International Law in Cyberspace: An Evaluation of the Tallinn Manuals

Öz

While cyber technologies have been advancing since the late 1980s and early 1990s, cyberspace became one of the platforms in which interstate relations occur, ranging from politics and economics to war and conflicts as a result of the mainstreaming of broadband Internet access in the early 2000s. Previously imagined as a platform for free and open communication among people without any state controls or regulations, cyberspace has become one of the main topics of international politics over the last decade. However, laws and policies managing cyberspace have fallen behind the technological developments. Thus, the issue only started to gain the global attention it deserves when modest progress was observed in international law concerning the legal status of cyberspace and the relevant valid principles in the 2000s. State-led cyber operations against Estonia in 2008, Georgia in 2009, and Iran in 2010 supposedly played a significant role in transforming cyberspace into an area of national and international concern. Subsequently, various initiatives have emerged at the international level for adopting internationally recognized cyber rules and principles. Within the framework of Janssens and Wouters’ (2022) study Informal International Law-Making: A Way Around the Deadlock of International Humanitarian Law?, this work aims to discuss how and to what extent international law can be developed for application in cyberspace by focusing on the Tallinn Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Warfare (Schmitt [Ed.], 2013) and the Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations (Schmitt [Ed.], 2017), the most comprehensive, albeit non-binding, works published to date on the applicability of existing international law in cyberspace. Using a literature review as its method, the study presents the results of the main legal texts and academic studies and argues that even though the issue has only recently come to the fore as one of the newest areas of international legal systems, the specific rights and duties of states flowing from the age-old principles of international law (i.e., sovereignty, territoriality, and non-intervention) have not become obsolete in this domain.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• International Law
• Cyberspace
• Sovereignty
• Territoriality
• Non-Intervention
• Tallinn Manual 2.0
• Informal International Law-Making

Kaynakça

1. Allen S, ‘Enforcing Criminal Jurisdiction in the Clouds and International Law’s google scholar
2. Enduring Commitment to Territoriality’ in S Allen, D Costelloe, M Fitzmaurice, P Gragl, and E Guntrip (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Jurisdiction in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2019) 1-35. google scholar
3. Betz D J and Stevens T, Cyberspace and the State: Toward a Strategy for Cyber Power (first published, Routledge, 2011). google scholar
4. Buchan R, Cyber Espionage and International Law (first published 2018, Hart Publishing, 2019). google scholar
5. Carr M, US Power and the Internet in International Relations: The Irony of the Information Age (first published, Palgrave Macmillan 2016). google scholar
6. Couture S and Toupin S, ‘What Does the Notion “Sovereignty” Mean When Referring to the Digital’ (2019) 21(10) New Media & Society 1-18. google scholar
7. Crawford J, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 8th edition, 2012). google scholar
8. Dannat G, ‘How Cloud Computing Complicates the Jurisdiction of State Law’ (E-International Relations, 14 September 2012) < https://www.e-ir.info/2012/09/14/how-cloud-computing-complicates-the-jurisdiction-of-state-law/> accessed 8 September 2023. google scholar

