Ekonomik, Finansal ve Politik Risk ile Büyüme Arasındaki Nedensellik İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’nin ekonomik, finansal ve politik risk oranları ile büyüme arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisini incelemektir. Çalışmada 2000:01– 2020:06 döneminde söz konusu risk oranları ile büyüme arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek için Toda-Yamamoto nedensellik testi, Hatemi-J tarafından geliştirilen Bootstrap Toda-Yamamoto nedensellik testi ve zamanla değişen simetrik ve asimetrik nedensellik testleri kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular şu şekildedir: (i) Toda-Yamamoto nedensellik testine göre; finansal riskten büyümeye, ekonomik riskten finansal riske ve ekonomik riskten politik riske doğru nedensellik ilişkisi bulunmaktadır. (ii) Bootstrap Toda-Yamamoto nedensellik testine göre finansal riskten büyümeye doğru nedensellik ilişkisi vardır. Bootstrap Toda-Yamamoto asimetrik nedensellik testine göre; finansal riskteki pozitif şok büyümede pozitif şoka, finansal riskteki negatif şok büyümede negatif şoka ve politik riskteki negatif şok ise büyümede pozitif şoka yol açmaktadır. (iii) Zamanla değişen simetrik nedensellik testine göre nedensellik ilişkisinin olduğu dönemler; ekonomik riskten büyümeye doğru, finansal riskten büyümeye doğru ve politik riskten büyümeye doğru tespit edilmiştir. Zamanla değişen asimetrik nedensellik testine göre nedensellik ilişkisinin olduğu dönemler; ekonomik riskteki negatif şokun büyümedeki pozitif şoka ekonomik riskteki pozitif şokun büyümedeki negatif şoka; finansal riskteki negatif şokun büyümedeki pozitif şoka, finansal riskteki pozitif şokun büyümedeki negatif şoka etkilerini göstermektedir. Ancak söz konusu dönemde sadece politik riskteki pozitif şokun büyümede negatif şoka neden olduğu dönem görülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ekonomik risk
• Finansal risk
• Politik risk
• Ekonomik büyüme
• Nedensellik analizi

Causality Relationship Between Economic, Financial, Political Risk and Growth: The Case of Turkey

Öz

This study aims to examine the causality relationship between Turkey’s economic, financial and political risk ratios and growth. Toda-Yamamoto causality, Bootstrap Toda-Yamamoto causality, and time-varying symmetric and asymmetric causality tests were used to examine the relationship between the risk ratios and growth between 2000- 2020. The findings show that (i) The Toda-Yamamoto causality test shows a causal relationship between financial risk and growth, economic risk and financial risk, and economic risk and political risk. (ii) The Bootstrap Toda-Yamamoto causality test revealed a causal relationship between financial risk and growth. The Bootstrap Toda‑Yamamoto, asymmetric causality test, showed that a positive shock in financial risk causes a positive shock in growth, a negative shock in financial risk causes a negative shock in growth, and a negative shock in political risk causes a positive shock in growth. (iii) The time-varying relationship symmetric causality tests allowed for detecting causality between economic risk and growth, financial risk and growth, and political risk and growth. The time-varying relationship asymmetric causality tests revealed that a negative shock in economic risk caused a positive shock in growth; a positive shock in economic risk caused a negative shock in growth; a negative shock in financial risk caused a positive shock in growth and demonstrated the effects of the positive shock in financial risk as a negative shock in growth. However, a negative shock in growth was only observed when there was a positive shock in political risk.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Economic risk
• Financial risk
• Political risk
• Economic growth
• Causality analysis

Kaynakça

1. Acemoğlu, D. (2012). Introduction to economic growth. Journal of Economic Theory, 147, 545-550. google scholar
2. Aisen, A., & Veiga, F. J. (2013). How does political instability affect economic growth?. European Journal of Political Economy, 29, 151-167. google scholar
