Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2020, , 385 - 406, 23.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2020-0040

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Bataille, G. (2001). Eroticism (M. Dalwood, Trans.). London, UK: Penguin Books.
  • Comensoli, V. (1993). Homophobia and the regulation of desire: A psychoanalytic reading of Marlowe’s Edward II. Journal of the History of Sexuality, 4(2), 175-200. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3704287
  • Dollimore, J. (2004). Radical tragedy: Religion, ideology and power in the drama of Shakespeare and his contemporaries. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Engle, L. (2013). Marlowe and the self. In E. C. Bartels & E. Smith (Eds.), Christopher Marlowe in context (pp. 202-211). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Foucault, M. (1988). The political technology of individuals. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 145-162). Amherst, USA: University of Massachusetts Press.
  • Foucault, M. (1990). The Use of Pleasure. Volume 2 of The History of Sexuality (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York, USA: Vintage Books.
  • Foucault, M. (2003). Abnormal: Lectures at the Collège de France 1974-1975 (G. Burchell, Trans.). London, UK: Verso.
  • Goldberg, D. (1992). Sacrifice in Marlowe’s The Jew of Malta. Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900, 32(2), 233-245. https://www.jstor.org/stable/450734
  • Greenblatt, S. (1980). Renaissance self-fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.
  • Huebert, R. (2003). The performance of pleasure in English renaissance drama. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Machiavelli, N. (1984). The Prince (P. Bondanella & M. Musa, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Marlowe, C. (1940). Tamburlaine the great I & II. In J. Hampden (Ed.), Three plays. London, UK: Thomas Nelson & Sons Ltd. Originally staged in 1587.
  • Marlowe, C. (1940). Doctor Faustus. In J. Hampden (Ed.), Three plays. London, UK: Thomas Nelson & Sons Ltd. Originally staged in 1592.
  • Marlowe, C. (1965). The Jew of Malta. R. W. V. Fossen (Ed.). London, UK: Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd. Originally staged in 1590.
  • Marlowe, C. (1981). Edward II. In F. Bowers (Ed.), The complete works of Christopher Marlowe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Originally staged in 1592.
  • Ribner, I. (1953). The idea of history in Marlowe’s Tamburlaine. ELH, 20(4), 251-266. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2871967
  • Schwarz, K. (2013). Marlowe and the question of will. In E. C. Bartels & E. Smith (Eds.), Christopher Marlowe in Context (pp. 192-201). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Teleological Trajectory of Subjection: A Critique of Marlovian Heroes

Yıl 2020, , 385 - 406, 23.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2020-0040

Öz

One might view Christopher Marlowe’s heroes such as Tamburlaine, Barabas, Edward II and Doctor Faustus in terms of individuals who capably transgress the boundaries within which they are located. War for Tamburlaine; gold for Barabas; philia, which is defined as love or friendship between an older and a young man, for Edward II; and the knowledge of good and evil for Doctor Faustus are those mediums by which they apparently subjectivise themselves. This study analyses their subjectivities by posing a fundamental question: do they form their individuality on their own or is it a matter of a paradigm of divine providence? The paradigm of divine providence might be equivalent to a structure of power. This study has recourse to what might be termed the Foucauldian teleology, which is based on some of Michel Foucault’s fundamental ideas. In other words, in order to present a critique of Marlovian heroes, this study has recourse to the Foucauldian teleology which involves various mechanisms of control to subjectivise ordinary people in accordance with the state or the structures of power. Thus, the Marlovian heroes are kept in a centripetal motion, which might be viewed in terms of a trajectory of subjection that brings them out from the periphery and carries them to the centre for subjectivisation, within and by the structures of power. This study utilises the textual evidence from prologues and epilogues of some of Christopher Marlowe’s plays that may indicate such a process of subjectivisation.

