MEKAN DİZİMİ ANALİZ YÖNTEMİ VE ARAŞTIRMA KONULARI (SPACE SYNTAX AND RESEARCHING ISSUES)

Öz

 

ÖZET

Mekan Dizimi Analiz Yöntemi; farklı ölçeklerdeki bölgelerin, kentlerin, yapılı çevrelerin, bina gruplarının mekansal modellerini, yapı içi mekan organizasyonunu tanımlamak ve bunların sosyal yapı ile etkileşimlerini incelemek için kullanılan, teorik yaklaşımlarla desteklenen teknikler bütününe verilen isimdir. Bu tekniklerin öncelikli hedefi mekansal organizasyonun insan hareketi ve görüş alanları ile ilişkisini nesnel olarak inceleyerek, “mekanların” insanları bir araya getirme ve yönlendirme potansiyellerini ortaya çıkarmaktır.  1970’li yıllarda geliştirilmeye başlanmış analiz yöntemi günümüzde mimarlık, iç mimarlık kentsel tasarım ve planlama dallarının yanı sıra arkeoloji, antropoloji, ulaşım, enformasyon teknolojileri, kent ve insan coğrafyası, peyzaj mimarlığı ve bilişime değin pek çok alanda kullanılmaktadır. Çalışma, akademik çevreler için çok çeşitli alanlarda araştırma olanağı veren bu analiz yönteminin ve bu yöntemden yararlanılarak yapılan ampirik çalışmaların irdelenmesi ile,  yeni çalışma konularının gündeme gelmesinde katkı sağlayabileceği düşünülerek hazırlanmıştır.

Anahtar kelimeler: Mekan, biçimlenme, derinlik, bütünleşme, mekansal model.

ABSTRACT

Space Syntax; It is given name of whole thecnical supplement that is supported by theoretical approach which are used to define by different scales of region, cities, built environment, spatial pattern of building groups, interior organisation of …structure and that are examined their social structures related interactions. The primary goal of these techniques spatial organization of human movement and its relationship to the fields of examining objectively see, bring people together "spaces" and referring to reveal their potential. The analysis method has begun to develop at the beginning of the 1970 which are used many areas mentioned such as in architecture, interior design architecture, urban design and planning, as well as in branches of archaeology, anthropology, transportation, information technologies, urban and human geography, landscape architecture and informatics. This study, has prepared for the academic community who could get the opportunity to work in a wide range of fields for this method of analysis and evaluation of empirical studies conducted using these methods, which are thought the current study could be ensure to contribute in the agenda.

Key Words: Space, configuration, depth, integration, spatial pattern.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Mekan, biçimlenme, derinlik, bütünleşme, mekansal model.

-

Öz

Space Syntax; It is given name of whole thecnical supplement that is supported by theoretical approach which are used to define by different scales of region, cities, built environment, spatial pattern of building groups, interior organisation of …structure and that are examined their social structures related interactions. The primary goal of these techniques spatial organization of human movement and its relationship to the fields of examining objectively see, bring people together "spaces" and referring to reveal their potential. The analysis method has begun to develop at the beginning of the 1970 which are used many areas mentioned such as in architecture, interior design architecture, urban design and planning, as well as in branches of archaeology, anthropology, transportation, information technologies, urban and human geography, landscape architecture and informatics. This study, has prepared for the academic community who could get the opportunity to work in a wide range of fields for this method of analysis and evaluation of empirical studies conducted using these methods, which are thought the current study could be ensure to contribute in the agenda.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Space, configuration, depth, integration, spatial pattern.

Kaynakça

1. Antoniadou N and N., Peristianis. 1999. “Ethnic Groups, Space and Identity”, Space Syntax Second International Symposium, Brasilia, 41.01-12.
2. Bustard W. 1997. “Space, Evolutıon and Function in the Houses of Chaco Canyon”, Space Syntax First International Symposium, London, 23.1-21.
3. Choi K.Y. 1997. “The Morphology of Exploratıon and Encounter in Museum Layouts” Space Syntax First International Symposium, London, 16.01-10
4. Conrads, Ulrich. 1964. Programme und Manıfeste Zur Archıtektur Des 20. Jahrhunderts, Ullstein Bauwelt-Fundamente.
5. Croxford, Ben. 1999. “Can Space Syntax Predict Traffic Flows, Speeds and Mix?” Space Syntax Second International Symposium, Brasilia 49.01-02.
6. Foster, Norman. 1997. “Opening Address”, Space Syntax First International Symposium, London.
7. Frampton, Kenneth. 1980. Modern Architecture: A Critical History, Newyork: Oxford Uni. Press.
8. Gündogdu Meltem. 1995. Şehirsel Mekanın Biçimlenme Özellikleri ve Yaya Hareketi Üzerindeki Etkisi Yeşilköy-Köyiçi Örneği, Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.

