Investigating Young Male and Female Road Users’ Behaviour as Pedestrians and Drivers

Öz

Young road users constitute one of the most vulnerable groups in terms of experiencing road traffic accidents as either drivers or pedestrians. Pedestrian and driver behaviours are important predictors of the road users’ safety. The present study mainly aims to investigate the relationship between behaviours of young male and female road users as drivers and pedestrians. A total number of 573 young road users (316 male, 257 female) aged from 19 to 28 (M = 22.2, SD = 1.77) participated in the present study. Participants were requested to fill out a questionnaire package including demographic information form as well as the Pedestrian Behaviour Scale (PBS), the Driver Behaviour Questionnaire (DBQ) and the Positive Driver Behaviours Scale (PDBS). In line with the aims of the present study, first, the factor structure of the Pedestrian Behaviour Scale was investigated. Following that, gender differences in pedestrian and driver behaviours were examined. In terms of gender difference, males showed more pedestrian transgressions, pedestrian aggressive violations, driver aggressive violations, driver ordinary violations and fewer driver lapses compared to females. Moreover, aberrant pedestrian behaviours were positively related to aberrant driver behaviour, whereas positive pedestrian behaviours were negatively associated with aberrant driver behaviour. While pedestrian lapses and aggressive violations were negatively related to positive driver behaviours, pedestrian transgression and positive pedestrian behaviours were positively associated with positive driver behaviours. Overall, the results indicated that young road users who expressed more aberrant pedestrian behaviours also showed more aberrant driver behaviours. The results were discussed in relation to the administration of countermeasures against aberrant driver behaviours. Considering the consistency between displayed pedestrian and driver behaviours evidenced in the present study; focusing on different road user roles in detail was shown to be important especially for planning intervention programs for specific traffic conditions or driver behaviours. Additionally, investigating different roles that young road users have provides the literature with additional knowledge which could be reflected in field administrations in the complex and dynamic nature of the traffic environment.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Young road users
• pedestrian behaviours
• driver behaviours
• aberrant road user behaviours
• road safety

Genç Erkek ve Kadın Yol Kullanıcılarının Yaya ve Sürücü Davranışları Arasındaki İlişkinin Araştırılması

Öz

Genç yol kullanıcıları, sürücü veya yaya olarak trafik kazalarına maruz kalma konusunda en savunmasız gruplardan birini oluşturmaktadır. Yaya ve sürücü davranışları, yol kullanıcılarının güvenliğinin önemli yordayıcılarındandır. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, genç erkek ve kadın yol kullanıcılarının yaya davranışları ile sürücü davranışları arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmaktır. Çalışmaya 19-28 yaş arası (M = 22.2, SD = 1.77) 573 genç yol kullanıcısı (316 erkek, 257 kadın) katılmıştır. Katılımcılar Yaya Davranışları Ölçeği (PBS), Sürücü Davranışları Ölçeği (DBQ), Olumlu Sürücü Davranışları Ölçeği (PDBS) ve demografik bilgi formundan oluşan bir anket bataryası tamamlamıştır. Çalışmanın amaçları doğrultusunda çalışmada ilk olarak yaya davranışları ölçeğinin faktör yapısı incelenmiştir. Bu aşamayı takiben, yaya ve sürücü davranışlarındaki cinsiyet farklılığı incelenmiştir. Cinsiyet farklılıkları açısından, erkekler kadınlara göre daha fazla yaya ihlalleri, yaya saldırgan ihlalleri, sürücü saldırgan ihlalleri, sürücü sıradan ihlalleri ve daha az sürücü dalgınlığı göstermiştir. Ayrıca, sapkın yaya davranışları sapkın sürücü davranışlarıyla pozitif ilişkili gösterirken, olumlu yaya davranışları sapkın sürücü davranışlarıyla negatif ilişki göstermiştir. Yaya dalgınlığı ve yaya saldırgan ihlalleri olumlu sürücü davranışlarıyla negatif ilişki gösterirken, yaya ihlalleri ve olumlu yaya davranışları olumlu sürücü davranışlarıyla pozitif ilişki göstermiştir. Genel olarak, sonuçlar daha fazla sapkın yaya davranışları gösteren genç yol kullanıcılarının aynı zamanda daha fazla sapkın sürücü davranışları gösterdiğini vurgulamaktadır. Bulgular sapkın sürücü davranışlarına karşı alınacak önlemler ile ilgili olarak da tartışılmıştır. Bu çalışmada belirtilen yaya ve sürücü davranışları arasındaki tutarlılık dikkate alındığında, farklı yol kullanıcısı rollerine ayrıntılı olarak odaklanmanın, özellikle belirli trafik koşulları veya sürücü davranışları için müdahale programlarının planlanmasında önemli olduğu gösterilmiştir. Ek olarak, genç yol kullanıcılarının sahip olduğu farklı rollerin araştırılması, alan yazına trafik ortamının karmaşık ve dinamik yapısında saha yönetimlerine yansıtılabilecek ek bilgiler sağlamaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Genç yol kullanıcıları
• yaya davranışları
• sürücü davranışları
• sapkın yol kullanıcı davranışları
• yol güvenliği

