Negotiorum Gestio As a Source of Obligation: From Roman Law to Modern Codes

Öz

The legal institution of Negotiorum Gestio refers first and foremost to the act of helping or aiding someone in need, typically with the intention of doing good or promoting the well-being of the recipient. This concept has a long history, with roots in Roman law and its diversified influence on modern legal systems. In this article, we explore the evolution of negotiorum gestio from its origins in Roman law to its current manifestation in modern civil codes while providing an examination of how the concept has been defined, understood, and applied within Roman law over time as well as of its long journey through out ius commune to the modern codification era. Being a strictly Roman law institution, the prevalent incorporation of negotiorum gestio into the codes of the ‘civil law’ jurisdiction as well as its designation as one of the sources for non-contractual obligations under the harmonized rules of ‘EU Rome II Regulation’ calls for a close-in analysis of this originally Roman concept which will shed light on the degrees of the evolution, transformation and reception it had experienced while helping to make sense of its current state in modern civil law.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Negotiorum Gestio
• Actio Negotiorum Directa
• Actio Negotiorum Contra
• Genuine Negotiorum Gestio
• Non-Genuine Negotiorum Gestio
• Mandate

Kaynakça

1. Aeby K, Die Geschaftsführung ohne Auftrag nach Schweizerischem Recht, (Universitat Zurich 1928) google scholar
2. Aksoy H C, ‘Vekaletsiz İş Görende İşi Vekaletsiz Olarak Görme Bilinci Aranmalı mıdır?’ (2017) 75 Ankara Barosu Dergisi 91 google scholar
3. Anson R W, Principles ofEnglish Law of Contract and ofAgency in Its Relation to Contract (18th ed, OUP 1937) google scholar
4. Arangio-Ruiz V, Il Mandato in Diritto Romano (Jovene 1949) google scholar
5. Arkan Akbıyık A, Gerçek Olmayan Vekaletsiz İş Görme (Alfa 1999) google scholar
6. Avorel K T, ‘Negotiorum Gestio’nun Şartları’ (1987) 3 (1-4) Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi HukukFakültesi Dergisi 33 google scholar
7. Ayan M, Tıbbi Müdahalelerden Doğan Hukuki Sorumluluk (Kazancı 1991) google scholar
8. Baş Süzel E, Gerçek Olmayan Vekâletsiz İş Görme ve Menfaat Devri Yaptırımı (On İki Levha 2015) google scholar

9. Başoğlu B, ‘Non-genuine Benevolent Intervention in Another’s Affairs and Disgorgement of Profits Under Turkish Law’ in Ewoud Hondius, Andre Janssen (eds), Disgorgement of Profits Gain-Based Remedies throughout the world (Springer, 2015) google scholar
10. Beatson J (ed), Anson’s Principles of the English Law of Contract (28th ed, OUP 2002) google scholar
11. Becker H (ed), Kommentar zum schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuch, Band VI Obligationenrecht II Abteilung: Die einzelnen Vertragsverhaltnisse Art. 184-551 (Stampfli 1934) google scholar
12. Bellomo M, The Common Legal Past ofEurope (Lydia G. Cochrane tr, The Catholic University of America Press 1996) google scholar
13. Bergmann A, Reuter D, Werner O, Julius von Staudingers Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch mit Einführungsgesetz und Nebengesetzen, Buch 2 Recht der Schuldverhaltnisse §§ 677-704 (Gruyter 2015) google scholar
14. Berman H J, Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition Vol 1 (Harvard University Press 1983) google scholar
