Access Opportunities of Earthquake Victims to Distance Education during the Covid-19 Pandemic

Yıl 2023, , 155 - 166, 30.06.2023

Tuba Gün Çıngı

https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2023.43.1.0030A

Öz

The Covid-19 pandemic has caused extensive changes in education, as in other fields, and the distance education system has been widely implemented as an alternative almost all over the world. However, these new conditions are not equal for everyone; the position of certain social groups has become more disadvantageous in this process. One of these groups is earthquake victims. This study aims to reveal the possibilities and practices of students who lost their homes due to an earthquake and lived in a container city during the pandemic to participate in distance education. The research was carried out in the province of Elazig, which experienced an earthquake in January 2020 and focuses on the access of students in primary and secondary school to distance education. A qualitative research method was adopted in this research, and interviews were conducted with 11 people who are teachers and parents of students. The findings revealed that students are in a disadvantageous position regarding physical access, ownership, skills, and usage opportunities in accessing the digital equipment and environments required by distance education. Students are mainly unable to access technological tools and the Internet. Students’ age, economic and cultural capital, inadequacies caused by physical access restrictions, and psychological, social, economic, and spatial problems triggered by earthquakes and pandemics have greatly restricted their ability and opportunities to access distance education. The study is essential in revealing that students’ multiple disadvantaged positions negatively affect their distance education participation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Digital inequalities, Distance education, Covid-19 Pandemic, Earthquake victims, Elazıg

