Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Organizational Movement of Theater Workers: A Case of Istanbul

Öz

The COVID-19 outbreak that emerged in China in late 2019 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization, causing havoc on national and global scales. Its impact on culture and the arts has been profound, resulting in devastating consequences for the sector. Recognizing this, a cooperation protocol titled “The Effects of the Global Pandemic on Istanbul Cultural Life” was established in 2021 through a partnership between Istanbul University and the Istanbul Provincial Directorate of Culture and Tourism. The primary objectives of this protocol were to assess the pandemic’s effects on Istanbul’s cultural and artistic scene, propose relevant solutions, and disseminate findings to the public through a comprehensive report. The protocol included eight distinct fields: cinema, theater, music, publishing, librarianship, museology, exhibition, and festivals. This study focuses on the impact of the pandemic on theater professionals. Throughout the pandemic, theater workers banded together, fostering a spirit of organization and solidarity. This collaborative environment provided artists with opportunities to collaborate, offer mutual support, and establish solidarity funds. In theater, the term “ensemble” denotes a group of actors who unite to produce a play. Each member of the ensemble brings their unique talents and skills to the performance, fostering a collaborative atmosphere in which they support one another, ultimately resulting in a seamless production. The concept of ensemble is foundational in theater as it not only promotes cooperation and support among actors but also encourages group innovation. We contend that the instances of cooperation and unionization witnessed in the theater industry during the COVID-19 pandemic exemplify the essence of the ensemble in the theater. In the study designed using the qualitative research method, an in-depth interview technique was used as a data collection tool. A total of 18 individuals, nine women, and nine men, working in the theater industry were interviewed. The data obtained from these interviews were transcribed and analyzed using the MAXQDA Qualitative Data Analysis Program.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• COVID-19 Pandemic
• Ensemble
• Theatre Workers
• Effects of Covid-19 on Theatre Sector

Kaynakça

1. Bal, H. (2017). Sosyolojide Yöntem ve Araştırma Teknikleri (Uygulamalı-Örnekli). İstanbul: Sentez Yayınları. google scholar
2. Baloğlu, B. (2020). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemi. İstanbul: Der Yayınları. google scholar
3. Baltacı, A. (2018). Nitel Araştırmalarda Örnekleme Yöntemleri ve Örnek Hacmi Sorunsalı Üzerine Kavramsal Bir İnceleme. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(1), 231-274. google scholar
4. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory. London: SAGE Publications. google scholar
5. Charmaz, K. (2017). The Power of Constructivist Grounded Theory for Critical Inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry Vol. 23(1), 34-45. google scholar
6. Coşkun, R., Altunışık, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S., & Yıldırım, E. (2015). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri. Adapazarı: Sakarya Kitabevi. google scholar
7. Cultural Relations Platform, (2021). The Assessment of the Impact of COVID-19 on the Cultural and Creative Sectors in the EU’s Partner Countries, Policy Responses and their Implications for International Cultural Relations, Study for the European Commission. https://www.cultureinexternalrelations.eu/downloader/download-file?file=2021/02/CRP_COVID_ICR_Study-final-Public.pdf google scholar
8. Çelik, H., & Ekşi, H. (2018). Nitel Desenler: Gömülü Teori. İstanbul: Edam Yayınları. google scholar