15. Birks P, An Introduction to the Law ofRestitution (Clarendon Press, 1936) google scholar
16. ----‘Negotiorum Gestio and Common Law’ (1971) 24 CLP 110 google scholar
17. Birks P, MacLeod G, ‘The Implied Contract Theory of Quasi-Contract: Civilian Opinion Current in the Century before Blackstone’ (1986) 6 OJLS 46 google scholar
18. Borkowski A, du Plessis P, Textbook on Roman Law (3rd ed, OUP 2005) google scholar
19. Bucher E, Obligationenrecht: Besonderer Teil (3rd edn, Schulthess 1988) google scholar
20. Buckland W W, A Text-Book ofRoman Law (Cambridge University Press 1963) google scholar
21. Burdese A, Manuale di Diritto Privato Romano (Utet 1966) google scholar
22. Buz V, Yenilik Doğuran Haklar (Yetkin 2005) google scholar
23. Canaris C W, ‘Risikohaftung bei schadensgeneigter Tatigkeit im fremden Interesse’ (1966) Recht der Arbeit 41 google scholar
24. Cartwright J, Whittaker S (eds), The Code Napoleon rewritten: French contract law after the 2016 reforms (Hart 2020) google scholar
25. Ceylan S G, ‘Roma Hukuku’nda Kayyımlık (Cura) Müessesesine Genel Bir Bakış’ (2004) 53 AÜHFD 221 google scholar
26. Dainow J, ‘The Civil Law and the Common Law: Some Points of Comparison’ (1966-67) 15 (3) google scholar
27. American Journal of Comparative Law 419 google scholar
28. Dawson J P, ‘Negotiorum Gestio: The Altruistic Intermeddler II’ (April 1961) 74 (6) Harvard Law Review 1073 google scholar
29. Decock W, Theologians and Contract Law: The Moral Transformation of the ius commune (ca 1500 - 1650) (Brill, 2012) google scholar
30. Di Marzo S, Roma Hukuku, (Ziya Umur trs, 2nd ed, İÜ Yayınları 1959) google scholar
31. Dornis T W, ‘The Doctrines of Contract and Negotiorum Gestio in European Private Law: Quest for Structure in a No Man’s Land of Legal Reasoning,’ (2015) 23 Restitution Law Review 79 google scholar
32. Dural M, ‘Roma Hukukunda Akit Benzerleri -Quasi Contractus-‘ (2011) 33 (3-4) İÜHFD 257 google scholar
33. Emiroğlu H, ‘Roma Hukukunda Vekalet Sözleşmesi (Mandatum) ve Hukuki İşlemlerde Temsil’ (2003) 52 (1) AÜHFD 101 google scholar
34. Enneccerus L, Lehmann H, Lehrbuch des Bürgerlichen Rechts II (14th edn, Mohr, 1954) google scholar
35. Ercoşkun Şenol H K, ‘Gerçek Olmayan Vekâletsiz İş Görmenin Sistematik Açıdan Borçlar Kanunundaki Yeri ve 2020 İsviçre Borçlar Kanunu Tasarısı’ndaki Durum’ (2018) 22 (4) Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 37 google scholar
36. Eren F, Borçlar Hukuku Özel Hükümler (4th edn, Yetkin 2017) google scholar
37. Frese B, ‘Procurator und Negotiorum Gestio im Römischen Recht’ in Melanges de droit romain dedies â Georges Cornil Vol I (Paris 1926) google scholar
38. Gordley J, Jurists: A Critical History (OUP 2014) google scholar
39. Gordley J, The Philosophical Origins of Modern Contract Doctrine (Clarendon Press 1991) google scholar
40. Goff R, Jones G, The Law of Restitution (Sweet & Maxwell 1966) google scholar
41. Gökcan H T, Tıbbi Müdahaleden Doğan Hukuki ve Cezai Sorumluluk (Seçkin 2013) google scholar
42. Guhl T, Schnyder A K, Koller A, Druey J N, Das Schweizerische Obligationenrecht - mit Einschluss des Handels und Wertpapierrechts (9th edn, Schulthess 2000) google scholar
43. Güriz A, Hukuk Başlangıcı (Siyasal Kitabevi 1997) google scholar
44. Gürten K, ‘Roma Hukuku ve İngiliz Hukuku’na Karşılaştırmalı bir Bakış’ (2016) 65 (1) AÜHFD 183 google scholar
