Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

How do the Characteristics of Gold Mining Projects Affect the Level of Resistance among Local Communities? A Comparative Study

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 42 Sayı: 2, 493 - 524, 30.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2022.42.2.0061

Öz

In this study, we aim to understand how the factors associated with gold mining projects affect the level of resistance of local communities against gold mining. Unlike previous research that claimed that the objectively observable features of mining projects directly affect the level of resistance, we argue from a post-structuralist perspective that objective features can affect resistance only as they are articulated in anti-mining and pro-mining discourses. Based on this premise, we compare the features of the Artvin-Cerrattepe, Eşme-Kışladağ, Menderes-Efemçukuru and İliç-Çöpler projects between 1994 and 2010 by associating them with anti-mining and pro-mining discourses as well as resistance levels. Our comparison shows that the features of projects, such as the mining company’s country of origin, the use of cyanide, the value of the mine for the company, the proximity of the mining site to settlement areas, its topographic location, and the income level of locals that the mining site directly impacts, affect the level of resistance only through the meanings that they take in the anti-mining and pro-mining discourses. Our study also reveals that the resistance level is unrelated to the kind of mineral, mining quarry, or grade. Our study contributes to the relevant literature by offering both a theoretical framework that relates the characteristics of mining projects to the level of local resistance in a novel way, as well as three influential project characteristics neglected in the literature – the mining company’s country of origin, the value of the mine for the company, and the mining site’s topographic location.

Kaynakça

  • Akdemir, Ö. (2011). Anadolu’nun ‘altın’daki tehlike: Kışladağ’a ağıt. Evrensel Basım Yayın. google scholar
  • Altın Madencileri Derneği. (2009). Türkiye’de altın madenciliğini engellemeye yönelik asılsız iddialar ve gerçekler. http://altinmadencileri.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/asilsiz_iddialar_mail_ sirali.pdf google scholar
  • Arellano-Yanguas, J. (2012). Mining and conflict in Peru: Sowing the minerals, reaping a hail of stones. In A. Bebbington (Eds.), Social conflict, economic development, and extractive industry: Evidence from South America (pp. 89-111). Routledge. google scholar
  • Arsel, M. (2005). The Bergama imbroglio. In F. Adaman & M. Arsel (Eds.), Environmentalism in Turkey: Between democracy and development (pp. 263- 292). Ashgate. google scholar
  • Bebbington, A., Hinojosa, L., Bebbington, D. H., Burneo, M. L., & Warnaars, Z. (2008). Contention and ambiguity: Mining and the possibilities of development. Development and Change, 39(6), 887-914. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2008.00517.x google scholar
  • Çoban, A. (2004). Community-based ecological resistance: The Bergama movement in Turkey. Environmental Politics, 13(2), 438-460. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964401042000209658 google scholar
  • Conde, M., & Le Billon, P. (2017). Why do some communities resist mining projects while others do not? The Extractive Industries and Society, 4(3), 681-697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. exis.2017.04.009 google scholar
  • della Porta, D., & Andretta, M. (2002). Changing forms of environmentalism in Italy: The protest campaign against the high-speed railway system. Mobilization, 7(1), 59-77. google scholar
  • della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (1999). Social movements: An Introduction.Blackwell. google scholar
  • della Porta, D., & Rucht, D. (2002). The dynamics of environmental campaigns. Mobilization, 7(1), 1-14. google scholar
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557 google scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., & Graebner M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.5465/ amj.2007.24160888 google scholar
  • Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. Tavistock. google scholar
  • Jenkins, H., & Yakovleva, N. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(3-4), 271-284. google scholar
  • Laclau, E. (1990). New reflections on the revolution of our time.Verso. google scholar
  • Laclau, E. (2004). Glimpsing the future. In S. Crtichley, & O. Marchart (Eds.), Laclau: A critical reader (pp. 279-328). Routledge. google scholar
  • Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics.Verso. google scholar
  • Mannarini, T., Roccato, M., Fedi, A., & Rovere, A. (2009). Six factors fostering protest: Predicting participation in locally unwanted land uses movements. Political Psychology, 30(6), 895-920. google scholar
  • Martinez Alier, J. (2003). The environmentalism of the poor: A study of ecological conflicts and valuation. Edward Elgar Publishing. google scholar
  • McAdam, D. (1982). Political process and the development of black insurgency 1930-1970. University of Chicago Press. google scholar
  • McAdam, D. (1996). Conceptual origins, current problems, future directions. In D. McAdam, J. McCarthy & M. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements (pp. 23-40). Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches(7th eds.). Pearson. google scholar
  • Öncü, A., & Koçan, G. (2001).Democratic citizenship movements in the context of multilayered governance: The case of the Bergama movement. New Perspectives on Turkey, 26, 29-57. google scholar
  • Özen, H. (2009). Located locally, disseminated nationally: The Bergama struggle. Environmental Politics, 18(3), 408-423. google scholar
  • Özen, H., & Özen, Ş. (2011a). Interactions in and between strategic action fields: A comparative analysis of two environmental conflicts in the gold-mining field in Turkey. Organization & Environment, 24(4), 343-363. google scholar
  • Özen, H., & Özen, Ş. (2011b). Toplumsal hareket ve örgüt kuramları açısından Türkiye’de altın madenciliği alanındaki çatışmaların incelenmesi. TÜBİTAK 1001 Projesi Raporu, SOBAG Proje No: 109K143. google scholar
  • Özen, H., & Özen, Ş. (2017). What makes locals protesters? A discursive analysis of two cases in gold-mining industry in Turkey. World Development, 90, 256-268. google scholar
  • Özen, H., & Özen, Ş. (2018). What comes after repression? The hegemonic contestation in the gold-mining field in Turkey. Geoforum, 88(1), 1-9. google scholar
  • Özen, Ş., & Özen, H. (2009). Peasants against MNCs and the state: The role of Bergama struggle in the institutional change of the gold mining field in Turkey. Organization, 16(4), 547-573. google scholar
  • Rootes, C. (2007). Acting locally: The character contexts and significance of local environmental mobilisations. Environmental Politics, 16(5), 722-741. google scholar
  • Rowley, T. J., & Moldoveanu, M. (2003). When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy Management Review, 28(2), 204-219. google scholar
  • Sakaryalı, M. (2011). Kışladağ’dan mektup var. Yeni İnsan Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Shriver, T. E., & Kennedy, D. K. (2005). Contested environmental hazards and conflict over relocation. Rural Sociology, 70(4), 491-513. google scholar
  • Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 729-753. google scholar
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory, procedures and techniques. Sage. google scholar
  • Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in movement: Social movement and contentious politics. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Tilly, C. (2004). Social movements, 1768-2004. Paradigm Publishers. google scholar
  • Urkidi, L., & Walter, M. (2011). Dimensions of environmental justice in anti-gold mining movements in Latin America. Geoforum, 42(6), 683-695. google scholar
  • Yaşın, Z. T. (2019). Contextualizing the rise of environmental movements in Turkey: Two instances of anti-gold mining resistance. In O. İnal & E. Turhan (Eds.), Transforming socio-Natures in Turkey (pp. 137-216). Routledge. google scholar
  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage. google scholar