9. Gündogdu Meltem. 2005. Galata Pera Bölgesi Mekansal Morfolojik Özellikleri ile Arazi Kullanımı Arasındaki Etkileşim, Basılmamış Doktora Tezi.
10. Heitor T, M. Kruger, J. Muchagato, T.Ramos and A.Tostões. 1999. “Breaking of the Medieval Space the Emergence of A New City of Enligthenment”, Space Syntax Second International Symposium, Brasilia 55. 01-14
11. Hillier, B., J.Hanson, J.Peponıs, J.Hudson and R. Burdet. 1983. “Space Syntax”, Architect J. November, 30:43-83.
12. Hillier B. ve J. Hanson. 1984. The Social Logic Of Space, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Hillier B., J. Hanson and J. Peponis. 1987. “The Syntactic Analysis Of Settlements”, Architecture and Behaviour, 3:217-220.
14. Hillier, Bill. 1993. “A Note on the Intuiting of Form; Three Issues in the Theory of Design”, Environment and Planning B, Planning and Design, 2:52-56.
15. Hillier B., A. Penn, J.Hanson and I. Grojeski. 1993. “Natural Movement or, Configuration and Attraction in Urban Pedestrian Movement”, Environment & Planning B: Planning & Design, 20:29-66.
16. Hillier Bill.1996b. Space is the Machine, Cambridge: Cambridge Universty Press.
17. Hillier B. and J. Hanson. 1997. “The Reasoning Art: Or, the Need For an Analytical Theory of Architecture,” Space Syntax First International Symposium, London, 01.1-6.
18. Hillier Bill. 1999. “Centrality as a Process Accounting for Attraction Inequalities in Deformed Grids “, Space Syntax Second International Symposium, Brasilia, 06.01-20.
19. Hillier, Bill. 2001. “A Theory Of The City as Object or How Spatial Laws Mediate the Social Constructions of Urban Space”, 3rd International Symposium on Space Syntax, Brazil, 02:1
20. Hillier, Bill. 2013. “The Now and the Future of the Space Syntax: From Structures and Models to Theory”, 9th International Space Syntax Symposium, Seoule, 00a.
21. Holanda F. 1999. “Class Footprınts in the Landscape”, Space Syntax Second International Symposium, Brasilia, 01.01-08.
22. Karimi, Kayvan. 1999. “Urban Conservatıon and Spatial Transformations Preserving the Fragments or Maintaining the ‘Spatial Spirit’”, Space Syntax Second International Symposium, Brasilia, 62.1-14.
23. Kim Y. O. 2000. “The Role of Spatial Configuration in Spatial Cognition”, 3rd International Symposium on Space Syntax, Brazil, 49:1-21.
24. Kubat A. S. and İstek Y. Asami. 2001. “Characterization Of Street Networks İnturkishIslamic Urban Form Proceedings”, 3rd International Space Syntax Symposium, Atlanta, 1Kubat A. S. 2001. “Istanbul: A Configurational Model For a Metropolis”, 3rd International Space Syntax Symposium, Atlanta, 62.01-07.
25. Kubat A. S., S. K. Kaya, G. Güler, F. Sarı and Ö. Özer. 2007. “The Effects Of Proposed Bridges on Urban Macroform of Istanbul: A Syntactic Evaluation”, 6th Uluslararası Space Syntax Sempozyumu, Istanbul, 003.01-12.
26. March, L .and P. Steadman.1974. The Geometry of Environment: An Introduction to Spatial
27. Organization in Design, The Mit Press. Monteiro G.C. 1997. “Activity Analysis in Houses of Recife, Brazi”, Space Syntax First International Symposium, London, 20.01-13
28. Orhun, Deniz. 1999. “Spatial Themes Among the Traditional Houses of Turkey” Space Syntax Second International Symposium, Brasilia, 40.1-12.
29. Peponis J., J. Wineman, M. Rashid, S. Kim and S. Bafna. 1997. On the Generatıon of Linear Representations of Spatial Configuration.
30. Peponis J., J.Wineman and S. Bafna. 2001. 3rd International Space Syntax Symposium Speeches, Atlanta.
31. Peponis, John. 2007. 6th International Space Syntax Congress Speeches, Istanbul.
32. Seamon, David. 2007. 6th International Space Syntax Congress Speeches, Istanbul.
33. Shapiro J..1997. “Fingerprints in the Landscape. Cultural Evolution in the North Rio Grande”, Space Syntax First International Symposium, London, 21.01-21
34. Steadman J. P. 1983. Architectural Morphology, An Introduction to the Geometry of Building Plans, London: Pion, U.K.
35. Steadman Philip. 1997. “Design and Innovation”, Space Syntax First International Symposium, London.
36. Ye M. and Josefsson H. 1997. “Urban Redevelopment and City Centre Growth Using Syntactic Analysis to Help Create Better City Centre”, Space Syntax First International Symposium, London, 7.01-13
37. Titi E., S.Darjosanjoto and F.E. Brown. 1999. “The Use of Streets: Configuration, Culture and Space-Use in the Coastal Settlements of Eastern Java”, Space Syntax Second International Symposium, Brasilia, 48.01-14.
38. Ünlü, Alper. 1999. “The Syntactic Analysis of Turkish Houses Between 17th And 19th Centuries”, Space Syntax Second International Symposium, Brasilia 41.01-12.