Sustainable Communication in 5G/6G Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey on Energy-Efficient Collaborative Routing

Öz

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) play an important role in modern communication systems with the advances in 5G/6G technologies. These networks have a wide range of applications, from smart cities to industrial automation, from environmental monitoring systems to healthcare applications. However, since sensor nodes have limited energy resources, energy efficiency remains a critical issue for the sustainability of these networks. Low-power routing protocols are needed to ensure the long lifespan and efficient operation of sensor nodes. This study comprehensively studies cooperative energy-efficient routing protocols designed to achieve sustainability in WSNs. First of all, the basic principles of cooperative routing methods are discussed and approaches to optimize data transmission between nodes are reviewed. Then, different energy-efficient routing protocols are compared and the pros and cons of hierarchical, planar and location-based protocols are analyzed. It is shown that by integrating artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) techniques into routing protocols, it is possible to dynamically optimize node selection processes and extend the network lifetime. This survey summarizes the current status of energy-efficient routing protocols, discusses the challenges encountered and suggests potential directions for future research.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• wireless sensor networks
• energy efficiency
• routing protocols
• 5G/6G
• artificial intelligence

5G/6G Kablosuz Sensör Ağlarında Sürdürülebilir Haberleşme: Enerji Verimli İşbirliğine Dayalı Rotalama Üzerine Literatür Taraması

Öz

Kablosuz sensör ağları (KSA’lar), 5G/6G teknolojilerindeki gelişmelerle birlikte yeni iletişim sistemlerinde önemli bir rol oynamaktadır. Bu ağlar, akıllı şehirlerden endüstriyel otomasyona, çevre izleme sistemlerinden sağlık uygulamalarına kadar geniş bir uygulama yelpazesine sahiptir. Ancak, sensör düğümlerinin sınırlı enerji kaynaklarına sahip olması nedeniyle, enerji verimliliği bu ağların sürdürülebilirliği için kritik bir konu olmaya devam etmektedir. Sensör düğümlerinin uzun ömürlü ve verimli çalışmasını sağlamak için düşük güçlü yönlendirme protokollerine ihtiyaç vardır. Bu çalışma, KSA’larda sürdürülebilirliği sağlamak için tasarlanmış işbirlikçi enerji verimli yönlendirme protokollerini incelemektedir. Her şeyden önce, işbirlikçi yönlendirme yöntemlerinin temel prensipleri tartışılmakta ve düğümler arasında veri iletimini optimize etme yaklaşımları incelenmektedir. Ardından, farklı enerji verimli yönlendirme protokolleri karşılaştırılmakta ve hiyerarşik, düzlemsel ve konum tabanlı protokollerin artıları ve eksileri analiz edilmektedir. Yapay zeka ve makine öğrenimi tekniklerinin yönlendirme protokollerine entegre edilmesiyle, düğüm seçim süreçlerinin dinamik olarak optimize edilmesinin ve ağ ömrünün uzatılmasının mümkün olduğu gösterilmektedir. Bu literatür taraması, enerji açısından verimli yönlendirme protokollerinin mevcut durumu özetlenmiş, karşılaşılan zorluklar tartışılmış ve gelecekteki araştırmalar için olası yönler önermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• kablosuz sensör ağları
• enerji verimliliği
• yönlendirme protokolleri
• 5G/6G
• yapay zeka

Kaynakça

1. D. Kandris and E. Anastasiadis, “Advanced wireless sensor networks: Applications, challenges and future directions,” Electronics, vol. 13, no. 12, p. 2268, 2023. DOI: 10.3390/electronics13122268.
2. D. Kannaujaiya and A. K. Dwivedi, “Challenges, issues, and applications of wireless sensor networks: A review,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Innovative Computing and Communication Technologies (ICICAT), 2023. DOI: 10.1109/ICICAT57735.2023.10263699.
3. O. Demigha, W.-K. Hidouci, and T. Ahmed, “On energy efficiency in collaborative target tracking in wireless sensor network: A review,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1210–1221, 2013.
