KAPİTALİST DEVLET İÇİN POST MODERN BİR ORTA YOL ÖNERİSİ: SOSYAL YATIRIM DEVLETİ

Öz

Refah devletinin yaşadığı finansman krizi sürecinde ortaya çıkan neo-liberal kaygılar, ekonomi ve sosyal koruma arasında yeni denge konumlarının belirlenmesi ihtiyacını gerekli kılmıştır. Bu süreçte geleneksel refah devletini savunan sosyal demokrasi anlayışının zayıf kalması karşısında, neo- liberalizm ve geleneksel refah devleti anlayışı arasında bir orta yol ideolojisi olan üçüncü yola ait sosyal yatırım devleti anlayışı, sosyal ve ekonomik alanı bağdaştıracak yeni bir refah mekanizması ile söz konusu dengenin yeniden kurulabileceğini iddia etmektedir.

Bu makalede, yeni ekonomi ile uyum kaygısı güden post-modern bir refah devleti anlayışının ürünü olan sosyal yatırım devleti kavramı tüm yönleriyle tanıtılmaya çalışılacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Refah Devleti, Geleneksel Sosyal Demokrasi, Neo-liberalizm

Kaynakça

1. Allan, James P. ve Lyle Scruggs, “Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies”, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 48, No. 3, 2004.
2. Aust, Andreas ve Ana Arriba. “Policy Reforms and Discourses in Social Assistance in the 1990s: Towards 'Activation'?”, Unidad de Políticas Comparadas (CSIC) Working Paper, No. 04-11, 2004.
3. Barr, Nicholas. “Economic Theory and the Welfare State: A Survey and Interpretation”, Journal of Economic Literature, V.30, June 1992.
4. Berkel, Rik van ve Iver Hornemann Mİller. “The Concept of Activation”, Rik van Berkel ve Iver Hornemann Mİller (Ed.), Active Social Policies in the EU, İçinde (103-134), Bristol: The Policy Press, 2002.
5. Bernard, Paul ve Guillaume Boucher. “Institutional Competitiveness, Social investment, and Welfare Regimes” Regulation & Governance No.1, 2007.
6. Bonoli, Guiliano. “Social Democratic Party Policies in Europe: Towards A Third Way?”, Guiliano Bonoli, Martin Powell (Ed.), Social Democratic Party Policies in Contemporary Europe İçinde, (197-213), New York: Routledge, 2004.
7. Bonoli, Giuliano ve Martin Powell. “One Third Way or Several”, Jane Lewis ve Rebecca Surrender (Ed.), Welfare State Change, Towards a Third Way?, içinde (47-66), New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.
8. Bradley, David ve Eveleyne Huber, Stephanie Moller, François Nielsen ve John D. Stephens. “Distribution and Redistribution in Postindustrial Democracies”, World Politics, Vol.55, No.2, January 2003.

