Two Scenes in the Post-Resurrection Cycle: On the Road to Emmaus and the Supper at Emmaus

Öz

This study examines scenes from two important 14th-century tableaus depicting Christ with his disciples: On the Road to Emmaus and the Supper at Emmaus. While such portrayals of the post-Resurrection cycle were rare in Eastern/Byzantine art, they were far more prevalent in Western/Latin art. The earliest example of On the Road to Emmaus in Eastern art is at the Basilica of Ravenna Sant’Apollinare Nuovo, dating to the 6th century. The earliest instance in Western art is a 9th-century depiction on an ivory plaque. Latin samples of the scenes are popular in illustrated manuscripts. The study scope can be divided into two parts. The first part examines Eastern/Byzantine examples and the second part analyzes Western/Latin samples per a hierarchical classification. In the conclusion and evaluation section, the selected examples are compared. Eastern examples of the two scenes are rare and quantitatively outnumbered in Western/Latin art. This study explores the reasons for the rareness of these scenes in Eastern art and their abundance in Western art; different interpretations of the same are presented in the conclusion. Finally, the iconography of the two scenes differs in Eastern and Western examples. Therefore, our evaluation is focused on solving these questions. Our primary aim was to answer these problematic questions on the sources and reasons for the differences in iconography. The selection of the Byzantine and Latin samples was limited to those from the end of the 14th century to evaluate them in their synchronicity.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Emmaus Road
• Supper
• Post-Resurrection
• Christ
• Byzantine Painting

Diriliş Sonrası Siklusu İçerisinde İki Sahne: Emmaus Yolunda ve Emmaus’da Akşam Yemeği

Öz

Bu çalışmada Emmaus Yolunda ve Emmaus’da Akşam Yemeği sahneleri incelenmiştir. Diriliş Sonrası siklusu içerisinde yer alan iki sahne, Doğu/Bizans tasvir sanatında nicel olarak az yer alırken, sahnelerin Batı/Latin örneklerinde sayıca fazla olması dikkat çeker. Doğu örneklerinde, sahnenin en erken tarihli örneği 6. yüzyıla tarihlenen Sant’Apollinore Nuovo bazilikasında görülürken, Batı örneklerinde en erken tarihli örnek, 9. yüzyıla ait bir fildişi levhaya aittir. Diğer taraftan Latin örneklerinin daha çok resimli el yazmalarında tercih edildiği gözlemlenir. Çalışmanın kapsamı iki alt başlık altında ele alınmıştır. İlk grupta, Doğu/Bizans örnekleri, ikinci alt başlık altında Batı/Latin örnekleri incelenmiştir. Değerlendirme bölümünde sahneler, kendi aralarında kıyaslanmıştır. Bu bağlamda, Doğu örneklerinin az olmasına karşın, Batı örneklerinin nicel olarak çok olması sorunsalına cevaplar bulunmaya çalışılmıştır. Değerlendirme kapsamında ele alınan noktalardan bir diğerini, ikonografik detaylar oluşturmuştur. Bu bağlamda her iki sahnenin ikonografisinde farklı yorumlar ile karşılaşılmıştır. Değerlendirme bölümünde, cevap aranan en önemli nokta ise bu detaylardaki farklılıkların kaynağının neler olabileceğine dair sorulardır. Çalışma kapsamında incelenen örneklerin (Bizans ve Latin) tarihleri, içlerinde bir eşzamanlılık olması adına 14. yüzyıl sonu ile sınırlandırılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Emmaus Yolu
• Akşam Yemeği
• Diriliş Sonrası
• İsa
• Resim

Destekleyen Kurum

Yazar bu çalışma için finansal destek almadığını beyan etmiştir.

