TALUS OSTEOKONDRAL LEZYONLARI ÜZERİNE EN ÇOK ATIF ALAN 50 MAKALE (1980–2024): BİR BİBLİYOMETRİK ANALİZ

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, talus osteokondral lezyonları (OLTs) üzerine en çok atıf alan 50 makaleyi belirlemek, bu makalelerin temel özelliklerini ve araştırma eğilimlerini inceleyerek gelecekteki araştırmalar ve klinik uygulamalara yönelik öngörüler sunmaktır.

Gereç ve Yöntemler: “Osteochondral lesions of the talus” ve “talus osteochondral lesions” anahtar kelimeleri kullanılarak Web of Science veritabanında sistematik bir tarama yapıldı. Makaleler atıf sayılarına göre sıralandı ve en çok atıf alan ilk 50 çalışma seçildi. Atıf sayıları, yayın yılları, yazarlar, araştırma konuları, dergiler, kanıt düzeyi (LOE) ve ülkeler hakkında veriler elde edildi.

Bulgular: En çok atıf alan 50 makalenin toplam atıf sayısı 8.470 idi (ortalama 169,4 atıf/makale). Çalışmaların yayımlanma yılları 1980–2017 arasında olmakla birlikte büyük çoğunluğu (%80) 2000 yılı sonrasına aittir. En çok atıf alan makale, Zengerink ve arkadaşlarının sistematik derlemesi olup 376 atıf almıştı. En fazla katkı sağlayan ülke ABD (%34) olurken, bunu İtalya ve Hollanda izledi. Foot and Ankle International ve The American Journal of Sports Medicine en sık yayın yapılan dergilerdi. Makalelerin çoğu (n=37) tedavi yöntemlerine odaklanmış olup, mikrofraktür (n=14) ve mozaikplasti (n=12) öne çıkan konular idi. Çalışmaların çoğunluğu (n=37) LOE IV düzeyinde olup, yüksek düzeyde kanıt sunan çalışmaların azlığı dikkat çekiciydi.

Sonuç: Bulgular, tedavi odaklı çalışmaların baskınlığını ve özellikle mikrofraktür ile mozaikplasti yöntemlerinin ön plana çıktığını göstermektedir. Tanı ve tedavideki ilerlemelere rağmen LOE IV kanıt düzeyinin baskınlığı ve randomize kontrollü çalışmaların yetersizliği, standart tedavi protokollerinin oluşturulabilmesi için çok merkezli çalışmalara ihtiyaç olduğunu vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Talus osteokondral lezyonları
• bibliyometrik analiz
• atıf analizi
• kanıt düzeyi
• ortopedi araştırma eğilimleri

THE TOP 50 MOST-CITED ARTICLES ON TALUS OSTEOCHONDRAL LESIONS (1980–2024): A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS

Öz

Objective: This study aimed to identify and evaluate the top 50 most-cited articles on talus osteochondral lesions (OLTs), analysing their characteristics and research trends to provide insights for future studies and clinical management.

Materials and Methods: A systematic search was performed in the Web of Science database using the terms “osteochondral lesions of the talus” and “talus osteochondral lesions.” Articles were ranked by citation count, and the top 50 were included. Data on citations, publication years, authorship, study topics, journals, levels of evidence (LOE), and countries of origin were extracted.

Results: The top 50 most-cited articles accumulated 8,470 citations (mean 169.4 per article). In the search covering the period 1980–2024, the top 50 most-cited articles were published between 1980 and 2017, with 80% appearing after 2000. The most-cited article, a systematic review by Zengerink et al., garnered 376 citations. The United States contributed 34% of the articles, followed by Italy and the Netherlands. Foot and Ankle International and The American Journal of Sports Medicine were the most common journals. Most articles (n=37) addressed treatment methods, including microfracture (n=14) and mosaicplasty (n=12). Diagnostic and imaging studies (n=7) were less common. The majority (n=37) were Level IV, with few higher-level studies.

Conclusion: The findings emphasise the dominance of treatment-focused studies, particularly microfracture and mosaicplasty techniques. Despite advancements in diagnosis and management, the predominance of Level IV evidence and scarcity of randomised controlled studies highlight the need for multicentre studies to establish standardised protocols.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Osteochondral lesions of the talus
• bibliometric analysis
• citation analysis
• level of evidence
• research trends in orthopedics.