3. Akimov, A., Wijeweraa, A., & Dollery, B. (2009). Financial development and economic growth: Evidence from transiton economies. Applied Financial Economics, 19(12), 999-1008. google scholar
4. Alper, A. E. (2018). BRICS-T ülkelerinde politik istikrar ve ekonomik performans ilişkisi üzerine bir analiz. Business and Economics Research Journal 9(1), 49-56. google scholar
5. Alesina, A., Özler, S., Roubini, N., & Swagel, P. (1996). Political stability and economic growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 1(2), 189-211. google scholar
6. Arslan, Ü. (2011). Siyasi istikrarsızlık ve ekonomik performans: Türkiye örneği. Ege Akademik Bakış, 11(1), 73-80. google scholar
7. Asteriou, D., & Price, S. (2001). Political instability and economic growth: UK time series evidence. Scottish Journal of 'Polttical Economy, 48(4), 383-399. google scholar
8. Baklouti, N. & Boujelbene, Y. (2018). An econometric study of the role of the political stability on the relationship between democracy and economic growth. Panoeconomicus, 67(2), 187-206. google scholar

9. Barro, R. J. (1995). Inflation and economic growth. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, 35(2), 407-443. google scholar
10. Berber, M., & Artan, S. (2004). Enflasyon ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği. Turkish Economic Association Discussion Paper, 21, 1-14. google scholar
11. Belkhir, M., Grira, J., Hassan, M. K., & Soumare, I. (2018). Islamic banks and political risk: International evidence. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 74, 39-55. google scholar
12. Beşkaya, A., & Koç, A. (2006). Ekonomik büyüme ve kalkınmada ekonomik özgürlüklerin rolü ve önemi. Liberal Düşünce, Sayı 43, 1-30. google scholar
13. Brooks, C., & Hinich, M. (1998). Episodic nonstationarity in exchange rates. Appl. Econ. Lett., 5(11), 719-722. google scholar
14. Brückner, M., & Gradstein, M. (2015). Income growth, ethnic polarization, and political risk: Evidence from international oil price shocks. Journal of Comparative Economics, 43(3), 575-594. google scholar
15. Calderon, C., & Liu, L. (2003). The direction of causality between financial development and economic growth. Journal of Development Economics, 72(1), 321-334. google scholar
16. Campos, N. F., & Nugent, J. B. (2002). Who is afraid of political instability?. Journal of Development Economics, 67(1), 157-172. google scholar
17. Caporale, M. C., Rault, C., & Sova, A. R. (2009). Financial development and economic growth: evidence from ten new EU members. Discussion Papers, No: 904, 1-39. google scholar
18. Caspi, I. (2017). Rtadf: testing for bubbles with eviews. Journal of Statistical Software, 81(1), 1-16. google scholar
19. Chen, B., & Feng, Y. (1996). Some political determinants of economic growth: theory and empirical implications. European Journal of Political Economy, 12(4), 609-627 google scholar
20. Christopoulos, D. K., & Tsionas, E. G. (2004). Financial development and economic growth: evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests. Journal of Development Economics, 73(1), 55-74. google scholar
21. Çela, A., & Hysa, E. (2021). Impact of political ınstability on economic growth in CEE countries. Ekonomika Regiona [Economy of region], 17(2), 582-592. google scholar
22. Das, A., & Loxley J. (2015). Non-linear relationship between ınflation and growth ın developing countries. Economic & Political Weekly, 1(37), 59-64. google scholar
23. Demez, S., Kızılkaya, F., & Turan, İ. (2019). NIC ülkelerinde politik istikrar ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi. Siirt Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı: 14, 485-499. google scholar
24. Demetriades, Panicos O., & Husseın, Khaled A. (1996). Does financial development cause economic growth? Timeseries evidence from 16 countries. Journal of Development Economics, 51(2), 387-411. google scholar
25. Demirgil, H. (2011). Politik istikrarsızlık, belirsizlik ve makroekonomi: Türkiye örneği (1970-2006). Marmara Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 16(2), 123-144. google scholar
26. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49(4), 1057- 1072. google scholar