45. Gümüş M A, Borçlar Hukuku Özel Hükümler II (3rd edn, Vedat, 2014) google scholar
46. Gradenwitz O, Interpolationen in den Pandekten (Weidmannsche 1887) google scholar
47. Hagenbüchli H A, Die Ansprüche des Geschaftsführers ohne Auftrag und ihre Voraussetzungen (Diss. Univ. Zürich. 95 S.8, Davos, 1926) google scholar
48. Hallebeek J, The Concept of Unjust Enrichment in Late Scholasticism (GNI, 1996) google scholar
49. Hamilton P J, ‘The Civil Law and Common Law’ (1922) 36 (2) Harvard Law Review 180 google scholar
50. Hans Theodor Soergel (ed), Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch mit Einführungsgesetz und Nebengesetzen: BGB, Band 10: Schuldrecht 8 (13th edn, Kohlhammer 2012) google scholar
51. Hatemi H, ‘Türk Hukukunda Gerçek Olmayan Vekaletsiz İş Görme Kurumuna İlişkin Düşünceler’ in Nami Barlas, Abuzer Kendigelen, Suat Sarı (eds), Prof. Dr. M. Kemal Oğuzman’ın Anısına Armağan (Seçkin 2000) google scholar
52. Hatemi H, Serozan R, Arpacı A, Borçlar Hukuku: Özel Bölüm (Filiz 1999) google scholar
53. Helm J G, ‘Geschaftsführung ohne Auftrag’ in Gutachten und Vorschlage zur Überarbeitung des Schuldrechts III (Bundesanzeiger, 1983) google scholar
54. Helvacı H, Aydın G S, ‘Kişilik Hakkı İhlâlinden Doğan Vekâletsiz İşgörmede Kusurun Bir Şart Olarak Aranıp Aranmayacağı Sorunu’ (2017) 23 Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi 265 google scholar
55. Hofstetter J, Der Auftrag und die Geschaftsführung ohne Auftrag (2nd edn, Helbing & Lichtenhahn 2000) google scholar
56. Honsell H, ‘Die Risikohaftung des Geschaftsheım’ in Manfred Harder und Georg Thielmann (eds), De iustitia et iure: Festgabe für Ulrich von Lübtow zum 80. Geburtstag (Duncker & Humbolt 1980) google scholar
57. Honsell H, Vogt N P, Wiegand W (eds), Basler Kommentar zum Schweizerischen Privatrecht, Obligationenrecht I, Art.1-529 OR (6th edn, Helbing & Lichtenhahn 2015) google scholar
58. Honsell H, Schweizerisches Obligationenrecht, Besonderer Teil (9th edn, Stampfli 2010) google scholar
59. Hope E W, ‘Officiousness’ (1929) 15 Cornell L. Rev. 25 google scholar
60. Helm T, ‘Disgorgement of Profits in German Law’ in Ewoud Hondius, Andre Janssen (eds) Disgorgement of Profits: Gain-based remedies throughout the world (Springer 2015) google scholar
61. Huguenin C, Hilty R (eds), Schweizer Obligationenrecht 2020: Entwurffür einen neuen allgemeinen Teil = Code des obligations suisse 2020 ((Schulthess 2013). google scholar
62. Huguenin C, Obligationenrecht - Allgemeiner und Besonderer Teil (Schultess 2014) google scholar
63. J. von Staudingers Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch: Staudinger BGB - Buch 2: Recht der Schuldverhaltnisse: §§ 677-704 (12th edn, Degruyter 1991) google scholar
64. Jackson M R, The History of Quasi- Contract in English Law (Cambridge University Press 1936) google scholar
65. Jansen N, ‘Die Korrektur grundloser Vermögensverschiebungen als Restitution? Zur Lehre von der ungerechtfertigten Bereicherung bei Savigny’ (2006) 120 ZSS: Romanistische Abteilung, 106. google scholar
66. Jansen N, ‘Ius commune’ in Jürgen Basedow, Klaus J. Hopt, Reinhard Zimmermann (eds), Max Planck Encyclopedia of European Private Law Vol. II (OUP 2012) 1106 google scholar
67. Jansen N, ‘Management of Another’s Affairs without a Mandate (Negotiorum Gestio)’ in Jürgen Basedow, Klaus J. Hopt, Reinhard Zimmermann (eds), Max Planck Encyclopedia of European Private Law Vol. II (OUP 2012) 1115 google scholar
