Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 35 Sayı: Special Issue, 1 - 15, 05.08.2025
https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2024-1607825

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Acar Savran, G. (2022). Sunuş [Introduction]. In Gülnur Acar Savran (Ed. & Trans.), Cinsiyetler arası toplumsal ilişkiler ve kesişimsellik [Social relations between the sexes and intersectionality] (pp. 7–22). Dipnot Yayınları. google scholar
  • Adkins, L. and D. Leonard. (2005). Reconstructing French feminism: Commodification, materialism and sex. In Diana Leonard and Lisa Adkins (Eds.), Sex in question: French materialist feminism (pp. 1-23) Taylor & Francis e-Library. google scholar
  • Braidotti, R. (1994). Mothers, monsters, and machines. In Nomadic subjects: Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory (pp. 75–94). Columbia University Press. google scholar
  • Delphy, C. (2022). Genel bir sömürü teorisi için: Yeniden ve doğru yerden başlamak [Pour Une théorie générale de l’exploitation: Repartir du bon pied] In Gülnur Acar Savran (Ed. & Trans.), Cinsiyetler arası toplumsal ilişkiler ve kesişimsellik [Social relations between the sexes and intersectionality] (pp. 69–88). Dipnot Yayınları. google scholar
  • Dunezat, X. (2022). Cinsiyetler arası toplumsal ilişkiler sosyolojisi: Erkek/kadın ilişkilerinin feminist ve maddeci bir okuması [La soci- ologie des rapports sociaux de sexe: une lecture féministe et matérialiste des rapports hommes/femmes]. In Gülnur Acar Savran (Ed. & Trans.), Cinsiyetler arası toplumsal ilişkiler ve kesişimsellik [Social relations between the sexes and intersectionality] (pp. 91–118). Dipnot Yayınları. google scholar
  • Euripides. (2008). Medea. (D. A. Svarlien, Trans.). Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. google scholar
  • Farrokhzad, A. (2022). Medea’ya göre ahlak [Moral enligt Medea] (A. Arda, Trans.). Habitus. google scholar
  • Guillaumin, C. (2005). The practice of power and belief in nature. In Diana Leonard & Lisa Adkins (Eds.), Sex in question: French materialist feminism (pp. 73109). Taylor & Francis e-Library. google scholar
  • Gültekin, H. (2021). Post-Neoliberalism, free market and disillusionment: Anders Lustgarten’s if you don’t let us dream, we won’t let you sleep. In Mesut Günenç & Enes Kavak (Eds.), New readings in British drama: from the post-war period to the contemporary era (pp. 115–129). Peter Lang. google scholar
  • Hutcheon, L. (2006). A theory of adaptation, with an epilogue by Siobhan O’Flynn. Routledge. google scholar
  • Kergoat, D. (2022). Cinsiyetler arası toplumsal ilişki: Toplumsal ilişkilerin yeniden üretilmelerinden yıkılmalarına [Le rapport social de sexe: De la reproduction des rapport sociaux à leur subversion]. In Gülnur Acar Savran (Ed. & Trans.), Cinsiyetler arası toplumsal ilişkiler ve kesişimsellik [Social relations between the sexes and intersectionality] (pp. 119–141). Dipnot Yayınları. google scholar
  • Juteau, D. (2022). Maddeci feminist bir kesişimsellik paradigması [Un paradigme féministe Matérialiste de l’intersectionnalité]. In Gülnur Acar Savran (Ed. & Trans.), Cinsiyetler arası toplumsal ilişkiler ve kesişimsellik [Social relations between the sexes and intersectionality] (pp. 253–276). Dipnot Yayınları. google scholar Juteau, D. (2022). “Biz” kadınlar: Kadınlar kategerosinin ayrıştırılamaz türdeşliği ve ayrışıklığı [“Nous” les femmes: Sur l'indissociable homogéné ité et hétérogénéité de la catégorie]. In Gülnur Acar Savran (Ed. & Trans.), Cinsiyetler arası toplumsal ilişkiler ve kesişimsellik [Social relations between the sexes and intersectionality] (pp. 227–252). Dipnot Yayınları. google scholar
  • Rees, C. (2017). Adaptation and nation: Theatrical contexts for contemporary English and Irish drama. Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  • Sanders, J. (2006). Adaptation and appropriation. Routledge. google scholar
  • Tabet, P. (2022). Büyük dalavere: Kadınların cinselliklerinden mülksüzleştirilmesi [La grande Arnaque – Sexualité des femmes et échange économico-sexuel]. In Gülnur Acar Savran (Ed. & Trans.), Cinsiyetler arası toplumsal ilişkiler ve kesişimsellik [Social relations between the sexes and intersectionality] (pp. 155–178). Dipnot Yayınları. google scholar
  • Walby, S. (1991). Theorizing patriarchy. Basil Blackwell. google scholar
  • Yetim, A. (2019). Modern dünya edebiyatında Medea mitinin görünümlerine arketipsel bir yaklaşım [An archetypal approach towards the representations of the myth of Medea in contemporary world literature] (PhD Dissertation). Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. google scholar