27. Dudian, M., & Popa, R. A. (2013). Financial development and economic growth in central and eastern europe. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 20(8/585), 59-68. google scholar
28. Erdoğan, S., Gedikli, A., & Kırca, M. (2019). A note on time-varying causality between natural gas consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Resources Policy, 64, 1-7. google scholar
29. Feng, Y. (2001). Political Freedom, Political ınstability and policy uncertainty: A study of political ınstitutions and private ınvestment in developing countries. International Studies Quarterly, 45, 271-294. google scholar
30. Fıscher, Stanley. (1993). The role of macroeconomic factors in growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 32(3), 485-512. google scholar
31. Granger, C., & Yoon, G. (2002). Hidden cointegration. Department of Economics Working Paper University of California, No:2002-02. google scholar
32. Gregory, R. P. (2019). Financial openness and entrepreneurship. Research in International Business and Finance, 48, 48-58. google scholar
33. Gujarati, D. N. (1995). Basic econometrics (Third edit). McGraw Hill Com. Inc. google scholar
34. Gurgul, H., & Lach, L. (2013). Political instability and economic growth: evidence from two decades of transition in CEE. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 46(2), 189-202. google scholar
35. Gür, T. H., & Akbulut, H. (2012). Gelişmekte olan ülkelerde politik istikrarın ekonomik büyüme üzerine etkisi. Sosyoekonomi, 282-300. google scholar
36. Hatemi-J, A. (2003). A new method to choose optimal lag order ın stable and unstable VAR models. Applied Economics Letters, 10(3), 135-137. google scholar
37. Hatemi-J, A. (2012). Asymmetric causality tests with an application. Empirical Economics, 43(1), 447-456. google scholar
38. Hacker, R., & Hatemi-J, A. (2006). Tests for causality between integrated variables using asymptotic and bootstrap distributions: Theory and application. Appl. Econ., 38(13), 1489-1500. google scholar
39. Howell, L. D., & Chaddick, B. (1994). Models of political risk for foreign ınvestment and trade- an assessment of three approaches. The Columbia Journal of World Business, 70-91. google scholar
40. ICRG (2020). International country risk guide political risk rating system, Political Risk Services Group. google scholar
41. Jones, C. I. (2017). İktisadi büyümeye giriş. (Sanlı Ateş;İsmail Tuncer,Çev.) İstanbul:Literatür Yayıncılık google scholar
42. Jong-A-Pin, R. (2009). On the measurement of political instability and its ımpact on economic growth. European Journal of Political Economy, 25, 15-29. google scholar
43. Karamelikli, H., & Bayar, Y., (2016). Makroekonomik ve finansal istikrarın ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisi: Türkiye örneği. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, ICAFR 16 Özel Sayısı, 225-236. google scholar
44. Kartal, G., & Öztürk, S. (2017). Türkiye’de politik istikrarsızlık ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(4), 250-270 google scholar
45. Kamacı, A. (2019). Politik istikrarsızlık-ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: 20 OECD ülkesi için panel veri analizi. Ticari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(2), 75-85. google scholar
46. Kamacı, A., (2016). Dış borçların ekonomik büyüme ve enflasyon üzerine etkileri: Panel eşbütünleşme ve panel nedensellik analizi. International Journal of Cultural and Social Studies (IntJCSS), Volume 2 (Special Issue 1), 165-175. google scholar
47. Kanca, O.C. (2012). Türkiye’de işsizlik ve iktisadi büyüme arasındaki nedenselliğin ampirik bir analizi. Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21(2), 1-18. google scholar
48. Kenourgios, D. & A. Samitas (2007). Financial development and economic growth in a transition economy: Evidence for Poland. Journal of Financial Decision Making, 3(1), 35-48. google scholar
49. Kırca, M., & Yıldız, Ü. (2020). Türkiye için kredi risk primi (cds) ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki zamanla değişen nedensellik ilişkileri. International Journal Of Afro-Eurasıan Research (IJAR), 5(10), 17-24. google scholar
