“Social Relations between the Sexes in Athena Farrokhzad’s Morals According to Medea”

Öz

This paper explores how patriarchal power relations construct the idea of “nature” in Athena Farrokhzad’s Morals According to Medea (Moral enligt Medea, 2022), an adaptation of Euripides’ classic play Medea (431 BCE). The analysis will concentrate on Medea’s subversion of patriarchal “appropriation” tactics from a feminist perspective, particularly through ideological codes embedded in the dialogues between Medea and Morality, the only other character in the play. By doing so, it seeks to understand women’s position in relation to patriarchy through a materialist feminist lens, with particular attention to the conflict between Medea and Morality. The focus will also be on how Medea challenges traditional discourses of motherhood, constructed within male-dominated societal structures. The study will further discuss the ways in which she raises her voice in resistance, both as a local and as a refugee, within the spaces where she is either confined or expelled. The discussion will be framed within the context of the theory of social relations between the sexes highlighting the specific impact of women’s resistance and militancy in examining the mechanisms of sovereignty.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Materialist feminism
• Medea
• Athena Farrokhzad
• social relations between the sexes
• adaptation studies

Kaynakça

1. Acar Savran, G. (2022). Sunuş [Introduction]. In Gülnur Acar Savran (Ed. & Trans.), Cinsiyetler arası toplumsal ilişkiler ve kesişimsellik [Social relations between the sexes and intersectionality] (pp. 7–22). Dipnot Yayınları. google scholar
2. Adkins, L. and D. Leonard. (2005). Reconstructing French feminism: Commodification, materialism and sex. In Diana Leonard and Lisa Adkins (Eds.), Sex in question: French materialist feminism (pp. 1-23) Taylor & Francis e-Library. google scholar
3. Braidotti, R. (1994). Mothers, monsters, and machines. In Nomadic subjects: Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory (pp. 75–94). Columbia University Press. google scholar
4. Delphy, C. (2022). Genel bir sömürü teorisi için: Yeniden ve doğru yerden başlamak [Pour Une théorie générale de l’exploitation: Repartir du bon pied] In Gülnur Acar Savran (Ed. & Trans.), Cinsiyetler arası toplumsal ilişkiler ve kesişimsellik [Social relations between the sexes and intersectionality] (pp. 69–88). Dipnot Yayınları. google scholar
5. Dunezat, X. (2022). Cinsiyetler arası toplumsal ilişkiler sosyolojisi: Erkek/kadın ilişkilerinin feminist ve maddeci bir okuması [La soci- ologie des rapports sociaux de sexe: une lecture féministe et matérialiste des rapports hommes/femmes]. In Gülnur Acar Savran (Ed. & Trans.), Cinsiyetler arası toplumsal ilişkiler ve kesişimsellik [Social relations between the sexes and intersectionality] (pp. 91–118). Dipnot Yayınları. google scholar
6. Euripides. (2008). Medea. (D. A. Svarlien, Trans.). Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. google scholar
7. Farrokhzad, A. (2022). Medea’ya göre ahlak [Moral enligt Medea] (A. Arda, Trans.). Habitus. google scholar
8. Guillaumin, C. (2005). The practice of power and belief in nature. In Diana Leonard & Lisa Adkins (Eds.), Sex in question: French materialist feminism (pp. 73109). Taylor & Francis e-Library. google scholar

9. Gültekin, H. (2021). Post-Neoliberalism, free market and disillusionment: Anders Lustgarten’s if you don’t let us dream, we won’t let you sleep. In Mesut Günenç & Enes Kavak (Eds.), New readings in British drama: from the post-war period to the contemporary era (pp. 115–129). Peter Lang. google scholar
10. Hutcheon, L. (2006). A theory of adaptation, with an epilogue by Siobhan O’Flynn. Routledge. google scholar
11. Kergoat, D. (2022). Cinsiyetler arası toplumsal ilişki: Toplumsal ilişkilerin yeniden üretilmelerinden yıkılmalarına [Le rapport social de sexe: De la reproduction des rapport sociaux à leur subversion]. In Gülnur Acar Savran (Ed. & Trans.), Cinsiyetler arası toplumsal ilişkiler ve kesişimsellik [Social relations between the sexes and intersectionality] (pp. 119–141). Dipnot Yayınları. google scholar
12. Juteau, D. (2022). Maddeci feminist bir kesişimsellik paradigması [Un paradigme féministe Matérialiste de l’intersectionnalité]. In Gülnur Acar Savran (Ed. & Trans.), Cinsiyetler arası toplumsal ilişkiler ve kesişimsellik [Social relations between the sexes and intersectionality] (pp. 253–276). Dipnot Yayınları. google scholar Juteau, D. (2022). “Biz” kadınlar: Kadınlar kategerosinin ayrıştırılamaz türdeşliği ve ayrışıklığı [“Nous” les femmes: Sur l'indissociable homogéné ité et hétérogénéité de la catégorie]. In Gülnur Acar Savran (Ed. & Trans.), Cinsiyetler arası toplumsal ilişkiler ve kesişimsellik [Social relations between the sexes and intersectionality] (pp. 227–252). Dipnot Yayınları. google scholar
13. Rees, C. (2017). Adaptation and nation: Theatrical contexts for contemporary English and Irish drama. Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
14. Sanders, J. (2006). Adaptation and appropriation. Routledge. google scholar
15. Tabet, P. (2022). Büyük dalavere: Kadınların cinselliklerinden mülksüzleştirilmesi [La grande Arnaque – Sexualité des femmes et échange économico-sexuel]. In Gülnur Acar Savran (Ed. & Trans.), Cinsiyetler arası toplumsal ilişkiler ve kesişimsellik [Social relations between the sexes and intersectionality] (pp. 155–178). Dipnot Yayınları. google scholar
16. Walby, S. (1991). Theorizing patriarchy. Basil Blackwell. google scholar
17. Yetim, A. (2019). Modern dünya edebiyatında Medea mitinin görünümlerine arketipsel bir yaklaşım [An archetypal approach towards the representations of the myth of Medea in contemporary world literature] (PhD Dissertation). Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. google scholar