68. Jauernig Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch: BGB Kommentar, Heinz-Peter Mansel (ed), §§ 652-704 (15th edn, Beck 2018) google scholar
69. Kantorwicz H, Studies in the Glossators of the Roman Law (Cambridge University Press 1938) google scholar
70. Karadeniz Çelebican Ö, Roma Eşya Hukuku (5th edn, Turhan 2015) google scholar
71. ------ Roma Hukuku, (17th edn, Turhan 2014) google scholar
72. Kaser M, Roman Private Law (Rolf Dannenbring tr, 2nd edn, Butterworths 1968) google scholar
73. Kaya Ü, Vekaletsiz İş Görme (Özel Uygulama Hali: Acil Tıbbi Müdahaleler) (Yetkin 2020) google scholar
74. Kohler J, ‘Die Menschenhilfe im Privatrecht’ (1887) 25 Jherings Jahrbucher für die Dogmatik des bürgerlichen Rechts, 47 google scholar
75. Kortmann J, Altruism in Private Law (OUP 2005) google scholar
76. Koschaker P, Europa und das römische Recht (4th edn, Beck 1966) google scholar
77. Koschaker P, Ayiter K, Roma Hususi Hukukunun Ana Hatları (Seçkin, 1977) google scholar
78. Kreller H, ‘Das Edikte de negotiis gestis in der Geschichte der Geschaftsbesorgung’ in Festschrift Paul Koschaker Vol II (Böhlaus 1939) google scholar
79. Larenz K, Lehrbuch des Schuldrechts (12nd edn, Beck 1981) google scholar
80. Lenel G, Das Edictum Perpetuum (B. Tauchnitz, 1927) google scholar
81. Limberg B et alia (eds), Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch Band 6: Schuldrecht - Besonderer Teil III (9th edn, Beck 2023) google scholar
82. Lischer U, Die Geschaftsführung ohne Auftrag im schweizerischen Recht (Helbing & Lichtenhahn 1990) google scholar
83. Loyal F, Die “entgeltliche” Geschaftsführung ohne Auftrag (Mohr, 2011) google scholar
84. Lorenzen E G, ‘Negotiorum Gestio in Roman and Modern Civil Law’ (1928) 13 (2) Cornell Law Review 190 google scholar
85. Maissen E, Huguenin C, Jenny R M (eds.), Claire Huguenin, Markus Müller-Chen, Handkommentar zum Schweizer Privatrecht, Vertragsverhaltnisse Teil 2: Art. 319-529 OR (3rd edn, Schulthess 2016) google scholar
86. Martinek M, Theobald U, ‘Grundfalle zum Recht der Geschaftsführung ohne Auftrag, 1. Teil: Die Grundstrukturen der Geschaftsführung ohne Auftrag’ (1997) 7 Juristische Schulung 617 google scholar
87. Mayer-Maly T, ‘Divisio Obligationum’ (1967) 2 (2) Irish Jurist new series 375 google scholar
88. -------‘Probleme der Negotiorum Gestio’ (1969) 86 (1) ZSS: RomanistischeAbteilung, 416 google scholar
89. Metzger E, ‘Actions’ in Ernst Metzger (ed.), A Companion to Justinian’s Institutes (Cornell University Press 1997) google scholar
90. Medicus D, Lorenz S, Schuldrecht II Besonderer Teil (18th edn, Beck 2018) google scholar
91. Meissel F S, Geschaftsführung ohne Auftrag - zwischen Quasikontrakt und aufgedrangter Bereicherung - (Manz 1993) google scholar
92. Mitteis L, Römisches Privatrecht bis auf die Zeit Diokletians Vol. 1 (Duncker & Humblot, 1908) google scholar
93. Monier R, Manuel elementaire de droit romain, Vol II (4th edn, Domat Montchrestien 1948) google scholar
94. Mouritsen H, The Freedman in the Roman World (Cambridge University Press 2011) google scholar
95. Nanz K P, Die Entstehung des allgemeinen Vertragsbegriffs im 16. bis 18. Jahrhundert (J.Schweitzer 1985) google scholar
96. Nicholas B, An Introduction to Roman Law (OUP 1962) google scholar
