İngilizce Hazırlık Programındaki Üniversite Öğrencilerinin İçerik Temelli İngilizce Öğretim Yöntemine Karşı Tutum ve Motivasyonuna Yönelik Çoklu Durum Araştırması

Öz

Bu çalışma İstanbul, Türkiye’deki bir vakıf üniversitesinin hazırlık yılına entegre edilmiş içerik temelli İngilizce derslerine karşı öğrencilerin tutum ve motivasyonlarını ölçmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu çalışmada karma araştırma deseni kullanılmıştır ve 16 farklı bölümden 27 öğrenci katılmıştır. İlk olarak öğrencilerin tutum ve motivasyonunu ölçmek amacıyla öğrencilere bir anket uygulanmıştır. Bu kısım araştırmanın nicel kısmını oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmanın nitel bölümünde ise öğrencilerle yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Tutum ve motivasyon anketine verilen yanıtların SPSS kullanılarak betimsel analizi yapılmış, kadın ve erkek öğrencilerin arasında tutum ve motivasyon açısından anlamlı bir fark olup olmadığını görmek için t-testler ve bölümler arası anlamlı bir fark olup olmadığını görmek için ise tek yönlü varyans analizi yapılmıştır. Yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmelerin durumsal veri analizi ise MAXQDA programında tamamlanmıştır. Araştırmanın sonucunda öğrencilerin yarısından fazlasının (%55,5) bu derse karşı olumlu bir tutum sergilediği görülmüştür. Tutum ölçeğinin ortalaması 3.48’dir. Öğrencilerin kısmen olumlu bir tutum sergilediği söylenebilir. İçsel motivasyon ölçeğinin ortalaması 3.51’ken araçsal motivasyonun ortalamasının biraz daha yüksek olduğu görülmüştür. Tutum ve motivasyon ölçeklerinde yapılan t-testler sonucu kadın ve erkekler öğrenciler arasında, tek yönlü varyans analizlerinin sonucunda ise bölümler arasında anlamlı bir fark olmadığı görülmüştür. Durumsal veri analizinin sonucunda ise öğrencilerin tutum ve motivasyonunu etkileyen altı tema ortaya çıkmıştır. Bunlar içeriğe yönelik ilgi, dil becerilerine katkı, kelime dağarcığına katkı, ders içi yapılan aktivitelerin etkisi, ders materyalinin etkisi ve son olarak öğretmenin etkisidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İçerik temelli ingilizce eğitimi
• Tematik dersler
• İngilizce hazırlık programı
• Motivasyon
• Tutum

Multiple Case Study on University Students’ Motivation and Attitudes toward the Content-Based English Teaching Method in English Preparatory Year Program

Öz

The purpose of this study is to evaluate students’ motivation and attitudes toward the content-based English classes that are a part of the freshman year curriculum at a university in Istanbul, Turkey. This study has adopted theintegrated research design and includes 27 students from 16 different disciplines. The learners were first given a scale to measure their attitudes and motivation, and this makes up the quantitative portion of the study. Attitude scale was adapted from the scale “Thai EFL High School Students’ Attitude Toward Content-Based Instruction” (2015) and motivation scale was adapted from "Motivations towards Learning English: The Case of Jordanian Gifted Students" (2015). After the adaptation and translation process, a pilot study was implemented to measure validity and reliability. Cronbach Alpha score of the scale was above 0.9. Therefore it is considered as reliable. (Nakip, 2003) Semi-structured interviews with the students were then conducted as part of the study’s qualitative methodology. The study uses SPSS to conduct a descriptive analysis of responses from the attitude and motivation scale t-tests to see whether a substantial difference exists between the motivation and attitudes of male and female students. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was also used to determine whether a significant difference exists for the students’ attitude and motivation in terms of department. The study then carried out a situational data analysis of the semi-structured interviews using MAXQDA, with the results showing more than half the students (55.5%) to have favorable attitudes toward the course. The median score from the attitude scale was 3.48, from which one can say that the learners are generally optimistic. The mean score from the instrumental motivation scale (M = 3.72) was found to be slightly higher than the mean score from the intrinsic motivation scale (M = 3.51). No discernible difference was found between the male and female students’ scores according to the results from the t-tests on the attitude and motivation scales nor among departments according to the one-way ANOVA. Six themes were revealed to impact students’ attitudes and motivation as a consequence of the situational data analysis. These include interest in the subject matter, contribution to language skill development, contribution to vocabulary, impact of in-class activities, impact of course materials, and teacher’s impact.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Content-based English education
• Thematic lessons
• English preparatory program
• Motivation
• Attitude