9. Deibert R J and Rohozinski R, ‘Risking Security: Policies and Paradoxes of Cyberspace Security’ (2010) 4(1), International Political Sociology 15-32. google scholar
10. Demchak C C and Dombrowski P, ‘Rise of a Cybered Westphalian Age’ (2011) 5(1) Strategic Studies Quarterly 32-61. google scholar
11. Ecemiş Yılmaz H K, ‘Siber Uzay, Siber Güvenlik, Dijital Egemenlik Kavramlarının Uluslararası Hukuk Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi’ (2021) 12(9) ULİSA- Mühendislik, Hukuk, İletişim ve İktisat Perspektifinden Siber Güvenlik ve Sosyal Medya 21-26. google scholar
12. Franzese P W, ‘Sovereignty in Cyberspace: Can It Exist?’ (2009) 64 Air Force Law Review 1-42. google scholar
13. Gibson W, Neuromancer (first published, Ace 1984). google scholar
14. Gourley S K, ‘Cyber Sovereignty’ in P A Yannakogeorgos and A B Lowther (eds) Conflict and Cooperation in Cyberspace: The Challenge to National Security (Taylor & Francis, 2014) 277290. google scholar
15. Güntay V, ‘21. Yüzyıl Paradoksu Olarak Siber Uzay ve Uluslararası Hukuk’ (2019) 1(2) Novus Orbis Journal of Politics and International Relations 87-109. google scholar
16. Haataja S, ‘Cyber Operations against Critical Infrastructure Under Norms of Responsible State Behaviour and International Law’ (2022) 30(4) International Journal of Law and Information Technology 423-443. google scholar
17. Hassan D, ‘The Rise of the Territorial State and the Treaty of Westphalia’ in G M (ed) Yearbook of New Zealand Jurisprudence (University of Waikato School of Law, 2006) 62-70. google scholar
18. Herrera G L, ‘Cyberspace and Sovereignty: Thoughts of Physical Space and Digital Space’, in M D Cavelty, V Maurer and S F Krishna-Hensel (eds) Power and Security in the Information Age: Investigating the Role of the State in Cyberspace (Ashgate, 2007) 67-93. google scholar
19. Hollis D B, ‘A Brief Primer on International Law and Cyberspace’ (Carneige Endowment for International Peace, June 2021) accessed 26 June 2023. google scholar
20. Hollis D B, ‘From Corollaries to Contents? Elaborating the Principle of Non-intervention in Cyberspace’ in F Delerue and A Gery (eds) International Law and Cybersecurity Governance (European Union Institute for Security Studies, 2022) 51-58. google scholar
21. Hörnle J, Internet Jurisdiction - Law and Practice (Oxford University Press, 1st edn, 2019). google scholar
22. Janssens P C and Wouters J, ‘Informal International Law-Making: A Way Around the Deadlock of International Humanitarian Law?’ (2022) 104(920-921) International Review of the Red Cross, 2111-2130. google scholar
23. Karadağ Ş, ‘Siber Uzayda Uluslararası Hukuk Mümkün Mü?’ (2019) 5(36) International Social Sciences Studies Journal 2827-2833. google scholar
24. Kello L, ‘The Meaning of the Cyber Revolution’ (2013) 38(2) International Security 7-40. google scholar
25. Keohane R O and Nye J S, ‘Power and Interdependence in the Information Age’ (1998) 77(5), Foreign Affairs 81-94. google scholar
26. Kshetri N, ‘Cybercrime and Cyber-security Issues Associated with China: Some Economic and Institutional Considerations’ (2013) 13(1) Electronic Commerce Research 41-69. google scholar
27. Kuehl D T, ‘From Cyberspace to Cyberpower: Defining the Problem’ in F D Kramer, S H Starr and L K Wentz (eds), Cyberpower and National Security (National Defense University Press, 2009) 24-42. google scholar
28. Lan T and Xin Z, ‘Can Cyber Deterrence Work?’ in A Nagorski (ed), Global Cyber Deterrence: Views From China, The U.S., Russia, India, and Norway (East-West Institute, 2010) 1-2. google scholar
29. Liarapoulos A, ‘Power and Security in Cyberspace: Implications for the Westphalian State System’ Panorama of Global Security Environment (Bratislava: Centre for European and North American Affairs, 2011) 541-549. google scholar
30. Libicki M C, Cyberdeterrence and Cyberwar (RAND Corporation, 2009) accessed 30 April 2023. google scholar
31. Maurer T, ‘Cyber Norm Emergence at the United Nations - An Analysis of the UN’s Activities Regarding Cyber-security’ (Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Discussion Paper, 2011-11) accessed 15 July 2023. google scholar
32. Moynihan H, ‘The Application of International Law to State Cyberattacks Sovereignty and Non-intervention’ (Chatham House, December 2019) accessed 1 July 2023. google scholar
33. Nye J S, ‘Cyber Power’ (Harvard Kennedy School, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, May 2010) accessed 15 April 2023. google scholar
34. Nye J S, The Future of Power (first published, PublicAffairs, 2011). google scholar
35. Nye J S, ‘The Regime Complex for Managing Global Cyber Activities’ (The Global Commission on Internet Governance and Chatham House, May 2014) accessed 15 April 2023 google scholar
36. Pauwelyn J, “Informal International Lawmaking: Framing the Concept and Research Questions”, in J Pauwelyn, R A Wessel and J Wouters (eds), Informal International Law-Making (Oxford University Press, 2014) 13-34 google scholar
37. Rauscher K F, ‘First Joint Russian-U.S. report on Cyber Conflict’ (EastWest Institute, 2011) www.eastwest.ngo/idea/towards-rules-governing-cyber-conflict-0> accessed 15 April 2023. google scholar
38. Ryngaert C, Jurisdiction in International Law (first published 2008, Oxford University Press, 2019) 5. google scholar
39. Schmitt M N, ‘International Law in Cyberspace: The Koh Speech and Tallinn Manual Juxtaposed’ (2013) 54(5) Harvard International Law Journal Online 13-37 31 accessed 15 July 2023. google scholar
40. Schmitt M. N. (ed), Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations (first published, Cambridge University Press, 2017). google scholar
41. Singer P W and Friedman A, ‘Cult of the Cyber Offensive’ (2014) Foreign Policy 182 accessed 15 July 2023. google scholar
42. Sönmezoğlu F, Uluslararası Politika ve Dış Politika Analizi (first published, Filiz Kitabevi 2000). google scholar
43. Tiirmaa-Klaar H, ‘Botnets, Cybercrime and National Security’ in H Tiirmaa-Klaar, J Gassen, E Gerhards-Padilla and P Martini (eds) Springer Briefs in Cyber Security - Botnets (Springer, 2013) 1-40. google scholar
44. Tsagourias N, ‘Law, Borders and the Territorialisation of Cyberspace’, (2018) 15(4) Indonesian Journal ofInternational Law 523-551. google scholar
45. Tsagourias N, The Legal Status of Cyberspace: Sovereignty Redux?,’ in N Tsagourias and R google scholar
46. Buchan (eds) Research Handbook on International Law and Cyberspace (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021) 9-31. google scholar
47. von Heinegg W H, ‘Legal Implications of Territorial Sovereignty in Cyberspace’ (Proceedings of 2012 4th International Conference on Cyber Conflict - NATO CCD COE Publications, 2012) 7-19
48. LegalImplicationsOfTerritorialSovereigntyInCyberspace.pdf> accessed 4 May 2023. google scholar
49. Waltz E, Information Warfare: Principles and Operations (first published 1998, Artech House 1998). google scholar
50. Wu T H, ‘Cyberspace Sovereignty? The Internet and the International System’ (1997) 10(3) Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 647-666. google scholar
51. Ziolkowski K, ‘Confidence Building Measures for Cyberspace’ in K Ziolkowski (ed), Peacetime Regime for State Activities in Cyberspace - International Law, International Relations and Diplomacy (NATO CCD COE Publication, 2013). google scholar