THE PREVALENCE OF SUPERFICIAL MYCOSIS (TINEA PEDIS AND ONYCHOMYCOSIS) IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CHILDREN IN ISTANBUL

Öz

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of tinea pedis and onychomycosis in children of elementary school age and to examine socio-demographic features that might influence the existence of both types of mycosis. Materials and methods:Atotal of 3390 female and 3768 male children aged between 6 and 14 years have been examined in seven schools. Skin scrapings and nail samples were taken from 13 students who were suspected to have tinea pedis and from 49 students who were suspected to have onychomycosis. Suspicious skin scrapings and nails were clarified in 10-15% KOH + calcofluor white through the direct microscopic method and then examined under a fluorescent microscope and assessed as positive or negative according to the existence of mycelium and / or spores. Afterwards, these samples were placed on test cultivation places onto SDAand DTM and incubated for a period of 21 days at 26-300C. Results: 11 students were diagnosed as tinea pedis and 24 were diagnosed as onychomycosis. Trichpohyton rubrum was isolated from 3 students with tinea pedis whose culture was positive, and five Candida albicans, five Candida glabrata and one Candida tropicalis cases were isolated from 11 samples with onychomycosis. Tinea pedis prevalence has been found to be 1.5% and onychomycosis prevalence has been found to be 3.3%. Differences between onychomycosis prevalence based on age have been found to be statistically significant (p<0.001). Conclusion: In conclusion, it has been determined that the prevalence of tinea pedis and onychomycosis among children is low. Candida spp. was isolated from all of the 14 samples diagnosed as onychomycosis. Our study shows similar results with previous studies done in Turkey and T.rubrum continues to be the most common isolated agent. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tinea pedis,onychomycoses,superficial mycoses,epidemiology,elementary school children

İSTANBUL'DA İLKÖĞRETİM ÇAĞINDAKİ ÇOCUKLARDA YÜZEYEL MİKOZ (TİNEA PEDİS VE ONİKOMİKOZ) PREVELANSI

Öz

Kaynakça

1. Aly R. Ecology and epidemiology of dermatophyte infections. Am Acad Dermatol 1994; 31: 21-25.
2. Bahamdan K, Mahfouz A, Tallab T, Badawi IA, Al-Amari OM. Skin diseases among adolescent boys in Abha, Saudi Arabia. Int J Dermatol 1996; 35:405-407.
3. Blank F, Mann SJ. Trichophyton rubrum infections according to age, anatomical distribution and sex. Br J Dermatol 1975; 92:171-174.
4. Bokhari MA, Hussain I, Jahangir M, Haroon TS, Aman S, Khursid K. Onychomycosis in Lahore, Pakistan. Int J Dermatol 1999; 38:591-595.
5. Brajac I, Prpic- Massari L, Stojnic-Sosa L, Gruber F. The epidemiology of Microsporum canis infections in Rijeka area, Crotia. Mycoses 2004; 47: 222-226.
6. Cheng SY, Chong LY. A prospective epidemiological study on tinea pedis and onychomycosis in Hong Kong. Chin Med J 2002; 115:860- 864.
7. Crissey JT. Common dermatophyte infections. A simple diagnostic test and current management. Postgrad Med 1998; 103: 191-192.
8. Drake LA, Dinehart SM, Farmer ER, Goltz RW, Graham GF, Hordinsky MK. Guidelines of care for superficial mycotic infections of the skin: Onychomycosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996; 34:116-121.