Kaynakça

1. af Wâhlberg, A. E., Barraclough, P., & Freeman, J. (2015). The Driver Behaviour Questionnaire as accident predictor: A methodological re-meta-analysis. Journal of Safety Research, 55, 185-212. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2015.08.003 google scholar
2. af Wâhlberg, A. E., Dorn, L., & Kline, T. (2011). The Manchester Driver Behaviour Questionnaire as predictor of road traffic accidents. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 12, 66-86. doi:10.1080/14639220903023376 google scholar
3. Antic, B., Pesic, D., Milutinovic, N., & Maslac, M. (2016). Pedestrian behaviours: Validation of the Serbian version of the pedestrian behaviour scale. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 41, 170-178. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2016.02.004 google scholar
4. Bener, A., & Crundall, D. (2008). Role of gender and driver behaviour in road traffic crashes. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 13(3), 331-336. doi:10.1080/13588260801942684 google scholar
5. Bener, A., Yildirim, E., Bolat, E., Özkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2016). The driver behaviour questionnaire as an accident predictor in cross-cultural countries in Qatar and Turkey: Global Public Health Problem. Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research, 15(7), 1-9. doi:10.9734/ BJMMR/2016/25719 google scholar
6. Chu, W., Wu, C., Atombo, C., Zhang, H., & Özkan, T. (2019). Traffic climate, driver behaviour, and accidents involvement in China. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 122, 119-126. doi:10.1016/j. aap.2018.09.007 google scholar
7. Cloutier, M. S., Lachapelle, U., d’Amours-Ouellet, A. A., Bergeron, J., Lord, S., & Torres, J. (2017). “Outta my way!” Individual and environmental correlates of interactions between pedestrians and vehicles during street crossings. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 104, 36-45. doi:10.1016/j. aap.2017.04.015 google scholar
8. Cordazzo, S. T. D., Scialfa, C. T., Bubric, K., & Ross, R. J. (2014). The Driver Behaviour Questionnaire: A North American analysis. Journal ofSafety Research, 50, 99-107. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2014.05.002 de Winter, J.C.F., & Dodou, D. (2010). The Driver Behaviour Questionnaire as a predictor of accidents:A meta-analysis. Journal ofSafety Research, 41, 463-470. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2010.10.007 google scholar

