Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

The Ecomaterialist Appropriation of the Shakespearean Stage: Tracing the Entangled Worlds in Rupert Goold’s The Tempest (2006)

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 34 Sayı: 2, 379 - 399, 24.12.2024
https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2024-1493773

Öz

Contemporary environmental concerns and ecological issues stimulate updated adaptation and appropriation of dramaturgy, allowing the playwrights, directors, stage designers, and performers to reconsider conventional strategies of theatre. Pushing intellectual and creative boundaries, the material-based practice of ecological theatre has recently found expression in theatre and performance studies. Drawing mainly upon recent ecomaterialist notions, this paper traces the entanglement of the material worlds in Rupert Goold’s The Tempest (2006). Therefore, this paper aims at investigating how Goold reappropriates the stage by employing William Shakespeare’s canonical text under the specific conditions of the Anthropocene, directly depicted on stage through arctic scenery, shipwreck, storm, and human despair against nonhuman climatic forces. By analyzing the 2006 production of The Tempest from an ecomaterialist point of view, this paper indicates that Goold pays particular attention to the entanglement of humans and more-than-human worlds, fostering the idea that a human being is an integral component of the material environment that contains and sustains, rather than being a distinct entity. Thus, by assigning distributive agency to the matter on stage, Goold uncovers nonhuman performance and suggests that each performing actor uniquely participates in the process of meaning and affect.

Kaynakça

  • Alaimo, S. (2010). Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. google scholar
  • Alaimo, S. (2012). Sustainable This, Sustainable That: New Materialisms, Posthumanism, and Unknown Futures. PMLA, 127 (3), 558-564. google scholar
  • Arons, W. & May, T. J. (2012). Readings in Performance and Ecology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  • Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28 (3), 801-831. google scholar
  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. google scholar
  • Bate, J. & Wright, K. (2008). The Director’s Cut: Interviews with Peter Brook, Sam Mendes and Rupert Goold. In J. Bate and E. Rasmussen (Eds.), The Tempest (125-141). Basingstoke: Macmillan. google scholar
  • Benedict, D. (2007). The Tempest Variety. https://variety.com/2007/legit/reviews/the-tempest-15-1200509930/ (accessed 8 April 2024). google scholar
  • Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham and London: Duke University Press. google scholar
  • Bonneuil, C. & Fressoz, J. (2016). The Shock of the Anthropocene: The Earth, History and Us. Trans. D. Fernbach. London: Verso. google scholar
  • Bruckner, L. & Brayton, D. (2011). Ecocritical Shakespeare. Farnham, Surrey and Burlington, VT: Ashgate. google scholar
  • Bulger, T. (1994). The Utopic Structure of The Tempest. Utopian Studies, 5 (1), 38-47. google scholar
  • Burnett, L. (2002). ‘Redescribing a World’: Towards a Theory of Shakespearean Adaptation in Canada. Canadian Theatre Review, 111, 5-9. google scholar
  • Chaudhuri, U. (1994). ‘There Must Be a Lot of Fish in that Lake’: Toward an Ecological Theater. Theater, 25 (1), 23-31. google scholar
  • Chaudhuri, U. (2014). Research Theatre. In U. Chaudhuri and S. Enelow (Eds.), Research Theatre, Climate Change, and the Ecocide Project, (1-21). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  • Cless, D. (2010). Ecology and Environment in European Drama. New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • Crutzen, P. & Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The ‘Anthropocene’. Global Change Newsletter 41, 17-18. google scholar
  • Dessen, A. C. (2006). Choices by the Dozen: Shakespeare Onstage in 2006. Shakespeare Bulletin 24 (4), 13-31. google scholar
  • Ellis, E.C. (2018). Anthropocene: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Ferrando, F. (2014). Posthumanism. Tidsskrift for kj0nnsforskning, 2 (38), 168-172. google scholar
  • Goold, R. (Dir.). (2006). The Tempest. [theatre production] Royal Shakespeare Company. google scholar
  • Hartwig, D. W. (2007). The Tempest, dir. Rupert Goold for the Royal Shakespeare Company. Green Letters, 8 (1), 26-31. google scholar
  • Hutcheon, L. (2003). From Page to Stage to Screen: The Age of Adaptation. In M. Goldberg (Ed.), Great Minds at the University of Toronto: The University Professor Lecture Series 2002-2003 (37-54). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. google scholar
  • Hutcheon, L. (2006). A Theory of Adaptation. London: Routledge. google scholar
  • Iovino, S. & Oppermann, S. (2014). Introduction: Stories Come to Matter. In S. Iovino and S. Oppermann (Eds.), Material Ecocriticism (1-17). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. google scholar
  • Kershaw, B. (1992). The Politics of Performance. London: Routledge. google scholar
  • Knowles, R. (2004). Reading the Material Theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. google scholar
  • Lavery, C. (2016). Introduction: Performance and Ecology - What Can Theatre Do? Green Letters: Studies in Ecocriticism, 20 (3), 229-236. Macmillan. google scholar
  • Martin, R. (2015). Shakespeare and Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham: Duke University Press. google scholar
  • May, T. J. (2007). Beyond Bambi: Toward a Dangerous Ecocriticism in Theatre Studies. Theatre Topics, 17 (2), 95-110. google scholar
  • May, T. J. (2016). Radical Empathy, Embodied Pedagogy, and Climate Change Theatre. HowlRound. google scholar
  • Morton, T. (2010). The Ecological Thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. google scholar
  • Oppermann, S. (2018). Ecomaterialism. In R. Braidotti and M. Hlavajova (Eds.), Posthuman Glossary (120-123). London: Bloomsbury. google scholar
  • Sanders, J. (2006). Adaptation and Appropriation. London: Routledge. google scholar
  • Scott, H. C. (2020). Shakespeare’s Tempest and Capitalism: The Storm of History. New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • Shakespeare, W. (2011). The Tempest. A. T. Vaughan and V. Mason Vaughan (Eds.). London: Arden Shakespeare. google scholar
Yıl 2024, Cilt: 34 Sayı: 2, 379 - 399, 24.12.2024
https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2024-1493773