“Social Relations between the Sexes in Athena Farrokhzad’s Morals According to Medea”

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 35 Sayı: Special Issue, 1 - 15, 05.08.2025
https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2024-1607825

Öz

This paper explores how patriarchal power relations construct the idea of “nature” in Athena Farrokhzad’s Morals According to Medea (Moral enligt Medea, 2022), an adaptation of Euripides’ classic play Medea (431 BCE). The analysis will concentrate on Medea’s subversion of patriarchal “appropriation” tactics from a feminist perspective, particularly through ideological codes embedded in the dialogues between Medea and Morality, the only other character in the play. By doing so, it seeks to understand women’s position in relation to patriarchy through a materialist feminist lens, with particular attention to the conflict between Medea and Morality. The focus will also be on how Medea challenges traditional discourses of motherhood, constructed within male-dominated societal structures. The study will further discuss the ways in which she raises her voice in resistance, both as a local and as a refugee, within the spaces where she is either confined or expelled. The discussion will be framed within the context of the theory of social relations between the sexes highlighting the specific impact of women’s resistance and militancy in examining the mechanisms of sovereignty.

Kaynakça

  • Acar Savran, G. (2022). Sunuş [Introduction]. In Gülnur Acar Savran (Ed. & Trans.), Cinsiyetler arası toplumsal ilişkiler ve kesişimsellik [Social relations between the sexes and intersectionality] (pp. 7–22). Dipnot Yayınları. google scholar
  • Adkins, L. and D. Leonard. (2005). Reconstructing French feminism: Commodification, materialism and sex. In Diana Leonard and Lisa Adkins (Eds.), Sex in question: French materialist feminism (pp. 1-23) Taylor & Francis e-Library. google scholar
  • Braidotti, R. (1994). Mothers, monsters, and machines. In Nomadic subjects: Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory (pp. 75–94). Columbia University Press. google scholar
  • Delphy, C. (2022). Genel bir sömürü teorisi için: Yeniden ve doğru yerden başlamak [Pour Une théorie générale de l’exploitation: Repartir du bon pied] In Gülnur Acar Savran (Ed. & Trans.), Cinsiyetler arası toplumsal ilişkiler ve kesişimsellik [Social relations between the sexes and intersectionality] (pp. 69–88). Dipnot Yayınları. google scholar
  • Dunezat, X. (2022). Cinsiyetler arası toplumsal ilişkiler sosyolojisi: Erkek/kadın ilişkilerinin feminist ve maddeci bir okuması [La soci- ologie des rapports sociaux de sexe: une lecture féministe et matérialiste des rapports hommes/femmes]. In Gülnur Acar Savran (Ed. & Trans.), Cinsiyetler arası toplumsal ilişkiler ve kesişimsellik [Social relations between the sexes and intersectionality] (pp. 91–118). Dipnot Yayınları. google scholar
  • Euripides. (2008). Medea. (D. A. Svarlien, Trans.). Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. google scholar
  • Farrokhzad, A. (2022). Medea’ya göre ahlak [Moral enligt Medea] (A. Arda, Trans.). Habitus. google scholar
  • Guillaumin, C. (2005). The practice of power and belief in nature. In Diana Leonard & Lisa Adkins (Eds.), Sex in question: French materialist feminism (pp. 73109). Taylor & Francis e-Library. google scholar
  • Gültekin, H. (2021). Post-Neoliberalism, free market and disillusionment: Anders Lustgarten’s if you don’t let us dream, we won’t let you sleep. In Mesut Günenç & Enes Kavak (Eds.), New readings in British drama: from the post-war period to the contemporary era (pp. 115–129). Peter Lang. google scholar
  • Hutcheon, L. (2006). A theory of adaptation, with an epilogue by Siobhan O’Flynn. Routledge. google scholar
  • Kergoat, D. (2022). Cinsiyetler arası toplumsal ilişki: Toplumsal ilişkilerin yeniden üretilmelerinden yıkılmalarına [Le rapport social de sexe: De la reproduction des rapport sociaux à leur subversion]. In Gülnur Acar Savran (Ed. & Trans.), Cinsiyetler arası toplumsal ilişkiler ve kesişimsellik [Social relations between the sexes and intersectionality] (pp. 119–141). Dipnot Yayınları. google scholar
  • Juteau, D. (2022). Maddeci feminist bir kesişimsellik paradigması [Un paradigme féministe Matérialiste de l’intersectionnalité]. In Gülnur Acar Savran (Ed. & Trans.), Cinsiyetler arası toplumsal ilişkiler ve kesişimsellik [Social relations between the sexes and intersectionality] (pp. 253–276). Dipnot Yayınları. google scholar Juteau, D. (2022). “Biz” kadınlar: Kadınlar kategerosinin ayrıştırılamaz türdeşliği ve ayrışıklığı [“Nous” les femmes: Sur l'indissociable homogéné ité et hétérogénéité de la catégorie]. In Gülnur Acar Savran (Ed. & Trans.), Cinsiyetler arası toplumsal ilişkiler ve kesişimsellik [Social relations between the sexes and intersectionality] (pp. 227–252). Dipnot Yayınları. google scholar
  • Rees, C. (2017). Adaptation and nation: Theatrical contexts for contemporary English and Irish drama. Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  • Sanders, J. (2006). Adaptation and appropriation. Routledge. google scholar
  • Tabet, P. (2022). Büyük dalavere: Kadınların cinselliklerinden mülksüzleştirilmesi [La grande Arnaque – Sexualité des femmes et échange économico-sexuel]. In Gülnur Acar Savran (Ed. & Trans.), Cinsiyetler arası toplumsal ilişkiler ve kesişimsellik [Social relations between the sexes and intersectionality] (pp. 155–178). Dipnot Yayınları. google scholar
  • Walby, S. (1991). Theorizing patriarchy. Basil Blackwell. google scholar
  • Yetim, A. (2019). Modern dünya edebiyatında Medea mitinin görünümlerine arketipsel bir yaklaşım [An archetypal approach towards the representations of the myth of Medea in contemporary world literature] (PhD Dissertation). Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. google scholar
Toplam 17 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Dünya Dilleri, Edebiyatı ve Kültürü (Diğer)
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Pelin Dogan Özger 0000-0002-6391-3523