Kaynakça

1. Looze CA, Capo J, Ryan MK, Begly JP, Chapman C, Swanson D, et al. Evaluation and management of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Cartilage 2017;8(1):19-30. google scholar
2. Anastasio AT, Wixted CM, McGroarty NK. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: etiology, clinical presentation, treatment options, and outcomes. Foot Ankle Clin 2024;29(2):193-211. google scholar
3. Lee JW. New perspectives of osteochondral lesion of the talus. Orthop J Sports Med 2019;7(11_suppl6):2325967119S00453. google scholar
4. Hollander JJ, Dahmen J, Emanuel KS, Stufkens SA, Kennedy JG, Kerkhoffs GM. The frequency and severity of complications in surgical treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 6,962 lesions. Cartilage 2023;14(2):180-97. google scholar
5. Kelly JC, Glynn RW, O'Briain DE, Felle P, McCabe JP. The 100 classic papers of orthopaedic surgery: A bibliometric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010;92(10):1338-43. google scholar
6. Malik AT, Noordin S. The top 50 most-cited articles on total ankle arthroplasty: A bibliometric analysis. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2018;10(1):7498. google scholar
7. Tekin SB, Bozgeyik B. The top 100 most-cited articles on hallux valgus. J Foot Ankle Surg 2021;60(4):757-61. google scholar
8. Feeney KM. The top 100 cited articles on plantar fasciitis: A bibliometric analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg 2022;61(6):1246-50. google scholar

