Causalities Between Exports, Imports, and Total Factor Productivity in Developing Countries: The Case of Türkiye, Brazil, India, and South Africa

Yıl 2024, , 186 - 203, 13.08.2024

Mehmet Emre Ünsal

https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1394692

Öz

Theoretical frameworks and practical research have shown that economic growth and employment in developing countries are influenced by their achievements in foreign trade and productivity. The link between exports and TFP can be analysed through various lenses; including competitiveness, innovation and quality enhancement, the learning-by-doing effect, the adoption of cutting-edge technologies, and market competition. The link between imports and TFP can be interpreted through factors such as the need for capital goods, the tastes and demands of consumers, the transfer of knowledge, and the focus on producing specialised goods. The aim of this study was to examine the causality between exports, imports, and total factor productivity in developing countries. For this purpose, time series analyses are performed using data from the economies of Türkiye, Brazil, India, and South Africa. The hypothesis of this study is that in developing countries, there is bidirectional causality between exports, imports, and total factor productivity, both in the short and long term. The series used in the analysis become stationary when the first differences are taken. According to the Johansen Co-integration Test results, there is no long-term causality between exports, imports, and total factor productivity. According to the results of the Granger Causality Test conducted within the framework of the VAR model; there are bidirectional causalities between exports, imports, and total factor productivity in these four developing countries in the short run.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Exports, Imports, Total factor productivity, Developing countries, Time series analyzes

Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde İhracat, İthalat ve Toplam Faktör Verimliliği Arasındaki Nedensellikler: Türkiye, Brezilya, Hindistan ve Güney Afrika Örneği

Öz

Teorik ve uygulamalı araştırmalar, gelişmekte olan ülkelerde ekonomik büyüme ve istihdamın, ilgili ülkelerin dış ticaret ve verimlilik performanslarından etkilendiğini göstermektedir. İhracat ile toplam faktör verimliliği arasındaki ilişki; rekabet gücü, inovasyon, yaparak öğrenme etkisi, son teknolojilerin benimsenmesi ve piyasa rekabeti gibi çeşitli açılardan analiz edilebilir. İthalat ile toplam faktör verimliliği arasındaki ilişki ise; sermaye malları ithalatı, tüketicilerin zevk ve tercihleri, bilgi ve teknoloji transferi ve üretimde uzmanlaşma gibi faktörler üzerinden yorumlanabilir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, gelişmekte olan ülkelerde ihracat, ithalat ve toplam faktör verimliliği arasındaki nedenselliği incelemektir. Bu amaçla Türkiye, Brezilya, Hindistan ve Güney Afrika ekonomilerinden elde edilen veriler kullanılarak Zaman Serisi Analizleri yapılmıştır. Çalışmanın hipotezi; gelişmekte olan ülkelerde hem kısa hem de uzun dönemde ihracat, ithalat ve toplam faktör verimliliği arasında çift yönlü nedensellik bulunduğu yönündedir. Analizde kullanılan seriler ilk farkları alındığında durağan hale gelmektedir. Johansen Eşbütünleşme Testi sonuçlarına göre ihracat, ithalat ve toplam faktör verimliliği arasında uzun dönemli bir nedensellik bulunmamaktadır. VAR modeli çerçevesinde yapılan Granger Nedensellik Testi sonuçlarına göre; bu dört gelişmekte olan ülkede ihracat, ithalat ve toplam faktör verimliliği arasında kısa dönmede çift yönlü nedensellikler bulunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İhracat, İthalat, Toplam faktör verimliliği, Gelişmekte olan ülkeler, Zaman serisi analizi