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Alaimo, S. (2010). Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. google scholar
  • Alaimo, S. (2012). Sustainable This, Sustainable That: New Materialisms, Posthumanism, and Unknown Futures. PMLA, 127 (3), 558-564. google scholar
  • Arons, W. & May, T. J. (2012). Readings in Performance and Ecology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  • Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28 (3), 801-831. google scholar
  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. google scholar
  • Bate, J. & Wright, K. (2008). The Director’s Cut: Interviews with Peter Brook, Sam Mendes and Rupert Goold. In J. Bate and E. Rasmussen (Eds.), The Tempest (125-141). Basingstoke: Macmillan. google scholar
  • Benedict, D. (2007). The Tempest Variety. https://variety.com/2007/legit/reviews/the-tempest-15-1200509930/ (accessed 8 April 2024). google scholar
  • Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham and London: Duke University Press. google scholar
  • Bonneuil, C. & Fressoz, J. (2016). The Shock of the Anthropocene: The Earth, History and Us. Trans. D. Fernbach. London: Verso. google scholar
  • Bruckner, L. & Brayton, D. (2011). Ecocritical Shakespeare. Farnham, Surrey and Burlington, VT: Ashgate. google scholar
  • Bulger, T. (1994). The Utopic Structure of The Tempest. Utopian Studies, 5 (1), 38-47. google scholar
  • Burnett, L. (2002). ‘Redescribing a World’: Towards a Theory of Shakespearean Adaptation in Canada. Canadian Theatre Review, 111, 5-9. google scholar
  • Chaudhuri, U. (1994). ‘There Must Be a Lot of Fish in that Lake’: Toward an Ecological Theater. Theater, 25 (1), 23-31. google scholar
  • Chaudhuri, U. (2014). Research Theatre. In U. Chaudhuri and S. Enelow (Eds.), Research Theatre, Climate Change, and the Ecocide Project, (1-21). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  • Cless, D. (2010). Ecology and Environment in European Drama. New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • Crutzen, P. & Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The ‘Anthropocene’. Global Change Newsletter 41, 17-18. google scholar
  • Dessen, A. C. (2006). Choices by the Dozen: Shakespeare Onstage in 2006. Shakespeare Bulletin 24 (4), 13-31. google scholar
  • Ellis, E.C. (2018). Anthropocene: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Ferrando, F. (2014). Posthumanism. Tidsskrift for kj0nnsforskning, 2 (38), 168-172. google scholar
  • Goold, R. (Dir.). (2006). The Tempest. [theatre production] Royal Shakespeare Company. google scholar
  • Hartwig, D. W. (2007). The Tempest, dir. Rupert Goold for the Royal Shakespeare Company. Green Letters, 8 (1), 26-31. google scholar
  • Hutcheon, L. (2003). From Page to Stage to Screen: The Age of Adaptation. In M. Goldberg (Ed.), Great Minds at the University of Toronto: The University Professor Lecture Series 2002-2003 (37-54). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. google scholar
  • Hutcheon, L. (2006). A Theory of Adaptation. London: Routledge. google scholar
  • Iovino, S. & Oppermann, S. (2014). Introduction: Stories Come to Matter. In S. Iovino and S. Oppermann (Eds.), Material Ecocriticism (1-17). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. google scholar
  • Kershaw, B. (1992). The Politics of Performance. London: Routledge. google scholar
  • Knowles, R. (2004). Reading the Material Theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. google scholar
  • Lavery, C. (2016). Introduction: Performance and Ecology - What Can Theatre Do? Green Letters: Studies in Ecocriticism, 20 (3), 229-236. Macmillan. google scholar
  • Martin, R. (2015). Shakespeare and Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham: Duke University Press. google scholar
  • May, T. J. (2007). Beyond Bambi: Toward a Dangerous Ecocriticism in Theatre Studies. Theatre Topics, 17 (2), 95-110. google scholar
  • May, T. J. (2016). Radical Empathy, Embodied Pedagogy, and Climate Change Theatre. HowlRound. google scholar
  • Morton, T. (2010). The Ecological Thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. google scholar
  • Oppermann, S. (2018). Ecomaterialism. In R. Braidotti and M. Hlavajova (Eds.), Posthuman Glossary (120-123). London: Bloomsbury. google scholar
  • Sanders, J. (2006). Adaptation and Appropriation. London: Routledge. google scholar
  • Scott, H. C. (2020). Shakespeare’s Tempest and Capitalism: The Storm of History. New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • Shakespeare, W. (2011). The Tempest. A. T. Vaughan and V. Mason Vaughan (Eds.). London: Arden Shakespeare. google scholar
Toplam 36 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular İngiliz ve İrlanda Dili, Edebiyatı ve Kültürü, Kültürel çalışmalar (Diğer)
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Işıl Şahin Gülter 0000-0002-2313-0997