97. Nipperdey H C, Julius von Staudingers Kommentar zum BGB, II Bd 3 Teil (10th edn, Berlin 1943) google scholar
98. Oğuz A, ‘Role of Comparative Law in the Development of Turkish Civil Law’ (2005) 17 (2) Pace International Law Review google scholar
99. Oğuzman K, Öz T, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler I (17th edn, Vedat 2019) google scholar
100. -------- Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler II (10th edn,Vedat 2013) google scholar
101. Oser H, Schönenberger W, Kommentar zum Schweizerishen Zivilgesetzbuch, V. Band: Das Obligationenrecht, 3. Teil: Art. 419-529 (2nd edn, SchultheB & Co 1945) google scholar
102. Öz T, Öğreti ve Uygulamada Sebepsiz Zenginleşme (Kazancı, 1990) google scholar
103. Özdemir H G, Roma ve Türk Hukuklarında Vekaletsiz İş Görme (Seçkin 2001) google scholar
104. Özkaya E, Vekâlet Sözleşmesi ve Kötüye Kullanılması (3rd edn, Seçkin 2013) google scholar
105. Patrick G H, Legal Traditions of the World (4th ed, OUP 2010) google scholar
106. Partsch J, Aus Nahgelassen und Kleineren verstreueten Schriften (Springer 1931) google scholar
107. Puchta G F, Pandekten (4th edn, Barth 1844) google scholar
108. Rabel E, ‘Negotium alienum und animus’ in Studi in onore di Pietro Bonfante nel XL anno d’insegnamento Vol IV (Treves 1930) 279 google scholar
109. Rabel E, ‘Ausbau oder Verwischung des Systems? Zwei praktische fragen’ (1919) 10 Rheinische Zeitschrift für Zivil und Prozessrecht 89 google scholar
110. Radding C, Ciaralli A, Corpus Iuris Civilis in the Middle Ages: Manuscripts and Transmission from the Sixth Century to the Juristic Revival (Brill 2007) google scholar
111. Radin M, ‘The Roman Law of Quasi-Contract’ (1937) 23 (3) Virginia Law Review 241 google scholar
112. Rado T, Roma Hukuku Dersleri Borçlar Hukuku (Filiz 2006) google scholar
113. Riccobono S, ‘La gestione degli affari e l’azione di arricchimento nel diritto moderno’ (1917) 15 (1) google scholar
114. Rivista del diritto commerciale e del diritto generale delle obligazioni, 369 google scholar
115. Saruhan U, Gerçek Vekâletsiz İşgörme (Yetkin 2018) google scholar
116. Savaş A, ‘Roma ve Türk Hukukunda Vekalet Sözleşmesi’ (2000) 8 (1-2) Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 598 google scholar
117. Schmid J, Die Geschâftsführung ohne Auftrag Art. 419-424 OR (3rd edn, Schulthess 1993) google scholar
118. Schmidt B, Die berechtigte Geschâftsführung ohne Auftrag: Eine Untersuchung der Voraussetzungen des gesetzlichen Schuldverhâltnisses der §§ 677 ff. BGB (Duncker & Humblot 2008) google scholar
119. Schulz F, History of Roman Legal Science (Clarendon Press 1946) google scholar
120. ----- Principles of Roman Law (Marguerita Wolff tr, Clarendon Press 1936) google scholar
121. ---- Classical Roman Law (Clarendon Press 1950) google scholar
122. Seiler H H, Der Tatbestand der negotiorum gestio im römischen Recht (Böhlau, 1968) google scholar
123. Seiler H H, ‘Über die Vergütung von Dienstleistungen des Geschaftsführers ohne Auftrag’ in Gottfried Baumgârtel, Hans-Jürgen Becker, Ernst Klingmüller, Andreas Wacke (eds), Festschrift für Heinz Hübner (Degruyter 1984) google scholar
124. Serozan R, Arpacı A, Borçlar Hukuku Özel Bölüm (Filiz 1992) google scholar
125. Sheehan D, ‘Negotiorum Gestio: A Civilian Concept in Common Law’ (2006) 55 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 253 google scholar