Kaynakça

• Adeleye, J. O., Adeteye, O. S., & Adewuyi, M. O. (2015). Impact of international trade on economic growth in Nigeria (1988-2012). International journal of financial research, 6(3), 163-172. google scholar
• Afonso, O. (2001). The impact of international trade on economic growth. Investigaçâo-Trabalhos em Curso, 106. google scholar
• Ahmed, T., & Bhatti, A. A. (2020). Measurement and determinants of multi-factor productivity: A survey of literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(2), 293-319. google scholar
• Amiti, M. and Konings, J. (2007). Trade liberalization, intermediate inputs, and productivity: evidence from Indonesia. American Economic Review, 97(5), 1611-1638. google scholar
• Appleyard, D. R., & Field, A. J. (2014). International economics. McGraw-Hill. google scholar
• Aydin, S. (2022). Time series analysis and some applications in medical research. Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Studies, 3(2), 31-36. google scholar
• Brockwell, P. J. and Davis, R. A. (2016). Introduction to time series and forecasting. Springer Texts in Statistics. google scholar
• Bigsten, A., & Gebreeyesus, M. (2009). Firm productivity and exports: Evidence from Ethiopian manufacturing. The Journal of Development Studies, 45(10), 1594-1614. google scholar
• Caleb, G., Mazanai, M., & Dhoro, N. L. (2014). Relationship between international trade and economic growth: A cointegration analysis for Zimbabwe. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(20), 621. google scholar
• Chen, E. K. (1997). The total factor productivity debate: determinants of economic growth in East Asia. Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, 11(1), 18-38. google scholar
• Cisneros-Reyes, Y., Rocha-Ibarra, J., & Hidalgo, M. (2018). Characteristics of mexican leather footwear industry and its international trade activity, correlation of productivity, and competitiveness. European Scientific Journal Esj, 14(22), 63. google scholar
• Comin, D. (2010). Total factor productivity. In S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.). Economic growth. London: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
• Çeştepe, H., Arslan, E., & Yazıcı, M. (2020). Toplam Faktör Verimliliği, Ekonomik Büyüme ve İhracat İlişkisi: Gelişmekte Olan Ülkeler Örneği. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 27(3), 495-510. google scholar
• Dolado, J. J., Ericsson, N. R., & Kremers, J. J. M. (1992). The power of cointegration tests. International Finance Discussion Paper, 1992(431), 1-33. google scholar
• Feenstra, R. C., Inklaar, R., & Timmer, M. P. (2015). The next generation of the Penn World Table. American economic review, 105(10), 3150-3182. google scholar
• Felipe, J. (1999). Total factor productivity growth in East Asia: A critical survey. The Journal of Development Studies, 35(4), 1-41. google scholar
• Fernandes, A. M., & Isgut, A. (2005). Learning-by-doing, learning-by-exporting, and productivity: evidence from Colombia. Available at SSRN 695444. google scholar
• Fu, X. (2005). Exports, technical progress and productivity growth in a transition economy: a non-parametric approach for China. Applied economics, 37(7), 725-739. google scholar
• Goldberg, P. K., Khandelwal, A. K., Pavcnik, N., & Topalova, P. (2010). Imported intermediate inputs and domestic product growth: Evidence from India. The Quarterly journal of economics, 125(4), 1727-1767. google scholar
• Gonçalves, D., & Martins, A. (2016). The determinants of TFP growth in the Portuguese manufacturing sector. GEE Papers, 62. google scholar
• Gömleksiz, M., Şahbaz, A., & Mercan, B. (2017). Toplam faktör verimliliğinin belirleyicileri üzerine ampirik bir inceleme: Seçilmiş OECD ülkeleri örneği. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 12(2), 65-82. google scholar
• Grifell-Tatje, E., &Lovell,C. K. (1995). AnoteontheMalmquistproductivityindex. Economics letters, 47(2), 169-175. google scholar
• Gujarati, D. N. (2010). Temel Ekonometri. (Çev. Ü. Şenesen, G. Günlük Şenesen). İstanbul: Literatür Yayıncılık. google scholar
• Halpern, L., Miklos, K., & Szeidl, A. (2005). Imports and productivity. CEPR Discussion Papers no. 5139. google scholar