Altın Madeni Projelerinin Özellikleri Yerel Toplulukların Direniş Düzeyini Nasıl Etkiler? Karşılaştırmalı Bir Araştırma

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 42 Sayı: 2, 493 - 524, 30.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2022.42.2.0061

Öz

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’deki altın madeni projelerinin özelliklerinin yerel toplulukların madene karşı direniş düzeyini nasıl etkilediğini araştırmayı amaçlamaktayız. Maden projelerinin nesnel bir şekilde gözlemlenebilir özelliklerinin direniş düzeyini doğrudan etkilediğini iddia eden nesnelci anlayışın egemen olduğu mevcut literatürün aksine, post-yapısalcı bir perspektiften nesnel özelliklerin ancak maden karşıtı ve yanlısı söylemde kurulduğu biçimiyle direnişi etkileyebileceğini iddia etmekteyiz. Bu doğrultuda, Artvin-Cerrattepe, Eşme-Kışladağ, Menderes-Efemçukuru ve İliç-Çöpler projelerinin 1994-2010 yılları arasında sahip oldukları özellikleri, hem maden yanlısı ve karşıtı grupların söylemleriyle hem de direniş düzeyleriyle ilişkilendirerek karşılaştırmaktayız. Bu karşılaştırmalı analiz sonucunda, projelerin özelliklerinden maden şirketinin menşei, üretim sürecinde siyanür kullanımı, madenin şirket için değeri, yerleşim yerlerine mesafesi, topoğrafik konumu, madenden etkilenen yöre halkının gelir düzeyinin, yöre halkının madene karşı direnişini hem protesto söylemi hem de maden yanlısı söylem aracılığıyla etkilediğini gösteriyoruz. Diğer yandan madenin türü, ocak türü ve tenör gibi özelliklerinin direnişle ilişkilerinin olmadığını ortaya koyuyoruz. Çalışmamız, ilgili literatüre bir yandan maden projelerinin özelliklerini direniş düzeyiyle ilişkilendiren yeni bir teorik çerçeve sunarak, diğer yandan maden şirketinin menşei, madenin şirket için değeri ve madenin topoğrafik konumu gibi literatürde değinilmeyen proje özelliklerinin de çatışan söylemlerde yer alarak direniş düzeyini etkilediğini göstererek katkıda bulunmaktadır.