9. Panchbhavi M. Top 100 cited articles in charcot neuroarthropathy. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2022;16(8):102578. google scholar
10. Sgadari A, Izzo A, Smeraglia F, Coviello A, Patel S, Mariconda M, et al. Analysis of the 50 Most Cited Articles on Achilles Tendon Injury. Orthop J Sports Med 2023;11(5):23259671231170846. google scholar
11. Sun X, Wang S, Wang Z, Chen Z. A bibliometric analysis and visualization of osteochondral lesions of talus (2004–2021). Med Data Min 2024;7(3):16. google scholar
12. Aydemir AN, Yücens M. Trends in osteochondral lesions of talus in twenty years and most cited twenty-five articles: a web-based bibliometric analysis. Pam Med J 2025;18(3):660-71. google scholar
13. Fu X, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Lu L, Chen T, Deng H, et al. Visualized trends and bibliometric analysis in ankle cartilage repair from 2004 to 2024. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024;11:1503707. google scholar
14. Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD. Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85(1):1-3. google scholar
15. Zengerink M, Struijs PA, Tol JL, van Dijk CN. Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010;18(2):238-46. google scholar
16. Canale ST, Belding RH. Osteochondral lesions of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980;62(1):97-102. google scholar
17. Ramponi L, Yasui Y, Murawski CD, Ferkel RD, DiGiovanni CW, Kerkhoffs G, et al. Lesion Size Is a Predictor of Clinical Outcomes After Bone Marrow Stimulation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Systematic Review. Am J Sports Med 2017;45(7):1698-705. google scholar
18. Karaismailoğlu B, Kara M. Characteristics and research trends of 50 most-cited hallux rigidus papers. Foot (Edinb) 2022;51:101903. google scholar
19. Karaismailoglu B, Tutuncu MN, Sahin E, Aslan L. Characteristics and Research Trends of the 100 Most-Cited Flatfoot Articles. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2023;113(4). google scholar
20. van Dijk NC, van Bergen CJ. Advancements in ankle arthroscopy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008;16(11):635-46. google scholar
21. Loomer R, Fisher C, Lloyd-Smith R, Sisler J, Cooney T. Osteochondral lesions of the talus. Am J Sports Med 1993;21(1):13-9. google scholar
22. Lambers KT, Saarig A, Turner H, Stufkens SA, Doornberg JN, Kerkhoffs GM, et al. Prevalence of osteochondral lesions in rotational type ankle fractures with syndesmotic injury. Foot Ankle Int 2019;40(2):159-66. google scholar
23. O'Loughlin PF, Heyworth BE, Kennedy JG. Current concepts in the diagnosis and treatment of osteochondral lesions of the ankle. Am J Sports Med 2010;38(2):392-404. google scholar
24. Berndt AL, Harty M. Transchondral fractures (osteochondritis dissecans) of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1959;41(6):988-1020. google scholar
25. Desai SS, Ezuma CO, El-Najjar DB, Ren M, Mueller JD, Popkin CA. Patellar tendon injury: a bibliometric analysis of the most-cited articles demonstrates relatively high overall level of evidence. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2022;4(5):e1747-e57. google scholar
26. Adams AB, Simonson D. Publications, citations, and impact factors of leading investigators in critical care medicine. Respir Care 2004;49(3):276-81. google scholar
27. Ahmad SS, Evangelopoulos DS, Abbasian M, Röder C, Kohl S. The hundred most-cited publications in orthopaedic knee research. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96(22):e190. google scholar
28. Giannini S, Vannini F. Operative treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talar dome: current concepts review. Foot Ankle Int 2004;25(3):168-75. google scholar
29. Chuckpaiwong B, Berkson EM, Theodore GH. Microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the ankle: outcome analysis and outcome predictors of 105 cases. Arthroscopy 2008;24(1):106-12. google scholar
30. Scranton P, Frey C, Feder K. Outcome of osteochondral autograft transplantation for type-V cystic osteochondral lesions of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88(5):614-9. google scholar
31. Verhagen R, Maas M, Dijkgraaf M, Tol J, Krips R, van Dijk CN. Prospective study on diagnostic strategies in osteochondral lesions of the talus: is MRI superior to helical CT? J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87(1):41-6. google scholar
32. Choi WJ, Park KK, Kim BS, Lee JW. Osteochondral lesion of the talus: is there a critical defect size for poor outcome? Am J Sports Med 2009;37(10):1974-80. google scholar
33. Giannini S, Buda R, Vannini F, Di Caprio F, Grigolo B. Arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation in osteochondral lesions of the talus: surgical technique and results. Am J Sports Med 2008;36(5):873-80. google scholar
34. Ferkel RD, Zanotti RM, Komenda GA, Sgaglione NA, Cheng MS, Applegate GR, et al. Arthroscopic treatment of chronic osteochondral lesions of the talus: long-term results. Am J Sports Med 2008;36(9):1750-62. google scholar
35. Robinson D, Winson I, Harries W, Kelly A. Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003;85(7):989-93. google scholar
36. Raikin SM, Elias I, Zoga AC, Morrison WB, Besser MP, Schweitzer ME. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: localization and morphologic data from 424 patients using a novel anatomical grid scheme. Foot Ankle Int 2007;28(2):154-61. google scholar
37. Mintz DN, Tashjian GS, Connell DA, Deland JT, O'Malley M, Potter HG. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: a new magnetic resonance grading system with arthroscopic correlation. Arthroscopy 2003;19(4):353-9. google scholar
38. Tol J, Struijs P, Bossuyt P, Verhagen R, Van Dijk C. Treatment strategies in osteochondral defects of the talar dome: a systematic review. Foot Ankle Int 2000;21(2):119-26. google scholar
39. Taranow WS, Bisignani GA, Towers JD, Conti SF. Retrograde drilling of osteochondral lesions of the medial talar dome. Foot Ankle Int 1999;20(8):474-80. google scholar
40. Gobbi A, Francisco RA, Lubowitz JH, Allegra F, Canata G. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: randomized controlled trial comparing chondroplasty, microfracture, and osteochondral autograft transplantation. Arthroscopy 2006;22(10):1085-92. google scholar
41. Hangody L, Kish G, Karpati Z, Szerb I, Eberhardt R. Treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the talus: use of the mosaicplasty technique—a preliminary report. Foot Ankle Int 1997;18(10):628-34. google scholar