9. Brettschneider, Antonio. “On the Way to Social Investment? The Normative Recalibration of the German Welfare State”, German Policy Studies, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2008.
10. Chu, Ke-young, Hamid Davoodi ve Sanjeev Gupta. “Income Distribution and Tax and Goverment Social Spending Policies in Developing Countries”, UNU/WIDER Working Papers, No. 214, December 2000.
11. Clasen, Jochen ve Daniel Clegg. “Unemployment Protection and Labour Market Reform in France and Great Britain in the 1990s: Solidarity Versus Activation?”, Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2003.
12. D’Andria, Diego. “The Debate on the Sustainability of Social Spending”, Libera University Internazionale Delgi Studi Sociale, Quaderno No: 157, Ottobre 2008.
13. Dolgof, Ralph. “What Does Social Welfare Produce?”, International Social Work, 42 (3), 1999.
14. Eichhorst, Werner ve Regina Konle-Seidl. “Contingent Convergence: A Comparative Analysis of Activation Policies”, IZA Discussion Paper, No. 3905, December 2008.
15. Esping-Andersen, Gİsta “Altın Çağ Sonrası? Küresel Bir Ekonomi’de Refah Devleti İkilemleri”, Ayşe Buğra ve Çağlar Keyder (drl.), Sosyal Politika Yazıları, İçinde (55-100), 3. Basım, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2008.
16. Esping-Andersen, Gİsta. “Towards the Good Society Once Again?”, Gosta Esping- Andersen,(Ed.), Why We Need a New Welfare State içinde, (1-25), New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
17. Esping-Andersen, Gİsta. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
18. Esping-Andersen, Gİsta. Politics Against Market: The Social Democratic Road to Power, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1988.
19. Esping-Andersen, Gİsta ve Kees van Kersbergen. “Contemporary Research on Social Democracy”, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol.18, 1992.
20. European Commission, Green Paper: Towards Adequate, Sustainable and Safe European Pension Systems, Brussels: 2010.
21. Friendland, Roger ve Jimy Sanders. “Private and Social Wage Expansion in the Advanced Market Economies”, Theory and Society, 1986, Vol. 15.
22. Giddens, Anthony. Üçüncü Yol ve Eleştirileri, Nihat Şad (Çev.), Ankara: Phoenix Yayınevi, 2001.
23. Giddens, Anthony. Üçüncü Yol : Sosyal Demokrasinin Yeniden Dirilişi, Mehmet Özay, (Çev.) İstanbul: Birey Yayıncılık, 2000.
24. Glyn, Andrew. “Aspirations, Constarins and Outcomes”, Andrew Glyn (Ed.), “Social Democracy in Neoliberal Times”, içinde (1-20), 2nd. Edition, New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
25. Gökbunar, Ramazan, Harun Özdemir ve Alparslan Uğur, “Küreselleşme Kıskacındaki Refah Devletinde Sosyal Refah Harcamaları”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 9 (2), 2008.
26. Grauwe, Paul De ve Magdalena Polan. “Globalization and Social Spending”, Pacific Economic Review, 10: 1, 2005.
27. Green-Pedersen, Christoffer ve Kees van Kersbergen and Anton Hemerijck, “Neo- liberalism, the ‘Third Way’ or What? Recent Social Democratic Welfare Policies in Denmark and the Netherlands”, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 8, No. 2, April 2001.
28. Hansen, Henning, P. Hespanha, C. Machado ve R. Berkel. “Inclusion Through Participation? Active Social Policies in the EU and Empirical Observations From Case Studies Into Types of Work”, Rik van Berkel ve Iver Hornemann Mİller (Ed.), Active Social Policies in the EU, İçinde (103-134), Bristol: The Policy Press, 2002.
29. Hicks, Alexander ve Joya Misra. “Two Perspectives on the Welfare State – Political Resources and the Growth of Welfare in Affluent Capitalist Democracies, 1960-1982”, the American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 99, No. 3, November 1993.
30. Hicks, Alexander M. ve Duane H. Swank. “Politics, Institutions, and Welfare Spending in Industrialized Democracies, 1960-82”, American Political Science Review, Vol. 86, No.3, September 1992.
31. Hou, Jingjing. Third Way Reforms: Social Democracy After the Golden Age, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
32. Huber, Evelyne ve John D. Stephens, “The Social Democratic Welfare State”, Andrew Glyn (Ed.), “Social Democracy in Neoliberal Times”, içinde (276- 311), 2nd. Edition, New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
33. Huber, Evelyne ve John D. Stephens, Development and Crises of the Welfare State, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2001.
34. Hudson, John ve Stefan Kühner. “Towards Productive Welfare? A Comparative Analysis of 23 OECD Countries”, Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2009.
35. ILO, Social Protection As a Productive Factor, Geneva, 2005.
36. Iversen, Torben ve Thomas R. Cusack. “The Causes of Welfare State Expansion: Deindustrialization or Globalization?” World Politics, V. 52, N.3, April 2000.
37. Jenson, Jane ve Denis Saint-Martin, “New Routes To Social Cohesion? Citizenship and the Social Investment State”, Canadian Journal of Sociology, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2003.
38. Katz, Ilan ve Gerry Redmond. “Investment In Early Childhood In Australia: International Comparisons and Recent Trends”, Health Sociology Review, Vol. 18, No. 1, June 2009.
39. Kittel, Bernhard ve Herbert Obinger. “Politics Parties, Institutions, and the Dynamics of Social Expenditures in Times of Austerity”, Journal of European Public Policy, 10: 1, February 2003.
40. Korpi, Walter. “Economic Growth and the Welfare State: Leaky Bucket or Irrigation System?”, European Sociological Review, Sept. 1985, Vol. 1, No. 2.