Kaynakça

  • Akdemir, Ö. (2011). Anadolu’nun ‘altın’daki tehlike: Kışladağ’a ağıt. Evrensel Basım Yayın. google scholar
  • Altın Madencileri Derneği. (2009). Türkiye’de altın madenciliğini engellemeye yönelik asılsız iddialar ve gerçekler. http://altinmadencileri.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/asilsiz_iddialar_mail_ sirali.pdf google scholar
  • Arellano-Yanguas, J. (2012). Mining and conflict in Peru: Sowing the minerals, reaping a hail of stones. In A. Bebbington (Eds.), Social conflict, economic development, and extractive industry: Evidence from South America (pp. 89-111). Routledge. google scholar
  • Arsel, M. (2005). The Bergama imbroglio. In F. Adaman & M. Arsel (Eds.), Environmentalism in Turkey: Between democracy and development (pp. 263- 292). Ashgate. google scholar
  • Bebbington, A., Hinojosa, L., Bebbington, D. H., Burneo, M. L., & Warnaars, Z. (2008). Contention and ambiguity: Mining and the possibilities of development. Development and Change, 39(6), 887-914. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2008.00517.x google scholar
  • Çoban, A. (2004). Community-based ecological resistance: The Bergama movement in Turkey. Environmental Politics, 13(2), 438-460. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964401042000209658 google scholar
  • Conde, M., & Le Billon, P. (2017). Why do some communities resist mining projects while others do not? The Extractive Industries and Society, 4(3), 681-697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. exis.2017.04.009 google scholar
  • della Porta, D., & Andretta, M. (2002). Changing forms of environmentalism in Italy: The protest campaign against the high-speed railway system. Mobilization, 7(1), 59-77. google scholar
  • della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (1999). Social movements: An Introduction.Blackwell. google scholar
  • della Porta, D., & Rucht, D. (2002). The dynamics of environmental campaigns. Mobilization, 7(1), 1-14. google scholar
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557 google scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., & Graebner M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.5465/ amj.2007.24160888 google scholar
  • Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. Tavistock. google scholar
  • Jenkins, H., & Yakovleva, N. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(3-4), 271-284. google scholar
  • Laclau, E. (1990). New reflections on the revolution of our time.Verso. google scholar
  • Laclau, E. (2004). Glimpsing the future. In S. Crtichley, & O. Marchart (Eds.), Laclau: A critical reader (pp. 279-328). Routledge. google scholar
  • Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics.Verso. google scholar
  • Mannarini, T., Roccato, M., Fedi, A., & Rovere, A. (2009). Six factors fostering protest: Predicting participation in locally unwanted land uses movements. Political Psychology, 30(6), 895-920. google scholar
  • Martinez Alier, J. (2003). The environmentalism of the poor: A study of ecological conflicts and valuation. Edward Elgar Publishing. google scholar
  • McAdam, D. (1982). Political process and the development of black insurgency 1930-1970. University of Chicago Press. google scholar
  • McAdam, D. (1996). Conceptual origins, current problems, future directions. In D. McAdam, J. McCarthy & M. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements (pp. 23-40). Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches(7th eds.). Pearson. google scholar
  • Öncü, A., & Koçan, G. (2001).Democratic citizenship movements in the context of multilayered governance: The case of the Bergama movement. New Perspectives on Turkey, 26, 29-57. google scholar
  • Özen, H. (2009). Located locally, disseminated nationally: The Bergama struggle. Environmental Politics, 18(3), 408-423. google scholar
  • Özen, H., & Özen, Ş. (2011a). Interactions in and between strategic action fields: A comparative analysis of two environmental conflicts in the gold-mining field in Turkey. Organization & Environment, 24(4), 343-363. google scholar
  • Özen, H., & Özen, Ş. (2011b). Toplumsal hareket ve örgüt kuramları açısından Türkiye’de altın madenciliği alanındaki çatışmaların incelenmesi. TÜBİTAK 1001 Projesi Raporu, SOBAG Proje No: 109K143. google scholar
  • Özen, H., & Özen, Ş. (2017). What makes locals protesters? A discursive analysis of two cases in gold-mining industry in Turkey. World Development, 90, 256-268. google scholar
  • Özen, H., & Özen, Ş. (2018). What comes after repression? The hegemonic contestation in the gold-mining field in Turkey. Geoforum, 88(1), 1-9. google scholar
  • Özen, Ş., & Özen, H. (2009). Peasants against MNCs and the state: The role of Bergama struggle in the institutional change of the gold mining field in Turkey. Organization, 16(4), 547-573. google scholar
  • Rootes, C. (2007). Acting locally: The character contexts and significance of local environmental mobilisations. Environmental Politics, 16(5), 722-741. google scholar
  • Rowley, T. J., & Moldoveanu, M. (2003). When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy Management Review, 28(2), 204-219. google scholar
  • Sakaryalı, M. (2011). Kışladağ’dan mektup var. Yeni İnsan Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Shriver, T. E., & Kennedy, D. K. (2005). Contested environmental hazards and conflict over relocation. Rural Sociology, 70(4), 491-513. google scholar
  • Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 729-753. google scholar
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory, procedures and techniques. Sage. google scholar
  • Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in movement: Social movement and contentious politics. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Tilly, C. (2004). Social movements, 1768-2004. Paradigm Publishers. google scholar
  • Urkidi, L., & Walter, M. (2011). Dimensions of environmental justice in anti-gold mining movements in Latin America. Geoforum, 42(6), 683-695. google scholar
  • Yaşın, Z. T. (2019). Contextualizing the rise of environmental movements in Turkey: Two instances of anti-gold mining resistance. In O. İnal & E. Turhan (Eds.), Transforming socio-Natures in Turkey (pp. 137-216). Routledge. google scholar
  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage. google scholar
Toplam 41 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Sosyoloji
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Şükrü Özen Bu kişi benim 0000-0003-3618-3171

