Peyzaj Metrikleri Kullanılarak Kentlerin Mekânsal Özelliklerinin Ölçülmesi; Malatya Kenti

Öz

Son yıllarda kentlere meydana gelen ekonomik büyüme, nüfus artışı ve hızlı kentleşme, kentlerin mekânsal formundaki büyük değişimler kentsel sürdürülebilirlik için önemli zorluklar meydana getirmiştir. Bu zorluklarla başa çıkmak ve kentleşmeyi yönetebilmek için, belirli tarihsel, coğrafi, sosyal, kültürel ve ekolojik faktörler ile temel mekânsal özellikleri anlamak, kentsel planlama ve tasarımda bilimsel bir girdiye ihtiyaç duyması nedeniyle oldukça önemlidir. Dolayısıyla bu çalışma, farklı açılardan şehirleri ele alan mekân dizim analizi ile peyzaj metrikleri yöntemlerinin karşılaştırması açısından oldukça önemlidir. Her iki tekniğin davranış temelli olması aralarındaki korelasyon olabileceği varsayımına dayanarak, bu çalışmada, iki teknik arasındaki korelasyonun araştırılması hedeflenmektedir. Bu hedef doğrultusunda çalışmada öncelikle Malatya kentinin ana kentsel çekirdeği belirlenmiştir. Belirlenen sınırlar içerisinde öncelikle peyzaj metrik analizleri yapılmıştır. Daha sonraki aşamada ise belirlenen kentsel çekirdek sınırları içerisinde mekân dizim analizleri yapılarak çalışma alanın mekânsal özellikleri ortaya konulmuştur. Çalışmanın sonucunda matematiksel ekoloji için nicel bilgiler üreterek ekosistemin ya da peyzajın dinamik yapısının anlaşılmasında kullanılan peyzaj metriklerinin ölçümlerin kentsel sistemlerin değerlendirilmesinde de kullanılabileceği ortaya konulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Mekan dizimi
• Peyzaj metrik analizi
• Kentsel Tasarım
• Kentsel Planlama

Measuring Spatial Characteristics of Cities Using Landscape Metrics; Malatya City

Öz

In recent years, economic growth, population growth and rapid urbanization, major changes in the spatial form of cities have created significant challenges for urban sustainability. In order to cope with these challenges and manage urbanization, understanding specific historical, geographical, social, cultural and ecological factors and key spatial characteristics is essential as it requires scientific input in urban planning and design. Therefore, this study is very important in terms of comparing the spatial syntax analysis and landscape metrics methods, which deal with cities from different perspectives. Based on the assumption that both techniques are behavior-based and there may be a correlation between them, this study aims to investigate the correlation between the two techniques. In line with this goal, first of all, the main urban core of the city of Malatya was determined in the study. First of all, landscape metric analysis were carried out within the determined boundaries. In the next stage, spatial characteristics of the study area were revealed by making space syntax analysis within the boundaries of the determined urban core. As a result of the study, it has been revealed that the landscape metrics used to understand the dynamic structure of the ecosystem or landscape by producing quantitative information for mathematical ecology can also be used in the evaluation of urban systems.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Space Syntax
• Landscape metric analyses
• Urban desing
• Urban planing

Kaynakça

1. Alberti, M. 2008. Advances In Urban Ecology: integrating Humans and Ecological Processes in Urban Ecosystems. 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, ISBN-13: 978-0-387-75509-0., LLC.
2. Angel, Shlomo and Parent, Jason and Civco and Daniel. 2007. Urban sprawl metrics: An analysis of global urban expansion using GIS. 1.
3. Asami, Yasushi, Ayse Sema Kubat, ve Cihangir Istek. 2001. “Characterization of the Street Networks in the Traditional Turkish Urban Form”. 21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1068/b2718.
4. Bhatta, B., 2010, Analysis of Urban Growth and Sprawl from Remote Sensing Data. 10.1007/978–3-642–05299-6.
5. Baran, Perver K., Daniel A. Rodríguez, ve Asad J. Khattak. 2008. “Space Syntax and Walking in a New Urbanist and Suburban Neighbourhoods”. Journal of Urban Design 13(1):5-28. doi: 10.1080/13574800701803498.
6. Cengiz, S. (2019). Kentsel büyüme dinamiklerinin modellenmesi: Ankara kenti simülasyonu [DoctoralThesis]. Retrieved from https://acikbilim.yok.gov.tr/handle/20.500.12812/44653
7. Cengiz, S., Atmis, E., & Gormus Cengiz, S., (2019). The impact of economic growth-oriented development policies on landscape changes in Istanbul Province in Turkey. Land Use Policy, vol.87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104086
8. Görmüş, S., Cengiz, S., & Yılmaz, B. (2018). Peyzaj Metrikleri Kullanarak Peyzaj Dinamiklerinin Analizi: Malatya Kenti. TÜCAUM, 30, 3-6.