9. Drusko VB, Rucevia I, Biljan D, Jukia Z. Epidemiology of dermatomycosis in the Eastern Crotia yesterday and today. Coll Antropol 2003; 27: 11-17.
10. Ekanem LS, Gugnani HC. Etiology of dermatophytoses amongst school children in Cross River State of Nigeria. Mykosen 1987; 30:493-498.
11. Elewski BE. Clinical pearl: diagnosis of onychomycosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995; 2:500-501.
12. Elewski BE. Cutaneous mycoses in children. Br J Dermatol 1996; 46(134 Suppl):7-11
13. Elewski BE, Charif MA. Prevalence of onychomycosis in patients attending a dermatology clinic in northeastern Ohio for other conditions. Arch Dermatol 1997; 133:1172-1173.
14. Elewski BE. Onychomycosis: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management.Clin Microbiol Rev 1998; 11:415-429.
15. Enveani IB, Ozan CC, Agbonlahor DE, Ndip RN. Dermatophytosis in schoolchildren in Ekpoma, Nigeria. Mycoses 1996; 39:303-305. .
16. Erbagci Z, Tuncel A, Zer Y, Balci I. A prospective epidemiologic survey on the prevalence of onychomycosis and dermatophytosis in male boarding school.residents. Mycopathologia 2005; 159:347-352.
17. F›nd›k D, Mevluto¤lu ‹, Kaya M, Arslan U, Yuksel A. Dermatofitoz ön tan›l› olgularda izole edilen etkenler. A.D.U. T›p Fakültesi Dergisi 2001; 2:19-22.
18. Gupta AK, Sibbald RG, Lynde CW, Hull PR, Prussick R, Shear NH, De Doncker P, Daniel CR, Elewski BE. Onychomycosis in children: prevalence and treatment strategies. Am Acad Dermatol 1997; 36:395-402.
19. Inanir I, Sahin MT, Dinc G, Turel A, Arisoy A, Ozturkcan S. Case Report. Tinea pedis and onychomycosis in primary school children in Turkey. Mycoses 2002; 45:198-201.
20. Jang KA, Chi DH, Choi JH, Sung KJ, Moon KC, Koh JK. Tinea pedis in Korean children Int J Dermatol 2000; 30: 25-27.
21. Jesudanam TM, Rao GRR, Lakshmi DJ, Kumari GR. Onychomycosis: A significant medical problem J. Indian J. Dermatol Venereal Leprol 2002; 68: 326-329.
22. Kiraz M,Ye¤enoglu Y, Erturan Z, Ang O. The epidemiology of onychomycoses in Istanbul, Turkey. Mycoses 1999; 42:323-329.
23. Kuklova I, Kucerova H. Dermatophytoses in Prague, Czech Republic, between 1987 and 1998. Mycoses 2001; 44: 493-496.
24. Leibovici V, Evron R, Dunchin M, Strauss-Leviatan N, Westerman M, Ingber A. Population-based epidemiologic study of tinea pedis in Israeli children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002; 21:851854.
25. Lupa S, Seneczko F, Jeske J, Glowacka A, Szymanska AO. Epidemiology of dermatomycoses of humans in Central Poland. Part IV. Onychomycosis due to dermatophytes. Mycoses 1999; 42:657-660.
26. Mercantini R, Marsella M, Moretto D. Onychomycosis in Rome, Italy. Mycopothologi 1996; 136: 25-30.
27. Merlin K, Kilkenny M, Plunkett A, Marks R. The prevalence of common skin conditions in Australian school students: 4 Tinea pedis. Br J Dermatol 1999; 140:897-901.
28. Metintas S, Kiraz N, Arslantas D, Kalyoncu C, Kiremitci A, Unsal A. Frequency and risk factors of dermatophytosis in students living in rural areas in Eskisehir, Turkey. Mycopathologia 2004; 157:379-382.
29. Ogasawara Y, Hiruma M, Muto M, Ogawa H. Clinical and mycological study of occult tinea pedis and tinea unguium in dermatological patients from Tokyo. Mycoses 2003; 46:114119.
30. Perea S, Ramos MJ, Garau M, Gonzalez A, Noriega AR. Prevalence and risk factors of tinea unguium and tinea pedis in the general population in Spain. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38:3226-3230.
31. Popescu R, Popescu CM, Williams HC, Forsea D. The prevalence of skin conditions in Romanian school children. Br J Dermatol 1999; 140 :891-896.
32. Reddy BSN, Ramesh V, Singh R. Clinico - mycological study of onychomycosis Indian J. Dermatol Venereal Leprol 1982; 48:145-150.
33. Scher RK.Onychomycosis: a significant medical disorder. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996; 35: 2-5.
34. Schmeller W, Baumgartner S, Dzikus A. Dermatophytomycoses in children in rural Kenya: the impact of primary health care. Mycoses 1997; 40:55-63.
35. Seneczko F, Lupa S, Jeske J, Glowacka A, Szymanska AO. Epidemiology of dermatomycoses of humans in Central Poland. Part 1. Mycoses 1999; 42: 297-306.
36. fiahin ‹, Öksüz S, Kaya D, fiencan ‹, Çetinkaya R. Dermatophytes in the rural area of Duzce, Turkey. Mycoses 2004; 47 : 470-474.
37. Tan HH. Superficial fungal infections seen at the National Skin Centre, Singapore. Jpn J Med Mycol 2005; 46: 77-80.
38. Tezcan S. Epidemiyoloji. Hacettepe Halk Sa¤l›¤› Vakf›, Ankara, 1992; 238-239.
39. Velez A, Linares MJ, Roldan JC, Casal M. Study of onychomycosis in Cordoba, Spain: prevailing fungi and pattern of infection. Mycopathologia 1997; 137:1-8.