
thought that it can be explained by associating the case with personality
traits. Therefore, in this research; smartphone dependency levels and social
media usage in students' relation to the Five Factor Personality traits have
been reviewed. To acquire the relevant research data, survey method and simple
random sampling method have been used. Correlation, simple linear regression,
multiple regression analyses were performed in addition to descriptive
statistics. As a result of the analyses, it was found that there were
statistically significant relationships between the personality traits of
students, smartphone dependency and social media usage. In addition, it was
seen that the social media usage increases the smartphone addiction.

Kaynakça

  • Akar, E. (2010). Sosyal Medya Pazarlaması, Sosyal Webde Pazarlama Stratejileri. Efil Yayınevi: İstanbul.
  • Allport, G.W. (1961). Pattern and Growth in Personality. Holt, Rinehart and Winston: New York.
  • Anagnostopoulos, A., Kumar, R. ve Mahdian, M. (2008). Influence and Correlation in Social Networks, KDD’08 Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 7-15, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
  • Antonioni, D. (1998). Relationship Between The Big Five Personality Factors and Conflict Management Styles. International Journal of Conflict Management. (9)4, 336-355.
  • Armelini, G. ve Villanueva, J. (2011). Adding Social Media to the Marketing Mix. IESE Insight Magazine. (2)9.
  • Bazana, P.G. ve Stelmack, R.M. (2004). Stability of Personality Across The Life Span: A Meta-Analysis. R. M. Stelmak, (Ed.), On The Psychology of Personality İçinde. Elsevier Ltd.
  • Bono, J.E., Boles, T.L., Judge, T.A. ve Lauver, K.J. (2002). The Role of Personality in Task and Relationship Conflict. Journal of Personality. (70)3, 1311-1344.
  • Borgatta, E.F. (1964). The Structure of Personality Characteristics. Behavioral Science. 9, 8-17.
  • Bouchard, G., Guillemette, A. ve Landry-Leger, N. (2004). Situational and Dispositional Coping: An Examination of Their Relation to Personality. Cognitive Appraisals and Psychological Distress. European Journal of Personality. 18, 221-238.
  • Boyd, D., Ellison, M., ve Nicole, B. (2007). Social Network: Definition, History and Scholarship, Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication. (13)1.
  • Bragazzı, N.L. ve Pente, G.D. (2014). A Proposal for Including Nomophobia in The New DSM-V. Psychology Research and Behavior Management. 7, 155-160.
  • Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2007). Personality and Individual Differences. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
  • Christensen, M.V. ve Kessing, L.V. (2006). Do Personality Traits Predict First Onset in Depressive and Bipolar Disorder? Nordic Journal of Psychiatry. (60)2, 79-88.
  • Costa, P.T. ve McCrae, R.R. (1992). Four Ways the Five Factors Are Basic. Personality and Individual Differences. 13, 653-665.
  • Costa, P.T. ve McCrae, R.R. (1995). Domains and Facets: Hiyerarchical Personality Assessment Using The Revised Neo Personality İnventory. Journal of Personality Assessment. (64)1, 21-50.
  • Dawley, L. (2009). Social Network Knowledge Construction: Emerging Virtual World Pedagogy. On The Horizon. (17)2.
  • Delongis, A. ve Holtzman, S. (2005). Coping in Context: The Role of Stres. Social Support and Personality in Coping. 73, 1633-1656.
  • Erkul, R. Erdem (2009). Sosyal Medya Araçlarının (Web 2.0) Kamu Hizmetleri ve Uygulamalarında Kullanılabilirliği. Türkiye Bilişim Derneği Bilişim Dergisi. (11)6, 96-101.
  • Eysenck, H.J. (1951). The Organization of Personality. Journal of Personality. (20)1, 101-107.
  • George, D., ve Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0 Update (10a ed.) Pearson: Boston.
  • Göker, G. (2015). İletişimin Mcdonaldlaşması: Sosyal Medya Üzerine Bir İnceleme. International Periodical For the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic. Winter (10)2.
  • Goldberg, L.R. (1990). An Alternative Description of Personality: The Big Five Factor Structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 59, 1216-1229.
  • Graziano, W.G., Jensen-Campbell, A.L. ve Hair, C.E. (1996). Perceiving Interpersonal Conflict and Reacting to it: The Case for Agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 70, 820-835.