4. I. Stanojev, O. Simeone, Y. Bar-Ness, and D. H. Kim, “Energy efficiency of non-collaborative and collaborative hybrid-arq protocols,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 326–337, 2009.
5. C. Felicetti, R. D. Rose, C. Raso, A. M. Felicetti, and S. Ammirato, “Collaborative smart environments for energy-efficiency and quality of life,” International Journal of Engineering and Technology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 543–552, 2015.
6. T. M. Behera, U. C. Samal, S. K. Mohapatra, et al., “Energy-efficient routing protocols for wireless sensor networks: Architectures, strategies, and performance,” Electronics, vol. 11, no. 15, p. 2282, 2022.
7. A. Al-Shaikh, H. Khattab, and S. Al-Sharaeh, “Performance comparison of leach and leach-c protocols in wireless sensor networks,” Journal of Computing & Communication, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 219–236, 2018. DOI: 10.5614/itbj.ict.res.appl.2018.12.3.2.
8. C. Schurgers and M. B. Srivastava, “Energy efficient routing in wireless sensor networks,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications, vol. 1, 2001, pp. 357–361.

9. C. Nakas, D. Kandris, and G. Visvardis, “Energy efficient routing in wireless sensor networks: A comprehensive survey,” Algorithms, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 72, 2020.
10. H. L. Gururaj, R. Natarajan, N. A. Almujally, F. Flammini, S. Krishna, and S. K. Gupta, “Collaborative energy-efficient routing protocol for sustainable communication in 5g/6g wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 4, pp. 2050–2061, 2023.
11. O. M. Gul and A. M. Erkmen, “Energy-efficient cluster-based data collection by a uav with a limited-capacity battery in robotic wireless sensor networks,” Sensors, vol. 20, p. 5865, 2020.
12. O. M. Gul, A. M. Erkmen, and B. Kantarci, “Uav-driven sustainable and quality-aware data collection in robotic wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, pp. 25 150–25 164, 2022.
13. O. M. Gul and A. M. Erkmen, “Energy-aware uav-driven data collection with priority in robotic wireless sensor network,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 23, pp. 17 667–17 675, 2023.
14. O. M. Gul, A. M. Erkmen, and B. Kantarci, “Ntn-aided quality and energy-aware data collection in time-critical robotic wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Internet of Things Magazine, vol. 7, pp. 114–120, 2024.
15. O. M. Gul, “Uav-driven robust and energy-aware data collection in robotic wireless sensor networks,” in 2024 15th IFIP Wireless and Mobile Networking Conference (WMNC), vol. 1, 2024, pp. 17–24.
16. O. M. Gul, “A novel energy-aware path planning by autonomous underwater vehicle in underwater wireless sensor networks,” Turkish Journal of Maritime and Marine Sciences, vol. 10, pp. 81–94, 2024.
17. O. M. Gul and M. Demirekler, “Average throughput performance of myopic policy in energy harvesting wireless sensor networks,” Sensors, vol. 17, p. 2206, 2017.
18. O. M. Gul and M. Demirekler, “Asymptotically throughput optimal scheduling for energy harvesting wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 45 004–45 020, 2018.
19. O. M. Gul, “Achieving near-optimal fairness in energy harvesting wireless sensor networks,” in 2019 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), vol. 1, 2019, pp. 1–6.
20. M. Biradar and B. Mathapathi, “Secure, reliable and energy efficient routing in wsn: A systematic literature survey,” in 2021 International Conference on Advances in Electrical, Computing, Communication and Sustainable Technologies (ICAECT), IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–7. DOI: 10.1109/ICAECT49130.2021.9392561.
21. E. Gures, I. Shaye, A. Alhammadi, M. Ergen, and H. Mohamad, “A comprehensive survey on mobility management in 5g heterogeneous networks: Architectures, challenges and solutions,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 195 883–195 901, 2020.
22. X.Wang, X.Wang, and J. Zhao, “Impact of mobility and heterogeneity on coverage and energy consumption in wireless sensor networks,” in 31st International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, 2011, pp. 477–484.