Kaynakça

1. Bagatti, Bellarmino. Emmaus-Qubeibeh: The Results of Excavations at Emmaus-Qubeibeh and Nearby Sites (1873, 1887-1890, 1900-1902, 1940-1944). Çev. Raphael Bonanno. Jerusalem: Franciscan Printing Press, 1993.
2. Baumstark, Anton. “I Mosaici di S. Apollinare Nuovo e L’antico Anno Liturgico Ravennate.” Rassegna Gregoriana IX (1910): 1-2.
3. Bayet, Charles. Byzantine Art. New-York: Parkstone International Press, 2009.
4. Blacketer, Raymond A. “Word and Sacrament on the Road to Emmaus: Homiletical Reflections on Luke 24:13-35.” CTJ 38 (2003): 321-329.
5. Bowen, Clayton Raymond. “The Emmaus Disciples and the Purposes of Luke.” The Biblical World 35/4 (1910): 234-245.
6. Brubaker, Leslie. Vision and Meaning in Ninth-Century Byzantium. Images as Exegesis in the Homilies of Gregory of Naziansus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
7. Brubaker, Leslie. Inventing Byzantine Iconoclasm. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press, 2012.
8. Bucur, Bogdan. “Blinded by Invisible Light Revisiting the Emmaus Story (Luke 24,13-35).” Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 90/4 (2014): 685-707.

