“Long Live the Weeds and the Wilderness Yet”: Critical Plant Studies and Gerard Manley Hopkins’ Plant Poetics

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 35 Sayı: 1, 37 - 55, 19.06.2025

Dilek Bulut Sarıkaya

https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2024-1577793

Öz

Regardless of their scientifically established vitality and agency, plants are still typically visualized as dormant elements of nature and allocated minimal importance. In literature, equivalently, plants are treated as insensate, unresponsive background elements and ornamental devices, which are perennially overlooked. It is due to the inception of critical plant studies that plants are brought into public attention as vitally awake, cognizant individuals playing active roles in the composition of the universe as well as literature. As a response to cultural and literary neglect of plants in human life, critical plants studies underpins the mattering of plants and embarks on investigating human-plant relationships from an interdisciplinary perspective. To this end, biological and botanical understanding of plants is appropriated into the literary representation of plants with the intention of superseding the metaphoric existence of plants in literature with that of biological standing. This study, accordingly, deals with the plant poetry of a prominent Victorian poet, Gerard Manley Hopkins (1844-1889) whose poetry allows an insightful access to the astoundingly complicated and animated world of plants and in this way, attempts to build a non-dualistic and non-oppressive human-plant relationship through his poetry. Thus, “Asboughs”, “Spring”, “Binsey Poplars”, and “Inversnaid” are specifically chosen poems presenting a perfect case study to demonstrate Hopkins’ attentiveness towards plants. The study will further uncover Hopkins’ botanical consciousness and environmental awareness propelling him to condemn humans’ brutal exploitation of plants which predominantly stems from an anthropocentric view of plants as lifeless commercial objects that can be used and consumed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Gerard Manley Hopkins , Critical Plant Studies , Agency , Nature , Victorian Poetry

Kaynakça

• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press. google scholar
• Bulut Sarıkaya, D. (2024). Human-plant entanglement and vegetal agency in the poetry of Thomas Hardy and Sylvia Plath. Lexington Books. google scholar
• Chang, E. H. (2019). Novel cultivations: Plants in British literature in the global nineteenth century. University of Virginia Press. google scholar
• Coccia, E. (2017). The life of plants: A metaphysics of mixture (D. J. Montanari, Trans.). Polity Press. google scholar
• Constantini, M. (2008). ‘Strokes of havoc’: Tree-felling and the poetic tradition of ecocriticism in Manley Hopkins and Gerard Manley Hopkins. Victorian Poetry, 46(4), 487-509. google scholar
• Domina, L. (2020). ‘Hack and Rack the Growing Green’: Gerard Manley Hopkins, ecotheology, and the poetry of Denise Levertov, Pattiann Rogers, and Martha Silano. In D. Westover & T. A. Holmes (Eds.), The fire that breaks: Gerard Manley Hopkins’s poetic legacies (pp. 181-198). Clemson University Press. google scholar
• Dürbeck, G., & P. Hüpkes. (2020). Anthropocenic turn?: An introduction. In G. Dürbeck & P. Hüpkes (Eds.), The Anthropocenic turn: The interplay between disciplinary and interdisciplinary responses to a new age (pp. 1-23). Routledge. google scholar
• Flower, D. (2020). Elegy and plenitude in the wild. The Hudson Review, 73(1), 138-144. google scholar
• Gagliano, M. (2016). Seeing green: The re-discovery of plants and nature’s wisdom. In P. Vieira, M. Gagliano & J. Ryan (Eds.), The green thread: Dialogues with the vegetal world (pp. 19-35). Lexington. google scholar
• Hopkins, G. M. (1959). The journals and papers of Gerard Manley Hopkins. H. House & G. Storey (Eds.), Oxford University Press. google scholar
• Hopkins, G. M. (1990). Gerard Manley Hopkins: Selected letters. C. Phillips. (Ed.), Clarendon Press. google scholar
• Iovino, S., & S. Oppermann. Introduction: Stories come to matter. In S. Iovino & S. Oppermann (Eds.) Material ecocriticism (pp. 1-17). Indiana University Press. google scholar
• Karban, R. (2017). The Language of plant communication (and how it compares to animal communication). In M. google scholar
• Gagliano, J. C. Ryan & P. Vieira (Eds.), The language of plants: science, philosophy, literatüre (pp. 3-26). University of Minnesota Press. google scholar
• Laist, R. (2013). Introduction. In R. Laist. (Ed.), Critical plant studies: Philosophy, literature, culture (pp. 917). Rodopi Press. google scholar
• Marder, M. (2013). Plant-thinking: A philosophy of vegetal life. Columbia University Press. google scholar
• Miller, E. P. (2002). The vegetative soul: From philosophy of nature to subjectivity in the feminine. State University of New York Press. google scholar
• Myers, N. (2017). From the anthropocene to the planthroposcene: Designing gardens for plant/people involution. History and Anthropology, 28(3), 297-301. google scholar
• Nixon, J. V. (2002). ‘Death blots black out’: Thermodynamics and the poetry of Gerard Manley Hopkins. Victorian Poetry, 40(2), 131-156. google scholar
• Nixon, J. V. (2006). Fathering Graces at Hampstead: Manley Hopkins’ ‘the old trees’ and Gerard Manley Hopkins’ ‘binsey poplars.’ Victorian Poetry, 44(2), 191-212. google scholar
• Oppermann, S. (2013). Material ecocriticism and the creativity of storied matter. Frame, 26(2), 55-69. google scholar
• Parham, J. (2010). Green man Hopkins: Poetry and Victorian ecological imagination. Rodopi. google scholar
• Pollan, M. (2002). Cannabis, forgetting, and the botany of desire. C. M. Gillis (Ed.), Townsend Center Occasional Papers (No. 27). google scholar
• Ryan, J. C. (2018). Plants in contemporary poetry: Ecocriticism and the botanical imagination. Routledge. google scholar
• Ryan, J. C. (2020). Writing the lives of plants: Phytography and the botanical imagination. a/b: Auto/Biography Studies, 35(1), 97-122. google scholar
• Simmons, I. G. (2001). An environmental history of Great Britain: From 10,000 years ago to present. Edinburgh University Press. google scholar
• Stark, H. (2015). Deleuze and critical plant studies. In J. Roffe & H. Stark (Eds.) Deleuze and the Non/Human (pp. 1800-196). Palgrave. google scholar
• Thorsheim, P. (2006). Inventing pollution: Coal, smoke, and culture in Britain since 1800. Ohio University Press. google scholar
• Trewavas, A. (2014). Plant behavior and intelligence. Oxford University Press. google scholar
• Vieira, P. (2017). Phytographia: Literature as plant writing. In M. Gagliano, J. C. Ryan & P. Vieira (Eds.), The language of plants: science, philosophy, literature (pp. 215-233). University of Minnesota Press. google scholar
• Wandersee, J. H., & E. E. Schussler. (1999). Preventing plant blindness. The American Biology Teacher, 61(2), 82-86. google scholar
• White, Jr, L. (1967). The Historical roots of our ecological crisis. Science, New Series, 155(3767), 12030-1207. google scholar
• Wirzba, N. (2021). This sacred life: Humanity’s place in a wounded world. Cambridge University Press. google scholar