The Wife of Bath’s Sexual Poetics and Politics of Food and Drink

Öz

In contrast to the predominant misogynistic discourse of medieval English society, Chaucer’s Wife of Bath in The Canterbury Tales is renowned for her arguments in favor of sexuality and female authority, which depicts her as a woman who was years ahead of her time. Chaucer uses food and drink imagery to have the Wife of Bath contest the patriarchal impositions on sexuality in the prologue to “The Wife of Bath’s Tale”. Accordingly, this article aims to analyze how the Wife of Bath makes use of this imagery, which forms her sexual poetics and politics, in order to subvert the Nurturing Mother image. Therefore, this article will, in the first part, analyze the Wife of Bath’s use of food and drink imagery through a discussion of how Chaucer undermines the social and religious implications to encode the Wife of Bath’s arguments for sexuality. In the second part, based on the Wife’s use of such imagery, Chaucer’s presentation of the Wife of Bath as a sexual nurturer will be analyzed as a reflection of her subversion of the Nurturing Mother image. Hence, the article aims to contribute to the discussions on the gendered conception of food, food production, and food consumption in the Middle Ages.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Chaucer
• The Wife of Bath
• Sexuality
• Food and Drink Imagery
• Nurturing Mother

Kaynakça

1. Adamson, M. W. (2004). Food in medieval times. Westport, CT and London: Greenwood Press. google scholar
2. Allman, W. W. & Hanks, D. T. (2003). Rough love: Notes toward an erotics of the Canterbury Tales. Chaucer Review, 38(1), 36-65. google scholar
3. Anderson, E. N. (2005). Everyone eats: Understanding food and culture. New York: New York University Press. google scholar
4. Bakhtin, M. (1984). Rabelais and his world (H. Iswolskly, Trans.) Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. google scholar
5. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham and London: Duke University Press. google scholar
6. Barthes, R. (2013). Toward a psychosociology of contemporary food consumption. In C. Counihan & P. Van Esterik. (Eds.). Food and culture: A Reader (pp. 23-30). New York and London: Routledge. google scholar
7. The Bible: Authorized King James version. (1997). (R. Carroll & S. Prickett, Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
8. Black, M. (1993). Medieval Britain. In Peter Brears, et al. (Eds.). A Taste of history: 10,000 years of food in Britain (pp.94-135). London: English Heritage. google scholar