9. Dalton, Nick. 2001. “Fractional Configurational Analysis And a Solution to the Manhattan Problem”. Proceedings . 14.
10. Fladd, Samantha G. 2017. “Social Syntax: An Approach to Spatial Modification through the Reworking of Space Syntax for Archaeological Applications”. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 47:127-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jaa.2017.05.002.
11. Günaydın, Ahmet Salih, ve Murat Yücekaya. 2020. “The Evaluation of The Perceptibility and Accessibility: The Case of Gaziantep”. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning ISSN: 2147-9380 8(2):480-97. doi: 10.15320/ICONARP.2020.123.
12. Günaydin, Ahmet Salih, ve Murat Yücekaya. 2020a. “Evaluation of the History of Cities in the Context of Spatial Configuration to Preview Their Future”. Sustainable Cities and Society 102202. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102202.
13. Hillier, B., A. Penn, J. Hanson, T. Grajewski, ve J. Xu. 1993. “Natural Movement: Or, Configuration and Attraction in Urban Pedestrian Movement”. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 20(1):29-66. doi: 10.1068/b200029.
14. Hillier, Bill. 2001. “A Theory of the City as Object: Or, How Spatial Laws Mediate the Social Construction of Urban Space”. içinde Presented at: 3rd International Space Syntax Symposium, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. (2001). Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
15. Hillier, Bill. 2007. Space is the machine: a configurational theory of architecture. Space Syntax.
16. Hillier, Bill, Richard Burdett, John Peponis, ve Alan Penn. 1987. “Creating Life: Or, Does Architecture Determine Anything?” Arch. 8 Comport./Arch. Behav., 3(3):233-50.
17. Hillier, Bill, ve Julienne Hanson. 1984. The Social Logic of Space. London: Cambridge University Press.
18. Hillier, Bill, ve Shinichi Iida. 2005. “Network and Psychological Effects in Urban Movement”. Ss. 475-90 içinde Spatial Information Theory. C. 3693, editör A. G. Cohn ve D. M. Mark. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
19. Hillier, Bill, ve Shinichi Lida. 2005. “Network effects and psychological effects: a theory of urban movement”. Ss. 553-64 içinde Network effects and psychological effects: a theory of urban movement. C. 1. Delft: TU Delft.
20. Hillier, Bill, Alasdair Turner, Tao Yang, ve Hoon Tae Park. 2007. “Metric and Topo-Geometric Properties of Urban Street Networks”: içinde Metric and topo-geometric properties of urban street networks. Istanbul Turkey.
21. Klarqvist, Björn. 1993. “A space syntax glossary”. 6.
22. Koohsari, Mohammad Javad, Andrew T. Kaczynski, Billie Giles-Corti, ve Justyna Anna Karakiewicz. 2013. “Effects of Access to Public Open Spaces on Walking: Is Proximity Enough?” Landscape and Urban Planning 117:92-99. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.04.020.
23. Lebendiger, Yonatan, ve Yoav Lerman. 2019. “Applying Space Syntax for Surface Rapid Transit Planning”. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 128:59-72. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2019.07.016.
24. McGarigal, K., 2015, Fragstats Help 4.2. www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents
25. Mustafa, Faris Ali, ve Dalia Ali Rafeeq. 2019. “Assessment of Elementary School Buildings in Erbil City Using Space Syntax Analysis and School Teachers′ Feedback”. Alexandria Engineering Journal 58(3):1039-52. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2019.09.007.
26. Nes, Akkelies van, ve Claudia Yamu. 2017. “Space Syntax: A Method to Measure Urban Space Related to Social, Economic and Cognitive Factors”. Ss. 136-50 içinde The Virtual and the Real in Planning and Urban Design : Perspectives, Practices and Applications. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
27. Özbil, Ayse, John Peponis, ve Brian Stone. 2011. “Understanding the Link between Street Connectivity, Land Use and Pedestrian Flows”. URBAN DESIGN International 16(2):125-41. doi: 10.1057/udi.2011.2.
28. Penn, A., ve N. Dalton. 1994. “The architecture of society: stochastic simulation of urban movement”. Ss. 85-126 içinde Simulating Societies, editör D. Gilbert. London: UCL Press.
29. Turner, Alasdair. 2001. “Angular Analysis”. S. 13 içinde. Georgia Institute of Technology.
30. Turner, Alasdair. 2007. “From Axial to Road-Centre Lines: A New Representation for Space Syntax and a New Model of Route Choice for Transport Network Analysis”. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 34(3):539-55. doi: 10.1068/b32067.
31. Ratnasari, Dewie & Nazir, Faisal & Husein Zilullah Toresano, La Ode & Pawiro, Supriyanto & Soejoko, D. (2016). The correlation between effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) with renal scintigraphy 99m Tc-DTPA study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 694. 012062. 10.1088/1742-6596/694/1/012062.