Kaynakça

1. Adhikary, R. P. (2020). Effectiveness of Content-based Instruction in Teaching Reading. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(5), 510-519. google scholar
2. Alptekin, C., Erçetin, G., & Bayyurt, Y. (2007). The effectiveness of a theme-based syllabus for young L2 learners. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 28(1), 1-17. google scholar
3. Anderson, J. R. (1993). Problem solving and learning. American psychologist, 48(1), 35. google scholar
4. Arulselvi, E. (2016). The Effectiveness of Content-Based Instruction in English Language Teaching. Excellence in Education Journal, 5(2), 36-51. google scholar
5. Ateş, M. (2019). Psycholinguistic development and content and language integrated learning (CLIL) across early childhood (Master’s thesis, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü). google scholar
6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy—the Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman. google scholar
7. Bayyurt, Y. (2013). 4+4+4 Eğitim Sisteminde Erken Yaşta Yabancı Dil Eğitimi. A.Sarıçoban ve H. Öz (Haz.), Türkiye’de Yabancı Dil Eğitiminde Eğilim Ne Olmalı? Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi İngiliz Dili Eğitimi Anabilim Dalı 1. Yabancı Dil Eğitimi Çalıştayı Bildirileri (ss. 115-126). Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayınları. google scholar
8. Brinton, D. M., & Snow, M. A. (2017). The evolving architecture of content-based instruction. The contentbased classroom: New perspectives on integrating language and content, 2-20. google scholar

