Mapping Urban Development of Giresun’s Historical Core and Surrounding Areas through Morphological Regions

Öz

This study employs a morphological perspective grounded in a historico-geographical approach to analyze the urban development process of the Giresun city center and its surrounding areas. Historical maps, urban plans, and written sources related to Giresun were evaluated within this framework. These data were integrated with Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to identify the city’s morphological regions. The approach initially developed by M.R.G. Conzen examined changes and transformations in the physical form of the city, enabling detailed spatial inferences. The key morphological components, such as plot sizes, urban blocks, street networks, land use, and development periods, were analyzed using GIS-based datasets. As a result, formations up to the fourth morphological level were identified within the study area. The methodology employed in this research provides a foundation for developing an applicable model for historical urban settlement analysis that can be applied to various contexts. In terms of planning, the morphological regions identified here serve as a foundation for urban development strategies and planning decisions. The outcomes of this study aim to guide planning practices, ensuring that the city’s growth aligns with its pre-existing urban layout and contributes to preserving its distinctive historical and morphological character.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Urban History
• Urban Morphology
• Urban Development Plans

Kaynakça

1. Arat, M. A. (2024). Urban morphology: An historico-geographical approach. Journal of Human Sciences, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v21i3.6484 google scholar
2. Aydın, A. (2002). Giresun Zeytinlik Mevkii Kentsel Sit Alanı Üzerine Bir Araştırma, (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi), KTÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon. google scholar
3. Barke, M. (2003). Urban landscape regions and conservation: New approaches and problems in Antequera, Malaga Province, Spain. Urban Morphology, 7, 3–13. google scholar
4. Barke, M. (2019). Fringe belts. In V. Oliveira (Ed.), J.W.R. Whitehand and the historico-geographical approach to urban morphology (pp. 47–66). Cham: Springer. google scholar
5. Barrett, H. J. (1996). Townscape change and local planning management in city centre conservation areas: The example of Birmingham and Bristol (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Birmingham, School of Geography, Faculty of Arts. google scholar
6. Bekdemir, Ü., Ertürk, M., & Güner, İ. (2000). Giresun'un tarihi coğrafyası [Historical geography of Giresun]. Atatürk Üniversitesi Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(4), 1–17. google scholar
7. Bienstman, H. (2007). Morphological concepts and urban landscape management (unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Birmingham, UK. google scholar
8. Birkhamshaw, A. J. , & Whitehand, J. W. R. (2012). Conzenian urban morphology and the character areas of planners and residents. Urban Design International, 17, 4–17. https://doi.org/ google scholar