• Hanel, P. (2000). R&D, interindustry and international technology spillovers and the total factor productivity growth of manufacturing industries in Canada, 1974-1989. Economic Systems Research, 12(3), 345-361. google scholar
• Hatemi-J, A., & Irandoust, M. (2001). Productivity performance and export performance: a time-series perspective. Eastern Economic Journal, 27(2), 149-164. google scholar
• Herzer, D. (2007). How does trade composition affect productivity? evidence for Chile. Applied Economics Letters, 14(12), 909-912. google scholar
• Hiemstra, C. and Jones, J. D. (1994). Testing for linear and nonlinear granger causality in the stock price-volume relation. The Journal of Finance, 49(5), 1639-1664. google scholar
• Isaksson, A. (2007). Determinants of total factor productivity: a literature review. Research and Statistics Branch, UNIDO, 1(101), 672. google scholar
• Johansen, S. (1991). Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica, 59(6), 1551. google scholar
• Kim, S., Lim, H., & Park, D. (2009). Imports, exports and total factor productivity in Korea. Applied Economics, 41(14), 1819-1834. google scholar
• Liao, H., & Liu, X. (2009). Export-total factor productivity growth nexus in East Asian economies. Applied Economics, 41(13), 1663-1675. google scholar
• Lu, Y. and Su, H. (2023). Research on embedded technology import and the growth of tfp in china’s manufacturing industry based on the panel data from 1992 to 2020. Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences, 4(1), 92-102. google scholar
• Matsushita, Y. and Otsu, T. (2022). A jackknife lagrange multiplier test with many weak instruments. Econometric Theory, 1-24. google scholar
• Melitz, M. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695-1725. google scholar
• Mendi, P. (2007). Trade in disembodied technology and total factor productivity in OECD countries. Research Policy, 36(1), 121-133. google scholar
• Mohammadi, T. and Abooali, S. (2013). An empirical study on long-term relationship between total factor productivity and non-oil exports in Iran. Management Science Letters, 2643- 2650. google scholar
• Nadiri, M. I. (1970). Some approaches to the theory and measurement of total factor productivity: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 8(4), 1137-1177. google scholar
• Niu, R., & Zhang, Y. (2023, March). Analysis on the Mechanism of Intermediate Goods Import and Total Factor Productivity on Enterprise Innovation. In Proceedings of the 4th Management Science Informatization and Economic Innovation Development Conference, MSIEID 2022, December 9-11, 2022, Chongqing, China. google scholar
• Ogunleye, E. O., & Ayeni, R. K. (2008). The link between export and total factor productivity: Evidence from Nigeria. Social Sciences, 1, 9-18. google scholar
• Salvatore, D. (2019). International economics. John Wiley & Sons. google scholar
• Sharma, C. (2014). Imported intermediate inputs, R&D, and productivity at firm level: Evidence from Indian manufacturing industries. The International Trade Journal, 28(3), 246-263. google scholar
• Thadewald, T. and Büning, H. (2007). Jarque-bera test and its competitors for testing normality - a power comparison. Journal of Applied Statistics, 34(1), 87-105. google scholar
• Uçak, H., & Arısoy, İ. (2011). Türkiye ekonomisinde verimlilik, ihracat ve ithalat arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisinin analizi. Ege Akademik Bakış, 11(4), 639-651. google scholar
• Vacu, N., & Odhiambo, N. M. (2020). The determinants of import demand: a review of international literature. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Economica, 16(5). google scholar
• Van Beveren, I. (2012). Total factor productivity estimation: A practical review. Journal of economic surveys, 26(1), 98-128. google scholar
• Wang, N., Liu, W., Sun, S., & Wang, Q. (2021). The influence of complexity of imported products on total factor productivity. Mobile Information Systems, 2021, 1-7. google scholar
• Wilhelmsson, F., & Kozlov, K. (2007). Exports and productivity of Russian firms: In search of causality. Economic Change and Restructuring, 40, 361-385. google scholar
• Zahonogo, P. (2016). Trade and economic growth in developing countries: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of African Trade, 3(1-2), 41-56. google scholar