The Syntactic Structure of the Persian Verbal Complement Clause

Öz

The verbal complement clause is a principal element of sentence structure that cannot be omitted. A major category of potential complications is elicited by the structural positioning of clausal complements. The determiner phrase embedded complementizer argument is preverbally base generated. In the case of the resistance principle, the tensed (bare) clausal complements must not occupy a cased marked position at some point of derivation. Thus, the bare complementizer phrase argument is positioned to the right of the verb, and the head verb encompasses different properties. This article examines the topicalization of the complement clause, the topicalizing of the constituent verbal (bare) complement clause, the appearance of the topic marker “ra” as well as the case marker “ra”, and two types of the pronominal enclitic, one base generated and the other a copy of the moved constituent. The study demonstrates the Persian word order mix, the head parameter, and the discourse status of “ra” and “ke”. This study uses data analysis to investigate in some detail the relationship between information structure and grammatical associations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Persian language
• Verbal complement clause
• Topicalization
• Syntax
• Clitic

Farsça Fiilimsi Yan Tümcenin Sözdizimsel Yapısı

Öz

Fiilimsi yan tümce cümle yapısının ayrılamayan temel bir ögesidir. Söz dizimi çözümünde yan tümcenin cümledeki yeri her zaman tartışmalı bir konu olmuştur. Bu konu, Farsça gibi fiili sonda gelen dillerde fazla sorun oluşturur. Bu yan tümce temel cümledeki fiilin sonunda türer ve temel cümledeki fiil ona hakimdir; yapısal aşamada temel cümle diziliminden sonra yan tümce başlamaktadır. Bu nedenle “fiilimsi yan tümce” adını alır ve temel cümledeki fiil farklı özelliklere sahiptir. Bu araştırmada, fiilimsi yan tümcenin dışa kaydırma ile iki tür nesne belirleyicisi (ra) ve özne belirleyicisi (ra)nın cümledeki konumları ele alınmıştır. Ayrıca Farsça işlevsel esnek gösteren öge sözdiziminin “ra” ve “ki”li yan tümcelerde dizim durumu da ele alınmış ve örnek sözdizim cümleleriyle analizler yapılıp dilbilgisi ile çözüm yapısı arasındaki ilişkiler ayrıntılı olarak incelenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Farsça
• Fiilimsi yan tümce
• Dışa kaydırma kuralı
• Sözdizim
• Biçimce

ساخت نحوی بند متممی فعلی فارسی

Öz

بند متمم فعلی جزء عناصر اجباری و غیرقابل حذف جمله است. این بند دارای جایگاه اشتقاق در پایه پسافعلی و در نتیجه هسته فعلی مسلط بر آن دارای ویژگی-های متفاوتی است. در این پژوهش به مسئله ی » را « ی مفعولی و » را « امکان مبتداسازی کل ساخت متممی فعلی به ابتدای جمله و حضور دو نوع مبتدایی و نیز حضور دو نوع بست واژه اشتقاق در پایه و واژه-بست حاصل حرکت در های ساخت مرکب مبتداشده، پرداخته می-شود و نشان خواهیم داد زبان فارسی وقتی در فضای کمینه-گرایی کار می-کند مسائلی را برای نظریه کمینه-گرایی پیش می-آورد. زیرا هنوز کمینه-گرایی، در بحث ساختار ی مبتدا پس از اعمال » را « آمیخته، پارامتر هسته، نقض شرط همجواری در حرکت-ها و نیز حضور فرایند مبتداسازی بر ساخت متممی، نمی-تواند به تنهایی برای تبیین داده-های زبان فارسی تحلیلی کارآمد و کامل باشد و از عهده تبیین آنها بربیاید. از ای نرو لزوم رویکردی تعاملی یا وجود بخشی به نام ساخت اطلاع در مدل زایشی ضروری است تا بتواند حرکت-های سبکی، انگیزه حرکت-ها را سامان بدهد و پاسخگوی پیچیدگی-های زبانی همچون فارسی باشد. یعنی بدون در نظرگرفتن چنین رویکرد -تعاملی نمی-توان درباره وابستگی فارسی نگاه کمینه-گرایی داشت.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• زبان فارسی
• بند متممی فعلی
• مبتداسازی
• نحو، واژ هبست

Kaynakça

1. Ahangar, Abbas Ali. “A VP Shell Analysis of Persian Verb Phrase Based on the Minimalist Program”. Language and Linguistics. Volume 4, Issue 7, (2009): 1-25.
2. Ahangar, Abbas Ali. “Analysis of the Verbal Phrase Core of Persian Language Based on the Minimalist Program”, Journal of Lyrical Literature Researches (Journal of Persian Language and Literature). Volume 6, Issue 10, (2008): 5-26.
3. Anushe, Mazdak. “Topicalization and Focus Movement in Persian A Feature-Based Approach”. Volume 1, Issue 1, (2010): 1-28.
4. Baltin, Mark. “Extraposision”. The Syntax of Interpretation. In M. Everaert and H. Van Riemsdijk (Eds), 237- 271. The Blackwell companion to syntax volumes I-V, Blackwell publishing Ltd. 2006.
5. Barbiers, Sjef, “The Syntax of Interpretation”. PhD. Dissertation, Leiden University. 1995.
6. Chomsky, Avram Noam. “Some empirical issues in the theory of transformational grammar”. In S. Peters (Ed.), Goals of linguistic theory. Englewood cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. 1972: 63-130.
7. DabirMoghaddam, Mohammad. Studies in Persian linguistics: selected articles. Tehran: Markaz Nashre Daneshgahi Publications. 2014.
8. Darzi, Ali. “Word order, NP-movement, and opacity condition in Persian”, PhD. dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana. 1996.

9. Darzi, Ali. Syntactic argumentation. Tehran: SAMT Publications. 2007.
10. Fillmore, Charles J. “The case for case”. Universals in Linguistic Theory. E. Bach and R. Harms. New York, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. 1968: 1–89.
11. Gholamalizadeh, Khosrow. The structure of Persian Language. Tehran: Ehya Ketab Publications. 1995.
12. Karimi, Simin. a Minimalist Approach to Scrambling: Evidence from Persian. Germany: De Gruyter Mouton. 2005.
13. Larson, Richard K. “On the Double Object Construction”, Linguistics Inquiry. Issue 19, (1988): 335-391.
14. Miremadi, Ali. Persian syntax: a government and binding theory-based analysis. Tehran: SAMT Publications. 1994.
15. Radford, Andrew. Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2004.
16. Rizzy, Luigi. “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery”, Proceedings of the XVIth International Congress of Linguists. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Amesterdam: Elsevier science, (1997):281-337.
17. Soheili-Isfahani, Abulghasem. “Noun Phrase Complementation in Persian”. PhD Dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Campaign. 1976.
18. Tabibzadeh, Omid. “Subordinate Clause and Two Kinds of Compliments in Persian”, The proceeding of LSI’s First Conference. Tehran: Linguistics Society of Iran. (2007): 69-78.