9. Burger, S. (1989). Content-Based ESL in a Sheltered Psychology Course: Input, Output and Outcomes. TESL Canada Journal, 6(2), 45-59. google scholar
10. Byrnes, H., & Sprang, K. A. (2003). Fostering advanced L2 literacy: A genre-based, cognitive approach. google scholar
11. Can Vatandaş, S. (2016). Content-task based approach in English language teaching: A study google scholar
12. Chapple, L., & Curtis, A. (2000). Content-based instruction in Hong Kong: Student responses to film. System, 28(3), 419-433.s google scholar
13. Cochran, C. 1989. Strategies for involving LEP students in the all-English medium classroom: A cooperative learning approach. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education. [ED 337 039] google scholar
14. Covington,M.W. 1998. The Will to Learn: A Guide for Motivating Young People. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
15. Crandall, J. (1992). Content-Centered Learning in the U.S. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 110-126. google scholar
16. Crookes, G. and R. W. Schmidt. 1991. ‘Motivation reopening the research agenda’. Language Learning 41/4: 469-512 google scholar
17. Cummins, J. (1981). The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students. Schooling and language minority students. A theoretical framework. google scholar
18. Curtain, H., & Haas, M. (1995). Integrating foreign language and content instruction in grades K-8. ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics, Center for Applied Linguistics. google scholar
19. Çakıcı, D. (2007). Üniversite öğrencilerinin ortak zorunlu dersler kapsamındaki İngilizceye yönelik tutumları. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(3), 21-36. google scholar
20. Demirbaş, B. (2018) İçerik temelli öğretime dayalı okuma stratejileri eğitiminin öğrencilerin okuma stratejileri kullanımına etkisi ve eğitim hakkında öğrenci görüşleri. (Master’s thesis, Kocaeli Üniversitesi) google scholar
21. Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Motivation in second and foreign language learning. Language teaching, 31(3), 117-135. google scholar
22. Dörnyei, Z. (2001). New themes and approaches in second language motivation research. Annual review of applied linguistics, 21, 43-59. google scholar
23. Elgün Gündüz, Z. (2017). Effects of multiple intelligences activities in a content-based context on grammar, vocabulary, writing and reading comprehension and attitudes of learners and teachers of English. google scholar
24. Filiz, H. İ. (2019). Students and instructors’ perceptions of elective theme-based courses in an English preparatory school (Master’s thesis, İstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa). google scholar
25. Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1959). Motivational variables in second-language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 13(4), 266. google scholar
26. Genesee, F. (1994). Integrating language and content: Lessons from immersion. Educational Practice Report 11. National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning. google scholar
27. Harley, B. (1993). Instructional strategies and SLA in early French immersion. Studies in second language acquisition, 15(2), 245-259. google scholar
28. Khruawan, P., & Dennis, N. K. (2017). A study of English reading comprehension using content-based instruction approach. International Journal of Research: Granthaalayah. google scholar
29. Kirkgöz, Y. (2005). Motivation and student perception of studying in an English-medium university. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 1(1), 101-123. google scholar
30. Kişlal, İ. (2019). An overview of content based instruction with young learners through student self-reported literacy achievement, teacher interview and classroom observation (Master’s thesis, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü). google scholar
31. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practices in second language acquisition. NY: Pergamon Press. google scholar
32. Lyster, R. (1994). The effect of functional-analytic teaching on aspects of French immersion students’ sociolinguistic competence. Applied linguistics, 15(3), 263-287. google scholar
33. Maloof A, César & Corrales,K. (2011). Student Perceptions on on how content based instruction supports learner development in a foreign language context. Zona Próxima. google scholar
34. Mede, E., & Çinar, S. (2018). Implementation of Content and Language Integrated Learning and Its Effects on Student Motivation. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 11(2), 215-235. google scholar
35. Met, M. (1991). Learning language through content: Learning content through language. Foreign language annals, 24(4), 281. google scholar
36. Met, M. (1993). Foreign Language Immersion Programs. ERIC Digest. MLA Convention, Washington DC (December). google scholar
37. O’malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U.,(1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge university press. Overhaul of English Language Learning for Non-native English Learners. International Journal of English Language Education, 3(1), 115. google scholar
38. Öztürk, G. (2012). Foreign language speaking anxiety and learner motivation: a case study at a Turkish state university [M.S. - Master of Science]. Middle East Technical University. google scholar
39. Rodgers, D. M. (2006). Developing content and form: Encouraging evidence from Italian content-based instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 90(3), 373-386. google scholar
40. Shibata, N. (2019). The effectiveness of content-based instruction on beginners’ writing skills. Diversity and inclusion, 352-359. google scholar
41. Snow, M. A., & Brinton, D. M. (1988). Content-based language instruction: Investigating the effectiveness of the adjunct model. TESOL quarterly, 22(4), 553-574. google scholar
42. Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (1993). Instruction and the development of questions in L2 classrooms. Studies in second language acquisition, 15(2), 205-224. google scholar
43. Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (2008). Form-focused instruction: Isolated or integrated?. TESOL quarterly, 42(2), 181-207. google scholar
44. Sunarwan, A. (2013). The Effectiveness Of Content-Based Instruction To Teach Speaking Viewed From Students’ Creativity (An Experimental Study At The Third Semester Students Of Stain Jurai Siwo Metro In The Academic Year Of 2012/2013) (Doctoral dissertation, UNS (Sebelas Maret University)). google scholar
45. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2013). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In Researching pedagogic tasks (pp. 109-128). Routledge. google scholar
46. Uğurer, H. (2018) Üniversite Seviyesindeki Türk Mimarlık Öğrencileri için İçerik Odaklı İngilizce Ders Kitabı Geliştirme ve Değerlendirme: Örnek Olay İncelemesi google scholar