Abbott’s Line Of Flight: Flatland – A Romance of Many Dimensions

Öz

This paper examines Abbott’s narrative , which explores the paradigmatic transformation of Victorian England accelerated by spatiotemporal dissolution/the problem of the fourth dimension through a line-based approach. Following Abbott’s orientation toward the line, the study approaches the story through a Deleuzian philosophy that builds a comprehensive, line-based vocabulary of spatiotemporal dissolution triggered by modernization, and through axonometric drawing—a technique also used by avant-garde artists to engage with the problem of the fourth dimension. It aims to decipher the internal logic of spatial narrative through the axonometric structure, grounded in “temporal objectives,” “spatial objectives,” and “lines of flight,” conceived as a conceptual network/diagram that explains and stimulates the reader’s imagination. By examining how temporal and spatial dimensions form a tightly integrated network (striated) and how the conditions for drawing a line of flight from the organizational order emerge (smooth), this study aims to reveal the line’s capacity to trigger a relational understanding of imaginary external worlds. The simultaneous use of linear and verbal descriptions in constructing external worlds corresponding to different modes of understanding in a society on the threshold of modernity is read as an immediate correspondence between form and content, and Abbott’s work itself is argued to draw a line of flight. Drawing on the story’s line-based approach, this article situates itself within the existing literature by fostering a discussion at the intersection of representation, spatiality, and literature while exploring the correspondence between form and content.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Deleuze&Guattari
• smooth space
• striated space
• fourth dimension

Kaynakça

1. Abbott, E. A. (1884). Flatland: A romance of many dimensions. Seeley & Co. https://archive.org/details/flatlandromanceo00abbouoft google scholar
2. Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism.Verso. google scholar
3. Barnett, L. (1948). The universe and Dr. Einstein. William Sloane Associates. https://archive.org/details/TheUniverseAndDr. EinsteinLincolnBarnett google scholar
4. Barrows, A. (2016). Time, literature, and cartography after the spatial turn: The chronometric imaginary. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56901-1 google scholar
5. Bois, Y. A. (1981). Metamorphosis of architecture. Daidalos, 1, 40–58. google scholar
6. Braidotti, R., & Oostveen, D. F. (2024). On the emergence and convergence of the new transversal humanities. In R. Braidotti, H. Casper- Hehne, M. Ivković, & D. F. Oostveen (Eds.), The Edinburgh Companion to the New European Humanities (pp. 23–46). Edinburgh University Press. google scholar
7. Conley, T. (2007). Early modern literature and cartography: An overview. In D. Woodward (Ed.), The history of Renaissance cartography: Interpretive essays (pp. 401–411). University of Chicago Press. google scholar
8. Deleuze, G. (1997). Bergsonism. Zone Books. google scholar

9. Deleuze, G. (2003). Francis Bacon – The logic of sensation. Continuum. google scholar
10. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2005). Capitalism and schizophrenia: A thousand plateaus. University of Minnesota Press. google scholar
11. Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (2007). Dialogues II. Columbia University Press. google scholar
12. Ebeling, S. (2010). Space as membrane. Architectural Association Publications. google scholar
13. Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage Books. google scholar
14. Forty, A. (2000). Words and buildings: A vocabulary of modern architecture. Thames and Hudson. google scholar
15. Harris, P. (2005). To see with the mind and think through the eye: Deleuze, folding architecture, and Simon Rada’a Watts Towers. In I. Buchanan & G. Lambert (Eds.), Deleuze and space (pp. 36–60). Edinburgh University Press. google scholar
16. Henderson, L. D. (2008). Einstein and 20th-century art: A romance of many dimensions. In P. L. Galison, G. Holton, & S. S. Schweber (Eds.), Einstein for the 21st century: His legacy in science, art, and modern culture (pp. 101–129). Princeton University Press. google scholar
17. Hight, C., Hensel, M., & Menges, A. (2009). En route: Towards a discourse on heterogeneous space beyond modernist space-time and post-modernist social geography. In M. Hensel, A. Menges & C. Hight (Eds.) Space reader: Heterogeneous space in architecture (pp. 9–37). John Wiley and Sons. google scholar
18. Ingold, T. (2007). Lines: A brief history. Routledge. google scholar
19. Ingraham, C. (1998). Architecture and burdens of linearity. Yale University Press. google scholar
20. Harper, D. (n.d.). Land. (2025, July 19). Online etymology dictionary. Retrieved July 19, 2026, from https://www.etymonline.com/word/land. google scholar
21. Jay, M. (1994). Downcast eyes: The denigration of vision in twentieth-century French thought. University of California Press. google scholar
22. Kern, S. (1983). The culture of time and space: 1880–1918. Harvard University Press. google scholar
23. Kwinter, S. (2001). Architectures of time: Toward a theory of the event in modernist culture. MIT Press. google scholar
24. Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions: 50th anniversary edition. University of Chicago Press. google scholar
25. Luecking, S. (2010). A man and his square: Kasimir Malevich and the visualization of the fourth dimension. Journal of Mathematics and the Arts, 4(2), 87–100. google scholar
26. Massey, J. (2007). Looking through axonometric windows. Architectural Theory Review, 12(1), 8–35. doi: 10.1080/13264820701553088 google scholar
27. Massumi, B. (2005). Translator’s foreword: Pleasures of philosophy. In G. Deleuze & F. Guattari, Capitalism and schizophrenia: A thousand plateaus (pp. ix–xv). University of Minnesota Press. google scholar
28. Ots, E. (2011). Fold. In Decoding theoryspeak: An illustrated guide to architectural theory (pp. 105–106). Routledge. google scholar
29. Panofsky, E. (1997). Perspective as a symbolic form. Princeton University Press. google scholar
30. Pinet, S. (2017). Diagrammatic thought in medieval literature. In A. Engberg-Pedersen (Ed.), Literature and cartography: Theories, histories, genres (pp. 173–197). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11177.003.0012 google scholar
31. Siegert, B. (2015). Cultural techniques: Grids, filters, doors, and other articulations of the real. Fordham University Press. google scholar
32. Stewart, I. (2002). Preface. In The annotated flatland: A romance of many dimensions – Introduction and notes by Ian Stewart, author of flatterland (pp. ix-xii). Basic Books. google scholar
33. The Museum of Modern Art (2012). Inventing Abstraction: 1910–1925. https://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2012/inventingabstraction/?artist=25. google scholar
34. Turner, H. S. (2007). Literature and mapping in early modern England, 1520–1688. In D. Woodward (Ed.), The history of Renaissance cartography: Interpretive essays (pp. 412–426). University of Chicago Press. google scholar
35. Vidler, A. (2001). Diagrams of utopia. In C. de Zegher & M. Wigley (Eds.), The activist drawing: Retracing situationist architectures from Constant’s New Babylon to beyond (pp. 83–91). MIT Press. google scholar
36. Zourabichvili, F. (2012). The vocabulary of Deleuze. In G. Lambert & D. W. Smith (Eds.), Deleuze: A philosophy of the event together with the vocabulary of Deleuze (pp. 137–224). Edinburgh University Press. google scholar