9. Cormack, Robin. “Visual Arts.” The Cambridge Ancient History Vol. XIV Late Antiquity: Empire and Successors, A.D. 425-600 (s. 884-917). Ed. A. Cameron, B. Ward-Perkins, M. Whitby. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, 884-917.
10. Corrigan, Kathleen. Visual Polemics in the Ninth-Century Byzantine Psalters. Cambridge-New-York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
11. De Angelis d'Ossat, Guglielmo. "Spazialita e Simbolismo delle Basi-liche Ravennati." CorsiRav 17 (1970): 313-333.
12. Der Nersessian, Sirarpie. “Program and Iconography of the Frescoes of the Parecclesion.” The Kariye/Khora Djami V. 4 Studies in the Art of the Kariye/Khora Djami and Its Intellectual Background. Ed. P. A. Underwood. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1975, 303-350.
13. Demus, Otto. Byzantine Mosaic Decoration. Aspects of Monumental Art in Byzantium. Boston: Boston & Art Shop, 1964.
14. Delvoye, Charles. “Bizans Resim Sanatının Ana Temayülleri.” Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih – Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi 22/3-4 (1964): 303-318.
15. Dinkler, Michal Beth. “Building Character on the Road to Emmaus: Lukan Characterization in Contemporary Literary Perspective.” Journal of Biblical Literature 136/3 (2017): 687-706.
16. Evseeva, Liliya M. “Liturgical Drama as a Source of the Monreale Mosaics.” Series Byzantina 8 (2010): 67-84.
17. Johnson, Mark J. “Toward a History of Theoderic's Building Program.” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 42 (1988): 73-96.
18. Germaner, Semra. “Siena Okulu.” Eczacıbaşı Sanat Ansiklopedisi. III. İstanbul: YEM/Yapı Endüstri Merkezi Yayınları, 1997, 1663.
19. Grabar, André. “La Fresque des Saintes Femmes au Tombeau à Doura.” Cahiers Archéologiques 8 (1956): 9-26.
20. Grabar, André. “Sur Plusieurs Images Insolites du Christ Dans le Psautier Chloudov.” ΔΧΑΕ, IV/10 (1980-81): 11-16.
21. Grabar, André. L’Iconoclasme Byzantine, Le Dossier Archéologique. Paris: College de France, 1984.
22. Hills, Paul. “Pattern, Plain and Splendour of Gold in Sienese Painting: Duccio, Simone Martini and Pietro Lorenzetti.” The Light of Early Italian Painting. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987, 95-157.
23. Huffman, Norman. “Emmaus Among the Resurrection Narratives.” Journal of Biblical Literature 64/2 (1945): 205- 226.
24. Kalafat Yılmaz, Merve. “Kapadokya Bölgesi Bizans Dönemi Kiliselerinde Son Akşam Yemeği Konulu Duvar Resimleri.” Yüksek Lisans tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi, 2017.
25. Kaplan, Necla. “Resimli Kutsal Kitap (Hristiyan) El Yazmalarındaki Kurban Sahnelerine Genel Bir Bakış.” Kadim Akademi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi/1 (2017): 125-137.
26. Kartsonis, Anna. Anastasis, The Making of an Image. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986.
27. Kavuncu, Evren. “Seçkiler Üzerinden 13.yy’dan 18.yy’a “Son Akşam Yemeği” İncelenmesi.” Sanat Dergisi 25 (2014): 67-79.
28. Kazhdan, Alexander P. “Incarnation.” The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. 2. New-York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, 990-991.
29. Kazhdan, Alexander P. (1991). “Monophysitism.” The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. 2. New-York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, 1398-1399.
30. Kidd, Peter. “Contents and Codicology.” Dombibliothek Hildesheim The Albani Psalter. Simbach am Inn: Verlag Müller & Schindler, 2008, 41-144.
31. Kitzinger, Ernst. Byzantine Art in the Making Main Lines of Stylistic Development in Mediterranean Art 3rd-7th Century. Cambridge-Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1995.
32. Kraeling, H. Carl. The Excavations at Dura-Europos. Final Report VIII. Part II, The Christian Building. New York: J. Augustin Publisher, 1967.
33. Konis, Polyvios. “From the Resurrection to the Ascension: Christ’s Post-Resurrection Appearances in Byzantine Art (3rd – 12th c.).” Doktora tezi, Birmingham Üniversitesi, 2008.
34. Lass, Egon H.E. “Is Motza Biblical Emmaus?.” Biblical Archaeology Review 34/6 (2008), 16.
35. LaVerdiere, Eugene. The Eucharist in the New Testament and the Early Church. Collegeville: Liturgical Press, 1996.
36. Mango, Cyrill. Bizans Mimarisi. Ed. Bülent İşler. Ankara: Rekmay Ltd. Şti., 2006.
37. McRay, John. Archaeology and the New Testament. Grand Rapids/Michigan: Baker Academic, 2008.
38. Meek, Russell L. “With Christ on the Road to Emmaus.” The Journal for Baptist Theology and Ministry 14/1 (2017): 3-12.