  • Guenole, N. ve Chernyshenko, O. (2005). The Suitability of Goldberg’s Big Five Personality Markers in New Zealand: A Dimensionality, Bias, and Criterion Validity Evaluation. New Zealand Journal of Psychology. (34)2, 86-96.
  • Güzeller, C.O. ve Coşguner, T. (2012). Development of A Problematic Mobile Phone Use Scale For Turkish Adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 15, 205-211.
  • Hutton, G., Maggie Fosdick, (2011). The Globolization of Social Media, Consumer Relationships with Brands Evolve in The Digital Space. Journal of Avertising Research, December.
  • Idc, Worldwide Smartphone 2014–2018 Forecast Update. Mart-2014. http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=247140.
  • İhh (2015). Teknoloji kullanımı ve bağımlılığı açısından Türkiye gençliğinin fotoğrafı. İnsani Sosyal Araştırmalar Merkezi, http://insanhaklarimerkezi.bilgi.edu.tr/tr/ Erişim Tarihi: 02.10.2017.
  • Jacobsen, W.C. ve Forste, R. (2010). The Wired Generation: Academic and Social Outcomes of Electronic Media Use Among University Students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. (14)5, 275-280. doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0135.
  • Jena, R.K. (2015). Compulsive Use of Smartphone and Its Effect on Engaged Learning and Nomophobia. Smart Journal of Business Management Studies. (11)1, 42-51.
  • John, O.P. ve Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five Trait Taxonomy: History, Measurement, and Theoretical Perspectives. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. 2, 102-138.
  • Jylhä, P. ve Isometsä, E. (2006). The Relationship of Neuroticism and Extraversion to Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression in The General Population. Depression & Anxiety. (23)5, 281-289.
  • Kaplan, M. ve Haenlein, M. (2009). The Fairyland of Second Life: About Virtual Social Worlds and How to Use Them. Business Horizons. (52)6, 59-68.
  • Karaca, M. (2007). Sosyolojik Bir Olgu Olarak İnternet Gençliği: Elazığ Örneği. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Elazığ: FÜ. SBE.
  • King, A.L.S., Valença, A.M., Silva, A.C., Sancassiani, F., Machado, S., ve Nardi, A.E. (2014). Nomophobia: Impact of Cell Phone Use Interfering with Symptoms and Emotions of Individuals with Panic Disorder Compared with a Control Group. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health. 10, 28–35.
  • Koçer M. (2012). Erciyes Üniversitesi Öğrencilerinin İnternet Ve Sosyal Medya Kullanım Alışkanlıkları. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi. 18, 70-85.
  • Kuss, D.J. ve Griffiths, M.D. (2011). Excessive Online Social Networking: Can Adolescents Become Addicted to Facebook? Education and Health. 29, 63-66.
  • Kwon, M., Kim, D.J., Cho, H. ve Yang, S. (2013). The Smartphone Addiction Scale: Development and Validation of a Short Version for Adolescents. Plos One. (8)12, 1-7.
  • Lepp, A., Barkley, J.E., Sanders, G.J., Rebold., M. ve Gates, P. (2013). The Relationship Between Cell Phone Use, Physical and Sedentary Activity, and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in A Sample of U.S. College Students. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 10, 1-9.
  • Leung, L. (2008). Linking Psychological Attributes to Addiction and Improper Use of The Mobile Phone Among Adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of Children and Media. (2)2, 93-113.
  • McCrae, R.R. ve John, O.P. (1992). An Introduction to The Five Factor and Its Applications. Journal of Personality. (60)2, 175-215.
  • Mount, M.K., Barrick, M.R., Scullen, S.M. ve Rounds, J. (2005). Higher-Order Dimensions of The Big Five Personality Traits and The Big Six Vocational Interest Types. Personal Psychology. 58, 447-478.
  • Noyan, C.O., Darçın, E.A., Nurmedov, S., Yılmaz, O. ve Dilbaz, N. (2015). Akıllı Telefon Bağimliliği Ölçeğinin Kisa Formunun Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Türkçe Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik Çalişmasi. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi. (16)1, 73-81.
  • Ozer, I. (2014). Facebook Addiction, Intensive Social Networking Site Use, Multitasking, and Academic Performance Among University Students in The United States, Europe, and Turkey: A Multigroup Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Kent State University.