9. Conzen, M. R. G. (1960). Alnwick, Northumberland: A study in town-plan analysis. Institute of British Geographers Publication 27. George Philip. google scholar
10. Conzen, M. R. G. (1962). The plan analysis of an English city centre. In K. Norborg (Ed.), Proceedings of the I.G.U. symposium on urban geography, Lund, 1960 (Lund Studies in Geography B, Vol. 24, pp. 383–414). google scholar
11. Conzen, M. R. G. (1975) Geography and townscape conservation. In: Uhlig, H. and Lienau, C. (eds) Anglo- German symposium in applied geography. Lenz, Giessen, pp. 95–102. google scholar
12. Conzen, M.R.G., (1988), “Morphogenesis, Morphogological Regions and Secular Human Agency in the Historic Townscape as Exemplified by Ludlow”, D. Denecke, G. Shaw (Eds.), Urban Historical Geography: Recent Progress in Britain and Germany, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp.253-72 google scholar
13. Çalışkan, O. (2024). Morphology by design? [Keynote speech]. Presented at the ISUF Conference: Future horizons for urban form: Disruption, continuity, expansion, and reverberation, São Paulo, Brazil. google scholar
14. Emecen, F. M. (2020). Karadeniz kıyı kentleri tarihi (1. basım). Turkuvaz Kitap. google scholar
15. Fleischmann, M., Romice, O., & Porta, S. (2020). Measuring urban form: Overcoming terminological inconsistencies for a quantitative and comprehensive morphologic analysis of cities. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 48(8), 2133-2150. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320910444 (Original work published 2021) google scholar
16. Gülşen, A. (2014). Giresun’da sosyal, ekonomik, siyasi ve kültürel yaşam (1945–1960) (Doctoral dissertation). Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Atatürk İlkeleri ve İnkılâp Tarihi Enstitüsü. google scholar
17. Hall, P. (2008). The form-based development plan: Bridging the gap between theory and practice in urban morphology. Urban Morphology, 12(1), 77–95. google scholar
18. Karaibrahimoğlu, S., & Demirkan, Ö. (2019). Eğitim tarihi izdüşümünde fiziksel mekanın inşası: Osmanlı’dan Cumhuriyet’e Giresun’da eğitim yapıları. Çağdaş Türkiye Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 19(38), 99–133. google scholar
19. Kropf, K. (1993). An enquiry into the definition of built form in urban morphology (unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Birmingham google scholar
20. Kropf, K. (1996). Urban tissue and the character of towns. Urban Design International, 1, 247–263. google scholar
21. Küçük, E. and Kubat, A. S. (2015). Tarihi kent dokularında morfolojik bölgeleri belirlemek: Tarihi Yarımada - Aksaray örneği. In Türkiye Kentsel Morfoloji Araştırma Ağı 1. Sempozyumu: Temel Yaklaşımlar ve Teknikler (pp. 274–294). Mersin Üniversitesi. google scholar
22. Larkham, P.J. (1990) ‘Conservation and the management of historical townscapes’, in Slater, T.R. (ed.) The built form of Western cities (Leicester University Press, Leicester) 349-69. google scholar
23. Larkham, P. J. and Morton, N. (2011). Drawing lines on maps: Morphological regions and planning practices. Urban Morphology, 15(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.51347/jum.v15i2.3964 google scholar
24. Lo , C. (2007). The application of geospatial technology to urban morphological research. Urban Morphology, 11(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.51347/jum.v11i2.3934 google scholar
25. Lynch, K. (1981). Good city form. MIT Press. google scholar
26. Moudon, A. V. (1997). Urban Morphology as an emerging interdisciplinary field. Urban Morphology, 1(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.51347/jum.v1i1.4047 google scholar
27. Oliveira , V. (2006). The morphological dimension of municipal plans. Urban Morphology, 10(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.51347/jum.v10i2.3929 google scholar
28. Oliveira, V., & Yaygin, M. A. (2022). The concept of the morphological region: developments and prospects. Urban Morphology, 24(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.51347/jum.v24i1.4089 google scholar
29. Oliveira, V., Silva, M., & Samuels, I. (2013). Urban morphological research and planning practice: a Portuguese assessment. Urban Morphology, 18(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.51347/jum.v18i1.3994 google scholar
30. Özcan, M. V. (2016). Taşra kıyı kentlerinde mekânsal değişim: Giresun örneği (Yüksek lisans tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Anabilim Dalı, Ankara. google scholar
31. Samuels, I. (1990). Architectural practice and urban morphology. In T. R. Slater (Ed.), The built form of Western cities (pp. 415–435). Leicester University Press. google scholar
32. Samuels, I. (2019). Research and practice. In V. Oliveira (Ed.), J.W.R. Whitehand and the historico-geographical approach to urban morphology (pp. 115–131). Cham: Springer. google scholar
33. Scheer, B. C. (2010). Evolution of urban form: Typology for planners and architects American Planning Association. google scholar
34. Shaw, J. W. (1972). Greek and Roman harbour works. In G. F. Bass (Ed.), A history of seafaring, based on underwater archaeology (pp. 87–112). google scholar
35. Ünlü, T. (2019). Managing the urban change: A morphological perspective for planning. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 7(Special Issue), 55–72. doi:10.15320/ICONARP.2019.82 google scholar
36. Sınmaz, S., & Özdemir, H. A. (2016). Türkiye Şehir Planlama Pratiğinin Kentsel Morfoloji ve Tipoloji Üzerindeki Etkileri, Siverek Kenti İçin Bir Değerlendirme. İDEALKENT, 7(18), 80-115. google scholar
37. Whitehand, J. W. R. (1989). Development pressure, development control and suburban townscape change: Case studies in south-east England. Town Planning Review, 60, 403–420. google scholar
38. Whitehand, J. W. R. (2001). British urban morphology: The Conzenian tradition. Urban Morphology, 5(2), 103–109. google scholar
39. Whitehand, J. W. R. (2009). The structure of urban landscapes: Strengthening research and practice. Urban Morphology, 13, 5–27. google scholar
40. Whitehand, J. W. R. (2012). Issues in urban morphology. Urban Morphology, 16(1), 55–65. google scholar
41. Whitehand, J. W. R. (2019). ISUF and urban morphology: 25 years on and counting. Urban Morphology, 23(2), 103–104. google scholar
42. Yücel, C. (2017). Koruma amaçlı planlarda yapılaşma kararları: Giresun örneği. Megaron, 12(1), 106–119. doi:10.5505/megaron.2016.22448 google scholar
43. Zhang, J. (2003). Planning, morphology and change in China’s conservation areas: A case study of Shanghai (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Liverp