The Role and Impact of Foreign Aid in Neoliberal Development

Öz

The impact of foreign aid on development and economic growth in poor countries has been a subject of academic debate for many years. From the first years of the post-World War II period until today, many studies have been conducted to evaluate the impact of foreign aid on development and economic growth. In discussions on the effectiveness of foreign aid, which are based on the results of these studies conducted by academics from many different disciplines, such as development economics, international relations, and sociology, no consensus has not been formed on the effectiveness of foreign aid. Although criticisms of foreign aid are generally associated with Marxist/critical approaches, especially Dependency Theory, neoliberal thought has also directed harsh criticism at foreign aid. However, despite neoliberal criticism questioning the usefulness and importance of foreign aid, the amount and scope of foreign aid provided to poor countries has continued to increase since the rise of neoliberalism in Western donor countries since the 1980s. Surprisingly, despite the anti-foreign aid views of neoliberal development approaches based on their unquestioning belief that free market mechanisms are the only and most efficient solution to poverty, official development aid has constantly increased and broken records over the past 50 years. If foreign aid is an intervention in the free market, does an increase in the amount and scope of foreign aid mean a move away from the basic principles of the neoliberal development approach? Or is there a change in neoliberal development approaches to foreign aid under the changing conditions of the global economy? The aim of this study is to examine the change and continuity in the perspective of neoliberal development approaches to foreign aid by analysing the discourses of neoliberal development literature on foreign aid and the foreign aid practises of donors that adopt neoliberal development prescriptions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Foreign aid
• Development
• Global value chains
• Neoliberalism
• OECD

Neoliberal Kalkınma Yaklaşımlarında Dış Yardımın Rolü ve Etkisi

Öz

Dış yardımların yoksul ülkelerde kalkınma ve ekonomik büyümeye etkisi, akademik çevrelerde uzun yıllardır süregelen bir tartışma konusudur. İkinci Dünya Savaşı sonrası dönemin ilk yıllarından günümüze kadar, dış yardımların kalkınma ve ekonomik büyümeye etkisini değerlendiren birçok araştırma gerçekleştirilmiştir. Kalkınma iktisadı, uluslararası ilişkiler ve sosyoloji gibi pek çok farklı disiplinden gelen akademisyenlerin yürüttüğü bu araştırmaların sonuçları üzerinden yürüyen dış yardımın etkinliği tartışmalarında hala bir uzlaşı sağlanamamış; dış yardımların etkinliği konusunda bir fikir birliği oluşmamıştır. Dış yardıma yönelik eleştiriler, Bağımlılık Teorisi başta olmak üzere genellikle Marksist/eleştirel yaklaşımlar ile ilişkilendiriliyor olmasına rağmen, neoliberal düşünce de dış yardımlara sert eleştiriler yöneltmiştir. Ancak, dış yardımların fayda ve önemini sorgulayan neoliberal eleştirilere rağmen, yoksul ülkelere sağlanan dış yardımların miktarı ve kapsamı Batılı donör ülkelerde 1980’li yıllardan itibaren neoliberalizmin yükselişinden sonra da artarak devam etmiştir. Neoliberal kalkınma yaklaşımlarının, serbest piyasa mekanizmalarının yoksulluğun tek ve en verimli çözümü olduğuna dair sorgusuz inançlarına dayanan dış yardım karşıtı görüşlerine rağmen, geçtiğimiz 50 yıl boyunca resmi kalkınma yardımlarının sürekli artması ve rekorlar kırması şaşırtıcıdır. Eğer dış yardım serbest piyasaya bir müdahale ise, miktarı ve kapsamı giderek artan dış yardımlar neoliberal kalkınma anlayışının temel ilkelerinden bir uzaklaşma anlamına mı gelmektedir? Yoksa neoliberal kalkınma yaklaşımlarının dış yardımlara bakışında küresel ekonominin değişen şartları altında bir değişim mi söz konudur? Bu çalışmanın amacı neoliberal kalkınma literatürünün dış yardıma ilişkin söylemlerini ve neoliberal kalkınma reçetelerini benimseyen donörlerin dış yardım uygulamalarını analiz ederek, neoliberal kalkınma yaklaşımlarının dış yardıma bakış açısındaki değişim ve sürekliliği incelemektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dış yardım
• Kalkınma
• Küresel değer zincirleri
• Neoliberalizm
• OECD