42. Hangody L, Kish G, Módis L, Szerb I, Gáspár L, Diószegi Z, et al. Mosaicplasty for the treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the talus: two to seven year results in 36 patients. Foot Ankle Int 2001;22(7):552-8. google scholar
43. Gautier E, Kolker D, Jakob R. Treatment of cartilage defects of the talus by autologous osteochondral grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002;84(2):237-44. google scholar
44. Van Dijk CN, Reilingh ML, Zengerink M, Van Bergen CJ. Osteochondral defects in the ankle: why painful? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010;18:570-80. google scholar
45. Giannini S, Buda R, Battaglia M, Cavallo M, Ruffilli A, Ramponi L, et al. One-step repair in talar osteochondral lesions: 4-year clinical results and t2-mapping capability in outcome prediction. Am J Sports Med 2013;41(3):511-8. google scholar
46. Anderson I, Crichton K, Grattan-Smith T, Cooper R, Brazier D. Osteochondral fractures of the dome of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989;71(8):1143-52. google scholar
47. Becher C, Thermann H. Results of microfracture in the treatment of articular cartilage defects of the talus. Foot Ankle Int 2005;26(8):583-9. google scholar
48. Giannini S, Buda R, Grigolo B, Vannini F. Autologous chondrocyte transplantation in osteochondral lesions of the ankle joint. Foot Ankle Int 2001;22(6):513-7. google scholar
49. Hepple S, Winson IG, Glew D. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: a revised classification. Foot Ankle Int 1999;20(12):789-93. google scholar
50. Giannini S, Buda R, Cavallo M, Ruffilli A, Cenacchi A, Cavallo C, et al. Cartilage repair evolution in post-traumatic osteochondral lesions of the talus: from open field autologous chondrocyte to bone-marrow-derived cells transplantation. Injury 2010;41(11):1196-203. google scholar
51. Giannini S, Buda R, Vannini F, Cavallo M, Grigolo B. One-step bone marrow-derived cell transplantation in talar osteochondral lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:3307-20. Raikin SM. Fresh osteochondral allografts for large-volume cystic osteochondral defects of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91(12):2818-26. google scholar
52. Saxena A, Eakin C. Articular talar injuries in athletes: results of microfracture and autogenous bone graft. Am J Sports Med 2007;35(10):1680-7. google scholar
53. Al-Shaikh RA, Chou LB, Mann JA, Dreeben SM, Prieskorn D. Autologous osteochondral grafting for talar cartilage defects. Foot Ankle Int 2002;23(5):381-9. google scholar
54. Reddy S, Pedowitz DI, Parekh SG, Sennett BJ, Okereke E. The morbidity associated with osteochondral harvest from asymptomatic knees for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Am J Sports Med 2007;35(1):80-5. google scholar
55. Schuman L, Struijs P, Van Dijk C. Arthroscopic treatment for osteochondral defects of the talus: results at follow-up at 2 to 11 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002;84(3):364-8. google scholar
56. Pritsch M, Horoshovski H, Farine I. Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986;68(6):862-5. google scholar
57. van Bergen CJ, Kox LS, Maas M, Sierevelt IN, Kerkhoffs GM, van Dijk CN. Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral defects of the talus: outcomes at eight to twenty years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95(6):519-25. google scholar
58. Kumai T, Takakura Y, Higashiyama I, Tamai S. Arthroscopic drilling for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81(9):1229-35. google scholar
59. Paul J, Sagstetter A, Kriner M, Imhoff A, Spang J, Hinterwimmer S. Donor-site morbidity after osteochondral autologous transplantation for lesions of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91(7):1683-8. google scholar
60. Kish G, Módis L, Hangody L. Osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of focal chondral and osteochondral lesions of the knee and talus in the athlete: rationale, indications, techniques, and results. Clin Sports Med 1999;18(1):45-66. google scholar
61. Becher C, Driessen A, Hess T, Longo UG, Maffulli N, Thermann H. Microfracture for chondral defects of the talus: maintenance of early results at midterm follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010;18:656-63. google scholar
62. Murawski CD, Kennedy JG. Operative treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95(11):1045-54. google scholar
63. Whittaker J-P, Smith G, Makwana N, Roberts S, Harrison P, Laing P, et al. Early results of autologous chondrocyte implantation in the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87(2):179-83. Valderrabano V, Leumann A, Rasch H, Egelhof T, Hintermann B, Pagenstert G. Knee-to-ankle mosaicplasty for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the ankle joint. Am J Sports Med 2009;37(1_suppl):105-11. google scholar
64. Baums MH, Heidrich G, Schultz W, Steckel H, Kahl E, Klinger H-M. Autologous chondrocyte transplantation for treating cartilage defects of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88(2):303-8. google scholar
65. Mei-Dan O, Carmont MR, Laver L, Mann G, Maffulli N, Nyska M. Platelet-rich plasma or hyaluronate in the management of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Am J Sports Med 2012;40(3):534-41. google scholar
66. El-Rashidy H, Villacis D, Omar I, Kelikian AS. Fresh osteochondral allograft for the treatment of cartilage defects of the talus: a retrospective review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93(17):1634-40. google scholar
67. Valderrabano V, Miska M, Leumann A, Wiewiorski M. Reconstruction of osteochondral lesions of the talus with autologous spongiosa grafts and autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis. Am J Sports Med 2013;41(3):519-27. google scholar
68. De Smet AA, Fisher D, Burnstein M, Graf B, Lange R. Value of MR imaging in staging osteochondral lesions of the talus (osteochondritis dissecans): results in 14 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;154(3):555-8. google scholar
69. Baltzer AW, Arnold JP. Bone-cartilage transplantation from the ipsilateral knee for chondral lesions of the talus. Arthroscopy 2005;21(2):159-66. google scholar
70. Gross AE, Agnidis Z, Hutchison CR. Osteochondral defects of the talus treated with fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation. Foot Ankle Int 2001;22(5):385-91. google scholar
71. Kennedy JG, Murawski CD. The treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus with autologous osteochondral transplantation and bone marrow aspirate concentrate: surgical technique. Cartilage 2011;2(4):327-36. google scholar