Yayımlanma Tarihi 5 Ağustos 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 26 Aralık 2024
Kabul Tarihi 24 Mart 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 35 Sayı: Special Issue

Kaynak Göster

APA Dogan Özger, P. (2025). “Social Relations between the Sexes in Athena Farrokhzad’s Morals According to Medea”. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies, 35(Special Issue), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2024-1607825
AMA Dogan Özger P. “Social Relations between the Sexes in Athena Farrokhzad’s Morals According to Medea”. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies. Ağustos 2025;35(Special Issue):1-15. doi:10.26650/LITERA2024-1607825
Chicago Dogan Özger, Pelin. “‘Social Relations between the Sexes in Athena Farrokhzad’s Morals According to Medea’”. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies 35, sy. Special Issue (Ağustos 2025): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2024-1607825.
EndNote Dogan Özger P (01 Ağustos 2025) “Social Relations between the Sexes in Athena Farrokhzad’s Morals According to Medea”. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies 35 Special Issue 1–15.
IEEE P. Dogan Özger, “‘Social Relations between the Sexes in Athena Farrokhzad’s Morals According to Medea’”, Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies, c. 35, sy. Special Issue, ss. 1–15, 2025, doi: 10.26650/LITERA2024-1607825.
ISNAD Dogan Özger, Pelin. “‘Social Relations between the Sexes in Athena Farrokhzad’s Morals According to Medea’”. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies 35/Special Issue (Ağustos2025), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2024-1607825.
JAMA Dogan Özger P. “Social Relations between the Sexes in Athena Farrokhzad’s Morals According to Medea”. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies. 2025;35:1–15.
MLA Dogan Özger, Pelin. “‘Social Relations between the Sexes in Athena Farrokhzad’s Morals According to Medea’”. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies, c. 35, sy. Special Issue, 2025, ss. 1-15, doi:10.26650/LITERA2024-1607825.
Vancouver Dogan Özger P. “Social Relations between the Sexes in Athena Farrokhzad’s Morals According to Medea”. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies. 2025;35(Special Issue):1-15.