9. Edelman, J., Gibbon, A. F., & Harris, L. (2021). The Future from Here: Theatre Freelancers and Planning for the Future during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Freelancers in the Dark. google scholar
10. European Commission, Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture, (2022). Study ‘The situation of theatres in the EU Member States’: final report. Publications Office of the European Union, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/89198 google scholar
11. Gill, S. L. (2020). Qualitative Sampling Methods. Journal of Human Lactation 36(4), 579-581. google scholar
12. Glesne, C. (2014). Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An Introduction. Pearson. google scholar
13. Güler, A., Halıcıoğlu, M. B., & Taşğın, S. (2012). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık. google scholar
14. Ilgar, M. Z., & Ilgar, S. C. (2013). Nitel Bir Araştırma Deseni Olarak Gömülü Teori (Temellendirilmiş Kuram). İZÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(3), 197-247. google scholar
15. Jackson II, R. L., Drummond, D. K., & Camara, S. (2007). What Is Qualitative Research? Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 8:1, 21-28. google scholar
16. Karakioulafi, C. (2022). The Covid-19 pandemic as a catalyst of art workers mobilisation and unionisation: the case of Greek actors. Revista Espanola de Sociolog^a, 31(4), a129. google scholar
17. Menger, P. M. (1999). Artistic labour markets and careers. Annual review of sociology, 25(1), 541-574. google scholar
18. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. google scholar
19. OECD. (2020). Culture shock: COVID-19 and the cultural and creative sectors. OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19), OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/08da9e0e-en. google scholar
20. Özarslan, Z. (2021). Yaratıcı ve Kültürel Endüstriler ve Covid19 Pandemi Döneminde Türkiye’de Kültür ve Sanat Sektörlerinin Durumu. Alternatif Politika, 13(2), 371-408, https://doi.org/10.53376/ap.2021.13 google scholar
21. Ramalho, R., Adams, P., Huggard, P., & Hoare, K. (2015). Literature Review and Constructivist Grounded Theory Methodology. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Volume 16, No. 3. google scholar
22. Rosenkrantz, H. (2021). Pandemic-Related Rise in Unionization Means Managers Need to Watch Workplace Dynamics. SHRM. google scholar
23. Serafini, P. & Novosel N. (2021). Culture as care: Argentina’s cultural policy response to Covid-19, Cultural Trends, 30(1), 52-62. google scholar
24. Seyidoğlu, H. (2003). Bilimsel araştırma ve Yazma El Kitabı. İstanbul: Güzem Can Yayınları. google scholar
25. Shaheen, M., Pradhan, S., & Ranajee. (2019). Sampling in Qualitative Research. In M. Shaheen, Sampling in Qualitative Research (pp. 25-51). Telangana: IGI Global. google scholar
26. Staunton, B. (2020). Herding cats or fighting like lions? Artists and trade union organising. European Trade Union Institute, HesaMag, https://www.etui.org/publications/herding-cats-or-fighting-lions-artists-and-trade-union-organising google scholar
27. Sutopo, O. R., Wibawanto, G. R., Utomo, A., Beta, A. R., & Kurnia, N. (2022). The Mode of Reflexive Practice among Young Indonesian Creative Workers in the Time of COVID-19. Sociological Research Online, Vol. 27(4), 878-895. google scholar
28. Tiyatro Dergisi, (2019), Türünün İlk Örneği: Tüm yönleriyle “Tiyatro Kooperatifi”, https://tiyatrodergisi.com.tr/turunun-ilk-ornegi-tum-yonleriyle-tiyatro-kooperatifi/. google scholar
29. Tiyatro Kooperatifi (2021),https://tiyatrokooperatifi.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Tiyatro-Kooperatifi-1.Do%CC%88nem-Faaliyet-Raporu.pdf google scholar
30. TÜİK (2021), https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Cinema-and-Performing-Arts-Statistics-2021-45743. google scholar
31. TÜİK (2022), https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Cinema-and-Performing-Arts-Statistics-2022-49695. google scholar
32. VanMaanen, J. (1979). Reclaiming qualitativemethodsfororganisationalresearch: Apreface. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 520-526. google scholar
33. Veri Kaynağı (2023), Retrived from https://www.verikaynagi.com/ana-baslik/dunya-kuresi/kultur-sanat/. google scholar
34. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2004). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık. google scholar
35. Yiğit, E. (2021). Pandemi Sürecinde Sanat Alanındaki Dayanışma. Birikim, 381, 68-75. google scholar