39. Mercangöz, Zeynep. “Orta Çağ Hristiyanlık İnanışında Ökaristi ve Sanattaki Yansımaları: Bizans Sanatında Ökaristi Sembolleri.” Sanat ve İnanç 2. İstanbul: Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi, Türk Sanat Tarihi Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi, 2004, 43-52.
40. Morris, Derek. “The Emmaus Road-Part 1-2-3, The Testimony of Cleopas”, Erişim 21 Haziran 2021. https://trilogyscriptureresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Emmaus-Road.pdf
41. Nordhagen Per, Jones. Institutum Romanum Norvegiae. Acta ad Archaeologia et Artium Historiam Pertinentia, Volumen III: The Frescoes of John VII (A.D. 705-707), Roma: L'Erma" di Bretschneide, 1968.
42. Nordhagen, Per, Jones. “S. Maria Antiqua: The Frescoes of the Seventh Century.” ActaAArtHist VIII (1978):89-142.
43. Omont, Henri. Evangiles avec Peintures Byzantine du XIe siecle. Tome II, Reproduction des 361 miniatures du Manuscrit Grec 74 de la Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris : Berthaud frères,1908.
44. Peppard, Michael. “Illuminating the Dura-Europos Baptistery: Comparanda for the Female Figures.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 20/4 (2012): 543-574.
45. Plato, “Symposium”, Walter, Hamilton (çev.). London: The Penguin Books, 1956.
46. Pringle, Denys. The Churches of the Crusaders Kingdom of Jerusalem. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
47. Rice, David, Talbot. Byzantine Art. Middlesex: Penguin Books, 1954.
48. Ross, Leslie. “Road to Emmaus.” Medieval Art: A Topical Dictionary. Westport-Connecticut-London: Greenwood Press, 1996, 217.
49. Routley Jonathan. “Finding Emmaus: The Problem of the Geographical Location of the Biblical Site” Erişim 22.01.2021 https://www.academia.edu/37192570/Finding_Emmaus_The_Problem_of_the_Geographical_Location_of_the_Biblical_Site
50. Röhricht, Reinhold. Regesta Regni Hierosolymitani (Mxcvii-Mccxci),Oeniponti: Libraria Academia Wagneriana, 1893.
51. Sang-Keun, Ann. A Study of God’s Encounter with Abraham in Genesis 18:1-15 Against the Background of the Abraham Narrative. Doktora tezi, University of Pretoria, 2010.
52. Shanks, Hershel. “Emmaus: Where Christ Appeared.” Biblical Archaeology Review 34/2 (2008): 40-51.
53. Stubblebine, James H. “Byzantine Sources for the Iconography of Duccio's Maestà.” The Art Bulletin, 57/2 (1975): 176-185.
54. Strzygowski, Josef. (1911). “The Origin of Christian Art.” The Burlington Magazine for Connoisseurs, 20/05 (1911): 146-153.
55. The Predicament of Serbian Orthodox Holy Places in Kosovo and Metohia Elements for a Historical, Legal and Conservational Understanding. Ed. Dragan M. Mitrović. Belgrade: University of Belgrade Publication, 2010.
56. The ‘Painter’s Manual’ of Dionysius of Fourna an English Translation with Commentary, of cod. gr. 708 in the Saltykov-Shchedrin State Public Library, Leningrad. Çev. Paul Hetherington. London: The Sagittarius Press, 1974.
57. Şenel, Zeliha. “Bizans Sanatı’nda Anastasis Sahnesinin Teolojik Temelleri.” Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 8/101 (2020): 296-311.
58. Velmans, Tania. Le Tétraévangile de la Laurentienne : Florence, Laur.VI 23, Paris : Bibliothèque des Cahiers Archéologiques/6, 1971.
59. Zenbilci Kaya, İlkgül. “Bizans Sanatında Alegorik Bir Figür: Hades.” Trakya Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 11/21 (2021): 153-189.
60. Yağız Korucu, Feray. “Bizans Tasvir Sanatında Kurban Sahneleri.” Doktora tezi, Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi, 2019.
61. Yağız Korucu, Feray. Bizans Sanatında Kurban Sahneleri. Ankara: Ürün Yayınları, 2020.
62. https://thedigitalwalters.org/Data/WaltersManuscripts/html/W174/ Erişim 20 Kasım 2020.
63. https://www.wga.hu/cgi-bin/search.cgi?author=&time=any&school=any&form=any&type=any&title=emmaus+&comment=&location=&from=20&max=20&format=5 Erişim 20 Ocak 2021.
64. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/471970 Erişim 20 Ocak 2021.
65. http://www.travelingintuscany.com/art/duccio/maestabackpanels.htm Erişim 22 Ocak 2021.
66. https://bible.oremus.org/?passage=Psalms%2016:10&version=nrsv Erişim 18 Aralık 2020.
67. https://bible.oremus.org/?passage=Acts%202:27&version=nrsv Erişim18 Aralık 2020.
68. https://www.themorgan.org/manuscript/141641 Erişim 1 Ocak 2021.
69. https://www.dombibliothek-hildesheim.de/en/st-albans-psalter Erişim 14 Aralık 2020.
70. “The Greek Road to Emmaus.” https://www.apsu.edu/philomathes/RossPhilomathes2020Online.pdf Erişim 12 Ocak 2021.
71. https://www.encyclo.co.uk/meaning-of-Theopaschism Erişim 30 Nisan 2021.