50. Kızılkaya, O. & Sofuoğlu, E. (2016). BRIC-T ülkelerinde politik risk ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki: heterojen panel nedensellik analizi. Uluslararası Ekonomi Konferansı, Türkiye Ekonomi Kurumu, UEK-TEK 2016, 223-232. google scholar
51. Kutlu, S. & Yurttagüler, İ. M. (2016). Türkiye’de dış borç ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: 1998-2014 dönemi için bir nedensellik analizi. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 38(1), 229-248. google scholar
52. Muscatelli, V.A. & Tirelli P. (2001). Unemployment and growth: some empirical evidence from structural time series models. Journal ofApplied Econometrics, 33, 1083-1088. google scholar
53. Nazeer, A. M. & Masih, M. (2017). Impact of political instability on foreign direct investment and economic growth: evidence from Malaysia. MPRA Paper No. 79418 https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/79418/ google scholar
54. Okafor, G. (2015). The impact of political instability on the economic growth of ecowas member countries. Defence and Peace Economics, 28(2), 208-229 google scholar
55. Parlakyıldız, F. M. (2015). Makro ekonomik ve politik istikrarsızlığın ekonomik performans üzerine etkisi: Latin Amerika örneği. Çukurova Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 19(2), 1-11. google scholar
56. Pattillo, C. (2011). External debt and growth. Review ofEconomics and Institutions, 2(3), Fall, Article 2, 1-30. google scholar
57. Phillips, P. C. B., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing For A Unit Root İn Time Series Regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335346. google scholar
58. Pasha, S. (2020). The impact of political instability on economic growth: the case of Guyana. MPRA Paper No. 103145, https://mpra.ub.uni- muenchen.de/103145/1/MPRA_paper_103145.pdf google scholar
59. Radu, M. (2015). Political stability - a condition for sustainable growth in Romania?. Procedia Economics and Finance, 30, 751-757. google scholar
60. Soytaş, U., & Küçükkaya, E. (2011). Economic growth and financial development in Turkey: New evidence. Applied Economics Letters, 18(6), 595-600. google scholar
61. Şanlısoy, S., & Kök, R. (2010). Politik istikrarsızlık ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği (1987-2006). Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1), 101-125 google scholar
62. Tang, C.F. & Abosedra, S. (2014). The impacts of tourism,energy consumption and political instability on economic growth in the MENA countries. Energy Policy, 68, 458-464. google scholar
63. Toda, H., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. J. Econom., 66(1), 225-250. google scholar
64. Uçak, S. (2017). Cari denge ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: Türkiye analizi, MCBÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 15(2), 107-140. google scholar
65. Üçler, G. (2017). Doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar için kurumların önemi: Gelişmekte olan ülkeler üzerine ekonometrik bir analiz. Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 54(627), 73-85. google scholar
66. Yalçınkaya, Ö., & Kaya, V. (2017). Politik istikrarın/istikrarsızlığın ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkileri: dünyanın en büyük ilk yirmi ekonomisi üzerinde bir uygulama (1996-2015). Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 13(2): 277-298. google scholar
67. Yapraklı, S., & Güngör, B. (2007). Ülke riskinin hisse senedi fiyatlarına etkisi: IMKB 100 endeksi üzerine bir araştırma. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 62(2), 199-2018. google scholar
68. Yılancı, V., & Bozoklu, Ş. (2014). Price and trade volume relationship in Turkish capital market: Time-varying asymmetric causality analysis. Ege Akademik Bakis (Ege Acad.Rev.), 14(2), 211-220. google scholar
69. Younis, M., Lin, XX., Sharahili, Y., & Selvarathinam, S. (2008). Political stability and economic growth in Asia. American Journal of Applied Sciences 5(3):203- 208. google scholar
70. Zouhaier, H., & Kefi, M.K. (2012). Interaction between political instability and investment. Journal Of Economics And International Finance, 4(2):49-54. google scholar