“and now we’re here: the Plasticene”: Ecological Awareness in Margaret Atwood’s Recent Poetry Collection, Dearly

Öz

Dearly, first published in 2020, is the latest poetry collection of the acclaimed writer, Margaret Atwood. In Dearly, Atwood revisits some of her favourite themes and subjects such as love, loss, time, ageing, sexuality, gender, nature, and environment. The book is divided into five sections, and the poems grouped in the same section revolve around a common theme. In section IV, the poems grouped under the title of “Plasticene Suite” discuss the increasing amount of plastic waste as the distinctive anthropogenic marker of our age. Accordingly, each poem focuses on a different aspect and consequence of this environmental problem. The primary objective of this study is to analyse Plasticene Suite poems, namely “Rock-Like Object on Beach”, “Faint Hopes”, “Foliage”, “Midway Island Albatross”, “Editorial Notes”, “Sorcerer’s Apprentice”, “Whales”, “Little Robot”, and “The Bright Side” from Dearly through the lens of ecopoetry to reveal Atwood’s criticism of the anthropogenic factors contributing to the current ecological crisis, particularly the ever-increasing generation of plastic waste, and to comment on contemporary poetry’s awareness of and power to address the pressing environmental issues. The study also contends that ecopoetic readings of Plasticene Suite poems can help raise awareness about the rise in plastic waste during and after the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. In that sense, the ecopoetic readings of Plasticene Suite poems can urge us to reconsider our dependence on plastic and encourage us to adopt sustainable practices and habits by promoting consciousness about this pressing environmental problem.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ecopoetry
• Margaret Atwood
• Dearly
• Plasticene Suite
• Plastic Waste

Kaynakça

1. Andersen, I. (n.d.). Plastic Pollution. In UN Environment Programme. Retrieved from https://www.unep.org/plastic-pollution#:~:text=Plastic%20pollution%20can% 20alter%20habitats, t%20exist%20in%20a%20vacuum google scholar
2. Andrew, S. (2020, November 13). Welcoming Disillusionment: PW Talks with Margaret Atwood. In Publishers Weekly. Retrieved from https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/authors/interviews/article/84874-welcoming-disillusionment-pw-talks-with-margaret-atwood.html google scholar
3. Astley, N. (2017). Earth Shattering: Eecopoems. Northumberland: Bloodaxe. google scholar
4. Atwood, M. (2014). Are Humans Necessary?. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes. com/2014/12/04/opinion/margaret-atwood-on-our-robotic-future.html google scholar
5. Atwood, M. (2020a). Rock-Like Object on Beach. In Dearly (p. 83). United Kingdom: Chatto & Windus. google scholar
6. Atwood, M. (2020b). Editorial Notes. In Dearly (p. 87). United Kingdom: Chatto & Windus. google scholar
7. Atwood, M. (2020c). Faint Hopes. In Dearly (p. 84). United Kingdom: Chatto & Windus. google scholar
8. Atwood, M. (2020d). Foliage. In Dearly (p. 85). United Kingdom: Chatto & Windus. google scholar