9. Blamires, A. (2006). Chaucer, ethics, and gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
10. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social critique of the judgement of taste. (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. google scholar
11. Bynum, C. W. (1987). Holy feast and holy fast: The Religious significance of food to medieval women. Berkeley, Los Angeles, CA and London: University of California Press. google scholar
12. Chaucer, G. (2008). The Riverside Chaucer. (L. Benson, Ed.). (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
13. Colquhoun, K. (2007). Taste: The History of Britain through its cooking. London: Bloomsbury. google scholar
14. Counihan, C. M. & Kaplan, S. L. (1998). Introduction. In Carole M. Counihan & Steven L. Kaplan. (Eds.). Food and gender: Identity and power (pp. 1-11). Amsterdam: Harwood. google scholar
15. Cox, C. S. (1997). Gender and language in Chaucer. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida. google scholar
16. Crane, S. (1994). Gender and romance in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. google scholar
17. Davies, O. (2004). The Creativity of God: World, Eucharist, reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
18. Davis, I. (2012). Calling: Langland, Gower, and Chaucer on Saint Paul. Studies in the Age of Chaucer, 34, 53-97. google scholar
19. Desmond, M. (2006). Ovid’s art and the Wife of Bath. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. google scholar
20. Dinshaw, C. (1989). Chaucer’s sexual poetics. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press. google scholar
21. Drummond, J. C. & Wilbraham, A. (1991). The Englishman’s food: A History of five centuries of English food. London: Pimlico. google scholar
22. Foucault, M. (1990). The History of sexuality. (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Vintage. google scholar
23. Hall, K. (2007). Teaching Margery Kempe in tandem with the Wife of Bath: Lollardy, mysticism, and ‘wandrynge by the weye.’ South Atlantic Review, 72(4), 59-71. google scholar
24. Hanawalt, B. A. (2007). The Wealth of wives: Women, law, and economy in late medieval London. Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
25. Hansen, E. T. (1998). Chaucer and the fictions of gender. Berkeley, Los Angeles, CA and Oxford: University of California Press. google scholar
26. Henry, M. M. (1992). The Edible Woman: Athenaeus’s Concept of the Pornographic. In A. Richlin. (Ed.). Pornography and representation in Greece and Rome (pp. 250-268). New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
27. Macy, G. (2012). Theology of the Eucharist in the High Middle Ages. In I. C. Levy, G. Macy & K. Van Ausdall. (Eds.). A Companion to the Eucharist in the Middle Ages (pp. 365-398). Leiden and Boston: Brill. google scholar
28. Mann, J. (2002). Feminizing Chaucer. Woodbridge: D. S. Brewer. google scholar
29. McGowan, A. (1999). Ascetic Eucharist: Food and drink in early ritual meals. Oxford: Clarendon. google scholar
30. Mendez Montoya, A. F. (2009). Theology of food: Eating and the Eucharist. Chichester: Blackwell. google scholar
31. Minnis, A. (2008). Fallible authors: Chaucer’s Pardoner and Wife of Bath. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. google scholar
32. Oberembt, K. J. (1976). Chaucer’s anti-misogynist Wife of Bath. Chaucer Review, 10(4), 287-302. google scholar
33. Pugh, T. (2003). Queering genres, battering males: The Wife of Bath’s narrative violence. Journal of Narrative Theory, 33(2), 115-142. google scholar
34. Rowland, B. (1965). Chaucer’s the Wife of Bath’s prologue, D. 389. The Explicator, 24(2), 20-23. google scholar
35. Rowland, B. (1972). The Wife of Bath’s ‘unlawful philtrum.’ Neophilologus, 56(2), 201-206. google scholar
36. Rubin, M. (2012). Popular attitudes to the Eucharist. In I. C. Levy, G. Macy & K. Van Ausdall. (Eds.). A Companion to the Eucharist in the Middle Ages (pp. 447-468). Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill. google scholar
37. Smith, W. S. (1997). The Wife of Bath debates Jerome. Chaucer Review, 32(2), 129-145. google scholar
38. Straus, B. R. (1988) The Subversive discourse of the Wife of Bath: Phallocentric discourse and the imprisonment of criticism. ELH, 55(3), 527-554. google scholar
39. Strohm, P. (1992). Hochon’s arrow: The Social imagination of fourteenth-century texts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. google scholar
40. Sutton, D. E. (2010). Food and Senses. Annual Review ofAnthropology, 39, 209-23. google scholar
41. Tinkle, T. (2010). Gender and power in medieval exegesis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
42. Van, T. A. (1994). False texts and disappearing women in the Wife of Bath’s prologue and tale. Chaucer Review, 29(2), 179-193. google scholar
43. Weil, S. (1995). Freedom through association? Chaucer’s psychology of argumentation in the Wife of Bath’s prologue. Pacific Coast Philology, 30(1), 27-41. google scholar
44. Weiss, G. (2003). The Body as a narrative horizon. In J. J. Cohen & G. Weiss. (Eds.). Thinking the Limits of the Body (pp. 25-35). Albany, NY: SUNY Press. google scholar
45. Wilson, C. A. (1973). Food and drink in Britain from the stone age to recent times. Harmondsworth: Penguin. google scholar
46. Wilson, K. (1985). Chaucer and St. Jerome: The Use of ‘barley’ in the Wife of Bath’s prologue. Chaucer Review, 19(3), 245-251. google scholar
47. Wilson, K. M. & Makowski, E. M. (1990). Wykked wyves and the woes of marriage: Misogamous literature from Juvenal to Chaucer. Albany, NY: SUNY Press. google scholar