Speaking of Extinction: A Comparative Corpus-assisted Analysis of Metaphorical Framing in Climate Change Fiction and British Newspapers

Öz

The present study brings a new perspective to climate fiction (cli-fi) studies, addressing two previously unexplored aspects. First, by focusing on how cli-fi writers frame climate change in their works, it extends the findings in earlier studies through corpus analysis of 20 works of cli-fi written after 1990. Second, by comparing the frames of climate change in the works of cli-fi and newspapers, it seeks to validate whether fiction writers frame climate change differently. To achieve this double objective, the study draws on Lakoff’s views on metaphors as linguistic manifestations of cognitive frames. Lakoff’s conceptual model investigates assumptions about the impact of reading cli-fi, emphasising language’s role. The analysis of the cli-fi and newspaper corpora offers key findings about how climate change is portrayed in cli-fi works and newspapers. The findings reveal that cli-fi writers frequently use personification and negative language in metaphorical framing. Additionally, the study highlights cli-fi writers’ reliance on figurative language compared to nonfiction writers. Despite the genre’s creative nature, the number of identified metaphors in cli-fi works appears relatively limited.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Climate Change
• Climate Change Fiction (cli-fi)
• Cognitive Linguistics
• Metaphorical Framing
• Climate News

Kaynakça

1. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press. google scholar
2. Brezina, V., Weill-Tessier, P., & McEnery, A. (2020). #LancsBox v. 5.x. [software package]. Lancaster University. google scholar
3. Caracciolo, M., Ionescu, A., & Fransoo, R. (2019). Metaphorical patterns in Anthropocene fiction. Language and Literatüre, 28(3), 221-240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947019865450. google scholar
4. Corbett, J., & Clark, B. (2017). The arts and humanities in climate change engagement. In M. H. Parry (Ed.), The Oxford research encyclopedia of climate science. Oxford University Press. google scholar
5. Deignan, A. (1999). Linguistic metaphors and collocation in nonliterary corpus data. Metaphor and Symbol, 14(1), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1401_3. google scholar
6. Deignan, A. (2017). Metaphors in texts about climate change. Iberica, (34), 45-66. https://revistaiberica.org/ index.php/iberica/article/view/144. google scholar
7. Demmen, J., Semino, E., Demjen, Z., Koller, V., Hardie, A., Rayson, P., & Payne, S. (2015). A computer-assisted study of the use of violence metaphors for cancer and end of life by patients, family carers and health professionals. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(2), 205-231. google scholar
8. Gaard, G. (2014). What’s the story? Competing narratives of climate change and climate justice. Forum for World Literature Studies, 6(2), 272-291. google scholar

9. Goodbody, A. (2014). Risk, denial and narrative form in climate change fiction: Barbara Kingsolver’s “Flight Behaviour” and Ilija Trojanow’s “Melting Ice.” In S. Mayer & A. Weik von Mossner (Eds.), *The anticipation of catastrophe: Environmental risk in North American literature and culture* (American Studies - A Monograph Series, Vol. 247, pp. 39-58). Universitatsverlag Winter. google scholar
10. Glotfelty, C. (1996). Introduction: Literary studies in an age of environmental crisis. In C. Glotfelty & H. Fromm (Eds.), The ecocriticism reader: Landmarks in literary ecology (pp. xv-xxxvii). University of Georgia Press. google scholar
11. Iovino, S., & Oppermann, S. (2012). Material ecocriticism: Materiality, agency, and models of narrativity. Ecozon@: European Journal of Literature, Culture and Environment, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.37536/ECOZONA.2012.3.1.452. google scholar
12. Irr, C. (2017). Climate fiction in English. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Literature. Retrieved February 26, 2025, from https://oxfordre.com/literature/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.001.0001/acrefore-97801902 01098-e-4. google scholar
13. Johns-Putra, A. (2016). Climate change in literature and literary studies: From Cli-Fi, climate change theater and ecopoetry to ecocriticism and climate change criticism. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7, 266-282. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.385. google scholar
14. Keen, S. (2006). A theory of narrative empathy. Narrative, 14(3), 207-236. google scholar
15. Koller, V., Hardie, A., Rayson, P., & Semino, E. (2008). Using a semantic annotation tool for the analysis of metaphor in discourse. metaphorik.de, 15, 141-160. http://www.metaphorik.de/15/koller.pdf. google scholar
16. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press. google scholar
17. Lakoff, G. (2010). Why it Matters How We Frame the Environment. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030903529749. google scholar
18. Leavenworth, M. L., & Manni, A. (2021). Climate fiction and young learners’ thoughts—A dialogue between literature and education. Environmental Education Research, 27(5), 727-742. google scholar
19. Leyda, J. (2016). The cultural affordances of Cli-Fi. In I. J0rgensen & J. Kristensen (Eds.), The dystopian impulse of contemporary Cli-Fi (pp. 11-17). Freie Universitat Berlin. google scholar
20. Lindgren Leavenworth, M., & Manni, A. (2020). Climate fiction and young learners’ thoughts—A dialogue between literatüre and education. EnvironmentalEducation Research, 27(5), 727-742. google scholar
21. Markley, R. (2012). Time, history, and sustainability. In T. Cohen (Ed.), Telemorphosis: Theory in the age of climate change (Vol. 1, pp. 43-64). Open Humanities Press. google scholar
22. Mehnert, A. (2016). Climate change fictions: Representations of global warming in American literature. Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
23. Milkoreit, M. (2016). The promise of climate fiction: Imagination, storytelling and the politics of the future. In P. Wapner & H. Elver (Eds.), Reimagining climate change (pp. 171-191). Routledge. google scholar
24. Moore, B. L. (2008). Ecology and literature: Ecocentric personification from antiquity to the twenty-first century. Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
25. Neuman, Y., Assaf, D., Cohen, Y., Last, M., Argamon, S., Howard, N., & Frieder, O. (2013). Metaphor Identification in Large Texts Corpora. PLoS ONE, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062343. google scholar
26. Rayson, P. (2009). Wmatrix: a web-based corpus processing environment, Computing Department, Lancaster University. http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/wmatrix/. google scholar
27. Schneider-Mayerson, M. (2018). The influence of climate fiction: An empirical survey of readers. Environmental Humanities, 10(2), 473-500. google scholar
28. Schneider-Mayerson, M., & Leong, K. L. (2020). Eco-reproductive concerns in the age of climate change. Climatic Change, 163(2), 1007-1023. google scholar
29. Schneider-Mayerson, M., Gustafson, A., Leiserowitz, A., Goldberg, M. H., Rosenthal, S. A., & Ballew, M. (2020). Environmental literature as persuasion: An experimental test of the effects of reading climate fiction. Environmental Communication, 17(1), 35-50. google scholar
30. Semino, E., Demjen, Z., Hardie, A., Payne, S., & Rayson, P. (2018). Metaphor, cancer and the end of life: A corpus-based study. Routledge. google scholar
31. Stefanowitsch, A. (2007). Words and their metaphors: A corpus-based approach. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp. 63-105). Mouton de Gruyter. google scholar
32. Trexler, A. (2015). Anthropocene fictions: The novel in a time of climate change. University of Virginia Press. google scholar
33. Wendy, A., & Semino, E. (2020). Metaphor. In A. Mangen (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of English language and digital humanities (pp. 125-142). Routledge. google scholar