41. Korpi, Walter ve Joakim Palme, “New Politics and Class Politics in the Context of Austarity and Globalization: Welfare State Regress in 18 Countries, 1975- 95”, American Political Science Review, Vol. 97, No. 3, August 2003.
42. Kuo, Chun Chien. “ The Determinants and Sustainability of Social Insurance Spending: A Cross-Country Examination”, (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Kaliforniya Üniversitesi Ekonomi Bölümü), 1999.
43. Lavella, Ashley. The Death of Social Democracy Political Consequences in the 21st Century, Cornwall: Ashgate Publishing, 2008.
44. Lindbeck, Asar. “ An Essay on Welfare State Dynamics”, Cesifo Working Paper No: 976, July 2003.
45. Lindert, Peter H. “What Limits Social Spending?”, Explorations in Economic History, Vol. 33, 1996.
46. Lister, Ruth. “The Third Way’s Social Investment State”, Jane Lewis ve Rebecca Surrender (Ed.), Welfare State Change, Towards a Third Way?, içinde (47-66), New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.
47. Lund, Brian. “Major, Blair and the Third Way in Social Policy”, Social Policy & Administration, Vol. 42, No. 1, February 2008.
48. Mello, Luiz de ve Erwin R. Tiongson. “Income Inequality and Redistributive Goverment Spending”, Public Finance Review, Vol. 34, No. 3, May 2006.
49. Midgley, James ve Kwong-leung Tang. “Social Policy, Economic Growth and Developmental Welfare”, International Journal of Social Welfare, N.10, 2001.
50. Mishra, Ramesh. The Welfare State in Capitalist Society, Worcester: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1990.
51. OECD, Factbook, 2008.
52. OECD, Employment Outlook, 2003
53. OECD, A Caring World the New Social Policy Agenda, Paris: 1999.
54. Özaydın, Mehmet Merve. “Küresel Etkilerle Şekillenen Sosyal Politika Anlayışı Ekseninde Sosyal Politikaların Geleceğini Tartışmak”, G.Ü. İİBF Dergisi, C. 10, S. 1, 2008.
55. Özbek, Nadir. “Osmanlı’dan Günümüze Türkiye’de Sosyal Devlet”, Toplum ve Bilim, S.92, Bahar 2002.
56. Özdemir, Süleyman. Küreselleşme Sürecinde Refah Devleti, 2. Baskı, İstanbul: İstanbul Ticaret Odası Yayınları, 2007.
57. Özdemir, Süleyman. “Başlangıcından Günümüze Refah Devletlerinde Sosyal Harcamaların Analizi”, Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları, (Prof. Dr. Nevzat Yalçıntaş’a Armağan Özel Sayısı), Sayı: 50, İstanbul, İ.Ü. İktisat Fakültesi Yayını, 2006.
58. Perkins, Daniel, Lucy Nelms ve Paul Smyth, “Beyond Neo-Liberalism: the Social Investment State?” Centre For Public Policy University of Melbourne, August 2004, http://www.bsl.org.au/pdfs/beyond_neoliberalism_social_ investment_state.pdf, (23.12.2009).
59. Pierson, Christopher. Beyond the Welfare State?, Pennsylvania, the Pennsylvania State University Press, 1991.
60. Pierson, Paul. “The New Politics of the Welfare State”, World Politics, Vol.48, No.2, January 1996.
61. Powell, Martin. “Social Democracy In Europe: Renewal Or Retreat”, Guiliano Bonoli, Martin Powell (Ed.), Social Democratic Party Policies In Contemporary Europe İçinde, (1-20), New York: Routledge, 2004.
62. Pratt, Alan. “Towards a ‘New’ Social Democracy”, Michael Lavalette, Alan Pratt (Ed.), Social Policy Theories, Concepts and Issues İçinde, (26-45), London: Sage Publications, 2007.
63. Pratt, Jonathan. “Citizenship, Social Solidarity and Social Policy”, Michael Lavalette, Alan Pratt (Ed.), Social Policy Theories, Concepts and Issues İçinde, (124-140), London: Sage Publications, 2007.
64. Prezeworski, Adam. “How Many Ways Can Be Third”, Andrew Glyn (Ed.), “Social Democracy in Neoliberal Times”, içinde (312-333), 2nd. Edition, New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
65. Rosanvallon, Pierre. Refah Devletinin Krizi, Burcu Şahinli, (Çev.) Ankara: Dost Kitabevi, 2004.
66. Shaikh, Anwar. “Who Pays for the Welfare in the Welfare State? A Multicountry Study”, Social Research, Summer 2003, Vol.: 70, No: 2.
67. Sipilä, Jorma. “Social Investment State: Something Real Or Just a New Discourse”, 2nd Annual RECWOWE Integration Week, Oslo, 10-14 June 2008, http://www.recwowe.vitamib.com, (04.08.2010).
68. Starke, Peter. “The Politics of Welfare State Retrechment: A Literature Review”, Social Policy & Administration Vol.40, No.1, February 2006.
69. Swank, Duane H. “The Political Economy of Goverment Domestic Expenditure in the Affluent Democracies, 1960-80”, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 32, No. 4, 1988.
70. Şenol Öztürk, “Sosyal Yatırım Devletinin Yükselişi: Pasif Sosyal Harcamalardan Aktif Sosyal Harcamalara Geçiş”, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi, SBE, 2011.
71. Taşçı, Faruk. “Sosyal Yardım Yapma(ma) Gerekçeleri Üzerine Yaklaşımlar”, Kamu-İş, İş Hukuku ve İktisat Dergisi, C. 9, S. 4, 2008.
72. Ulutürk, Süleyman ve Kutlu Dane. “Kapitalist Devletin Dönüşümü, Metalaşma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Reformu: Ülke Örnekleri ve Reformun Geleceği”, Karaburun Bilim Kongresi Tebliği, 4-7 Eylül 2008, http://www.kongrekaraburun.org, (24.03.2009).
73. Ulutürk, Süleyman ve Kutlu Dane. “Sosyal Güvenlik: Teori, Dönüşüm ve Türkiye Uygulaması”, Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, C. 8, N. 29, Yaz 2009, http://www.esosder.com, (05.10. 2010).
74. Uslu, Hasan Faruk. “Güvenceli Esneklik (Flexicurity) ve Avrupa Toplulukları Komisyonu”, 1. Çalışma İlişkileri Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, Sakarya: Sakarya Üniversitesi, 6-8 Kasım 2008.
75. Whiteford, Peter. “The Active Social Policy Agenda: An OECD Perspective”, ISSA Europen Regional Meeting, Oslo, 15-16.05.2007, http://www.issa.int/aiss/Resursy/Conference-Reports/The-active-social- policy-agenda, (05.04.2009).