  • Przybylski, A.K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C.R. ve Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, Emotional, and Behavioral Correlates of Fear of Missing Out. Computers in Human Behavior. 1841–1848. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014.
  • Sayımer, İ. (2008). Sanal Ortamda Halkla İlişkiler. Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım: İstanbul.
  • Schmitt, D.P., Allik, J., McCrae, R.R. ve Benet-Martinez, V. (2007). The Geographic Distribution of Big Five Personality Traits: Patterns and Profiles of Human Self-Description Across 56 Nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. (38)2, 173-212.
  • Staiano, J., Lepri, B., Aharony, N., Pianesi, F., Sebe, N. ve Pentland, A. (2012). Friends don't Lie: Inferring Personality Traits from Social Network Structure. UbiComp ‟12, Sep 5-Sep 8, 2012, Pittsburgh, USA.
  • Sungur, Z. M. (1997). Fobik Bozukluklar. Psikiyatri Dünyası Dergisi. (1)1, 5-11.
  • Takao, M., Takahashi., S. ve Kitamura, M. (2009). Addictive Personality and Problematic Mobile Phone Use. Cyberpsychology and Behavior. 12, 501-507.
  • Tavolacci, M.P., Meyrignac, G., Richard, L., Dechelotte P., ve Ladner, J. (2015). Problematic Use of Mobile Phone and Nomophobia Among French College Students. The European Journal of Public Health. (25)3, 206.
  • Thoms, P., Moore, K.S. ve Scott, K. (1996). The Relationship Between Self-Efficacy for Participating in Self-Managed Work Groups and the Big Five Personality Dimensions. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 17, 349-362.
  • Toda, M. ve Ezoe, S. (2013). Multifactorial Study of Mobile Phone Dependence in Medical Students: Relationship to Health-Related Lifestyle, Type A Behavior, and Depressive State. Open Journal of Preventive Medicine. (3)1, 99-103.
  • Tüik, Hane Halkı Bilişim Teknolojileri Kullanım Araştırması, 2015, http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=18660,Kasım, 2017.
  • Uzgören, E., Mehmet, Ş. ve Yiğit, Ü. (2013). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Cep Telefonu Talebinde İsrafa Yönelik Davranışlarının Analizi -Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Öğrencilerine Yönelik Bir Uygulama. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. (18)1, 29-44.
  • Vural, Z. ve Bat, M. (2010). Yeni Bir İletişim Ortamı Olarak Sosyal Medya: Ege Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma. Yaşar Üniversitesi Dergisi. http://journal.yasar. edu.tr/wpcontent/ uploads/ 2012/08/3_BVural_ MBat.pdf, erişim tarihi: 10.11.2017.
  • Yen, C., Tang, T., Yen, J., Lin, H., Huang, C., ve Liu, S. (2009). Symptoms of Problematic Cellular Phone Use, Functional Impairment and Its Association with Depression Among Adolescents in Southern Taiwan, Journal of Adolescence. 32, 863-873.
  • Yen, C., Tang, T., Yen, J., Lin, H., Huang, C., ve Liu, S. (2009). Symptoms of Problematic Cellular Phone Use, Functional Impairment and Its Association with Depression Among Adolescents in Southern Taiwan. Journal of Adolescence. 32, 863-873.
  • Young, K. (1996). Internet Addiction; The Emergence of New Clinical Disorder. Cyber Psychology & Behavior. 1, 237-244.
  • http://www.dijitalajanslar.com/internet-ve-sosyal-medya-kullanici-istatistikleri-2017/ erişim: 15.11.2017.
Toplam 60 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Metin Işık 0000-0003-4577-0095

İrem Kaptangil Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Işık, M., & Kaptangil, İ. (2018). Akıllı Telefon Bağımlılığının Sosyal Medya Kullanımı ve Beş Faktör Kişilik Özelliği İle İlişkisi: Üniversite Öğrencileri Üzerinden Bir Araştırma. İnsan Ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(2), 695-717. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.361081

Cited By






















Kişilik Özelliklerinin Faydacı ve Hedonik Tüketim Davranışı Üzerindeki Etkisi
Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
Şahin EKBER
https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.884138



İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi  Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY NC) ile lisanslanmıştır.