23. P. B. et al., “Ai-driven approaches for optimizing power consumption: A comprehensive survey,” Journal of Energy Informatics, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 234–256, 2024.
24. A. Pasqualetto, L. Serafini, and M. Sprocatti, Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Energy Efficiency: A Review. Department of Information Engineering, University of Padua, 2024.
25. M. Mahamat, G. Jaber, and A. Bouabdallah, “Achieving efficient energy-aware security in iot networks: A survey of recent solutions and research challenges,” Wireless Networks, vol. 29, pp. 787–808, 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s11276-022-03170-y.
26. R. Priyadarshi, “Energy-efficient routing in wireless sensor networks: A meta-heuristic and artificial intelligence-based approach: A comprehensive review,” Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 231–256, 2024.
27. S. Misra, M. Reisslein, and G. Xue, “A survey of multimedia streaming in wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 18–39, 2008. DOI: 10.1109/SURV.2008.080404.
28. K. Tebessi and F. Semchedine, “An improvement on leachc protocol (leach-ccmsn),” Russian Journal of Electrical Engineering, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 10–16, 2022. DOI: 10.3103/S0146411622010102.
29. P. Rawat and S. Chauhan, “Clustering protocols in wireless sensor network: A survey, classification, issues, and future directions,” Computer Science Review, vol. 41, p. 100 396, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100396.
30. M. Hosseinzadeh, J. Yoo, and S. A. et al., “A clusterbased trusted routing method using fire hawk optimizer (fho) in wireless sensor networks (wsns),” Scientific Reports, vol. 13, p. 13 046, 2023. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-40273-8.
31. K. H. M and R. Dilli, “Wireless sensor networks: Network life time enhancement using an improved grey wolf optimization algorithm,” Engineered Science, vol. 19, pp. 186–197, 2022, ISSN: 2576-9898. DOI: 10.30919/es8d717.
32. S. Sharmin, I. Ahmedy, and R. Md Noor, “An energy-efficient data aggregation clustering algorithm for wireless sensor networks using hybrid pso,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 5, 2023, ISSN: 1996-1073. DOI: 10.3390/en16052487.
33. Y. Yu, R. Govindan, and D. Estrin, “Geographical and energy aware routing: A recursive data dissemination protocol for wireless sensor networks,” UCLA Computer Science Department, Los Angeles, CA, USA, Tech. Rep., 2001, pp. 1–11.
34. J. Newsome and D. Song, “Gem: Graph embedding for routing and data-centric storage in sensor networks without geographic information,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2003, pp. 76–88.
35. B. Blum, T. He, S. Son, and J. Stankovic, “Igf: A state-free robust communication protocol for wireless sensor networks,” Department of Computer Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA, Tech. Rep. CS-2003-11, 2003.
36. G. Lukachan and M. Labrador, “Selar: Scalable energy-efficient location aided routing protocol for wireless sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the 29th Annual IEEE International Conference on Local Computer Networks, Tampa, FL, USA, 2004, pp. 694–695.
37. B. Leong, B. Liskov, and R. Morris, “Geographic routing without planarization,” in Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, vol. 3, San Jose, CA, USA, 2006, pp. 25–39.
38. M. Zimmerling, W. Dargie, and J. Reason, “Energy-efficient routing in linear wireless sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems (MASS 2007), Pisa, Italy, 2007, pp. 1–3.
39. D. Chen and P. K. Varshney, “On-demand geographic forwarding for data delivery in wireless sensor networks,” Computer Communications, vol. 30, no. 14, pp. 2954–2967, 2007, Network Coverage and Routing Schemes for Wireless Sensor Networks, ISSN: 0140-3664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2007.05.022.
40. L. Zou, M. Lu, and Z. Xiong, “Pager-m: A novel location-based routing protocol for mobile sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, Beijing, China, 2007, pp. 1182–1185.
41. M. Chen, V. C. M. Leung, S. Mao, Y. Xiao, and I. Chlamtac, “Hybrid geographic routing for flexible energy—delay tradeoff,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 4976–4988, 2009. DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2009.2025767.