Kaynakça

1. Altenburg, T. (2007). Donor approaches to supporting pro-poor value chains. Report prepared for the donor committee for enterprise development. http://www.fao-ilo.org/fileadmin/user_upload/fao_ilo/pdf/DonorApproachestoPro-PoorValueChains.pdf. google scholar
2. Barrientos, S., Gereffi, G., & Rossi, A. (2011). Economic and social upgrading in global production networks: A new paradigm for a changing world. International Labour Review, 150(3-4), 319-340. doi: 10.1111/j.1564-913X.2011.00119.x. google scholar
3. Bauer, P. T. (1972). Dissent on development: Studies and debates in Development Economics. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Univ. Press. google scholar
4. Bernhardt, T. (2014). North-South imbalances in the international trade regime: Why the WTO does not benefit developing countries as much as it could. Consilience, 12, 123-141. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26476156. google scholar
5. Brown, S. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on development assistance. International Journal, 76(1), 42-54. doi: 10.1177/0020702020986888. google scholar
6. Burnside, C., & Dollar, D. (2000). Aid, policies, and growth. American Economic Review, 90(4), 847-868. doi:10.1257/aer.90.4.847. google scholar
7. Dalgaard, C., Hansen, H., & Tarp, F. (2004). On the empirics of foreign aid and growth. The Economic Journal, 114(496), 191-216. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00219.x. google scholar
8. Deaton, A. (2013). The great escape: Health, wealth, and the origins of inequality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. google scholar