9. Deb. S., Strawderman, L., DuBien, J., Smith, B., Carruth, D. W., & Garrison, T. M. (2017). Evaluating pedestrian behavior at crosswalks: Validation of a pedestrian behavior questionnaire for the U.S. population. AccidentAnalysis andPrevention, 106, 191-201. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2017.05.020 google scholar
10. Demir, B. (2017). The Social psychological predictors of pedestrian behaviors. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey. google scholar
11. Dinh, D. D., Vû, N. H., McIlroy, R. C., Plant, K. A., & Stanton, N. A. (2020a). Effect of attitudes towards traffic safety and risk perceptions on pedestrian behaviours in Vietnam. IATSS Research, 44, 238-247. doi:10.1016/j.iatssr.2020.01.002 google scholar
12. Dinh, D. D., Vu, N. H., McIlroy, R. C., Plant, K. A., & Stanton, N. A. (2020b). Examining the roles of multidimensional fatalism on traffic safety attitudes and pedestrian behaviour. Safety Science, 124, 104587. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104587Elander, J., West, R., & French, D. (1993). Behavioral correlates of individual differences in road-traffic crash risk: An examination method and findings. Psychological Bulletin, 113(2), 279-294. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.113.2.279 google scholar
13. Ersan, Ö., Üzümcüoğlu, Y., Azık, D., Fındık, G., Kaçan, B., Solmazer, G., ... & Xheladini, G. (2020). Cross-cultural differences in driver aggression, aberrant, and positive driver behaviors. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 71, 88-97. doi:10.1016/j. trf.2020.03.020 google scholar
14. Granie, M., Pannetier, M., & Gueho, L. (2013). Developing a self-reporting method to measure pedestrian behaviors at all ages. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 50, 830-839. doi:10.1016/j. aap.2012.07.009 google scholar
15. Gras, M. E., Sullman, M. J. M., Cunill, M., Planes, M., Aymerich, M., & Font-Mayolas, S. (2006). Spanish drivers and their aberrant driving behaviors. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 9, 129-137. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2005.09.004 google scholar
16. Gueho, L., Granie, M. A., & Abric, J. C. (2014). French validation of a new version of the Driver Behavior Questionnaire (DBQ) for drivers of all ages and level of experiences. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 63, 41-48. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.024 google scholar
17. Herrero-Fernândez, D., Maüa-Guerrero, R., Silvano-Chaparro, L., Merino, L., & Jenchura E. C. (2016). Risky behavior in young adult pedestrians: Personality determinants, correlates with risk perception, and gender differences. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 36, 14-24. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2015.11.007 google scholar
18. Lawton, R., Parker, D., Manstead, A. S. R., & Stradling, S. G. (1997). The role of affect in predicting social behaviours: The case of road traffic violations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1258-1276. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01805.x google scholar
19. Lefever, S., Dal, M., & Matthiasdottir, A. (2007). Online data collection in academic research: Advantages and limitations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 574-582. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00638.x google scholar
20. Martinussen, L. M., M0ller, M., & Prato, C. G. (2014). Assessing the relationship between the Driver Behavior Questionnaire and the Driver Skill Inventory: Revealing sub-groups of drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 26, 82-91. doi:10.1016/j. trf.2014.06.008 google scholar
21. McIlroy, R. C., Plant, K. L., Jikyong, U., Hoâi, N. V., Bunyasi, B., Kokwaro, G. O., ... & Stanton, N. A. (2019). Vulnerable road users in low-, middle-, and high-income countries: validation of a pedestrian behaviour questionnaire. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 131, 80-94. doi:10.1016/j. aap.2019.05.027 google scholar
22. Nordfjsrn, T., & Şimşekoğlu, Ö. (2013). The role of cultural factors and attitudes for pedestrian behaviour in an urban Turkish sample. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 21, 181-193. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2013.09.015 google scholar
23. Öz, B., Özkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2013). An investigation of professional drivers: Organizational safety climate, driver behaviours and performance. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology andBehaviour, 16, 81-91. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2012.08.005 google scholar
24. Öz, B., Özkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2014). Trip-focused organizational safety climate: Investigating the relationships with errors, violations and positive driver behaviours in professional driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 26, 361-369. doi:10.1016/j. trf.2014.03.004 google scholar
25. Özkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2005). A new addition to DBQ: Positive Driver Behaviours Scale. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8, 355-368. doi:10.1016/j. trf.2005.04.018 google scholar
26. Özkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2011). Person and environment: Traffic culture. In B. E. Porter (Ed.), Handbook of traffic psychology (pp.179-192). San Diego, CA: Elsevier. google scholar
27. Öztürk, İ., & Özkan, T. (2018). Genç sürücülerde sürücü becerileri ve sürücü davranışları arasındaki ilişki [The relationship between driving skills and driver behaviors among young drivers]. Trafik ve Ulaşım Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 1-15. doi:10.38002/tuad.418260 google scholar
28. Papadimitriou, E. (2016). Towards an integrated approach of pedestrian behaviour and exposure. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 92, 139-152. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.03.022 google scholar
29. Papadimitriou, E., Lasarre, S., & Yannis, G. (2016). Pedestrian risk taking while road crossing: A comparison of observed and declared behaviour. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 43544363. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.357 google scholar