Kaynakça

  • Bataille, G. (2001). Eroticism (M. Dalwood, Trans.). London, UK: Penguin Books.
  • Comensoli, V. (1993). Homophobia and the regulation of desire: A psychoanalytic reading of Marlowe’s Edward II. Journal of the History of Sexuality, 4(2), 175-200. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3704287
  • Dollimore, J. (2004). Radical tragedy: Religion, ideology and power in the drama of Shakespeare and his contemporaries. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Engle, L. (2013). Marlowe and the self. In E. C. Bartels & E. Smith (Eds.), Christopher Marlowe in context (pp. 202-211). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Foucault, M. (1988). The political technology of individuals. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 145-162). Amherst, USA: University of Massachusetts Press.
  • Foucault, M. (1990). The Use of Pleasure. Volume 2 of The History of Sexuality (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York, USA: Vintage Books.
  • Foucault, M. (2003). Abnormal: Lectures at the Collège de France 1974-1975 (G. Burchell, Trans.). London, UK: Verso.
  • Goldberg, D. (1992). Sacrifice in Marlowe’s The Jew of Malta. Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900, 32(2), 233-245. https://www.jstor.org/stable/450734
  • Greenblatt, S. (1980). Renaissance self-fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.
  • Huebert, R. (2003). The performance of pleasure in English renaissance drama. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Machiavelli, N. (1984). The Prince (P. Bondanella & M. Musa, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Marlowe, C. (1940). Tamburlaine the great I & II. In J. Hampden (Ed.), Three plays. London, UK: Thomas Nelson & Sons Ltd. Originally staged in 1587.
  • Marlowe, C. (1940). Doctor Faustus. In J. Hampden (Ed.), Three plays. London, UK: Thomas Nelson & Sons Ltd. Originally staged in 1592.
  • Marlowe, C. (1965). The Jew of Malta. R. W. V. Fossen (Ed.). London, UK: Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd. Originally staged in 1590.
  • Marlowe, C. (1981). Edward II. In F. Bowers (Ed.), The complete works of Christopher Marlowe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Originally staged in 1592.
  • Ribner, I. (1953). The idea of history in Marlowe’s Tamburlaine. ELH, 20(4), 251-266. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2871967
  • Schwarz, K. (2013). Marlowe and the question of will. In E. C. Bartels & E. Smith (Eds.), Christopher Marlowe in Context (pp. 192-201). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Toplam 17 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sanat ve Edebiyat
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Sukhdev Sıngh 0000-0002-4952-9541

Yayımlanma Tarihi 23 Aralık 2020
Gönderilme Tarihi 19 Şubat 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020

Kaynak Göster

APA Sıngh, S. (2020). Teleological Trajectory of Subjection: A Critique of Marlovian Heroes. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies, 30(2), 385-406. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2020-0040
AMA Sıngh S. Teleological Trajectory of Subjection: A Critique of Marlovian Heroes. Litera. Aralık 2020;30(2):385-406. doi:10.26650/LITERA2020-0040
Chicago Sıngh, Sukhdev. “Teleological Trajectory of Subjection: A Critique of Marlovian Heroes”. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies 30, sy. 2 (Aralık 2020): 385-406. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2020-0040.
EndNote Sıngh S (01 Aralık 2020) Teleological Trajectory of Subjection: A Critique of Marlovian Heroes. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies 30 2 385–406.
IEEE S. Sıngh, “Teleological Trajectory of Subjection: A Critique of Marlovian Heroes”, Litera, c. 30, sy. 2, ss. 385–406, 2020, doi: 10.26650/LITERA2020-0040.
ISNAD Sıngh, Sukhdev. “Teleological Trajectory of Subjection: A Critique of Marlovian Heroes”. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies 30/2 (Aralık 2020), 385-406. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2020-0040.
JAMA Sıngh S. Teleological Trajectory of Subjection: A Critique of Marlovian Heroes. Litera. 2020;30:385–406.
MLA Sıngh, Sukhdev. “Teleological Trajectory of Subjection: A Critique of Marlovian Heroes”. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies, c. 30, sy. 2, 2020, ss. 385-06, doi:10.26650/LITERA2020-0040.
Vancouver Sıngh S. Teleological Trajectory of Subjection: A Critique of Marlovian Heroes. Litera. 2020;30(2):385-406.