42. V. Rodoplu and T. Meng, “Minimum energy mobile wireless networks,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1333–1344, 1999. DOI: 10.1109/49.779917.
43. L. Li and J. Halpern, “Minimum energy mobile wireless networks revisited,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Helsinki, Finland, 2001, pp. 278–283.
44. Y. Xu, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin, “Geography-informed energy conservation for ad hoc routing,” in Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom), Rome, Italy, 2001.
45. C. Boucetta, H. Idoudi, and L. Saidane, “Ant colony optimization based hierarchical data dissemination in wsn,” in Proceedings of the 2015 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2015.
46. C. Boucetta, H. Idoudi, and L. Saidane, “Adaptive scheduling with fault tolerance for wireless sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 81st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), Glasgow, Scotland, 2015.
47. C. Eris, O. M. Gul, and P. S. Boluk, “An energy-harvesting aware cluster head selection policy in underwater acoustic sensor networks,” in 2023 International Balkan Conference on Communications and Networking (BalkanCom), vol. 1, 2023, pp. 1–5.
48. Ç. Eriş, Ö. M. Gül, and P. S. Bölük, “A novel medium access policy based on reinforcement learning in energy-harvesting underwater sensor networks,” Sensors, vol. 24, p. 5791, 2024.
49. Ç. Eriş, Ö. M. Gül, and P. S. Bölük, “A novel reinforcement learning based routing algorithm for energy management in networks,” Journal of Industrial Management and Optimization, vol. 20, p. 12, 2024.
50. M. Fathi, V. Maihami, and P. Moradi, “Reinforcement learning for multiple access control in wireless sensor networks: Review, model, and open issues,” Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 72, 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s11277- 013-1028-9.
51. M. Yari, P. Hadikhani, M. Yaghoubi, R. Nowrozy, and Z. Asgharzadeh, “An energy efficient routing algorithm for wireless sensor networks using mobile sensors,” arXiv preprint, vol. 2103.04119, 2021. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2103.04119.
52. D. A. Milovanovic and Z. S. Bojkovic, “Exploring 5g/6g energy-efficiency in mobile communications for sustainable future,” in Intelligent and Sustainable Engineering Systems for Industry 4.0 and Beyond, CRC Press, 2023, ch. 13, pp. 259–284. DOI: 10.1201/9781003511298-13.
53. A. Roy and T. Deb, “Performance comparison of routing protocols in mobile ad hoc networks,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing and Communication Systems, ser. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 24, Springer, 2018, pp. 33–48. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-6890-4_4. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6890-4_4.
54. M. Sabokrou, M. Fathy, and M. Hoseini, “Idsa: Intelligent distributed sensor activation algorithm for target tracking with wireless sensor network,” arXiv preprint, vol. 1506.00122, 2015.
55. S. Zhang, S. Liu, V. Sharma, and P. K. Varshney, “Optimal sensor collaboration for parameter tracking using energy harvesting sensors,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 2647–2659, 2018. DOI: 10.1109/TSP.2018.2827319.
56. H. Y. Shwe, A. Kumar, and P. H. J. Chong, “Building efficient multi-level wireless sensor networks with cluster-based routing protocol,” KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, vol. 10, pp. 4272–4286, 2016. DOI:10.3837/tiis.2016.09.014.
57. A. Javadpour, “An optimize-aware target tracking method with combine mac layer and active nodes in wireless sensor networks,” arXiv preprint, vol. 2005.06598, 2020.
58. H. Wang, N. Agoulmine, M. Ma, and Y. Jin, “Network lifetime optimization in wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1127–1137, 2010. DOI: 10.1109/JSAC.2010.100917.
59. A. K. Salama and M. M. Abdellatif, “Aiot-based smart home energy management system,” in Proc. 2022 Global Conference on Artificial Intelligence of Things (GCAIoT), 2022, pp. 177–181. DOI: 10.1109/GCAIoT57150.2022.10019091.
60. H. Wang, J. Zhang, and Z. Chen, “Coverage and energy consumption control in mobile heterogeneous wireless sensor networks,” International Journal of Sensor Networks, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 273–285, 2015.