30. Parker, D., & Stradling, S. (2001). Influencing Driver Attitudes and Behaviour: DETR Road Safety Research Report (Report no.17). London: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions. google scholar
31. Qu, W., Zhang, H., Zhao, W., Zhang, K., & Ge, Y. (2016). The effect of cognitive errors, mindfulness, and personality traits on pedestrian behavior in a Chinese sample. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 41, 29-37. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2016.06.009 google scholar
32. Reason, J., Manstead, A., Stradling, S., Baxter, J., & Campbell, K. (1990). Errors and violations on the roads: A real distinction? Ergonomics, 33, 1315-1332. doi:10.1080/00140139008925335 google scholar
33. Scott-Parker, B., Watson, B., King, M. J., & Hyde, M. K. (2014). Young novice drivers and the risky behaviours of parents and friends during the Provisional (intermediate) licence phase: A brief report. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 69, 51-55. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2013.11.016 google scholar
34. Scott-Parker, B., Watson, B., King, M. J., & Hyde, M. K. (2015). “I would have lost the respect of my friends and family if they knew I had bent the road rules”: Parents, peers, and the perilous behaviour of young drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 28, 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2014.10.004 google scholar
35. Shen, B., Qu, W., Ge, Y., Sun, X., & Zhang, K. (2018). The relationship between personalities and self-report positive driving behavior in a Chinese sample. PLoS One, 13(1), e0190746. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0190746 google scholar
36. Solmazer, G., Azık, D., Fındık, G., Üzümcüoğlu, Y., Ersan, Ö., Kaçan, B., ... & Pashkevich, M. (2020). Cross-cultural differences in pedestrian behaviors in relation to values: A comparison of five countries. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 138, 105459. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105459 google scholar
37. Stephens, A. N., & Fitzharris, M. (2016). Validation of the Driver Behaviour Questionnaire in a representative sample of drivers in Australia. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 86, 186-198. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2015.10.030 google scholar
38. Sümer, N., Lajunen, T., & Özkan, T. (2002, 8-12 May). Sürücü davranışlarının kaza riskindeki rolü: İhlaller ve hatalar [The role of driver behaviours at the risk of accident: Violations and errors]. Traffic and Road Safety International Congress, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara, Turkey. google scholar
39. Şimşekoğlu, Ö. (2015). How do attitudes, personality traits, and driver behaviors relate to pedestrian behaviors?: A Turkish case. Traffic Injury Prevention, 16(1), 84-89. doi:10.1080/15389588.2014. 880785 google scholar
40. Şimşekoğlu, Ö., Nordfjsm, T., Zavareh, M. F., Hezaveh, A. M., Mamdoohi, A. R., & Rundmo, T. (2013). Risk perceptions, fatalism and driver behaviors in Turkey and Iran. Safety Science, 59, 187-192. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2013.05.014 google scholar
41. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed). Northridge, CA: Pearson. google scholar
42. Taubman-Ben-Ari, O., & Shay, E. (2012). The association between risky driver and pedestrian behaviors: The case of Ultra-Orthodox Jewish road users. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 15, 188-195. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2011.12.005 google scholar
43. Taubman-Ben-Ari, O., Eherenfreund-Hager, A., & Prato, C. G. (2016). The value of self-report measures as indicators of driving behaviors among young drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 39, 33-42. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2016.03.005 google scholar
44. Tom, A., & Granie, M. A. (2011). Gender differences in pedestrian rule compliance and visual search at signalized and unsignalized crossroads. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43, 1794-1801. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.012 google scholar
45. Ulleberg, P., & Rundmo, T. (2003). Personality, attitudes and risk perception as predictors of risky driving behaviour among young drivers. Safety Science, 41(5), 427-443. doi:10.1016/S0925-7535(01)00077-7 google scholar
46. Üzümcüoğlu, Y., & Özkan, T. (2019). Traffic climate and driver behaviors: Explicit and implicit measures. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 62, 805-818. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2019.03.016 google scholar
47. Üzümcüoğlu, Y., Özkan, T., Wu, C., & Zhang, H. (2019). How drivers perceive traffic? How they behave in traffic of Turkey and China?. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 64, 463-471. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2019.06.006 google scholar
48. World Health Organization (2018). Global status report on road safety 2018. Retrieved from: https:// www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/road_safety_status/2018/en/ google scholar
49. Xu, J., Ge, Y., Qu, W., Sun, X., & Zhang, K. (2018). The mediating effect of traffic safety climate between pedestrian inconvenience and pedestrian behavior. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 119, 155-161. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2018.07.020 google scholar
50. Xu, J., Liu, J., Qu, W., Ge, Y., Sun, X., & Zhang, K. (2018a). Comparison of pedestrian behaviors between drivers and non-drivers in Chinese sample. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 58, 1053-1060. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.05.034 google scholar
51. Yıldırım, Z. (2007). Religiousness, conservatism and their relationship with traffic behaviours. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey. google scholar
52. Yılmaz, Ş., Öz, B., & Özkan, T. (2019) Profesyonel sürücülükte sürücü davranışlarına yönelik nitel bir çalışma [A qualitative study of driving behaviors of professional driving]. Trafik ve Ulaşım Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(1), 51-65. doi:10.38002/tuad.525441 google scholar