Hayriye Özen Bu kişi benim 0000-0001-5476-176X

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Aralık 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022 Cilt: 42 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Özen, Ş., & Özen, H. (2022). Altın Madeni Projelerinin Özellikleri Yerel Toplulukların Direniş Düzeyini Nasıl Etkiler? Karşılaştırmalı Bir Araştırma. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, 42(2), 493-524. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2022.42.2.0061
AMA Özen Ş, Özen H. Altın Madeni Projelerinin Özellikleri Yerel Toplulukların Direniş Düzeyini Nasıl Etkiler? Karşılaştırmalı Bir Araştırma. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology. Aralık 2022;42(2):493-524. doi:10.26650/SJ.2022.42.2.0061
Chicago Özen, Şükrü, ve Hayriye Özen. “Altın Madeni Projelerinin Özellikleri Yerel Toplulukların Direniş Düzeyini Nasıl Etkiler? Karşılaştırmalı Bir Araştırma”. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology 42, sy. 2 (Aralık 2022): 493-524. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2022.42.2.0061.
EndNote Özen Ş, Özen H (01 Aralık 2022) Altın Madeni Projelerinin Özellikleri Yerel Toplulukların Direniş Düzeyini Nasıl Etkiler? Karşılaştırmalı Bir Araştırma. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology 42 2 493–524.
IEEE Ş. Özen ve H. Özen, “Altın Madeni Projelerinin Özellikleri Yerel Toplulukların Direniş Düzeyini Nasıl Etkiler? Karşılaştırmalı Bir Araştırma”, İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, c. 42, sy. 2, ss. 493–524, 2022, doi: 10.26650/SJ.2022.42.2.0061.
ISNAD Özen, Şükrü - Özen, Hayriye. “Altın Madeni Projelerinin Özellikleri Yerel Toplulukların Direniş Düzeyini Nasıl Etkiler? Karşılaştırmalı Bir Araştırma”. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology 42/2 (Aralık 2022), 493-524. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2022.42.2.0061.
JAMA Özen Ş, Özen H. Altın Madeni Projelerinin Özellikleri Yerel Toplulukların Direniş Düzeyini Nasıl Etkiler? Karşılaştırmalı Bir Araştırma. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology. 2022;42:493–524.
MLA Özen, Şükrü ve Hayriye Özen. “Altın Madeni Projelerinin Özellikleri Yerel Toplulukların Direniş Düzeyini Nasıl Etkiler? Karşılaştırmalı Bir Araştırma”. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, c. 42, sy. 2, 2022, ss. 493-24, doi:10.26650/SJ.2022.42.2.0061.
Vancouver Özen Ş, Özen H. Altın Madeni Projelerinin Özellikleri Yerel Toplulukların Direniş Düzeyini Nasıl Etkiler? Karşılaştırmalı Bir Araştırma. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology. 2022;42(2):493-524.