61. W. T. et al., “Mobility robustness optimization in future mobile heterogeneous networks: A survey,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 45 522–45 537, 2022.
62. P. E. I. Rivera, M. Elsayed, M. Bavand, R. Gaigalas, S. Furr, and M. Erol-Kantarci, “Hierarchical deep q-learning based handover in wireless networks with dual connectivity,” arXiv preprint, vol. 2301.05391, 2023. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2301.05391.
63. H. F. Alhashimi, M. N. Hindia, K. Dimyati, et al., “A survey on resource management for 6g heterogeneous networks: Current research, future trends, and challenges,” Electronics, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 647, 2023. DOI: 10.3390/electronics12030647.
64. H. Yang and B. Sikdar, “A protocol for tracking mobile targets using sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the First IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications, 2003., 2003, pp. 71–81. DOI: 10.1109/SNPA.2003.1203358.
65. M. Rajagopal, “Optimal power control technique for a wireless sensor node: A new approach,” International Journal of Computer and Electrical Engineering, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 1, 2011. DOI: 10.7763/IJCEE.2011.V3.289.
66. G. Samara, G. AlBesani, M. Alauthman, and M. A. Khaldy, “Energy-efficiency routing algorithms in wireless sensor networks: A survey,” International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 4415–4419, 2020.
67. W. Osamy, M. Khedr, A. Salim, A. I. A. Ali, and A. A. El-Sawy, “A review on recent studies utilizing artificial intelligence methods for solving routing challenges in wireless sensor networks,” PeerJ Computer Science, vol. 8, e1089, 2022. DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1089.
68. J. Costa-Requena, A Hybrid Routing Approach for Ad Hoc Networks. Tampere University of Technology, Finland, 2005.
69. R. Priyadarshi, “Energy-efficient routing in wireless sensor networks: A meta-heuristic and artificial intelligence-based approach: A comprehensive review,” Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 2109–2137, May 2024, ISSN: 1886-1784. DOI: 10.1007/s11831-023-10039-6.
70. A. Sharma, H. Babbar, S. Rani, D. K. Sah, S. Sehar, and G. Gianini, “Mhseer: A meta-heuristic secure and energy-efficient routing protocol for wireless sensor network-based industrial iot,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 10, 2023, ISSN: 1996-1073. DOI: 10.3390/en16104198.
71. A. Rovira-Sugranes, A. Razi, F. Afghah, and J. Chakareski, “A review of ai-enabled routing protocols for uav networks: Trends, challenges, and future outlook,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 130, p. 102 790, 2022, ISSN: 1570-8705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2022.102790.
72. I. Bhattacharjee, “Ai-driven routing: Transforming network efficiency and resilience,” TechRxiv, vol. Preprint, 2025, Preliminary report, not peer reviewed. DOI: 10.36227/techrxiv.174114640.07395422/v1. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.174114640.07395422/v1.
73. D. S. Ibrahim, A. F. Mahdi, and Q. M. Yas, “Challenges and issues for wireless sensor networks: A survey,” Journal of Global Scientific Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1079–1097, 2021.
74. K. Haseeb, A. Almogren, N. Islam, I. Ud Din, and Z. Jan, “An energy-efficient and secure routing protocol for intrusion avoidance in iot-based wsn,” Energies, vol. 12, no. 21, 2019, ISSN: 1996-1073. DOI: 10.3390/en12214174.
75. S. B. Khan, A. Kumar, A. Mashat, D. Pruthviraja, M. K. I. Rahmani, and J. Mathew, “Artificial intelligence in next-generation networking: Energy efficiency optimization in iot networks using hybrid leach protocol,” SN Computer Science, vol. 5, no. 5, p. 546, May 2024, ISSN: 2661-8907. DOI: 10.1007/s42979-024-02778-5.
76. M. Lacoste, G. Privat, and F. Ramparany, “Evaluating confidence in context for context-aware security,” in Ambient Intelligence, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007, pp. 211–229, ISBN: 978-3-540-76652-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76652-0_13.