9. Atwood, M. (2020e). Little Robot. In Dearly (pp. 91-92). United Kingdom: Chatto & Windus. google scholar
10. Atwood, M. (2020f). Midway Island Albatross. In Dearly (p. 86). United Kingdom: Chatto & Windus. google scholar
11. Atwood, M. (2020g). Sorcerer’s Apprentice. In Dearly (p. 88). United Kingdom: Chatto & Windus. google scholar
12. Atwood, M. (2020h). The Bright Side. In Dearly (pp. 93-94). United Kingdom: Chatto & Windus. google scholar
13. Atwood, M. (2020i). Whales. In Dearly (pp. 89-90). United Kingdom: Chatto & Windus. google scholar
14. Bate, J. (2001). The Song of the Earth. London: Picador. google scholar
15. Bryson, J. S. (2005). The West Side of Any Mountain: Place, Space, and Ecopoetry. United States of America: University of Iowa Press. google scholar
16. Buell, L. (2005). The Future of Environmental Criticism: Environmental Crisis and Literary Imagination. UK: Blackwell Publishing. google scholar
17. Crutzen, P. & Stoermer, E. (2000). The “Anthropocene”. IGBP Newsletter, 41, 17-18. http://people.whitman. edu/~frierspr/Crutzen%20and%20Stoermer%202000%20AnthroAnthro%20essay.pdf google scholar
18. Davis, H. (2015). Life & Death in the Anthropocene: A Short History of Plastic. In H. Davis & E. Turpin (Eds.), Art in the Anthropocene (pp. 347-358). London: Open Humanities Press. google scholar
19. DeLoughrey, E. M. (2019). Allegories of the Anthropocene. Durham and London: Duke University Press. google scholar
20. Dobrin, S. I. (2021). Blue Ecocriticism and the Oceanic Imperative. New York: Routledge. google scholar
21. Fromm, H. (1996). From Transcendence to Obsolescence: A Route Map. In C. Glotfelty & H. Fromm (Eds.), The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology (pp. 30-39). United States of America: University of Georgia Press. google scholar
22. Gifford, T. (1996). The Social Construction of Nature. Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 3(2), 27-35. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44085427 google scholar
23. Glotfelty, C. (1996). Introduction: Literary Studies in an Age of Environmental Crisis. In C. Glotfelty & H. Fromm (Eds.), The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology (pp. xv-xxxvii). United States of America: University of Georgia Press. google scholar
24. Hass, R. (2013). American Ecopoetry: An Introduction. In A. Fisher-Wirth & L. G. Street (Eds.), The Ecopoetry Anthology (pp. xli-lxv). San Antonio, Texas: Trinity University Press. google scholar
25. Heise, U. K. (1997). Science and Ecocriticism. The American Book Review, 18(5), 1-4. Retrieved from https://www. asle.org/wp-content/uploads/ASLE_Primer_Heise.pdf google scholar
26. Howarth, W. (1996). Some Principles of Ecocriticism. In C. Glotfelty & H. Fromm (Eds.), The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology (pp. 69-91). United States of America: University of Georgia Press. google scholar
27. Iovino, S. & Oppermann, S. (2012). Theorizing Material Ecocriticism: A Diptych. Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 19(3), 448-475. doi.10.1093/isle/iss087 google scholar
28. Iovino, S. & Oppermann, S. (2014). Introduction: Stories Come to Matter. In S. Iovino & S. Oppermann (Eds.), Material Ecocriticism (pp. 1-20). United States of America: Indiana University Press. google scholar
29. Iovino, S. (2012). Steps to Material Ecocriticism: The Recent Literature About the “New Materialisms” and its Implications for Ecological Theory. Ecozona, 3(1), 134-145. https://doi.org/10.37536/ECOZONA.2012.3.1.461 google scholar
30. Leber, J. (2019, November 25). Margaret Atwood Insists Birds Matter to Everyone - Whether They Realize It or Not. In Audubon Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.audubon.org/news/margaret-atwood-insists-birds-matter-everyone-whether-they-realize-it-or-not google scholar
31. Lidström, S. & Garrard, G. (2014). ‘Images adequate to our predicament’: Ecology, Environment and Ecopoetics. Environmental Humanities, 5, 35-53. google scholar
32. Love, G. A. (1990). Revaluing Nature: Toward An Ecological Criticism. Western American Literature, 25(3), 201-215. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43020652 google scholar
33. —— (2003). Practical Ecocriticism: Literature, Biology, and the Environment. United States of America: University of Virginia Press. google scholar
34. Marx, L. (2000). The Machine in the Garden: Technology and the Pastoral Ideal in America. New York: Oxford University Press. google scholar
35. McMillan, J. (2020, November 8). Book Review: Dearly, by Margaret Atwood. In The Scotsman. Retrieved from https://www.scotsman.com/arts-and-culture/books/book-review-dearly-by-margaret-atwood-3026183 google scholar
36. Moore, J. W. (2016). Introduction. In J. W. Moore (Ed.), Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism (pp. 11-13). United States of America: Kairos. google scholar
37. Oppermann, S. (2016). From Material to Posthuman Ecocriticism: Hybridity, Stories, Natures. In H. Zapf (Ed.), Handbook of Ecocriticism and Cultural Ecology (pp. 273-294). Berlin: DeGruyter. google scholar
38. Rangel-Buitargo, N., Neal, W. & Williams, A. (2022). The Plasticene: Time and Rocks. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 185, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.114358 google scholar
39. Rueckert, W. (1996). Literature and Ecology: An Experiment in Ecocriticism. In C. Glotfelty & H. Fromm (Eds.), The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology (pp. 105-123). United States of America: University of Georgia Press. google scholar
40. Schneider-Mayerson, M., Von Mossner, A. W., Malecki, W. P. & Hakemulder, F. (2023). Introduction: Toward an Integrated Approach to Environmental Narratives and Social Change. In M. Schneider-Mayerson, A. W. Von Mossner, W. P. Malecki & F. Hakemulder (Eds.), Empirical Ecocriticism: Environmental Narratives for Social Change (pp. 1-32). United States of America: University of Minnesota Press. google scholar
41. Slovic, S. & Slovic, P. (2015a). Introduction: The Psychophysics of Brightness and the Value of Life. In S. Slovic & P. Slovic (Eds.), Numbers and Nerves: Information, Emotion and Meaning in a World of Data (pp. 1-22). United States of America: Oregon State University Press. google scholar
42. Slovic, S. & Slovic, P. (2015b). Interviews on the Communication of Numerical Information to the General Public. In S. Slovic & P. Slovic (Eds.), Numbers and Nerves: Information, Emotion and Meaning in a World of Data (pp. 165-170). United States of America: Oregon State University Press. google scholar
43. UN Environment Programme. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.unep.org/interactives/beat-plastic-pollution/?gad_source=1&gclid=CjwKCAiAzc2tBhA6EiwArv-i6VPmNZndaciJwbTmWyQynS4cwNkfF1paOK eAaJ3DCN4as7qvnnfJEBoCR8EQAvE_BwE google scholar
44. Zalasiewicz, J., et al. (2016). The Geological Cycle of Plastics and Their Use as a Stratigraphic Indicator of the Anthropocene. Anthropocene, 13, 4-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2016.01.002 google scholar
45. Zettler, E. R. Mincer, T. J. & Amaral-Zettler, L. A. (2013). Life in the “Plastisphere”: Microbial Communities on Plastic Marine Debris. Environmental Science & Technology, 47, 7137-7146. https://doi.org/10.1021/es401288x google scholar