Kaynakça

• Arun, Ö., & Elmas, Ç. (2020). Türkiye’de dijital eşitsizliğin toplumsal kökenleri. In M. Fiğan & Y. D. Özdemir (Eds.), Dijital kültür, dijital eşitsizlikler ve yaşlanma (pp. 115-135). Alternatif Bilişim Derneği. google scholar
• Attewell, P. (2001). Comment: The first and second digital divides. Sociology of Education, 74(3), 252-259. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673277 google scholar
• Attride-Sterling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385-405. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F146879410100100307 google scholar
• Binark, M. (2015). Yeni medya çalışmaları özel sayısı hakkında: Neden? Folklor&Edebiyat, 21(83), 9-18. google scholar
• https://www.academia.edu/17281625/Yeni_Medya_Çalışmaları_Özel_SayısıHakkında_Neden?from=cover_page google scholar
• Bonfadelli, H. (2002). The internet and knowledge gaps: A theoretical and empirical investigation. European Journal of Communication, 17(1), 65-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323102017001607 google scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Sage. google scholar
• Chandler, D., & Munday, R. (2011). A dictionary of media and communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2011). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education. google scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage. google scholar
• Curtis, S., Gesler, W., Smith, G., & Washburn, S. (2000). Approaches to sampling and case selection in qualitative research: Examples in the geography of health. Social Science & Medicine, 50(7-8), 1001-1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00350-0 google scholar
• Cutter, S. L. (1996). Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Progress in Human Geography, 20(4), 529-539. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F030913259602000407 google scholar
• Denzin. N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1-32). Sage. google scholar
• DiMaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2001). From the ‘digital divide’ to ‘digital inequality’: Studying Internet use as penetration increases. Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, 4(1), 1-23. https://digitalinclusion.typepad.com/digital_inclusion/documentos/digitalinequality.pdf google scholar
• DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, C., & Shafer, S. (2004). Digital inequality: From unequal access to differentiated use. In K. Neckerman (Ed.), Social inequality (pp. 355-400). Russell Sage Foundation. google scholar
• Guggenheim, M. (2014). Introduction: Disasters as politics - politics as disasters. The Sociological Review, 62(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1467-954X.12121 google scholar
• Halford, S., & Savage, M. (2010). Reconceptualizing digital social inequality. Information, Communitaiın & Society, 13(7), 937-955. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2010.499956 google scholar
• Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: differences in people’s online skills. First Monday, 7(4). https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/942/864 google scholar
• Idris, M., Hussain, S., & Ahmad, N. (2020). Relationship between parents’ education and their children’s academic achievement. Journal of Arts & Social Sciences, 7(2), 82-92. https://doi.org/10.46662/jass-vol7-iss2-2020(82-92) google scholar
• Istanbul Technical University. (2020). An overview of the state of digital development around the world based on ITU data. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Dashboards/Pages/Digital-Development.aspx google scholar
• Lee, J. S., & Bowen, N. K. (2006). Parent involvement, cultural capital, and the achievement gap among elementary school children. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 193-218. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F00028312043002193 google scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Collins, K. M. (2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. Qualitative Report, 12(2), 281-316. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR12-2/onwuegbuzie2.pdf google scholar
• Özsoy, D. (2020). Dijital bölünme düzeylerine dair literatür analizi. In M. Fiğan & Y. D. Özdemir (Eds.), Dijital Kültür, Dijital Eşitsizlikler ve Yaşlanma (pp. 11-24). Alternatif Bilişim Derneği. google scholar
• Ragnedda, M., & Ruiu, M. (2017) Social capital and the three levels of digital divide. In M. Regnedda & G. Muschert (Eds.), Theorizing digital divides (pp. 21-34). Routledge. google scholar
• Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education. (2020). Bakan Selçuk, koronavirüse karşı eğitim alanında alınan tedbirleri açıkladı. http://www.meb.gov.tr/bakan-selcuk-koronaviruse-karsi-egitim-alaninda-alinan-tedbirleri-acikladi/haber/20497/tr google scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6 (3), 341-362.https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804042519 google scholar
• Sezgin, S., & Fırat, M. (2020). Covid-19 pandemisinde uzaktan eğitime geçiş ve djital uçurum tehlikesi. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(4), 37-54. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/auad/issue/57638/767299 google scholar
• Suna, H. E., Tanberkan, H., Gur, B. S., Perc, M., & Ozer, M. (2020). Socioeconomic status and school type as predictors of academic achievement. Journal of Economy, Culture and Society, 61(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0034 google scholar
• Sütlüoğlu, T. (2020). Orta yaş ve üzerindeki bireylerde djital eşitsizliğin görünümleri: Erişim eşitsizlikleri ve kullanım farklılıkları. In M. Fiğan & Y. D. Özdemir (Eds.), Djital kültür, djital eşitsizlikler ve yaşlanma (pp. 215-246). Alternatif Bilişim Derneği. google scholar
• UNESCO. (2020). Startling digital divides in distance learning emerge. https://en.unesco.org/news/startling-%20digital-divides-distance-learning-emerge google scholar
• UNICEF. (2020). Covid -19 and children. https://data.unicef.org/covid-19-and-children/ google scholar
• van Deursen, A., & J., Helsper, E. J. (2015). Third-level digital divide: Who benefits most from being online? Communication and Information Technologies Annual: Digital Distinctions and Inequalities Studies in Media and Communications, 10, 29-53. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002 google scholar
• Van Djk, J. A. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Sage. google scholar
• Van Djk, J. A., & Hacker, K. (2003). The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. The Information Society, 19(4), 315-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240309487 google scholar
• Varışlı, B.(2021). Pandemi sürecinde eğitimin dönüşümü: Çevrimiçi eğitimin sosyolojik yansımaları. Avrasya Uluslararası Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9(26), 237-249. google scholar
• Yazgan, Ç. Ü. (2022). Attitudes and interaction practices towards distance education during the pandemic. Education and Information Technolo-gies, 27(4), 5349-5364. google scholar
• Yıldırım, A., & Simsek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık. google scholar
• Yıldız, A., Vural, R. A. (2020). Covid-19 pandemisi ve derinleşen eğitim eşitsizlikleri. Covid-19 Pandemisi Altıncı Ay Değerlendirme Raporu. google scholar
• TTB. https://www.ttb.org.tr/kutuphane/covid19-rapor_6/covid19-rapor_6_Part64.pdf google scholar