126. Smits J, Calomme C, ‘The Reform of the French Law of Obligations: Les Jeux Sont Faits’ (2016) 23 (6) Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 1040 google scholar
127. Sohm R, The Institutes (James Crawford Ledlie tr, 3rd edn, Clarendon Press, 1907) google scholar
128. Spickhoff A, Medizinrecht (3rd edn, Beck 2018) google scholar
129. Stoljar S J, ‘Negotiorum Gestio’ in Ernst von Caemmerer, Peter Schlechtriem (eds) International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Vol. X (Mohr 1984) 66 google scholar
130. Suter R, Echte und Unechte Geschâftsführung ohne Auftrag nach Schweizerischem Obiligationenrecht (Stampfli, 1933) google scholar
131. Swoboda E, Bereicherung, Geschaftsführung ohne Auftrag, versio in rem nach österreichischem Recht, mit. Ausblicken in das deutsche Recht (Leuschner & Lubensky, 1919) google scholar
132. Şen Doğramacı H, ‘Bir Borç Kaynağı Olarak Vekâletsiz İşgörme’ in Şebnem Akipek Öcal et al (eds), Medeni Kanun’un ve Borçlar Kanunu’nun 90. Yılı Uluslararası Sempozyumu: 1926’dan Günümüze Türk-İsviçre Medeni Hukuku Vol. II (Yetkin 2017) google scholar
133. Şenol N, ‘Hekimin Tazminat Sorumluluğu (Hekimin Hukuki Sorumluluğu)’ in Aysun Altuntaş, İpek Sevda Söğüt, Hamide Bağçeci (eds), II. Ulusal Sağlık Hukuku ‘Tıbbi Müdahalenin Hukuki Yansımaları’ Sempozyumu (Seçkin 2014) google scholar
134. Tahiroğlu B, Erdoğmuş B, Roma Usul Hukuku (Filiz 1989) google scholar
135. Tunçomağ K, Türk Borçlar Hukuku, Genel Hükümler I (6th edn, Sermet 1976) google scholar
136. Tandoğan H, Mukayeseli Hukuk ve Hususiyle Türk - İsviçre Hukuku bakımından Vekaletsiz İş Görme (Ankara Hukuk Fakültesi Yayınları 1957) google scholar
137. ----- Borçlar Hukuku Özel Borç İlişkileri Vol 2 (5th edn, Vedat 2010) google scholar
138. -----‘Vekaletsiz İşgörenin Ücret Talebi’ (1955) 12 AÜHFD 384 google scholar
139. Türkoğlu Özdemir G, ‘Roma Hukukunda Actio de peculio’ (2005) 7 (2) Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 103 google scholar
140. -------- ‘Roma Medeni Usulünde Formula Yargılaması’ (2005) 7 Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 167 google scholar
141. Umur Z, Roma Hukuku - Tarihi Giriş - Kaynaklar - Genel Esaslar (Fakülteler Matbaası, 1983) google scholar
142. von Bar C, ‘Benevolent Intervention in Another’s Affairs’ in Christin von Bar (ed), Principles of European Law: Benevolent intervention in another’s affair (Sellier, 2006) google scholar
143. von Büren B, Schweizerisches Obligationenrecht Besonderer Teil (Art. 184-551) (Schulthess, 1972) google scholar
144. von Savigny F C, System des heutigen Romischen Rechts III (Berlin 1840) google scholar
145. von Tuhr A, Peter H, Allgemeiner Teil des Schweizerischen Obligationenrechts (3rd edn, Schulthess 1984) google scholar
146. Watson A, The Law of Obligations in the Roman Republic (Clarendon Press 1965) google scholar
147. ---- The Contract ofMandate in Roman Law (Clarendon Press 1961) google scholar
148. ---- The Making of Civil Law (Harvard University Press 1981) google scholar
149. Weiss E, Institutionen des römischen Privatrechts (2nd edn, Verlag für Recht und Gesellschaft 1949) google scholar
150. Wittmann R, Begriff und Funktionen der Geschaftsführung ohne Auftrag (Beck 1981) google scholar
151. Windscheid B, Lehrbuch des Pandektenrechts Vol I (Frankfurt 1875) google scholar
152. Wlassak M, Zur Geschichte der negotiorum gestio (G. Fischer 1879) google scholar
