“Everything Must Leave Some Kind of Mark”: An Agambenian Reading of Tom McCarthy’s Remainder

Öz

The concept of “remnant” or “remainder” holds a special place in Giorgio Agamben’s philosophy. Across his discussions of language/law, bios/zoe, and potentiality/ impotentiality, Agamben dismantles binary oppositions through the concept of ‘remainder,’ focusing on the zone of indistinction that exceeds division and dialectical thinking. The concept of remainder, which functions as a key in the thought of Agamben, is also the title of Tom McCarthy’s debut novel Remainder (2005). The novel unfolds the story of an unnamed thirty-year-old man whose life takes a dramatic turn after an accident involving “something falling from the sky.” Following his emergence from a coma, he finds himself in a threshold where he is a remnant of his former identity. For months, he endeavours to recover both his memory and motor control with the expectation that he will eventually return to a semblance of normalcy. But contrary to expectations, he develops a fixation on recreating, re-enacting, and simulating specific scenes and situations that linger in his memory as disjointed images. From Agamben’s standpoint, he might be approached as the ‘remainder’ of the human/inhuman binary, akin to a ‘remnant’ during the time of the end, a parody of the sovereign who suspends law to create his state of exception, or a ‘kink’ in the smoothly operating system of simulations. This paper offers a reading of Tom McCarthy’s Remainder from Giorgio Agamben’s perspective and provides an analysis of its eccentric character’s relationship with time, space, and reality by delving into the threshold he occupies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Remainder
• kairotic time
• homo sacer
• Tom McCarthy
• Giorgio Agamben

Kaynakça

1. Agamben, G. (1993a). Infancy and history: Essays on the destruction of experience (L. Heron, Trans.). Verso. google scholar
2. Agamben, G. (1993b). The coming community (M. Hardt, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press. google scholar
3. Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: The sovereign power and bare life (D. Heller-Roazen, Trans.). Stanford University Press. google scholar
4. Agamben, G. (1999). Potentialities: Collected essays in philosophy (D. Heller-Roazen, Trans.). Stanford University Press. google scholar
5. Agamben, G. (2000). Means without end: Notes on politics (V. Binetti & C. Cesarino, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press. google scholar
6. Agamben, G. (2005a). The time that remains: A commentary on the letter to the romans (P. Daly, Trans.). Stanford University Press. google scholar
7. Agamben, G. (2005b). State of exception (K. Attell, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. google scholar
8. Antakyalıoğlu, Z. (2022). The rhizome d'etre of posthumanism and the question of ethics: Revisiting Braidotti with Agamben. In Z. Antakyalıoğlu (Ed.), Post-Theories in Literary and Cultural Studies (pp. 85-97). Lexington Books. google scholar

9. Attridge, D. (2016). Tom McCarthy’s fiction: A reading diary. Etudes britanniques contemporaines 50 | 2016. https://doi.org/10.4000/ebc.3033 google scholar
10. Bartolini, P. (2011). Indistinction. In A. Murray & J. Whyte (Eds.), The Agamben dictionary. Edinburgh University Press. google scholar
11. Baudrillard, Jean. (1998). Simulacra and simulations. In M. Poster (Ed.), Selected writings. Stanford University Press. google scholar
12. Boxall, P. (2013). Twenty-first century fiction: A critical introduction. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
13. Clarke, R. (2022, January 10). Tom McCarthy thinks the wrong Kurt Vonnegut book is famous. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/20/books/review/tom-mccarthy-by-the-book-interview.html google scholar
14. Colebrook, C., & Maxwell, J. (2016). Agamben. Polity. de la Durantaye, L. (2009). Giorgio Agamben: A critical introduction. Stanford University Press. google scholar
15. Duncan, D. (2010). Introduction. In Calling all agents: Transmission, death, technology: General secretary’s report to the international necronautical society. Vargas Publications. google scholar
16. Hart, M., Jaff, A., & Eburne J. (2013). An interview with Tom McCarthy. Comparative literature, 54(4), 656-682. https://doi.org/10.1353/cli.2013.0048 google scholar
17. Huber, N. (2018, August 1). Zero degree everything: An interview with Tom McCarthy. Novel: A Forum on Fiction, 51(2), 176-187. https://doi.org/10.1215/00295132-6846030 google scholar
18. Maxwell, J. (2011). Ethics. In A. Murray & J. Whyte (Eds.), The Agamben dictionary. Edinburg University Press. google scholar
19. McCarthy, T. (2016). Remainder. Alma Books. google scholar
20. McCarthy, T., & Critchley, S. (2007). The New York declaration: INS statement on inauthenticity. https:// tc3production.s3.amazonaws.com/upload/52228de602e3e620b1000205/sfinsnydeclaration.pdf google scholar
21. Millis, C. (2011). Happiness/Happy Life. In A. Murray & J. Whyte (Eds.), The Agamben dictionary. Edinburgh University Press. google scholar
22. Molad, Y. (2011). Expropriation. In A. Murray & J. Whyte (Eds.), The Agamben dictionary. Edinburgh University Press. google scholar
23. Povinelli, E. A. (2011). The persistence of hope: Critical theory and enduring in late liberalism. In J. Elliott & D. Attridge (Eds.), Theory after ‘theory’. Routledge. google scholar
24. Prozorov, S. (2014). Agamben and Politics: A Critical Introduction. Edinburgh University Press. google scholar
25. Rourke, L. (2010, September 18). In conversation: Lee Rourke and Tom McCarthy. The Guardian. https://www. theguardian.com/books/2010/sep/18/tom-mccarthy-lee-rourke-conversation google scholar
26. Sarıkaya Şen, M. (2017). The construction of vulnerability and monstrosity in slipstream: Tom McCarthy’s remainder. In J.M. Ganteau & S. Onega (Eds.), Victimhood and vulnerability in the 21st century fiction. Routledge. google scholar
27. Tuten, F. (2015, March 18). Tom McCarthy: Interview. Bomb magazine. https://bombmagazine.org/articles/tom-mccarthy/ google scholar
28. Vermeulen, P. (2012). The critique of trauma and the afterlife of the novel in Tom McCarthy’s remainder. MFS Modern Fiction Studies, 58(3), 549-568. Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/ mfs.2012.0056. google scholar
29. Wark, M. (2016). Preface. In T. McCarthy, Remainder. Alma Books. google scholar
30. Watkin, W. (2011). Semiotic/Semantic. In A. Murray & J. Whyte (Eds.), The Agamben dictionary. Edinburgh University Press. google scholar