9. Dichter, T. W. (2003). Despite good intentions: Why development assistance to the third world has failed. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. google scholar
10. Easterly, W., Levine, R., & Roodman, D. (2004). Aid, policies, and growth: Comment. American Economic Review, 94(3), 774-780. doi:10.1257/0002828041464560. google scholar
11. Easterly, W. (2006). The White man’s burden: Why the West’s efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good, New York: Penguin. google scholar
12. Frank, A. G. (1973). Latin America: Underdevelopment or revolution. Andover, Mass: Warner Modular Publications. google scholar
13. Glennie, J., & Sumner, A. (2016). Aid, growth and poverty. London: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
14. Hansen, H., & Tarp, F. (2001). Aid and growth regressions. Journal of Development Economics, 64(2), 547-570. doi:10.1016/s0304-3878(00)00150-4. google scholar
15. Harvey, D. L., & Reed, M. (1992). Paradigms of poverty: A critical assessment of contemporary perspectives. International Journal ofPolitics, Culture, and Society, 6(2), 269-297. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20007086. google scholar
16. Haslam, P. A. (2012). Multinational corporations. In P.A. Haslam, P. Beaudet, & J. Schafer (Eds.), Introduction to international development: Approaches, actors, issues, and Practice. Ontario: Oxford University Press. google scholar
17. Hayter, T. (1971). Aid as imperialism. Middlesex: Penguin Books. google scholar
18. Jakupec, V. (2016). Aid for trade: A critical analysis. In V. Jakupec & M. Kelly (Eds.), Assessing the impact of foreign aid (pp. 45-59). London: Academic Press. google scholar
19. Jakupec. V. (2018). Development aid: Populism and the end of the neoliberal agenda. Cham: Springer. google scholar
20. Moyo, D. (2010). Dead aid: Why aid makes things worse and how there is another way for Africa. London: Penguin. google scholar
21. Neilson, J. (2017). Value chains, neoliberalism and development practice: The Indonesian experience. In J. Neilson, B. google scholar
22. Pritchard & H. Yeung (Eds.), Global value chains and global production networks (pp. 38-69). London: Routledge. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2013.809782. google scholar
23. Newman, S. (2012). Global commodity chains and global value chains. In The Elgar companion to Marxist economics (pp. 155-161). London: Edward Elgar Publishing. google scholar
24. O’Brien, R., & Williams, M. (2010). Global political economy: Evolution & dynamics. London: Bloomsbury Academic. google scholar
25. OECD. (2015). Aid for trade at a glance 2015: Reducing trade costs for inclusive, sustainable growth. Paris: OECD Publishing. google scholar
26. OECD. (2022). Aid for trade at a glance 2022: Empowering connected, sustainable trade. Paris: OECD Publishing. google scholar
27. OECD. (2023a). ODA levels in 2022 - preliminary data. https://www.oecd.org/dac/financing-sustainable-development /ODA-2022-summary.pdf. google scholar
28. OECD. (2023b). Development co-operation report 2023: Debating the aid system, Paris: OECD Publishing. google scholar
29. OECD. (2024a). Aid for trade statistics by bilateral donors by bilateral donors (2005-2023). https://web-archive.oecd.org/temp/2024-06-25/58513-aid-for-tradestatisticalqueries.htm. google scholar
30. OECD. (2024b). Aid for trade statistics by bilateral donors by multilateral donors (2005-2023). https://web-archive.oecd.org/temp/2024-06-25/58513-aid-for-tradestatisticalqueries.htm. google scholar
31. OECD. (2024c). Official development asssistance by bilateral donors (1980-2022). https://data-explorer.oecd.org/vis?fs[0]=Topic%2C1%7CDevelopment%. google scholar
32. OECD. (2024d). Official development asssistance by multilateral donors (1980-2022). https://data-explorer.oecd.org/20Assistance%20%28ODA%29%23DEV_ODA. google scholar
33. OECD. (2024e). Total official development assistance provided to support integration into global value chains. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/policy-issues/global-value-and-supply-chains.html. google scholar
34. Pomerantz, P. R. (2024). Foreign aid: Policy and practice. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. google scholar
35. Prebisch, R. (1964). Towards a new trade policy for development: report by the secretary-general of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. New York: United Nations. google scholar
36. Roodman, D. (2007). The anarchy of numbers: Aid, development, and Cross-Country Empirics. The World Bank Economic Review, 21(2), 255-277. doi:10.1093/wber/lhm004. google scholar
37. Ruiz, J. B. (2017). Raul Prebisch and the theory of regional economic integration. In The Global Political Economy of Raul Prebisch (pp. 61-77). London: Routledge. google scholar
38. Solheim, E. E. (2013). Connecting to value chains: The role of aid for trade in private sector development. https://ecdpm.org/work/aid-for-trade-volume-2-issue-5-july-august-2013/connecting-to-value-chains-the-role-of-aid-for-trade-in-private-sector-development. google scholar
39. Stiglitz, J. E., & Charlton, A. (2013). The Right to trade: Rethinking the aid for trade agenda. London: Commonwealth Secretariat. google scholar
40. Stockemer, D., LaMontagne, B., & Charrette, J. (2011). Panacea, placebo, or poison? the impact of development aid on growth. Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 32(1), 3-16. doi:10.1080/02255189.2011.576133. google scholar
41. Szentes, T. (1976). The political economy of underdevelopment. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado. google scholar
42. Taglioni, D., & Winkler, D. (2016). Making global value chains work for development. New York: World Bank Publications. google scholar
43. Thorbecke, E. (2006). The evolution of the development doctrine, 1950-2005. In G. Mavrotas & A. Shorrocks (Eds.), Advancing Development: Core Themes in Global Economics (pp. 3-37). London: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
44. UNCTAD. (2009). Aid for trade and development. In P. De Lombaerde & L. Puri (Eds.), Aid for Trade: Global and Regional Perspectives (pp. 5-27). Dordrecht: Springer. google scholar
45. Van Bilzen, G. (2015). The development of aid. Newcaste: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. google scholar
46. Wright, E. O. (1994). Interrogating inequality: Essays on class analysis, socialism and Marxism. London: Verso. google scholar
47. WTO. (2020). Annual report 2020. Geneva: World Trade Organization. google scholar