153. Wollschlager C, Die Geschaftsführung ohne Auftrag Theorie und Rechtsprechung (Duncker & Humblot 1976) google scholar
154. Yavuz C, Acar F, Özen B, Türk Borçlar Hukuku: Özel Hükümler (10th edn, Beta 2012) google scholar
155. Yıldız K, ‘SMK Hükümleriyle Karşilaştirmali Olarak FSEK Kapsaminda Gerçek Olmayan Vekâletsiz Iş Görme’ (2020) 6 Ticaret ve Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku Dergisi 154 google scholar
156. Yüksel S R, ‘Hekimin Vekâletsiz İş Görmeden Doğan Sorumluluğu’ (2015) 21 (2) Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Özel Sayı: Mehmet Akif Aydın’a Armağan, 793 google scholar
157. Zevkliler A, Gökyayla E, Borçlar Hukuku Özel Borç İlişkileri (12nd edn, Turhan 2013) google scholar
158. Zilelioğlu H, ‘Roma Hukukundaki Sorumluluk Ölçütlerine Genel bir Bakış’ (1982-87) 39 (1-4) AÜHFD 241 google scholar
159. Zimmerman R, The Law of Obligations Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition I (OUP 1999) google scholar
160. Zimmermann E,Aechte und unachte negotiorum gestio: ein Beitragzum römischen Obligationsrecht (J. Ricker 1872) google scholar
161. Aquinas T, Summa theologiae II-II (Peter Schöffer ed, Mainz 1471) google scholar
162. Cicero, Selected Works (Michael Grant trs, Penguin 2004) google scholar
163. Cicero, On Government (Micheal Grant trs, Penguin 1994) google scholar
164. Cicero, Selected Letters (DR Schakleton Bailey trs, Penguin 1986) google scholar
165. Cicero, On Duties (EM Atkins ed, MT Griffin trs, Cambridge University Press, 1991) google scholar
166. de Molina L, De iustitia et iure tractatus (Venice 1614) google scholar
167. de Soto D, De iustitia et iure libri decem (Salamanca, 1553) google scholar
168. Grotius H, De Iure belli ac pacis (Jean Barbeyrac, Janssonio-Waesbergios eds, Amsterdam 1720) google scholar
169. Lessius L, De iustitia et iure, ceterisque virtutibus cardinalis libri quatuor (Paris 1628) google scholar
170. Pufendorf S, De iure naturae et gentium (editio nova, Knochius 1694) google scholar
171. Corpus Iuris Civilis I-III, Kruger P, Mommsen T, Kroll W, Schoell R (eds), (Weidmann, 1889) google scholar
172. The Codex of Justinian, (ed) Frier B W, Fred H Blume (trs), (Cambridge University Press, 2016) google scholar
173. Dictionnaire Etymologique de la langue Latine, (New Edition Klincksieck 2001) google scholar
174. The Digest of Justinian 1-4, Mommsen T, Kruger P (eds), Alan Watson (trs), (University of Pennsylvania Press, 1985) google scholar
175. Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law (The American Philosophical Society reprint 1991) google scholar
176. Gaius Institutiones, de Zulueta F (trs), (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1946) google scholar
177. Heumann’s Handlexicon zu den Quellen des Römischen Rechts (9th ed, Gustav Fischer 1926) google scholar
178. Oxford Latin Dictionary (2nd ed OUP 2012) google scholar
179. Pauli Sententiae (Pubblicazioni della Facolta di giurisprudenza dell’Universita di Padova, 1995) google scholar
180. Rabel E, Levy E, Index Interpolatium, Vol. 3, XXXVII-L (Bohlaus 1929) google scholar
181. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2019/834/contents google scholar
182. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_bgb google scholar
183. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32007R0864 google scholar