Yayımlanma Tarihi 24 Aralık 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi 31 Mayıs 2024
Kabul Tarihi 10 Aralık 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 34 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Şahin Gülter, I. (2024). The Ecomaterialist Appropriation of the Shakespearean Stage: Tracing the Entangled Worlds in Rupert Goold’s The Tempest (2006). Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies, 34(2), 379-399. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2024-1493773
AMA Şahin Gülter I. The Ecomaterialist Appropriation of the Shakespearean Stage: Tracing the Entangled Worlds in Rupert Goold’s The Tempest (2006). Litera. Aralık 2024;34(2):379-399. doi:10.26650/LITERA2024-1493773
Chicago Şahin Gülter, Işıl. “The Ecomaterialist Appropriation of the Shakespearean Stage: Tracing the Entangled Worlds in Rupert Goold’s The Tempest (2006)”. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies 34, sy. 2 (Aralık 2024): 379-99. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2024-1493773.
EndNote Şahin Gülter I (01 Aralık 2024) The Ecomaterialist Appropriation of the Shakespearean Stage: Tracing the Entangled Worlds in Rupert Goold’s The Tempest (2006). Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies 34 2 379–399.
IEEE I. Şahin Gülter, “The Ecomaterialist Appropriation of the Shakespearean Stage: Tracing the Entangled Worlds in Rupert Goold’s The Tempest (2006)”, Litera, c. 34, sy. 2, ss. 379–399, 2024, doi: 10.26650/LITERA2024-1493773.
ISNAD Şahin Gülter, Işıl. “The Ecomaterialist Appropriation of the Shakespearean Stage: Tracing the Entangled Worlds in Rupert Goold’s The Tempest (2006)”. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies 34/2 (Aralık 2024), 379-399. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2024-1493773.
JAMA Şahin Gülter I. The Ecomaterialist Appropriation of the Shakespearean Stage: Tracing the Entangled Worlds in Rupert Goold’s The Tempest (2006). Litera. 2024;34:379–399.
MLA Şahin Gülter, Işıl. “The Ecomaterialist Appropriation of the Shakespearean Stage: Tracing the Entangled Worlds in Rupert Goold’s The Tempest (2006)”. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies, c. 34, sy. 2, 2024, ss. 379-9, doi:10.26650/LITERA2024-1493773.
Vancouver Şahin Gülter I. The Ecomaterialist Appropriation of the Shakespearean Stage: Tracing the Entangled Worlds in Rupert Goold’s The Tempest (2006). Litera. 2024;34(2):379-9.